V-]'<:ipvA A BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF EMINENT SCOTSMEN. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/biographicaldict02cham3 ^■iC /./> L-V'.,„v Mi-.X. TlTT.Ti.XSa, EDmBURQK. .ABGdW. EDIir 4 a '3 . 1 i-. '9^ ;^. A^A ^ I- ■,v;t-h XmiEROUS AUTHEXTIC PORTRAITS, VOLUME ILTZT n^^iUr^o^. TH-E UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOV/ NMF, R rOHKT •Bldcki GL/^Sn-OW EDinBURGH /? R D LORDOR A BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF EMINENT SCOTSMEN. ORIGINALLY EDITED BY ROBERT CHAMBERS. NEW EDITION, REVISED THROUGHOUT AND CONTINUED REV. THOMAS THOMSON, EDITOR OF THE "COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF ENGLAND," ETC. ILLUSTRATED BY NUMEROUS AUTHENTIC PORTRAITS ON STEEL. VOLUME II. LONDON: BLACKIE AND SON, PATERNOSTER ROW; AND GLASGOW AND EDINBURGH. 1870. A BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY EMIXEXT SCOTSMEX. F. FALCOXER, Hi-GH, M.D. During the eight- eenth cenrun,-, when ethical and metaphysical specu- lation was accounted the highest effort of intellect, the Scottish mind heartily sympathized in the stud v. It was an outlet to the keen investigating character which formed one of the national distinctions, and the writings of Hume and others of his countr}"men soon effected a revolution in the world of abstract thought. But in the nineteenth century, when the tide had entirely changed — when metaph}"sic3 was exchanged for physics, and the theoretic for the practical, so that the present age came to be called the age of utilitarianism — Scotland was not found wanting. Hence in every department of natural science we find her children among the foremost; and not the least of these was Hugh Falconer, the sub- ject of the present biographical notice. He was bom at Forres, Mora%-5hire, on the 29th of Februar}-, 180S. Having prosecuted his litenm- and general education at King's College, Aberdeen, where he took the degree of A.M., after completing the usual curriculum, he went to Edinburgh about the year 1826, and studied at its university until he had finished his medical education, and received the diplomas of surgeon and M.D. But although he acquired a competent knowledge of the medicd pro- fession, it was not to the mysteries of the healing art that he exclusively, or even chiefly, confined his at- tention : his enthusiasm was directed to natural science, while his comprehensive intellect ranged over its ^s-ide and diversified field — and the lessons of Professors Jameson and Graham, as well as the so- ciety of their chief pupils, aided and animated him in his scientific career. He was also a member of the Plinian Societv", where he found associates with whom he maintained a close intimacy that lasted till his death. Having graduated for the medical profession, Hugh Falconer commenced his active course as assistant- surgeon in the East India Company's sen-ice, and on his arrival in Bengal he was so forttmate as to find a field already prepared for him. His favourite study had been botany, and in this his proficiency was so marked, as to show him a fit successor to the Rox- burghs and Wallichs, by whom the gardens of the Honourable East India Company had been superin- tended. He was therefore placed in charge of them, first at Seharunpoor, and latterly at Calcutta. His gratification at the appointment, and modest estimate of his own claims to such distinction, are thus men- tioned in one of his letters written ft-om Mussooree, 7000 feet in height among the Himalaya Mountains: VOL. II. "Botany is now a sort of profession with me. I am superintendent of a botanic garden in India, I had the luck to get it before I was a year in the country, and perhaps long before I could have expected any- thing of the kind; but as there are few in the medic^ senice in India who trouble themselves with botany, I got the charge in lack of a fitter man." Of his superior fitness for such a charge, even though able competitors had been at hand, it was soon e\adent that there could be little question. During a tenure of office that lasted twent}' years, his researches extended fi-om Calcutta to Cashmere in a northerly and westerly, and from Calcutta to Burmah in a south-easterly direction, while his in- quiries were directed to every branch by which the resources of India could be developed, and the in- terests of natural science promoted. In Indian botany he may be pronounced the creator of the teas of Assam, the first attempt to transfer the Chinese plant to other regions, by which the world at a future day may be made independent of its exclusive supplies of tea fi-om China. It was he also who developed the resources of the great teak forests of Martaban, where the sound of the woodman's axe had never been heard; and who first suggested the naturalization of the Jesuit's bark of Peru in the Himalaya Mountains and the Xeilgherr)- Hills. But independently of these strictly professional duties, were Falconers discoveries in palaeontolog)- while in India. In the Sewalik Mountains, the lowest range of the Himalayas, he classified, described, and brought to England the largest collection of fossils, the organic beings of a former state of the world, that any in- di\-idual had ever hitherto collected. Thus briefly we are compelled to comprise the narrative of a twenty years' scientific life in India — a life filled with active adventure, scientific discover)-, and successfid experiment, by which the boundaries of knowledge were enlarged^ and the welfare of society promoted. And, with the exception of the usual furlough to Europe, these years had been passed, and these toils undergone, in the diversified climates and under the burning sun of the East. Ha^-ing thus so ably dis- charged his task. Dr. Falconer retired from the service, and returned to England; but although his constitution was considerably shattered, his mental acti^•ity was as great and his love of scientific re- search as strong as ever. As soon, therefore, as his health was partially recruited, he resumed those palseontological inquiries among the fields of Europe, which he had so successfully prosecuted in Indix S6 WILLIAM FALCONER. And for this also he was admirahly qualified, as, in- dependently of his enthusiasm in the pursuit, and his intellectual adaptation for such a task as that of collecting the fragments of a past existence, and out of these educing the forms and characters of the creatures to which they had belonged — a work in which he showed himself equal to the most distin- guished paUvontologists of the day, he possessed an amount of experience derived from the earliest eastern fields of prehistoric life to which they could not lay claim. In the course of his investigations he visited t.he drift of Amiens, the caverns of southern France, and those of Sicily. He also, in the autumn of 1864, made a voyage to Gibraltar in company with Pro- fessor Busk, the eminent naturalist and anatomist, for the purjjose of exploring its caves, in which not only the fossilized bones of extinct animals were discovered, such as mastodons, cave-lions, cave-bears, and elephants, but those of man himself This jour- ney, however, terminated his life as well as his scientific inquiries. On returning to England through Spain, exposure to the weather tried his constitution so severely that he was unable to rally from its effects, and he died in Park Crescent, London, on the 31st of January, 1S65, being only fifty-five years old. Such was Dr. Hugh Falconer, a man whose many- sided mind this brief sketch can but imperfectly delineate. In every department of natural science, and the departments of knowledge connected with them, he was completely versed. A perfect master of geology, botany, and zoology, he was also an ex- cellent ethnologist and archaeologist, while in litera- ture he was not only well acquainted with the clas- sical but oriental languages. Having died a bachelor, he left no children to succeed him, and it was un- fortunate that his busy life allowed him no leisure to construct such a work as might have shown the amount of his acquirements, and been a lasting monument to his fame. His two principal publica- tions, of which, however, the labour was shared with others, were — i. '^ Fauna Antiqita Sivalonis, being the Fossil Zoology of the Sewalik Hills, in the North of India" (in conjunction with T. Cautley), Lond. fol. 1846-49; and, 2. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Fossil Ketnai Its of Vcrtebrata in the Museum of Bengal (in conjunction with H. Walker). Calcutta, 8vo, 1859. Besides these, he contributed several papers to the chief scientific societies, especially the Geolo- gical and Philosophical, which are published in their Transactions. FALCONER, William, author of The Ship- wreck, a poem, was bom in Edinburgh about the year 1730. His father was a barber and wig-maker in a well-known street called the Netheibow, where he ultimately became insolvent. A brother and sister of the tuneful Falconer — the only individuals who stood in that relation to him — were born deaf and dumb; and the latter, on account of her infirmi- ties, was a constant inmate of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, some time after the beginning of the present century. The father of the poet was a cousin-german of the Rev. Mr. Robertson, minister of the parish of Borthwick; so that this humble bard was a very near relation of the author of the Ilistorv of Scotland, and also of Lord Brougham and Vaux. Old Falconer, being reduced to insolvency, was enabled by his friends to open a grocer's shop; but being deprived of his wife, who was a prudent and active woman, his affairs once more became deranged, and he terminated his life in extreme indigence. The education of young Falconer was of that humble kind which might have been expected from his father's circumstances. A teacher of the name of Webster gave him instructions in reading, writing, and arithmetic. He used to say that this was the whole amount of his school education. It appears that he possessed, even in early youth, an ardour of genius, and a zeal in the acquisition of knowledge, which in a great measure supplied his deficiencies. In his poem of the Ship-wreck he evidently alludes to his own attainments in the following lines : — "On him fair science dawned in happier hour, Awakening into bloom young fancy's flower; But soon adversity, with freezing blast, I'he blossom withered and the dawn o'ercast; Forlorn of heart, and, by severe decree. Condemned, reluctant, to the faithless sea; With long farewell, he left the laurel grove. Where science and the tuneful sLsters rove." W'hen very young he was torn from his self-pursued studies, and entered as an apprentice on hoard a merchant vessel belonging to Leith. He afterwards became servant to Mr. Campbell, the author of Zt'.r/- phanes, who was purser of the ship to which he belonged, and who, finding in him an aptitude for knowledge, kindly undertook to give him some in- structions in person. He subsequently became second mate in the Britannia, a vessel in the Levant trade, which, on her passage from Alexandria to Venice, was shipwrecked off Cape Colonna, on the coast of Greece. Only three of the crew were saved, and Falconer was of the number. The event fur- nished him with the material of a poem, by which it is probable his name will be for ever remembered. The poet was at this time about eighteen years of age. In 1751, when two or three years older, he is found residing in his native city, where he published his first known work, a poem, Saered to the Me?nory of His Royal Highness Frederick Prince of I Vales. He is said to have followed up this effort by several minor pieces which he transmitted to the Gen- tle/nan's Jl/agazine. !Mr. Clarke, the editor of a respectable edition of his poems, points out The Chaplain's Petition to the Lietitenants in the Ward- room, the Description of a Ninety-gun Ship, and some lines On the ztncoiiunon Scarcity of Poetry, as among these fugitive productions. ^Ir. Clarke has likewise presented his readers with a whimsical little poem, descriptive of the abode and sentiments of a midshipman, which was one of the poet's early pro- ductions, and offers some reasons for supposing that he was the author of the popular song. Cease, nide Boreas. Little is known of Falconer during this period of his life except that he must have been making con- siderable additions to his stock of knowledge and ideas. His poem 7'he Shipwj-eck was published in 1762, being dedicated to Edward, Duke of York, brother of George III. This composition displays a degree of polish and an array of classical allusions which could only have been acquired by extensive reading. It was at once placed in the first rank of descriptive poetry, where it has ever since continued. "The distant ocean," says an eminent critic, "and its grand phenomena have employed the pens of the most eminent poets, but they have generally pro- duced an effect by indefinite outlines and imaginary incidents. In Falconer we have the painting of a great artist, taken on the spot, with such minute fidelity, as well as picturesque effect, that we are chained to tlie scene with all the feelings of actual terror. In the use of imagery Falconer displays original powers. His sunset, midnight, morning, &c., are not such as have descended from poet to poet. He beheld these objects under circumstances in which it is the lot of few to be placed. His images, therefore, cannot be transferred or borrowed; they have an appropriation which must not be dis- WILLIAM FALCONER JOHN FARQUIIAR. turbed, nor can we trace them to any source but that of genuine poetry." Another writer remarks, '■'^ The Shipzureck is didactic as well as descriptive, and may be recommended to a young sailor, not only to excite his enthusiasm, but improve his knowledge of the art. It is of inestimable value to this countr)-, since it contains within itself the rudiments of navigation: if not sufficient to form a complete seaman, it may cer- tainly be considered as the grammar of his profes- sional science. I have heard many experienced officers declare that the rules and maxims delivered in this poem for the conduct of a ship in the most perilous emergency form the best, indeed the only opinions which a skilful mariner should adopt." Against such a poem it forms no proper objection that much of the language, being technical, is only perfectly understood by a class. By his dedication the poet gained the notice and patronage of the Duke of York, who, it will be recol- lected, was himself a seaman. Almost immediately after the poem was published his royal highness in- duced Falconer to leave the merchant service, and procured him the rank of a midshipman in Sir Ed- ward Hawke's ship, the Royal George. In gratitude, Falconer wrote an Ode on the Duke of York^s Second Departure from England as Rear-admiral, which was published, but displays a merit more commensurate with the unimportance of the subject than the genius of the author. It is said that Falconer composed this poem "during an occasional absence from his messmates, when he retired into a small space formed between the cable tiers and the ship's side." In 1763, the war being brought to a close, Falconer's ship was paid off, — long before he had completed that period of service which could have entitled him to promotion. He then exchanged the military for the civil department of the naval ser- vice, and became purser of the Glory frigate of 32 guns. Either in the interval between the two ser- vices, or before his appointment as a midshipman, he paid a visit to Scotland, and spent some time in the manse of Gladsmuir with Dr. Robertson, the his- torian, who, we are told, was proud to acknowledge the relationship that existed between him and this self-instructed and ingenious man. Soon after this period Falconer married a Miss Hicks, daughter of the surgeon of Sheemess Yard. She has been described as "a woman of cultivated mind, elegant in her person, and sensible and agreeable in conversation."^ It is said that the match was entered into against the will of her parents, who, look- ing only to the external circumstances of the poet, thought her thrown away upon a poor Scottish ad- venturer. Notwithstanding this painful circumstance, and there is reason to fear real poverty besides, the pair lived happily. Falconer endeavoured to sup- port himself by literature. He compiled a Universal Marine Diciio>tary, which, from its usefulness as a book of reference, soon became generally used in the navy. Like most other literary Scotsmen of that period, he was a zealous partisan of the Bute ad- ministration, and endeavoured to defend it against the attacks of its jealous and illiberal enemies. For this purpose he published a satire, called The Dema- gogue, which was more particularly aimed at Lord Chatham, Wilkes, and Churchill. We have not learned that it was attended with any particular effect. Falconer at this time lived in a manner at once economical, and highly appropriate to his literary character. "When the Glory was laid in ordinary at Chatham, Commissioner Hanway, brother to the benevolent Jonas Hanway, became * Letter by Joseph Moser, European Magazine, 1803, p. 424. delighted with the genius of its purser. The cap- tain's cabin was ordered to be fitted up with a stove, and with every addition of comfort that could be procured, in order that Falconer might thus be enabled to enjoy his favourite propensity, without either molestation or expense" (Clarke's Life). In 1769 the poet had removed to London, and resided for some time in the former buildings of Somerset House. From this place he dated the last edition of the Shipvjrcck published in his own life- time. That P'alconer must have possessed the per- sonal qualities of a man of the world, rather than those of an abstracted student or child of the muses, seems to be proved by Mr. Murray, the bookseller, having proposed to take him into partnership. He is supposed to have been only prevented from acced- ing to this proposal by receiving an appointment to the pursership of the Aurora frigate, which was ordered to carry out to India Messrs. Vansittart, Scrofton, and Forde, as supervisors of the affairs of the Company. He was also promised the office of private secretary to those gentlemen, a situation from which his friends conceived hopes that he might eventually obtain lasting advantages. It had been otherwise ordered. The Au>-ora sailed from Eng- land on the 30th of September, 1769, and, after touching at the Cape, was lost during the remainder of the passage, in a manner that left no trace by which the cause of the calamity could be discovered. It was conjectured that the vessel took fire at sea; but the more probable supposition is that she foun- dered in the Mosambique Channel. The widow of Falconer (who eventually died at Bath) resided for some years afterwards in his apartments at Somerset House, partly supported by Mr. Miller, the book- seller, who, in consideration of the rapid sale of the Marine Dictionary, generously bestowed upon her sums not stipulated for in his contract with the author. Mr. Moser, whom we have already quoted, mentions that he once met her walking in the garden, near her lodging, and, without knowing who she was, happened, in conversation, to express his admiration of the Shipiureck. She was instantly in tears. "She presented me," says Mr. M., "with a copy of the Shipivreck, and seemed much affected by my com- miseration of the misfortunes of a man whose work appears in its catastrophe prophetic." They had never had any children. "In person," says Mr. Clarke, "Falconer was about five feet seven inches in height; of a thin light make, with a dark weather-beaten complexion, and rather what is termed hard-featured, being consider- ably marked with the small-pox; his hair was of a brownish hue. In point of address, his manner was blunt, awkward, and forbidding; but he spoke with great fluency; and his simple yet impressive diction was couched in words which reminded his hearers of the terseness of Swift. Though he possessed a warm and friendly disposition, he was fond of con- troversy, and inclined to satire. His observation was keen and rapid; his criticisms on any inaccuracy of language or expression were frequently severe; yet this severity was always intended to create mirth, and not by any means to show his own superiority, or to give the smallest offence. In his natural tem- per he was cheerful, and frequently used to amuse his messmates by composing acrostics on their favour- ites, in which he particularly excelled. As a pro- fessional man, he was a thorough seaman; and, like most of that profession, was kind, generous, and benevolent. " FARQUHAR, John. This remarkable char- acter, who went to India a penniless youth and re- JOHN FARQUHAR. turned a millionaire, was the son of poor parents, and born in Crimond, Aberdeenshire, in 175 1. In early life he went to India as a cadet in the iJombay establishment, and in the voyage was a chum of the late General Kerr. A dangerous wound in the hip, which affected his health and occasioned lameness, disqualified him for the military service, and by the advice of his friends he removed to Bengal, where he became a free merchant. Either his original tendencies, or the confinement occasioned by his wound, maile him turn his mind to close study, in which chemistry and its practical application was the favourite pursuit. It was upon this that the foundation of his immense fortune was laid. The manufacturing of gunpowder in the interior at Pultah being defective, Nlr. Fariomy, a small treatise on electricity, and the following sheets. In the year 1748 I ventured to read lectures on the eclipse of the sun that fell on the 14th of July in that year. Afterwards I began to read astronomical lectures on an orrery which I made, and of which the figures of all the wheel-work are contained in the sixth and seventh plates of this book. I next began to make an apparatus for lectures on mechanics, and gradually increased the apparatus for other parts of experimental philosophy, buying from others what I could not make for myself, till I brought it to its present state. I then entirely left off drawing pic- tures, and employed myself in the much pleasanter business of reading lectures on mechanics, hydro- statics, hydraulics, pneumatics, electricity, and astro- nomy, in all which my encouragement has been greater than I could have expected. The best machine I ever contrived is the eclip- sareon, of which there is a figure in the thirteenth plate of my Astrono/ny. It shows the time, quantity, duration, and progress of solar eclipses at all parts of the earth. My next best contrivance is the universal dialing cylinder, of which there is a figure in the eighth plate of the supplement to my Mechanical Lectures. It is now thirty years since I came to London, and during all that time I have met with the highest instances of friendship from all ranks of people, both in town and country, which I do here acknowledge with the utmost respect and gratitude, and particu- larly the goodness of our present gracious sovereign, who, out of his privy purse, allows me £^^0 a year, which is regularly paid without any deduction. To this narrative we shall add the few particulars which are necessary to complete the view of Fergu- son's life and character. ^ 1 The following is a succinct list of his published works: — I. Astro7iomical Tables, and Precepts for Calculating t)ie True Times of Ne-u and Full Moons, &c., 1763. — 2. Tables and Tracts relative to Several Arts a>id Scienees, 1767. — 3. An Easy Introduction to Astronomy, for Y&ung Gentlemen and Ladies, 2d edit. 1769. — 4. Astronotny Explained upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles, ^\^ edit. 1772. — 5. Lectures on Select Subjects in Mechanics, Hydrostatics, Pneumatics, atid Optics, 4th edit. 1772. — 6. Select Mec/utnical Exercises, with a Short Account of tlie Life of t/u Autlior, by Himself, 'ilTi- — 7- The Art of Drawing in Perspective Made Easy, 1775 — 8. An Introduction to Electricity, 1775. — 9. Two Ferguson was honoured with the royal bounty, which he himself mentions, through the mere zeal of King George III. in behalf of science. His majesty had attended some of the lectures of the ingenious astronomer, and often sent for him, after his acces- sion, to converse upon scientific and curious topics. He had the extraordinary honour of being elected a member of the Royal Society without paying either the initiatory or the annual fees, which were dis- pensed with in his case from a supposition of his being too poor to pay them without inconvenience. From the same idea many persons gave him very handsome presents. But to the astonishment of all who knew him, he died worth about _;^6ooo. "Ferguson," says Charles Hutton in his Mathe- matical Dictionary, "must be allowed to have been a very uncommon genius, especially in mechanical contrivances and inventions, for he constructed many machines himself in a very neat manner. He had also a good taste in astronomy as well as in natural and experimental philosophy, and was possessed of a happy manner of explaining himself in a clear, easy, and familiar way. His general mathematical know- ledge, however, was little or nothing. Of algebra he understood but little more than the notation; and he has often told me that he could never demonstrate one proposition in Euclid's Elements, his constant method being to satisfy himself as to the truth of any problem with a measurement by scale and compasses." He was a man of very clear judgment in anything that he professed, and of unwearied application to study: benevolent, meek, and innocent in his man- ners as a child ; humble, courteous, and communi- cative : instead of pedantr}', philosophy seemed to produce in him only diffidence and urbanity — a love for mankind and for his Maker. His whole life was an example of resignation and Christian piety. He might be called an enthusiast in his love of God, if religion founded on such substantial and enlightened grounds as his was could be like enthusiasm. After a long and useful life, unhappy in his family connec- tions, in a feeble and precarious state of health, worn out with study, age, and infirmities, he died on the 1 6th of November, 1776. "Ferguson's only daughter," says Mr. Nichols in his life of Bowyer, "was lost in a ver>' singular manner at about the age of eighteen. She was re- markable for the elegance of her person, the agree- ablenessand vivacity of her conversation, and in philo- sophic genius and knowledge worthy of such a father. His son, Mr. Murdoch Ferguson, was a surgeon, and attempted to settle at Bury, stayed but a little while, went to sea, was cast away, and lost his all, a little before his father's death, but found himself in no bad plight after that event. He had another son, who studied at Marischal College, Aberdeen, from 1772 to 1777, and afterwards, it is believed, applied to physic." The astronomer has been thus elegantly noticed in Eudosia, a Poem on the Universe, by Mr. Capel Lloft: — " Nor shall thy guidance but conduct our feet, O honoured shepherd of our later days! Thee from the flocks, while thy untutored soul, Mature in childhood, traced the starr>- course, Astronomy, enamoured, gently led Through all the splendid labyrinths of heaven, And taught thee her stupendous laws; and clothed In all the light of fair simplicity, Thy apt expression." Letters to tlie Rev. Mr. John Kennedy, 1775.— 10. A Third Letter to tlie Rev. Mr. John Kcntudy, 1775. He communi- cated also several letters to the Royal Society, which are printed in their Transactions. In 1805 a ver>- valuable edition of his lectures was pubUshed at Edinburgh by Dr. Brewster, in 2 vols. 8vo, with notes and an appendix, the whole adapted to the present state of the arts and sciences. u ROBERT FERGUSSON. FERGUSSON, Robert, an ingenious poet, like his successor Bums, drew his descent from the coun- try north of the Forth. His father, William Fergus- son, after ser>ing an apprenticeship to a tradesman in Aberdeen, and having married Elizabeth Forbes, ] by whom he had three children, removed, in 1746, i to Edinburgh, where he was employed as a clerk by } several masters in succession. It appears that the ' father of the poet had himself in early life courted j the Muses, and was at all f>eriods remarkable as a man of taste and ingenuity. When acting as clerk to Messrs. Wardrop and Peat, upholsterers m Camibber's Close, he framed a very useful book of rates; and he eventually attained the respectable situation of ac- countant to the Briibh Linen Company, but whether in its ultimate capacity of a bank has not been men- i tioned. Previous to his arrival in Edinburgh he had two sons and a daughter, bom in the following [ order: Henrj-, 17+2; Barbara,' 1744; John (who j seems to have died young), 1 746. After remo\ing thither he had at least two other children, Robert, I born 1750, and Margaret,* 1753. The subject of this memoir was born on the 17th | of October,' 1750, and was an exceedingly delicate child. Owing to the state of his health, he was not , sent to school till his sLvth year, though it is likely I that his parents gave him a good deal of private in- [ struction before that time. What renders this the more probable is, that he had not been six months under his first teacher (a Mr. Philp in Niddrj-'s W\-nd) when he was judged fit to be transferred to the high-school, and entered in the first Latin class. Here he went through the usual classical course of four years, under a teacher named Gilchrist. What degree of proficiency he might have attained under ordinarj' circumstances it is impossible to determine; but it is to be related to his credit, that, though fre- quently absent for a considerable period in conse- quence of bad health, he nevertheless kept fully abreast of his companions, a temporary application being sufficient to bring him up to any point which the class had attained in his absence. At the same time he acquired, in the leisure of confinement, a taste for general reading, and it is stated that the Bible was his favourite book. A remarkable instance of the vi\-id impressions of which he was s\isceptible occurred at an early period. In p>erusing the Proverbs of Solomon one passage struck his infant mind with peculiar force ; and hastening to his mother's apart- ment in tears, he besought her to chastise him. Sur- prised at a request so extraordinary.-, she inquired the cause of it, when he exclaimed — " O mother I he that spareth the rod hateth the child I" So ingenuous by nature was the mind of this boy, and such the pure source whence his youth drew instructions, which, disregarded but not forgotten amid the gaieties of a long course of dissipation, at last reasserted in a fear- ful manner their influence over him. Fergusson finished his elementary education at the grammar-school of Dundee, which he attended for two years. His parents had resolved to educate him for the church, and with that \-iew removed him in his thirteenth year to the university of St. Andrews, which he entered with the advantage of a bursarj-, endowed by a Mr. Fergusson, for the benefit of young men of the same name. Here his abilities re- commended him to the notice of Dr. Wilkie, author • .Afterwords the wife of Mr. David Inverarir>-, joiner. * After»'ards the wife of Mr. Alexander Duvsj, purser in the navy. *The date usually given is 3th September, which appears, however, from a list by Mrs. Duval, to have been the birth- day of the elder sister, Barbara. The above is the date given by Mrs. DuvaL of the Epi^^oniad, then professor of natural philo- sophy, and it has even been said that learned person made choice of him to read his lectures to his class when sickness or other causes prevented his own p)erformance of the duty. Dr. Irsnng ridicules the idea of a youth of sixteen "mounting," as he expresses it, "the professorial rostrum;'' and besides the in- adequacy of years, Fergusson possessed none of that gravity of demeanour which was calculated to secure the respectful attention of his compeers. His classi- cal attainments were respectable, but for the austerer branches of scholastic and scientific knowledge he alwaj-s expressed, with the petulance of a youth of lively parts who did not wish to be subjected to the labour of hard study, a decided contempt. Dr. Wilkie's regards must therefore have been attracted by other qualifications than those of the graver and more solid cast — namely, by the sprightly humour and uncommon powers of conversation for which Fergus- son was already in a remarkable degree distinguished. The story of his reading the lectures in public arose from his ha\'ing been employed to transcribe them. Professor VUant, in a letter to Mr. Inverarity on this subject, says, "A youthful frolicsome exhi- bition of your uncle first directed Dr. Wilkie's at- tention to him, and he afterwards employed him one summer and part of another in transcribing a fair copy of his academical lectures." On the doctor's death, in 1772, Fergusson showed his gratitude in a poem dedicated to his memory. In this composi- tion, which assumed the form of a Scottish eclogue, Wilkie's success as an agTicult;iral improver was not forgotten. He had cultivated, with a very remark- able degree of skill, a farm in the vicinity of St. Andrews; and we must go back to the time when our fathers were contented to raise small patches of stunted com here and there, on the uninclosed moor, in order to appreciate fially the enterprise which merited the youthfiil poet's compliment: — *" Lang had the thristles and the dockans been In use to wag their taps upo' the green WTiare now his bonny rigs delight the view. And thriving hedges drink the cauler dew." Among his fellow-students Fergusson was distin- guished for ^^vacity and humour, and his poetical talents soon began to display themselves on subjects of local and occasional interest, in such a way as to attract the notice both of his companions and of their teachers. We are warranted in concluding, that the pieces to which he owed this celebrity were dis- tinguished by passages of no ordinary merit, for pro- fessors are not a set of men upon whom it is easy to produce an impression. It is indeed said that the youthful poet chose the ready instnmient of sarcasm with which to move their calm collectedness; but if this were true, the satire must have been of a playfiil nature; for, from all that has appeared, these gentle- men manifested nothing but kindly feelings towards their pupil, and he a corresponding afi'ection and re- spect for them. Besides the tribute which he paid to the memory of Wilkie, he wrote an elegy on the death of Mr. Gregory*, the professor of mathematics, ^ in which, though the prevailing tone is that of re- I spectful regret, we probably have an example of the length to which he ventured in his satirical effusions. Bewailing the loss that the scientific world had sus- tained by the decease of this learned person, and enumerating various instances of his sagacity, he says, with irrepressible waggery, " By numbers, too, he could divine That three times three just made up nine; But now he's dead! Another effusion of which the occasion may be re- ferred to the time of Fergusson's attendance at college, ROBERT FERGUSSOX. 15 is his elegy on John Hogg, porter to the university; in this piece he alludes with some humour to the unwillingness with which ha was wont to quit his comfortable bed in a morning after some frolic, when that functionary was sent to summon him be- fore the college tribunal. The familiarity of the old door-keeper, together with the denii- professorial stram of his admonitions, is not unhappily portrayed in the stanza — " When I had been fu' laith to rise, John then begude to moralize — ' fhe tither nap — the sluggard cries, And turns him round; Sae spak auld Solomon the wise, Uivine profound !' " If Fergusson thus remembered in a kindly manner the species of intercourse wiiicli his exploits had ren- dered necessary between him and the servants of the university, they seem on their part to have cherished a corresponding degree of partiality for him. Mr. James Inverarity, a nephew of the poet, had the curiosity to ask one of them if he recollected Robert Fergusson. "Bob Fergusson !" exclaimed the man; "that I do ! Many a time I've put him to the door — ah, he was a tricky callant; but," he added, "a fine laddie for a' that." He seemed to feel great pleasure in the recollection of so lively and so amiable a boy. While at college the young poet used to put in practice a frolic which marks the singular vivacity of his character. Whenever he received a remittance from his friends at Edinburgh, he hung out the money in a little bag attached by a string to the end of a pole fixed in his window; and there he would let it dangle for a whole day in the wind. He is supposed to have done this partly from puerile exul- tation in the possession of his wealth, and partly by way of making a bravado in the eyes of his com- panions; among whom, no doubt, the slenderness of their funds and the failure of supplies would be fre- quent subjects of raillery. His talents of mimicry were great, and his sportive humour was ever too exuberant, and sometimes led him to overstep the bounds of justifiable indulgence. "An instance of this," says Mr. Tennant in the Edin- burgh Literary yournal (No. 164), "was communi- cated to me by the late Rev. Dr. James Brown, his fellow-student at St. Andrews, who was also a poet,^ and who, from kindred delights and sympathies, en- joyed much of Fergusson's society. On the afternoon of a college holiday they took a walk together into the country, and after perambulating many farms, and tripping with fraternal glee over field and hil- lock, they at last, being desirous of a little rest, be- thought themselves of calling at a small farmhouse, or pendicle, as it is named, on the king's muirs of Denino. They approached the house and were kindly invited to a seat by the rustic and honest- hearted family. A frank and unceremonious con- versation immediately took place, in the course of which it was discovered that a young person, a member of the family, was lying ill of fever. The playful Fergusson instantly took it into his head to profess himself a medical practitioner; — he started to his feet, begged to be shown to the sick-bed; ap- proached, and felt the pulse of the patient; assumed a serious air; put the usual pathological interroga- tories; and pronounced his opinion with a pomp and dignity worthy of a true doctor of physic. In short, ^ " Dr. Brown, who was for thirty years rector of a consider- able parish in the neighbourhood of London, was the author of a pjem called Britain Preserved, written about 1793, in refer- ence to, and commendation of, Mr. Pitt's plan of policy, then adopted." he personated his assumed cliaracter so perfectly, that his frientl Brown, though somewhat vexed, was confounded into silent admiration of his dexterity. On leaving the house, however, Mr. Brown expostu- lated with him on the indefensibility of practising so boldly on the simplicity of an unsuspecting family, and of misleading their conceptions as to the cure of the distemper, by a stratagem, on which, however witty, neither of them could congratulate themselves." The impulse of the moment seems to have been at all times irresistible with Fergusson, without any dread or consideration of the consequences which his levity might produce. His voice being good, he was requested, oftener than was agreeable to him, to officiate as precentor at prayers. His wicked wit suggested a method of getting rid of the distasteful employment, which he did not scruple to put in prac- tice, though there was great danger that it would incense the heads of the college against him. It is customary in the Scottish churches for persons who are considered to be in a dangerous state of illness to request the prayers of the congregation, which it is the duty of the precentor publicly to intimate. One morning when Fergusson occupied the desk, he rose up, and, with the solemnity of tone usual upon such occasions, pronounced — "Remember in prayer, , a young man (then present) of whom, from the sudden effects of inebriety, there ap- pears but small hope of recovery." A proceeding so indecorous could not but be frowned upon by the professors; and another inci- dent, which it was still less in their power to over- look, soon occurred. The circumstances attending the expulsion of the poet from the university have occasioned some controversy, and we therefore deem it best to give the account drawn up in 1801 by Dr. Hill, and attested by Professor Vilant, who was unable from sickness to do more at that time than affix his name to it. "Mr. Nicholas Vilant," says this document, "professor of mathematics, the only person now in the university who was then a mem- ber of it, declares, that in the year 1767, as he re- collects, at the first institution of the prizes given by the Earl of Kinnoul, late chancellor of this univer- sity, there was a meeting one night, after the deter- mination of the prizes for that year, of the winners in one room of the united college, and a meeting of the losers in another room at a small distance; that, in consequence of some communication between the winners and the losers, a scufile arose, which was reported to the masters of the college, and that Robert Fergusson and some others who had appeared the most active were expelled; but that the next day, or the day thereafter, they were all received back into the college upon promises of good behav- iour for the future." Dr. Wilkie's intercessions were exerted on this occasion in behalf of the poet; nor are we to suppose that the cordial co-operation of others was wanting, for Mr. Inverarity assures us that in Mr. Vilant, Fergusson had found a friend and judicious director of his studies. On the whole, this transaction affords a proof that Fergusson, what- ever might be his indiscretions, had not, by refrac- tory or disrespectful conduct, rendered himself ob- noxious to the heads of the university, since, had that been the case, it is to be presumed they would have availed themselves of this infraction of aca- demical discipline to make good his expulsion. If, therefore, the first aspirations of his muse were em- ployed in satirical effusions against his instructors, it must have been with an absence of all bitterness, and in a vein of pleasantry which was not meant to be, and did not prove, offensive. Of the progress made by Fergusson in his studies i6 ROBERT FERGUSSON. wc have no means of forming a very exact estimate. "He performed," says Dr. Irving, "with a sufficient share of applause, the various exercises which the rules of his college prescribed. " '\'ct it is acknow- ledged that he found more pleasure in the active sports of youth, and in social enjoyment, than in habits of recluse study. His time, however, does not seem to have been spent without some plans of more serious application. A book which belonged to him, entitled A Dc-fence of the Church Goz'eriiinent, Faith, Heirship, and Spirit of the Presbyterians, is pre- served; the blank leaves of this volume were de- voted by him to the somewhat incongruous purpose of receiving scraps of speeches, evidently the germs of a play which he meditated writing. Another dramatic scheme of his assumed a more decided shape; he finished two acts of a tragedy, founded on the achievements and fate of Sir William Wallace, but abandoned the undertaking, having seen another play on the same subject, and being afraid that his own might be considered a plagiarism. Probably both productions were of a commonplace descrip- tion; and the poet, perceiving the flatness of that of which he was not the author, and conscious of the similarity of his own, relinquished an undertaking to which his abilities certainly were not equal. It has been observed, that the choice of the subject affords an evidence of Fergusson's judgment; inasmuch as the fate of the illustrious Scottish hero, together with his disinterested patriotism and braver)', supply a much more eligible theme for the tragical muse, than the deaths of Macbeth, Richard III., Pizarro, or any other tyrant of ancient or modern times, whose ca- tastrophes, being nothing more than the vengeance due to their crimes, cannot e.xcite those sympathetic feelings that arise only from the contemplation of suffering virtue. This would be very justly said if it were true that the success of a dramatic author depends upon his enlisting the approbation of the audience in behalf of his hero. But the case is widely different. A view of human nature under the influence of some powerful emotion, with which mankind in general are not familiar, seems to be what is mainly required. All men are not acquainted with the workings of an ambitious and wicked heart; and hence, when the tyrant is exhibited before them, they learn something that is new and surprising, and the skill of the poet meets with its proportionate meed of applause. But there are few, indeed, who have not considered from their youth up the char- acter of a great patriot like Wallace; their admira- tion and pity have been bestowed upon him from their tenderest years, and there is nothing left for poetry to effect. Nor was the genius of Fergusson fitted for the delineation of a majestic character. He had a fund of humour, an agreeable gaiety, but not much reach of passion or of feeling. In his Eng- lish blank verses there is no stately flow nor eleva- tion of sentiment. His mind, moreover, did not possess strength sufficient to accom]jlish more than can be done in a series of occasional verses; he had not as much resolution to carry him through the succession of efforts necessary for the completion of a dramatic poem; and, on the whole, we see no occa- sion either for surprise or regret that he never per- fected his third act. What were the reasons for Fergusson abandoning his academical career is nowhere mentioned. Pro- bably he had no great heart for the profession to which he had been destined, and was prevented by want of pecuniary means from pursuing his studies with a view to any other. When the term of his bursary expired, which was at the end of four years, he quitted St. Andrews, and returned to Edinburgh, to his mother's house, his father having died two ' years before. Here, if his prospects were not gloomy, his plans were unsettled, and never took any decided aim for his settlement in life. The profession of a teacher has been resorted to by many who have acquired some learning, but whose narrow circum- stances did not allow them to aspire to more pleas- ant and profitable employments; and, even after qualifying themselves for superior offices, numbers of young men, failing to obtain the reward of their labours, fall back upon that humbler means of ob- taining a subsistence. But for the patient duties of a schoolmaster Fergusson's ardent temperament completely disqualified him, and probably he never thought of the alternative. The study of medicine was suggested to him; but this was no less distaste- ful, for to such vivid nervous excitement was he liable, that he could not read the description of a disease without imagining that his own frame felt its symptoms. After some time spent in vain hope that some opening would present itself, he paid a visit to Mr. John Forbes, a maternal uncle, near Aberdeen, who, being in easy circumstances, was expected to do something for his nephew. That gentleman, accord- ing to the usual account, entertained him for some time, hoping, perhaps, that after a reasonable stay, such as the hospitality of an uncle's roof might war- rant, he would take his leave and give him no farther trouble. But time slipped on, and Fergusson still continued his guest. At last the habiliments of the dependent relative began to grow somewhat shabby, and an intimation was conveyed to him that he was no longer fit to appear at Mr. Forbes's table. The indignant poet immediately retired to an ale-house in the neighbourhood, where he penned a letter full of resentment of the usage he had received. This remonstrance produced some little efifect, for his uncle sent him, by a messenger, a few shillings to bear his charges to Edinburgh. He performed the journey on foot, and returned to his mother's house so worn out with fatigue, and ovenvhelmed with mortification, that he fell into a serious illness. In a few days his strength of body revived, and he re- gained sufficient composure of mind to express his vexation in a poem, entitled The Decay of Friendship, and his grounds for philosophic resignation in another. Against Repining at Fortune. These pieces exhibit some fluency of versification, but do not breathe any poetic fire. In the first he bewails the ingratitude of man, and, according to ancient usage, determines to resort to some solitary shore, there to disclose his griefs to the murmuring surge, and teach the hollow caverns to resound his woes. In the second k he declares that he was able to contemplate the I gorgeous vanity of state with a cool disdain, and J after reasoning the matter on the inadequacy of wealth to procure happiness, concludes that virtue is the sacred source of permanent and heart-felt satisfaction — a fact, the truth of which is so very generally ac- knowledged, that the statement and elucidation of it is no longer considered to constitute poetry. The behaviour of Mr. Forbes in the matter just related has been reprobated as ungenerous in the extreme. But it seems questionable whether the censure be merited in its full extent. Every man is, no doubt, bound to assist his fellow-men, and more particularly those who are connected with his own family, or have other claims to his patronage, as far as lies in his power. But it is difficult to fix the limits to which his exertions ought, in any particular case, to be carried. It may seem very clear to every one at the present day that Fergusson was a man of genius, and ought to have been promoted to some ROBERT FERGUSSON. 17 office which might have conferred independence, at the same time that it left him leisure for the cultiva- tion of his literary talents. This was, however, by no means so apparent at the period to which we refer, nor perhaps at any future period during the poet's lifetime. He presented himself in his uncle's house an expectant of favour; but his expectations might not, to any ordinary-minded person, appear very rea- sonable. He was a young man that had addicted himself to the profitless occupation of rhyming (who could tell he was to render himself eminent by it?) ; he could not submit his mind to common business, and had aversions, that did not appear to rest on very feasible foundations, to certain employments which were proposed to him : and when we consider to how close a scrutiny it is reasonable that those who solicit patronage should be prepared to submit, it does not seem wonderful that he should have been regarded as a young man who was disposed to re- main idle, and that his friends should have been dis- couraged from using their influence in behalf of one who did not seem willing to do what he could for himself. We know few of the circumstances that took place during Fergusson's residence with his uncle, and it is unjust to deal out reproaches so much at random. Some time after his return to Edinburgh, Fergus- son obtained employment as a copyist of legal papers, in the office of the commissary clerk of Edinburgh; a situation miserably inferior to his talents, but which his straitened circumstances and his total want of an aim in life compelled him to accept. With the exception of some months devoted to similar duties at the sheriff-clerk's office, he spent, in this humble employment, the remainder of his brief and unhappy life. The change from the one office to the other seems to have been dictated purely by that desire of an alternation of misery, which caused the soldier who suffered under flagellation to cry first "strike high," and then "strike low." Having ex- perienced some trouble from the fretful temper of the deputy commissary clerk, Mr. Abercromby, under whom he performed his drudgery, he sought relief in the other office ; but finding worse evils there in the painful nature of the sheriff's duties as an enforcer of executions, he speedily solicited re-admission to his former place, and was glad to obtain it. It is generally supposed that Fergusson's employment involved the study of law, and that in that lay the unpleasantness of his situation. But in reality, the study of law, allowing it to be as dry as several of Fergusson's biographers have represented it, and as unsuitable as they have supposed to the mercurial genius of a poet, would have been absolutely a daily delight of the highest kind, compared to the monoto- nous duties of perpetual transcription, which formed in reality the extent of the poet's professional la- bours. This wretched drudgery, however, was relieved in two ways. Fergusson, during the whole period of his residence in Edinburgh as a clerk or copyist, wrote more or less poetry almost every day. At the same time he spent a part of almost every evening in those convivial regalements with which the citizens of Edinburgh of all classes were then accustomed to solace themselves after the drudgery of the day. The mind of the poet was partly directed to Eng- lish classical models: he wrote pastorals and dia- logues, in the manner of Pope, Shenstone, and Somerville; but these are mere exhibitions of lan- guage, totally uninspired by the least force or origi- nality of ideas, and would now weary even the most patient antiquary in the perusal. Fortunately he also adventured upon the course lately left vacant by VOL. 11. Ramsay, and there found themes for which his genius was better adapted. The humours and peculiarities of social life in the ancient city of Edinburgh attracted his attention, and became in his hands the materials of various specimens of Scottish poetry, which far surpassed the similar poems of Ramsay, and are but little inferior to those of Burns. In his Lcith Races, The Rising and Sitting of the Session, Caiiler Oysters, and The King's Birth-Jay, there is a power of hum- orous description which at once stamps him as a poet of superior genius, even if the nervous sense of his Braid Claith, Caulcr Jlater, and other poems upon general subjects, and the homely grace of his Farmer's Ingle, which describes in the most vivid and genuine colours a scene worthy of the highest effiarts of the muse, had not placed him still more unequivocally in that rank. The language employed by Fergusson is much more purely Scottish than that of Bums, and he uses it with a readiness and ease in the highest degree pleasing. He has not the firm and vigorous tone of Burns, but more softness and polish, such as might have been expected from his gentler and perhaps more instructed mind. The poet chiefly wrote these effusions for a periodical work, entitled Ruddiman' s Weekly Magazine, where they attracted a considerable share of public atten- tion, not only in Edinburgh but throughout the country. The convivialities of Fergusson have been generally described as bordering on excess, and as characteriz- ing himself in particular, amidst a population gene- rally sober. The real truth is, that the poor poet indulged exactly in the same way, and in general to the same extent, as other young men of that day. The want of public amusements, the less general taste for reading, and the limited accommodations of private houses in those days, led partly to a practice which, as already mentioned, prevailed among all orders of people in Edinburgh of frequent- ing taverns in the evening for the sake of relaxation and exercise of the intellect. The favourite haunt of Robert Fergusson, and many other persons of his own standing, was Lucky Middlemass's tavern in the Cowgate, which he celebrates in his poem on Caiiler Oysters. One of the individuals who almost nightly enjoyed his company there, communicated to the present writer, in 1827, the following particulars re- specting the extent and nature of their convivi- alities : — "The entertainment almost invariably consisted of a few boards of raw oysters, porter, gin, and occasionally a rizzared [dried] haddock, which was neither more nor less than what formed the evening enjoyments of most of the citizens of Edinburgh. The best gin was then sold at about five shillings a gallon, and accordingly the gill at Lucky Middle- mass's cost only threepence. The whole debauch of the young men seldom came to more than sixpence or sevenpence. Mr. S distinctly recollects that Fergusson always seemed unwilling to spend any more. They generally met at eight o'clock, and rose to depart at ten ; but Fergusson was sometimes prevailed upon to outsit his friends, by other persons who came in later, and, for the sake of his company, entreated him to join them in further potations. The humour of his conversation, which was in itself the highest treat, frequently turned upon the odd and obnoxious characters who then abounded in the town. In the case, however, of the latter, he never permitted his satire to become in the least rancorous. He generally contented himself with conceiving them in ludicrous or awkward situations, such, for instance, as their going home .at night, and having their clothes bleached by an impure ablution from 37 i8 ROBERT FERGUSSON. the garrets — a very common occurrence at that time, and the mention of which was sufficient to awaken the sympathies of all present." The personal appearance of the poet is thus de- scribed by the same informant: — "In stature Fergus- son was about five feet nine, slender and handsome. His face never exhibited the least trace of red, but was perfectly and uniformly pale, or rather yellow. He had all the appearance of a person in delicate health ; and Mr. S remembers that, at last, he could not eat raw oysters, but was compelled by the weakness of his stomach to ask for them pickled. His forehead was elevated, and his whole countenance open and pleasing. He wore his own fair brown hair, with a long massive curl along each side of the head, and terminating in a queue, dressed with a black silk riband. His dress was never very good, but often much faded, and the white thread stockings ■which he generally wore in preference to the more common kind of gray worsted, he often permitted to become considerably soiled before changing them." The following anecdote has been related for the purpose of showing the irksomeness of the poet under his usual avocations. In copying out the extract of a deed, one forenoon, he blundered it two different times, and was at length obliged to abandon the task without completing it. On returning in the evening he found that the extract had been much wanted, and he accordingly sat down with great reluctance to attempt it a third time. He had not, however, half accomplished his task, when he cried out to his office companion that a thought had just struck him, which he would instantly put into verse, and carry to RudJiinaii^s Magazine (on the eve of publication), but that he would instantly return and complete the extract. He immediately scrawled out the following stanza on one Thomas Lancashire, who, after acting the gravedigger in Hamlet, and other such characters, on the Edinburgh stage, had set up a public-house, in which he died : — "Alas, poor Tom! how oft, with merry heart, Have we beheld thee play the sexton's part ! Each comic heart must now be grieved to see The sexton's dreary part performed on thee." On his return towards the office he called at the shop of his friend Sommers, paintseller and glazier, in the Parliament Close, where he found a boy read- ing a poem on creation. This circumstance furnished him with the point of another epigram, which he immediately scribbled down, and left for Mr. Som- mers's perusal. These proceedings occupied him about twenty minutes, and he then returned to his drudgery. Uniform tradition, and every other testimony, ascribe to Fergusson an excellent voice, and a most captivating manner of singing the simple melodies of his native country. His Birks of Invermay long survived in the recollection of his associates as a musical gem of the first lustre. The following anec- dote, communicated by his biographer Sommers, at once proves his vocal powers and reflects a light upon his character. "In one of his convivial frolics he laid a wager with some of his associates that, if they would furnish him with a certain number of printed ballads (no matter what kind), he would undertake to dispose of them as a street singer in the course of two hours. The bet was laid, and next evening, being in the month of November, a large bundle of ballads were procured for him. He wrapped himself in a shabby greatcoat, put on an old scratch wig, and in this disguised form commenced his adventure at the weigh-house, head of the West ]5ow. In his going, down the Lawnmarket and High Street, he had the address to collect great multitudes around him, while he amused them with a variety of favourite Scottish songs, by no means such as he had ballads for, and gained the wager by disposing of the whole collection. He waited on his companions by eight o'clock that evening, and spent with them in mirthful glee the produce of his street adventure." Fergusson's disposition led him into many frolics; of which the following instances are recounted. His landlord happened to be a man very much given to intemperance, at the same time that he aspired to all the honours of a saint. One night he attempted to perform family worship in a state of complete in- toxication, when, to his inconceivable horror, every sentence of his prayer was echoed Ijy some unseen being at no great distance. Confounded with drunken terror, he ordered his family to retire, and tak aiua the bulks. It was Fergusson who thus alarmed him from a neighbouring closet. Afterwards the poor man gave his family an impressive lecture on the necessity of their improving their ways, as he felt certain that something serious was about to befall them. He even unbosomed his own conscience to the waggish cause of all his terrors, and received, with marks of extreme contrition, the absolution which Fergusson administered to him in considera- tion of his repentance. On another occasion Fer- gusson went, with some companions, to the door of a similar zealot, and began to whine forth a psalm in burlesque of the hypocritical habits (as he considered them) of those within. With even less justifiable thoughtlessness, he once threw into the open window of a Glassite meeting-house a paper, on which he had inscribed some lines in imitation of the manner in which they were pleased to perform their devotions. A more innocent frolic was as follows: having procured a sailor's dress, he dressed himself in it, assumed a huge stick, and sallying out, paid a round of visits to his acquaintances. He was so effectually disguised that few or none of them knew him; and by throwing forth hints of some of their former indiscretions, he so much surprised them that they imputed his know- ledge to divination. By this means he procured from many of them such a fund of information as enabled him to give them a greater surprise when he resumed the genuine character of Robby Fergusson. For in the sailor's habit he informed them of many frailties and failings, which they imagined it impossible for any one of his appearance to know ; and in the habit of Robby Fergusson he divulged many things which they believed none but the ragged sailor was acquainted with. Fergusson's power of mimicry was indeed admirable, and he displayed a consider- able turn for acting in general. Towards the end of his life he was the very life and soul of a particu- lar spouting club to which he attached himself. In the circle of his acquaintance, though it ex- tended through nearly all ranks of society, he had few more respectable friends than Mr. Woods, a distinguished player long established in Edinburgh. Woods was a man of w-it, taste, and good sense, to which good qualities he added a prudence of con- duct, in which it is to be wished that the poet had uniformly imitated him. Through the influence of Mr. Woods, and in consideration perhaps of occa- sional poetical ser\'ices, he enjoyed a free admission to the theatre, of which he took not unfrequent advantage. To quote a memorandum which has been supplied to us on this subject : — "He always sat in the central box, denominated the Shakspeare box ; and his mode of expressing approbation in comic performances was very singular. Instead of clapping his hands, or using any exclamations, he used to show how much he was delighted by raising ROBERT FERGUSSON. 19 liis riglit hand clenclied above his head, and bringing it down emphatically on the front of the box, with a sweeping blow." His brotiier Henry, who was eight years older than himself, had before this period been obliged by some youthful indiscretions to go to sea. Henry was a youth of considerable acquirements and in- genuity, and in particular had an extraordinary taste for fencing. Some letters are extant which the young sailor addressed to his mother and brother, and they certainly display powers of mind and habits of reflection which, if discovered on shipboard, must have astonished his superiors. Apparently quite tired of the hopeless drudgery of his office, and per- haps impelled by more pressing considerations, Robert Fergusson at one time contemplated the course of life now pursued by his brother, the wild dangers of which might harve some charm to a poet's breast. He thus humorously alludes to his design in an epigram: — " Fortune and Bob, e'er since his birth, Could never yet agree; She fairly kicked him from the earth. To try his fate at sea." He was not destined, however, to execute this resolu- tion. In 1773 Fergusson's poems were collected from the IFcv/c/}' Magazine into one volume; but it does not appear that the poet reaped any pecuniary benefit from the publication. It is probable, indeed, that this admired son of genius never realized a single shilling by his writings. For a brief number of years Fergusson led the aimless life which we have endeavoured to describe, obtaining the means of a scanty subsistence by a ser- vile and unworthy drudgery, and cheering his leisure moments with mingled intellectual exertion and con- vivial dissipation. To many persons he was recom- mended by his fascinating conversation, his modesty, and his gentle and affectionate character. Of these, however, with but one exception, there were none who either felt called upon, or had it in their power, to advance his worldly fortunes. That exception was a Mr. Burnet, who, becoming much attached to the poet at Edinburgh, was afterwards enabled to send him a draught for a hundred pounds from India, with an invitation to come thither, in order to experience still more solid and lasting proofs of his friendship. Even of this single ray of kindness from his fellowmen the poor poet was destined to reap no advantage, being dead before the money and the invitation arrived. The unhappy youth con- tinued, so long as his mind was sensible of anything, to feel that, with powers which elevated him above most of his fellows, and were likely to make him be remembered when all of them were forgotten, he yet ate every day a bitterer and a scantier meal, and moiled on and on in hopeless poverty, at once the instrument and the victim of their pleasures. Early in the year 1774, when his frame was pe- culiarly exposed by the effects of a certain medicine to cold, he was induced to accompany some gentle- men, who were interested in an election business, to one of the eastern counties of Scotland. It is no imcommon thing for cold, contracted under such circumstances, to produce mental derangement; and such was the melancholy destiny of Fergusson ! Be- ing involved in the riotous scenes of the election, he easily caught the baneful distemper, the effects of which were quite as much mental as physical. While in this disordered state he happened one day to wander into the churchyard, where he was soon after accosted by the venerable John Brown, author of many well-known works in divinity, and who exercised the humble but respectable functions of a dissenting clergyman in the town. After a few trivial remarks had passed between them, Mr. Brown was led by the nature of the scene to advert to the mortality of man, observing that in a short time they would soon be laid in the dust, and that therefore it was wise to prepare for eternity. To Mr. Brown the conversation seemed the most casual and unim- portant that could well be. But such were not its effects. In the present state of the poet's mind his early religious impressions were fast reviving, and while the penalties of folly wrung his nerves, his thoughts wandered back over his misspent and un- prosperous life. Upon a mind so prepared the acci- dental remarks of the divine (who did not even know who he was) sunk as deep as if they had been im- printed in characters of fire. He returned home an altered and despairing man. One of his intimate friends, who met him in March, 1774, a short time after this event, found him somewhat tranquillized, but still in a very pre- carious state. The poor bard gave an account of the excesses which had lately produced such dreadful effects, and spoke with terror of what would be unavoidable in the event of a relapse — confinement in the common asylum for insane persons. He also introduced the subject of religion, and conversed with much earnestness on some of its fundamental doctrines. " Upon a particular occasion, which he specified, he said a Mr. Ferrier, at or near St. An- drews, had alarmed and rather displeased him by maintaining what are usually denominated the ortho- dox tenets of our Scottish creeds : and Fergusson appeared to differ, in a very considerable degree, from the commonly received notions on these sub- jects. He did not seem to be satisfied of the ne- cessity of the fall of man, and of a mediatorial sac- rifice for human iniquity; and he questioned, with considerable boldness, the consistency of such doc- trines with the attributes of divine wisdom and good- ness. At the same time, however, he confessed the imperfect nature of the human intellect, and the un- fathomable depth of all such inquiries. This is the only gleam of infidelity which ever seems to have diminished the fearful gloom of superstitious terror: no consoling rays of genuine religion charmed his bosom; no sounds of peace gladdened his heart, and enabled him to sustain, with fortitude and calmness, the sorrows which oppressed him. He anticipated ' the last peal of the thunder of heaven ' as the voice of eternal vengeance speaking in wrath, and con- signing him to irremediable perdition."' After having partially recovered from his disorder, his mind is said to have received another shock from the following incident : — "In the room adjoining to tliat in which he slept was a starling, which being seized one night by a cat that had found its way down the chimney, awakened Mr. Fergusson by the most alarming screams. Having learned the cause of the alarm, he began seriously to reflect how often he, an accountable and immortal being, had in the hour of intemperance set death at defiance, though it was thus terrible, in reality, to an unaccountable and sinless creature. This brought to his recollection the conversation of the clergyman, which, aided by the solemnity of midnight, wrought his mind up to a pitch of remorse that almost bordered on frantic despair. Sleep now forsook his eyelids; and he rose in the morning, not as he had formerly done, to mix again with the 1 VcicrVm's Li/e 0/ Fergitsson, prefixed to London edition of his poems, 1807. 20 ROBERT FERGUSSON. social and the gay, but to be a recluse from society, and to allow the remembrance of his past follies to prey upon his vitals. All his vivacity now forsook him; those lips which were formed to give delight were closed as by the hand of death, and on his countenance sat horror plumed!"' It is probably to this period that we are to refer two anecdotes which have been related as giving the first proofs of a decided cra2e in his understand- ing. Mr. Tennant, in an article which has been already quoted, says: — "It is difficult, even in sane persons, to determine where wit ends and temporary reeling of the imagination begins; and in the case of Fergusson, whose conceptions were ever so vivid, and whose wit was so fantastical and irregular, it was difficult for his friends to discriminate between his wit and his madness — to set a boundary-line be- tween those of his days that were but frolicsome and funny, and those that were desperately and invariably delirious. The first occurrence that startled his comrades, and put them in alarm for the safety of his understanding, took place one day in the High Street of Edinburgh, when Mr. B , one of his friends (who, I believe, is still alive), was standing engaged in conversation with a knot of acquain- tances. Fergusson came running up, apparently in a state of high perturbation ; and, accosting them familiarly, as he was wont, acquainted them that, confused and perturbed as he was, it was a mar\-el that they saw him alive that day at all. On ques- tioning him, with a desire that he should explain himself, he informed them that on the night before he had met with some Irish students in the street, with whom he had an altercation that led to a quarrel; that they scuffled and buffeted each other furiously ; that the combat deepened to deadly ferocity, when one of them, the bloodiest homicide of the troop, at last drew out a cutlass, with which he smote off his head at one blow; that his head ran down the strand trembling and streaming blood for many paces; that had it not been for his presence of mind he must infallibly have been a dead man ; but that, running instantly after the head, decapitated as he was, he snatched it up, and replaced it so nicely on its former position, that the parts coalesced, and no man could discover any vestiges of decapita- tion. This story was told with such wild looks and extravagant gesticulation as impressed the hearers with the suspicion that his mind had shifted from its wonted 'form and pressure;' a suspicion that was afterwards fully confirmed by other more decided and unfortunate indications." The other anecdote, which indicates a more ad- vanced stage of insanity, is as follows: — Mr. Woods, of the Theatre Royal, one day met him at the bottom of St. Anne Street, under the North Bridge (a street which does not now exist), and found him in a very disordered state. "I have just," said Fergusson in a confidential tone, "made a most important dis- covery." On Mr. Woods inquiring what it was, he answered, "I have found out one of the reprobates who crucified our Saviour; and in order to bring him to proper punishment I am going to lodge an information against him with Lord Kames." He then walked off towards the residence of that dis- tinguished philosopher and judge. Even from this second shock his reason was be- ginning to recover, when all was thrown into tenfold disorder by a fall which he met with one evening in descending a stair. Having cut his head severely, he lost a great deal of blood, and was carried home ' y^^^^y ^''■- loi'erarity, in Gleig's Supplement to t/te En- cj/clopaata Britannka. to his mother's house in a state of delirium, and totally insensible of his deplorable condition. His reason seemed to be now in a great measure de- stroyed. He passed nights and days in total abstin- ence from food, sometimes muttering dolefully to himself, and at other times so outrageous that it required the strength of several men to keep him in his bed. Occasionally he sang his favourite melodies, but in a style of pathos and tenderness such as he had never before reached. In particular, he chanted The Birks of Invermay with such exquisite melody, that those who heard his notes could never forget the sound. While in this state, probably anticipating that miserable catastrophe which soon after happened, he burned all his manuscripts, remarking, when the task was done, "I am satisfied; I feel some consola- tion in never having written anything against re- ligion." Like Collins hfe now used but one book, but he probably felt, with that unfortunate bard, "that it was the best." It is needless to mention that this sole companion of his moody hours was the Bible. The circumstances of his widowed mother were not, unfortunately, of such a kind as to enable her to keep her son, and procure for him the attendance necessar)' for his malady in her own house. She was, therefore, compelled to make arrangements for consigning him to a very ■wretched public asylum, which, before the erection of an elegant building at Momingside, was the only place in connection with the Scottish capital where such accommodations could be obtained. This house was situated within a gloomy nook of the old city wall, with another large building closing it up in front, as if it had been thought necessary to select for the insane a scene as sombre and wretched as their own mental condition. To this horrid mansion it was found necessary to con- vey Fergusson by a kind of stratagem, for he was too well aware of what was contemplated, and too much alive to the horrors of the place, to have either gone willingly himself, or to have been conveyed thither w^ithout some indecent exposure. Two friends, there- fore, were instructed to pay him a visit about night- fall, as if for the purpose of inquiring after his wel- fare. He met them with easy confidence, and after some conversation, in which he took part like a sane man, they proposed that he should accompany them on a visit to a friend at another part of the town. To this he cheerfully consented, and was accordingly placed in a sedan which they had in readiness at the bottom of the stair. The unhappy youth then per- mitted himself to be conveyed peaceably along the streets till he arrived at the place which he had all along feared would be his final abode. The chair was conveyed into the hall, and it was only when Fergusson stepped out that he perceived the decep- tion which had been practised upon him. One wild halloo — the heart-burst of despair — broke from him, and was immediately echoed from the tenants of the surrounding cells. Thrilled with horror, his friends departed, and left the wretched Fergusson to his fate. "During the first night of his confinement," says Mr. Sommers, "he slept none; and when the keeper visited him in the morning, he found him walking along the stone floor of his cell, with his arms folded, and in sullen sadness, uttering not a word. After some minutes' silence, he clapped his right hand on his forehead, and complained much of pain. He asked the keeper who brought him there? He answered, 'Friends.' 'Yes, friends, indeed,' re- plied Robert; 'they think I am too wicked to live, but you will soon see me a burning arid a shining light' 'Vou have been so already,' observed the ROBERT FERGUSSON. keeper, alluding to his poems. 'You mistake me,' said the poet: 'I mean, you shall see and hear of me as a bright minister of the gospel.'" P'ergusson continued about two months to occupy a cell in this gloomy mansion. Occasionally, when the comparative tramjuiliity of his mind permitted it, his friends were allowed to visit him. A few days before his dissolution his mother and sister found him lying on his straw bed calm and collected. The evening was chill and damp: he requested his mother to gather the bed-clothes about him, and sit on his feet, for he said they were so very cold as to be almost insensible to the touch. She did so, and his sister took her seat by the bedside. lie then looked wistfully in the face of his affectionate parent, and said, "Oh, mother, this is kind indeed." Then ad- dressing his sister, he said, "Might you not come frequently and sit beside me; you cannot imagine how comfortable it would be; you might fetch your seam, and sew beside me." To this no answer was returned: an interval of silence was filled up by sobs and tears. "What ails ye?" inquired the dying poet; "wherefore sorrow for me, sirs? I am very well cared for here — I do assure you, I want for nothing — but it is cold — it is very cold. You know I told you it would come to this at last — yes, I told you so. Oh, do not go yet, mother — I hope to be soon — oh, do not go yet — do not leave me!" The keeper, however, whispered that it was time to depart, and this was the last time that Fergusson saw these beloved relatives. Mr. Sommers thus describes his last interview with the poet, which took place in company with Dr. John Aitken, another friend of the unfortunate maniac: — "We.got immediate access to the cell, and found Robert lying with his clothes on, stretched upon a bed of loose uncovered straw. The moment he heard my voice he arose, got me in his arms, and wept. The doctor felt his pulse, and declared it to be favourable. I asked the keeper to allow him to accompany us into an adjoining back-court, by way of taking the air. He consented. Robert took hold of me by the arm, placing me on his right, and the doctor on his left, and in this form we walked back- ward and forward along the court, conversing for nearly an hour, in the course of which many ques- tions were asked both by the doctor and myself, to which he returned most satisfactory answers; but he seemed very anxious to obtain his liberty. Having passed two hours with him on this visit, we found it necessary to take our leave, the doctor assuring him that he would soon be restored to his friends, and that I would visit him again in a day or two. He calmly and without a murmur walked with us to the cell, and, upon parting, reminded the doctor of his promise to get him soon at liberty, and of mine to see him next day. Neither of us, however, had an opportunity of accomplishing our promise, for in a few days thereafter I received an intimation from the keeper that Robert Fergusson had breathed his last." Before this period Mrs. Fergusson had been en- abled, by a remittance from her son Henry, to make some preparations for receiving the poor maniac back into her own house, where superior accommodations, and the tenderness of a mother's and a sister's love, might have been expected to produce some favourable effect. But it came too late : misery had already secured her victim. "In the solitude of his cell," says Mr. Peterkin, "amid the terrors of the night, 'without a hand to help or an eye to pity,' the poet expired. His dying couch was a mat of straw; the last sounds that pealed upon his ear were the bowl- ings of insanity. No tongue whispered peace; and even a consoling tear of sympathy mingled not with those of contrition and hope, which, in charity I trust, illumined his closing eye." Robert Fergusson died on the iGtli of October, 1774, aged one day less than twenty-four years. His body was interred in the Canongatc Churchyard, where his grave remained quite undistinguished, until his successor, and (as he was pleased to acknowledge) his imitator, Robert Burns, appeared in Edinburgh. WHen Burns came to the grave of Fergusson he uncovered his head, and, with his characteristic en- thusiasm, kneeling down, embraced the venerated clay. He afterwards ol)tained permission from the magistrates to erect a monument to Fergusson, which he inscribed with the following stanza : — • "No sculptured marble here, nor pompous lay, ' No storied urn, nor animated bust;' This simple stone directs pale Scotia's way To pour her sorrows o'er her poet's dust." On the reverse of the monument, which is literally a "simple stone," is the following honourable inscrip- tion: "By special grant of the managers to Robert Burns, who erected this stone, this burial-place is ever to remain sacred to the memory of Robert Fer- gusson." In more than one of his effusions in prose and poetry the Ayrshire poet has bewailed the fate of Fergusson; but perhaps the following little elegy, which he inscribed on a copy of the works of that poet which he presented to a young lady (March 19, 1787), is less generally known than the rest : — ' ' Curse on ungrateful man, that can be pleased And yet can starve the author of his pleasure! Oh thou, my elder brother in misfortune, By far my elder brother in the muses, With tears I pity thy unhappy fate! Why is the bard unfitted for the world, Yet has so keen a relish of its pleasures!" Whatever may be thought of the philosophy of this stanza, its feeling has an irresistible appeal. The external appearance of Fergusson, so far as it is left undelineated in the sketch already quoted, was as follows:' His countenance was somewhat effeminate, but redeemed by the animation imparted to it by his large black eyes. Mingled with the penetrative glance of an acute and active mind was that modesty which gives to superior intellect its greatest charm. Unfortunately there is no authentic portrait in existence, though it may be worth while to mention that his grand-niece, the late Miss Inver- arity, the actress, bore so strong a resemblance to him as to have struck the mind of an individual who remembered the appearance of Fergusson, and who had learned neither the name of the young lady nor her relation to the poet. Fergusson's manners were always accommodated to the moment: he was gay, serious, set the table in a roar, charmed with his powers of song, or bore with becoming dignity his part in learned or philosophical disquisition. "In short, he had united in him," says Mr. Alexander Campbell, "the sprightliness and innocence of a child, with the knowledge of a profound and judicious thinker." "Gentleness and humanity of disposition," says Dr. Irving, "he possessed in an eminent degree. The impulse of benevolence frequently led him to bestow his last farthing on those who solicited his charity. His surviving relations retain a pleasing remembrance of his dutiful behaviour towards his parents; and the tender regard with which his memory is still cherished by his numerous acquaintance fully demonstrates his value as a friend." It may be added that, to this day, there prevails but one uni- versal impression in favour of Fergusson. Cut off in > According to another individual who recollects seeing him, "he was very smally and delicate, a little in-kneed, and ■waigkd a good deal in walking." JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER. the preenest of his clays, he still lives in the feeling of the world exactly what he really was in life — a gentle and youthful being, of whom no one could think any ill, and who was the friend and brother of everybody. FERRIER, James Frkdf.rick, professor of morals and political economy in the university of St. Andrews. This profound metaphysician and elo- quent writer in general literature, was born at Kdin- burgh in November, iSoS. He was the nephew of Miss Ferrier, the talented and popular authoress of Murriiis^cr and 7'/ie Inheritance, of whom a memoir will appear in our pages. He became a student in the university of Edinburgh when a new impulse had been given to the study of ethics and metaphysics by Dugald Stewart and Professor Brown, which was continued by the enthusiastic eloquence of John Wilson, afterwards the father-in-law of Ferrier — and under such influences, an acute active mind could scarcely be idle or undistinguished. Accordingly, in the class of moral philosophy James Ferrier dis- ])layed those intellectual powers which augured well for his future career; and a class poem which he produced during that year carried off the prize, and was long after remembered for its superiority to such class productions as have been successful in a gene- ral competition. This acknowledged superiority, so often the close of a student's career, was with Ferrier only the starting-point, and from the univer- sity of Edinburgh he passed to that of Oxford, where his studies were alternated with classics and philo- sophy until the latter secured his undivided attention, but not until he had become a ripe classical scholar. There also he graduated in arts, and passed the usual examinations with distinction. Desirous to enlarge his knowledge in general learning and metaphysics, he afterwards became a student in one of the German universities, and the mastery of the German language which he there acquired enabled him to advance into those profound speculations which as yet were little known in the colleges of Britain. The literature of Germany, and especially its poetry, occupied much of his study; and from his knowledge in this depart- ment, as well as his acquaintance with the niceties of the German language, he was enabled to aid the studies of those who were employed in a similar field. In this way he was of such service in inter- preting the poetry of Goethe and Schiller, that Sir iiuKver Lytton in his translation of the latter poet dedicated the publication to Ferrier. In 1832 James Ferrier was admitted to the Scot- tish bar. With a person of such a cast of mind, and so educated, the dry study of the law and oratory of the bar could have little congeniality, and his choice of such a profession might excite our wonder mixed with not a little astonishment. That he had no purpose, however, to involve himself in the occu- pations of a Scottish advocate, was evitlent from his neither attaining nor yet seeking such distinction. The charms of literature and peaceful contemplation had more attractions for him than the active stir of litigation and the prospect of a silk gown, while BlackwooJ^s ]\Iagazine supplied a sufficient outlet for his first attemiUs in authorship. Aiul to the pages of this distinguished periodical, now at the height of its reputation, the contributions of Ferrier were always welcome; for besides his Tory principles, he wrote with a vigour, eloquence, wit, and learning that recalled to memory the early articles of Wilson, Lockhart, and other distinguished founders of the magazine. For a series of years his contributions were continued; and wliile they were remarkable for their freshness of style and originality of thought, they excited the attention of the reflective, among other subjects, to the Berkleian jihilosophy, and the cITects of German thought upon the writings of Cole- ritlge. With all this acknowledged excellence, Ferrier was worthy of a more permanent field of action, and this was opened to him in 1845 ^ly his appoint- ment to the professorship of moral philosophy and political economy in the university of St. Andrews. Into this important charge he brought an earnestness and eloquence, and an amount of scholarship not often exhibited in the chairs of that ancient seat of learning; and their effect was shown in the new in- tellectual impulse which he imparted to his students, and the devotedness with which they loved their distinguished teacher. The professorship of moral philosophy in the university of Edinburgh having become vacant by the retirement of John Wilson, his father-in-law, Ferrier became a candidate for the chair, but was unsuccessful. That the failure, how- ever, was owing to no lack of qualification for the office was proved two years afterwards, when he published his Theory 0/ A'tiincntig and Being, a work of great power, but upon a doubtful and debatable subject. His attempts to solve the great metaphy- sical problem, of course, found as many opponents as advocates, but all were at one in their opinion of the originality and ingenuity of many of its accessory ideas, and the brilliant eloquence with which the work was pervaded. In 1854 he was again a com- petitor for an Edinburgh chair, in consequence of the death of Sir William Hamilton, by which the pro- fessorship of logic and metaphysics was left vacant in the university of the northern capital. Ferrier was one of the candidates, the competition was a keen one, and to a pamphlet written in favour of the successful candidate he published a stinging answer, under the title of Scottish Philosophy: the Old and the N'ew. Once more defeated in his attempts to estab- lish himself in the university of Edinburgh, Ferrier resumed his duties in St. Andrews with undiminished zeal and success, until his failing health warned him that evening was at hand when his day was little more than half ended. That mysterious and fatal disease so prevalent in our own period, to which people of ardent temperament and active brain are so peculiarly subject — commonly called disease of the heart — had manifested itself in repeated attacks of angina pectoris, and so unfitted him for his public duties, that he was obliged to devolve the charge of his class into other hands. Recovery from such a malady was hopeless, however the end might be delayed, and he died at St. Andrews on the iith of June, 1864. To this brief account of Professor Ferrier we sub- join a sketch of his character contained in a short memoir inserted in the Edinburgh Evening Cow-ant, from which the foregoing statements have been taken. In a life otherwise so uneventful such a portrait is ne- cessary, in order to sec him more effectually both in his public and ]irivate relationships; and this, it is hoped, will justify the length and fulness of the quotation: — "In jirivate life the professor added to those solid ([ualities which are universally resjiected, a pleasant- ness and refinement of manner not always found in the occupants of our Scottish chairs. The visitor who entered his house at St. Andrews found there not hospitality only, but a certain empresseinent of politeness wdiich recalled the old school, and which was so far from being stiff that it contributed by its grace to the charm of his fresh and lively conversa- tion. He was not a philosopher alone, but a man of letters, and took an interest in the beautiful and SUSAN EDMONSTON FERRIER. 23 the humorous — in poetry and anecdotes of life and ciiaracter — as well as in those severer studies to which he owed his fame. The worthy admirer of Berkeley was also the worthy friend of SVilson ; and you felt yourself, when with him in his social hour, connected by a living link with those eminent Scotsmen of an older day whose great attraction was that they were learned without pedantry, and polished without priggishness. "His death leaves a vacancy in the front rank of Scottish thinkers and men of letters which will not easily be filled up. Beloved by all his students, en- deared to a large circle of friends by his generous character, his great accomplishments, his philoso- phical power, and his stores of wit and humour, Mr. Ferrier's death will be felt as another blank in the brilliant group of literary men of whom Wilson and Lockhart were the acknowledged chiefs, and whose congenial organ ^^•as Blackwood's Magazine. Tory as he was, he will leave few generous Scots- men, of whatever party, unregretful of his premature decease ; while scholars of whatever degree, and philosophers of whatever school, will join in mourn- ing the loss of one whose literary sympathies were as wide as they were discriminating, and whose philosophy perhaps fell short of conclusiveness by its too ardent efforts after catholicity." FEPvRIEE, Susan Edmonston. Of this highly talented novelist, whose works created such a popu- lar sensation in their favour, little is known beyond the fact that she was the authoress of three highly popular novels, and that their sterling merits have secured for them a durability seldom accorded to works of this nature. Miss Ferrier was born in Edinburgh in 1 782, and was the aunt of the learned professor whom we have previously recorded. Her father, James Ferrier, a writer to the signet, was one of the principal clerks of the Court of Session, and colleague in that office of Sir Walter Scott. Of the early years and educational training of Miss Ferrier we have no account ; but the society of the eminent literary characters with which Edinburgh at that time abounded, and with whom her father lived in daily intimacy, is enough to prove that she had superior opportunities for the development of her intellectual powers, while her writings show that she had turned these opportunities to the best account. The society of such men, and especially of Sir W^alter Scott, could not be enjoyed by a mind like that of our authoress without the im- provement which mere reading would fail to impart; and the result was such as Sir Walter himself has recorded in his private diary. Speaking of Miss Ferrier, he describes her as "a gifted personage, having, besides her great talents, conversation the least exigeante of any author, female at least, whom I have ever seen, among the long list I have en- countered; simple, full of humour, and exceedingly ready at repartee; and all this without the least affec- tation of the blue-stocking." With all this intellectual vivacity and humour, and great conversational powers. Miss Ferrier could combine a tact which nothing but the most delicate benevolence could inspire. Of this a striking instance is given in Lockhart's Life of Sir Wa'lter Scott. When the great poet and novelist was in the decline both of his health and intellect, but still as eager for intellectual work and as industrious as ever, it was the aim of his family in his occasional visits to them from the study, to render these visits as long and frequent as possible, and for this purpose they invited his friend Miss Ferrier to Abbotsford. "Her com- ing," adds the biographer, "was serviceable; for she knew and loved him well, and she had seen enough of affliction akin to his to be well skilled in dealing with it. She could not be an hour in his company without observing what fdled his children with more sorrow than all the rest of the case. He would begin a story as gaily as ever, and go on, in spite of the hesitation in his speech, to tell it with highly pic- turesque effect; but before he reached the point, it would seem as if some internal spring had given way: he paused, and gazed round him with the blank anxiety of look that a blind man has when he has dropped his staff Unthinking friends sometimes pained him sadly by giving him the catch-word abruptly. I noticed the delicacy of Miss Ferrier on such occasions. Her sight was bad, and she took care not to use her glasses when he was speaking; and she affected to be also troubled with deafness, and would say, 'Well, I am getting as dull as a post; I have not heard a word since you said so and so,' being sure to mention a circumstance behind that at which he had really halted. He then took up the thread with his habitual smile of courtesy, as if for- getting his case entirely in the consideration of the lady's infirmity." From these brief glimpses, which reveal Miss Ferrier's character — and which so amiably reveal it that we are compelled to regret that they are so few — we pass to her literary productions. Her first work, entitled Alarriage, was published in the year 1818, when she had attained the ripe age of thirty- six, and therefore, although her first production, the novel indicated a mind completely matured. As such, J\Iarriage at once became popular, even al- though the " Great Unknown" was in the field, and occupying it without a rival; and the author of Waverley sanctioned this public judgment with his heartiest approbation. In the conclusion of his Tales of My Landlord, he welcomed his "sister shadow," the author of ' ' the very lively work entitled Marriage, as one of the labourers capable of gathering in the large harvest of Scottish character and fiction." The great merit of the work, indeed, and that which dis- tinguished her subsequent productions, was the force and fidelity of her Scottish portraits, in which depart- ment none perhaps but Sir W^ alter himself was her superior; and on this account her novels have still an intrinsic charm which keeps them alive after so much in the literary world of fiction has passed away. The publishing of her first work was therefore the open- ing of a picture-gallery, and the public who crowded in could not sufficiently admire the life-like sketches of Mrs. Violet Macshake, the grim, sarcastic, but really affectionate lady of ninety, a glorious relic of the old Scotch school, who pronounced everything new a folly and an abomination — and Lady Mac- lauchlan, shrewd, short, and snappish — and the three old spinster sisters. Miss Jacky, Miss Grizzy, and Miss Nicky — each having her separate originality, but all tugging at the same oar. But while excelling in female portraits, Miss Ferrier showed that she could also hit off male characters with almost equal power, whether by single touches or elaborate de- scriptions, and produce a narrative by which her readers would be spell-bound without going beyond the limits of ever)--day life. Her next novel, The Inheritatice, with equal originality, was of a still more elaborate and finished description, and the religious element with which it is mixed is so judi- ciously introduced, as to throw an attractive sunshine over the whole tale. While the Inha-itance also dealt with a higher sphere of life, and more im- portant objects than Marriage, the comic, in which Miss Ferrier excelled, was not neglected; and her descriptions of the pompous old earl, of Uncle JAMES FILLANS. Adam, and Miss Pratt, arc among the choicest of her many delineations of the kind. Her last tale, entitled Datiny; or, the Chiefs Daus;hUr, ajipeared in 183I; but as the characters, incidents, manners, and scenery are Hitjhiand, it does not possess the same variety and attractiveness as her former works, and this production was on the whole a failure. After this she laid aside her pen, to the regret of those whom her writings had so greatly charmed, and retired into private life. Her death occurred near the close of 1S54; but the particular date of it we are unable to ascertain. FILLANS, James. This excellent sculptor was the s )n of John Thomson Fillans, who had served as sailor in the Spiwiy under Lord Cochrane, but after^vards found employment in the ironworks of Carnwath. He was born at Wilsontown in Lanark- shire, on the 27th of March, 1808, and was the third but eldest surviving son of a family of thirteen children. Inconsequence of his father's misfortunes in trade, he was only a short time at school; but he had already chosen his future occupation, and com- menced a course of self- training for its work, so that when a boy his chief delight was to mould the figures of men and animals from no better material than snow. From his eighth to his twelfth year, his regu- lar occupation was to herd cattle at Busby in the Mearns, where he had ample opportunity of study- ing the beauty of nature; after which he removed with the members of his family to Paisley, and was there set to learn weaving as his future craft. In spite, however, of his dull employment at the loom — perhaps even invited by its dulness and monotony — his artistic bias became more intense; and he be- took himself to fashioning in clay, such models of the animal form as astonished his companions, and even excited the admiration of more critical judges. While following this favourite bent, obstacles did not deter him; and on one occasion, when he was ambitious to model a helmet such as Sir William Wallace was supposed to wear, he kneaded his clay into proper ductility, and afterwards clapped it, for •want of a block, upon his younger brother's head, where it remained until he had fashioned it into the likeness of a warlike and highly ornamented head- piece. As weaving was not congenial to such a spirit, he quitted it in less than a twelvemonth, and with an eye to the practice of sculpture and the use of its tools, became apprentice to a stone-mason. lie had now greater scope for the study of his favourite art, and while he continued to execute models in clay which were always advancing in improvement, his range of ideas was enlarged, and his perception of the grand and beautiful refined by reading works of history and biography. As a workman, also, those tasks were consigned to him which reqviircd a superior exertion of professional skill. His ai^prenticeship being finished while still in his minority, he con- tinueil to work as a journeyman, and in Paisley and Lireenock carvings are still pointed out which were executed by his chisel. Over the door of a house at Lanend, that was once a smithy, is the figure of a horse which young Fillans copied from a living animal in the neighl^ourhood; and with this spirited figure the smith for whom it was made was so well pleased, that he rewarded the artist with two pounds for his trouble— the first professional fee which as yet he had touched. In 1828, when he had reached his twentieth year, Fillans was employed to carve some of the ornamental parts of the Glasgow Royal Exchange, then in the course of erection. The splendid Corinthian capitals in the interior of the building, which were especially his workmanship, and his enthusiasm for Grecian art, were so con- spicuous among his fellow-workmen, that they dubbed him, as a mark of honourable distinction, with the title of "\'oung Athens." Although he had now acquired the character of a first-rate mason, this was but a step to the oliject of his ambition, and being encouraged by his friend Motherwell, who at tiiis time was editor of the Paisley Aiii'eriiser, Fillans set up his studio as a statuary in the manufacturing town of Paisley, where his productions soon became popular, and commis- sions continued to flow upon him. Besides executing the busts of some of the principal citizens, he pro- duced several ideal figures in groups, the fame of which quickly extended to Glasgow, and made its citizens desirous of securing the services of the young rising artist. In compliance with their invita- tions, he removed to this great city of the west, and opened his studio in Miller Street, where his professional engagements were so numerous, that he employed two of his brothers to assist in the mecha- nical operations of his art. He was now a thriving man; he had been married between two and three years to the object of his warmest affections; and everything seemed to promise that at last he had found his right home, and would select it as his per- manent abode. But nothing short of perfection as a sculptor would satisfy him, and this could not be effected without the instructions that could only be obtained by travel. He accordingly commenced his professional pilgrimage in October, 1835, and after visiting Dublin and London, he arrived on the fol- lowing month in Paris. After studying the master- pieces contained in the Louvre, Fillans returned after an absence of only three months, the shortness of his tour being occasioned by scanty funds and the exigencies of a growing family. He now resolved to settle in London as the most congenial home for an artist, and best mart for his productions, and in the capital he accordingly established his residence, first in South Bank, Regent's Park, and afterwards in Baker Street, Portman Square. To bring him- self into notice in the wide world of London, it was necessary that his claims should be publicly exhibited, and accordingly he had no fewer than seven busts in marble in the exhibition of the Royal Academy in Trafalgar Square. One of these was a likeness of his friend Allan Cunningham, which not only excited general attention, but obtained the approbation of Chantrey himself Still, however, his principal orders came from Scotland, among the chief of which was a bust of Mr. Hastie, M.P. for Paisley; and the model of a jug illustrative of the tale of Tatit O' Shanter, in the style of Cellini. Other commis- sions succeeded so numerously that his life was spent alternately in London and Scotland, greatly to the interruption of his professional studies, although such calls were but the consequence of his acknowledged excellence. He naturally exulted, however, in these warm tokens of his increasing celebrity, while his friends, who triumphed in his success, exclaimed, "You have now the ball at your foot; keep it rolling !" A bust of Richard Oswald, Esq., of Auchincruive, which he was commissioned to execute, occasioned, in 1841, his journey to Florence, where that gentle- man resided. It was a delightful tour; it was also a profitable one in an artistic point of view, as it af- fortled him am])le leisure to study the rich collections of art in the city of Florence. When the bust was finished and brought home, his constituents, the Oswald committee, were loud and unanimous in their approbation; the local journals confirmed their suf- frage; and when it was placed in the Assembly Rooms \ JAMES FILLANS. 2S of Ayr, it was universally acknowledged, that as a work of art nothing equal to it had ever been seen in that city. Having been thus far so successful, Fillans did not relapse into idleness, and allow the ball at his foot to remain at rest; so that the various commis- sions which he was engaged to execute kept him in almost perpetual transition between England and Scotland. Of the works he accomplished at this time, nothing so highly excited the general applause as his group of statuary entitled "The Blind Teaching the Blind.'.' It was an original and poetical idea, while the style of its execution was as happy as the concep- tion. The followii>g account of it is from one of the journals of the period: — -"Mr. Fillans has not only the merit of being the first to depict the blind in this interesting light, but he has done so in a manner which seems to defy any attempt to surpass it. In- deed, we cannot imagine the subject treated differ- ently and so well. The group is exquisitely simple. A young girl, with beautifully rounded features, is sitting upon a low seat with the Scriptures in raised letters open upon her knee, and her fingers resting on the inspiretl words; while another female, some- what older and taller, but still young, is kneeling by her side, her head resting affectionately on that of her pupil, and one hand gently touching her heart, as if to impress the lesson upon her with greater earnestness. The former is the principal figure, and concentrates within itself the sentiment of the piece. If it be the highest effort of art to depict, not the mere outward forms of nature, but the invisible essence of mind which surrounds these like a fra- grance, Mr. Fillans has been eminently successful. The whole figure of the learner is a visible embodi- ment of the ideal. The acute sense of touch almost apparent in the action of the hand, the half-parted lips — nay, the very sightless orbs uplifted, not in vain, to heaven, are instinct with awakening thoughts, and indicative of a radiance within, which burns only the more brightly from the daylight being quite shut out. Indeed the darkness which veils her eyes seems but the shadow of the illumined spirit en- shrined in the perishable clay; and we can almost fancy, as we gaze upon her sainted and beaming as- pect, that her eyes are closed only that she may re- ceive the words of truth through some diviner sense, and, undisturbed by earthly visions, commune in secret with the angels. The draping is simple and appropriate, and the outline and general effect of the grouping is sweet, expressive, and beautiful." To this critique we may add the following incident, as related by the artist's biographer: — "Two of the best-looking inmates of the Blind Asylum .were se- lected by Mr. Fillans to sit for the model. Delicate as beautiful, neither of them seems to have been capable of resisting those scourges of the sensitive and lovely — consumption and small-pox. The one died, and the other cannot now be recognized as one of the originals in this divine group. A friend who accompanied the sculptor to see the bust of Mr. Alston, saw this girl under very interesting circum- stances. She was walking with a companion in front of the asylum, when Mr. Fillans asked if the gover- ness was at home. Knowing his voice she sprang towards him, throwing up her arms with an exclama- tion of joy; but, instantly recollecting herself, stopped short, hung down her head, and answered his ques- tion in a subdued and tremulous voice. Nothing could more forcibly illustrate the impression produced on the mind of the blind and desolate girl at the recollection of the kindness and affability of the warm-hearted and generous sculptor, who seemed much affected at the sight of her altered appear- ance, and the death of her still more beautiful com- panion." In consequence of his high reputation, Fillans was now the sculptor generally employed on the busts and statues of eminent Scotsmen clcsigned as public monuments. They are too numerous to particu- larize, so tliat we can only mention the monument at Beith to Captain Wilson, who fell in the Kyber Pass, Afghanistan; the statue of Sir James Shaw for Kilmarnock; and the bust of Professor Wilson for the coffee-room of Paisley. Scotland had now be- come proud of her favourite sculptor; public bodies united in their admiration of his excellence; and two public dinners were given in his honour; one at Paisley, the other at Burns' cottage, Ayrshire, and at both, the laudations heaped upon the artist, how- ever ample, as post-prandial compliments are wont to be, could only have been called forth by an ex- traordinary amount of merit. Surely, then, he was securing an ample fortune as the natural fruit of suth public distinction ! But numerous and well-paid though his productions were, he still continued to be comparatively poor — and for this the nature of his occupations will account. Although his home was in London, his commissions for the greater part came from Scotland, so that his constant journeys thither were a serious drawback upon his funds. He was also liberal perhaps to a fault, so that he be- stowed not merely his money but also his art in deeds of benevolence, giving statues or groups as contributions to the funds of charitable institutions. To add to his difficulties, an accident while employed upon a scaffold at Glasgow, by which his knee was sprained, laid him aside from work for a considerable period. On his recovery and return to London, he set himself in earnest to model a series of bas-reliefs under the title of "Taming the Wild Horse," and to represent the animal in its principal attitudes, and the mode of its capture as practised in the pampas of Southern America. The study of the horse was new to him; but the citizens of Glasgow were already talking of an equestrian statue to commemorate the queen's visit to their city, and the friends of Fillans were hopeful that he would be commissioned to execute it. Upon this new attempt, therefore, he laboured night and day in his studio in London; and as the apartment was damp, it is believed that there, and at this time, he laid the foundation of his future ill health. When this splendid series of bas- reliefs was finished, his next work was to model the Flying Dutchman, a celebrated race-horse belonging to the Earl of Eglinton. But the equestrian statue for Glasgow was not consigned to his workmanship after all, but to a foreign artist. This and other professional disappointments damped his spirit, while the failure of occupation induced him to break up his costly establishment in London, and take up his permanent abode in Glasgow. He accordingly re- moved to that city in December, 185 1; but the change was made too late. The sprain of his knee and the effects of his damp London studio settled into a confirmed rheumatism, which gradually as- cended from his limbs to the neighbourhood of the heart, and he died in Glasgow on the 27th of Sep- tember, 1852, aged about forty-four years, leaving behind him a widow and eight young children. Among the many proofs of the affection and esteem in which Fillans was held, the f(jllowing was of too amiable a character to be omitted. Immediately after his funeral a meeting of the friends of the de- ceased was called, a committee was formed, and such steps were adopted in raising a fund for the relief of the widow and family as placed them above imme- diate want. And, in the subsequent exhibition of 26 JOHN FLEMING. the West of Scotland Academy of Artists, where numerous productions of tlie deceased were exhibiteil, the academicians exerted themselves in their sale^ that Mrs. FilLms and h^-r children might reap the benefit. Fillans mit;ht be called an artist in the widest acceptation of the term: his whole heart was per- vaded with a love of the beautiful, and his emotions expressed themselves not merely in statuary, but in painting and poetry, in each of which he might have attained distinction had he not been so highly de- voted to his first love. It was therefore as a sculptor that his fame will descend to posterity, and of all liis productions, those will be most admired where the subject was of his own choosing, and in the handling of which he was allowed to follow the bent of his own genius. Of this his "Blind Teaching the Blind," "Boy and Fawn," colossal statue of Sir James Shaw, and bust of Professor Wilson, not to mention others, are sufficient evidence. FLEMING, Rev. John, D.D., F.R.S.E., pro- fessor of natural science. New College, Edinburgh. This eminent naturalist was the son of Mr. Alexander Fleming, a small farmer in Linlithgowshire, and was bom at Kirkroads, near Bathgate, in 1785. Like his father, he might have been destined to the occupa- tion of a hard-working peasant, had he not in early life evinced talents that were worthy of a better con- dition; and this was aided by the wish of his mother, who, above all things, desired that her son John should be trained for the ministry. Accordingly, after his preliminary education was finished, he, at the age of seventeen, became a student at the uni- versity of Edinburgh. But the particular direction of his studies had been already fixed, as from his earliest youth he had shown an exclusive predilection for natural science; and before he went to college he was no ordinary proficient in zoology, botany, and geology. In bis researches connected with these de- partments of science he had made several important discoveries, in consequence of which he had hoped to render the same service to his native Linlithgow- shire which White had done for Selborne. Al- though his intention was frustrated by his lot being cast in a different locality, he partly accomplished it by diffusing the result of his explorations in the Outline of the Flora of Linlitlis;inusliire, a paper read to the Wernerian Society in 1809, and several other scientific communications. While Fleming was a student, the university of Edinburgh was distinguished by the eminence of its professors in natural science, ami of such an oppor- tunity he so carefully availed himself, that when little more than twenty years old he was already distin- guished by the maturity of his attainments. In con- sequence of this, when he had been licensed as a preacher, he was commissioned by Sir John Sinclair, in 1807, to undertake a survey of the economical mine- ralogy of the northern isles. This he willingly did, and while employed in the task it unexpectedly pro- cured for him a church living. That of the parish of Bressay having become vacant, and the patron failing within the sjiccified time to exercise his right of presentation, the right devolved, by the ecclesiastical law of .Scotland, upon the presbytery of Lerwick; and its members having been won by the rare attainments and agreeable manners lof the young preacher and naturalist who resided among them, unanimously elected him minister of the parish. Soon after his ordination, and before he had completed his twenty- third year, Fleming drew up for publication The licouomii-al Mlneralo^iy of the Orkney and Zetland Islands, which is thus characterized by his biographer: "There are evidences in it of great descriptive power, readiness in the application of the nomenclature of the science, correctness of eye, and such a quick ap- preciation of the economical value of the rocks de- scribed, as would not discredit the ablest mineralogist at the present time." This also was but a portion of his scientific writings in his island seclusion of Bressay, as in the same month in which his mineralogical report was published, he communicated to the Wer- nerian Society a paper O71 the IVar-wal or Sea-unieorn. At the close of the same year he also sent to the Wer- nerian Society several papers, entitled Contributions to the British Fauna. It was fortunate for Fleming as well as for science that he was not long doomed to waste his energies among the listless solitudes of Shetland. In i8io he was transferred to the parish of Flisk, Fifeshire, where, amidst a wide field for scientific investigation, and numerous associates in such pursuits, he had for his next neighbour Dr. Chalmers, who at that time was minister of the adjacent parish of Kilmany. In Fifeshire Mr. Fleming prosecuted his favourite studies with renewed ardour, and a reputation always increas- ing; and while faithfully discharginghis clerical duties, his eye was continually on the watch for such pro- ductions as might enlarge the boundaries of natural science, or throw additional light upon former dis- coveries. On this account his communications were frequent both in letters to his scientific friends and in papers to the Wernerian Society. In these com- munications also he occasionally gives scope to that dry sarcastic spirit which had been one of his charac- teristics from boyhood, and which the theories of the day would not allow to slumber. But this causticity was especially reserved for those theorists who did not trouble themselves about facts, or who concluded from insufficient data. To him the book of nature was a sacred gospel, and woe be to the heretic who misinterpreted or perverted it ! While he thus in- tently prosecuted his investigations in chemistry and mineralogy, in geology, botany, and zoology, he was so fortunate as to find a fit helpmate in Miss Melville Christie, second daughter of Andrew Christie, Esq., banker, Cupar, whom he married in March, 181 3, and who entered into his pursuits with a zeal almost equal to his own. Having also artistic skill in a very high degree, she was able to assist him with her pen- cil, and the plates of his Philosophy of Zoology' were taken from drawings which she had executed for the purpose. While such a blessing was added both to the comforts of his fireside and the requirements of his study, the honours which his philosophical achievements had merited were not withheld. He was already a member of the Antiquarian Society; in 1813 the university of St. Andrews conferred upon him the degree of Doctor in Divinity; and in January, 1814, he was elected a fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Although minister of Flisk, the stipend was not more than ^150 per annum, and Dr. Fleming, if he could have found a favourable opportunity, was willing to make the study of science the sole business of his life, instead of a divided occupation. An opportunity for this change seemed to occur in 1815 by the estab- lishment of the Cork Institution, and its advertise- ment for a lecturer in natural history, which was in- serted in the Edinburgh newspapers. He hoped also that in addition to the salary of ;^ 1 00 per annum which was attached to the lectureship, he might have private classes, the fees of which might more than remunerate him for the sacrifice of his parish stipend. On second thoughts, however, the abandonment of such a cer- tainty as Flisk appeared so hazardous, that he re- solved to proceed without committing himself, and JOHN TLEMIXG. 27 with this view offered to the Cork Institution to de- liver one course of lectures by way of experimental trial. He accordingly repaired to Ireland in the spring of 1816, and delivered eighteen lectures on botany, his pulpit of P'lisk during his absence being supplied by his brethren of the presbytery. Finding, however, no adequate inducement to accept the lec- tureship, he, greatly to the satisfaction of his friends, returned to his clerical charge in Fifeshire. After his return from Ireland he published an outline en- titled Observations on the JMineralogy of the iVeigh- bour hood of Cork, and soon after read a paper to the Royal Society of Obscti'ations on the function of the Fresh Hater of Rivers and the Salt Water of the Sea. At this time the increasing expense of living, and the smallness of his income, made it impossible for him to further his studies by the resources of a library and costly apparatus, or even the aids of travelling. All was to be accomplished by his own personal obser- vation, and within the limited sphere of his own dis- trict. Writing to a friend he says, "It is my inten- tion to collect facts patiently, to read nature more than books, and trust to Providence more than to politicians." In 1819 Dr. Fleming wrote the article "Ichthyology" for the Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, by which his scientific reputation was considerably in- creased. In producing this elaborate article, its author neglected no opportunity of perfecting his knowledge on the subject, having consulted the writings of twenty-four authors, and examined eight- een systems for the purpose. Having finished the article on ichthyology. Dr. Fleming resumed his studies, which were directed to the construction of his great work. The Philosophy of Zoology. In this way the year 1820 was a busy period, as he communicated several zoological articles to the Wernerian Society, the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, the Edinburgh Revieiv, and the Edinburgh Encyclopedia. For the last-mentioned work he wrote two elaborate articles on Insecta and Hebnin- thology. The importance of these patient researches, devoted to such insignificant creatures as insects and worms, he thus vindicated, in treating of the despised worm : — "Dew-worms, though in appearance a small and despicable link in the chain of nature, yet, if lost, might make a lamentable chasm. For, to say nothing of half the birds and some quadrupeds which are almost entirely supported by them, worms seem to be the great promoters of vegetation (which would pro- ceed but ill without them), by boring, perforating, and loosening the soil, and rendering it pervious to rains and the fibres of plants; by drawing straws and stalks of leaves and twigs into it; and, most of all, by throwing up such infinite numbers of lumps called worm-casts, which form a fine manure for grain and grass. Worms probably provide new soil for hills and slopes when the rain washes the earth away; and they affect slopes, probably to avoid being flooded. " In this philosophic way he broke ground upon a sub- ject which at that time was comparatively new and little understood, but which has now become so greatly amplified and improved. After communicating papers to the Wernerian Society on "Dew-like Drops on Leaves of Corn," "The Water-rail," "Sertularia," "New Species of Vorticella," &c. ; to the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal articles on "The Arctic and Skua Gulls," "Sertularia Gelatinosa," "Changes of Colour in the Feathers of Birds," &c., when these exertions made relaxation and change desirable. Dr. Fleming accompanied Robert Stevenson, his friend, the superintendent of Northern Lighthouses in one of his periodical craises along the western coast in the government lighthouse yacht, and on arriving at Campbeltown the distinguished pair were compli- mented by the magistrates with the freedom of the town. But in this otherwise delightful trip we find the doctor sighing for the want of a dredge on board, with which he might have fished up the zoophytes of the western sea, and congratulating himself that he had found an Asterias jiiger new to liritain, and a Terebratula different from that of Zetland. On returning fnMii his cruise among the northern lighthouses. Dr. I'leming resumed his clerical and philosophical labours with fresh vigour, and during that and the following year wrote three papers, entitled "Gleanings of Natural History during a Voyage in 1 82 1," for tiie Edinburgh Philosophical Journal ; and a notice of a submarine forest in tiie Firth of Tay, for the Royal Society. But it was in 1S23 that Dr. Fleming's great work, Tlie Philosophy of Zoology, appeared. It was upon this that he had been em- ployed for years, and in which the most important of his discoveries and observations were contained. Its reception by the scientific world was gratifying in the highest degree. Baron Cuvier wrote to its author eulogizing its merits ; it was translated into Italian by Zendrini, the accomplished professor of mineralogy and zoology at Pavia; and Dr. Turton, the celebrated conchologist, in writing to Dr. Fleming, thus expresses himself on his Philosophy of Zoology : "Thirty years and more have I been an anxious inquirer into the progress of natural science, and can safely say that, except from the works of Linne, I have never been so fully gratified. It is just what this department of science wanted: a brief but sufficiently comprehensive display of this attractive department of human know- ledge. Lamark is too diffuse; Stewart is too con- fined. Your work ranks you not only among the scriptores feliciores, but among Xhefundatoj-es." Flem- ing was now indeed regarded by many competent judges as the first naturalist of the age. In the midst of all this well-merited laudation, instead of reposing under the shade of his own laurels, he was still busy, and still prosecuting his inquiries into the many departments of his beloved sciences; and soon after the publication of his great work, he transmitted se- veral papers to Professor Jameson's philosophical journal. Among these were "The Influence of Society in the Distribution of British Animals," "Remarks on Modem Strata," and "The Geological Deluge, as interpreted by Baron Cuvier and Professor Buck- land, inconsistent with the Testimony of Moses and the Phenomena of Nature. " The next separate work of Dr. Fleming, after The Philosophy of Zoology, was 77ie British Animals, ]iublished in 1828. It was a subject upon which he had cogitated from his boyhood, and in his matured age the work was written as a handbook for students, to whom such a help was still wanting. "To this task," writes his biographer, "he had brought rare attainments in the knowledge of the literature of the sciences, and of the habits and habitats of the ani- mals described, as well as of extinct species. It is not saying too much to aver that few, if any, recent British systematic naturalists have not been obliged to it. This is evident from the references to it in almost every monograph in different departments of zoology and ])alceontology. The pala:ontological part of the volume was a new feature in a work of this kind. . . . It is in every sense a history of British animals; and the strong antiquarian tastes which characterized its author enabled him to bring illustrations from many remote sources." The work was welcomed by the most eminent naturalists of the day. It is true, indeed, tliat in the progress of natural science many additions have been made to the species there mentioned, and such modifications been effected in systems of classification, that Fleming's work is 28 JOHN FLEMING. now nearly useless to mere beginners in the study; but to those who took from it their early lessons, and who have used it as a manual and book of refer- ence, it is still invaluable. In 1S29 Dr. Fleming wrote a paper for the Edin- burgh A'eiu Philosophual Journal on "The Insuf- ficiency of the lividence of the Supposed Change of Climate of the Arctic Regions;" and in proof of his position he had referred, among other instances, to ruminating animals. "Observation," he said, "had discovereil many animals with cloven hoofs which ruminate; but in such circumstances would it be safe to infer that all cloven -hoofed animals ruminate?" "Conceive ourselves," he added, "contemplating the footmarks of a sheep and sow. Under the guid- ance of Cuvier's declarations we would conclude that both ruminated — an inference true in the one case, and false in the other." This attack upon a favour- ite theory of the day excited the indignation of the Rev. W. Conybeare, author of the Geology of Eng- land and WaUs, and a keen controversy between the reverend philosophers was the result, conducted with a severity of language at which the laity might well have been astonished. The debate at last was nar- rowed to such limits, that it mainly rested upon what Fleming had alleged concerning the sow; and from this circumstance it came to be termed the "pig's- foot controversy." Mr. Conybeare, who lived in the country, and, like other country parsons, kept pork- ers, thought he had triumphantly settled the question by the following declaration: "Now, my pigs are not bisulcous, but wear four distinct toes on their feet, although the middle ones, being most elongated, and armed with large hoofs, certainly produce an e.\ternal resemblance to cloven-footed animals, which has oc- casioned their being classed in the Levitical law (which purports not to be a philosophical arrange- ment) as dividing the hoof, though chewing not the cud. The impression of their feet in walking may, if carefully examined, as Cuvier says, be distinguished from the genuine bisulca." Here was a question for the Scottish naturalists to settle. Are Scottish pigs bisulcous, or actually four-toed ? The facts might be ascertained by watching their footsteps ; but these sages had not been wont so to study pigs' feet. In this new dilemma the Wernerians of Edin- burgh assembled, but being unable to decide, they referred the matter to a committee, who were to ex- periment, and report to the next meeting. The com- mittee reported accordingly, and among other things stated, "That with some difficulty they caused the pigs to walk across a board spread over with soft clay — that the impressions were in some places bisulcated — that in others, besides the bisulcous marks, there were those of two posterior toes — that owing to the unruly nature of the animals they could not make them walk along the board when placed as an inclined plane, and that they had to j)lace it horizontally," &c. It was a strange and humbling accident that had reduced the settlement of such an important theory to a question of pettitoes. The inquirers awoke from their philosophical reverie — roused, no doubt, by the laughter that surrounded them — while Dr. Fleming, leaving them to settle the question as they might, jiroceeded to the more serious branches of the argument. Notwithstanding his many discoveries in natural science, and the distinction they had acquired not only for himself but his country, Dr. Fleming still remained in the obscure parish of Flisk. In writing of this to his friend, Mr. Neil, he says, "But I have no choice. I have been cast by Providence in a secluded situation, with a stinted income, and exposed to the malevolence of those who fancied that I might interfere with their interests. In this way the best of my life has been lost to the public, but the accompanying discipline has not, I hope, been lost upon myself." Even the results of his geologi- cal researches, which he honestly and fearlessly an- nounced, had subjected him to suspicions of being unsound in the faith; and because he demurred at the Mosaic account of the creation, as interpreted by the old-world divines, he was suspected of the wish to remove the foundation-stone of the whole structure of revelation. Alluding to this in the same letter, he says, "If you mean to say that I am thought heterodox, I can only reply that it is not in- tentional if I be so; and I have reason to believe, aye, good reason, that I am not thought so by those who have the best opportunities of judging." It was no wonder that he was desirous of change, or that the desire became so strong that sometimes he thought of emigrating to some of our colonies. The prospect of removal to a more eligible locality at length occurred by a vacancy in the parish church of Auchtermuchty, and 400 of the parishioners — every member of the church except one — signed a petition for his appointment as their minister. Although the patron did not assent to their desire, Fleming was gratified at what he justly termed "a unanimous call from the parish — the most complete even a wor- shipper of popularity could desire." It was not long, however, until his wishes for a removal from Flisk were gratified by a presentation to the parish of Clackmannan. This occurred in 1832, and al- though the removal was from the charge of a parish of less than 300 to one of more than 3000 souls, while much of the zeal and ardour of youth had de- parted from him, he addressed himself to the duties of his new charge with renewed diligence. Even here, however, he was not long to remain, as a still more congenial field of occupation awaited him. It had long been felt that a university was his proper sphere; and in 1834 a vacancy occurred in the natural philosophy chair of King's College, Aberdeen. The scnatus of the college, who were patrons of the charge, offered it to Dr. Fleming, and by him it was gratefully accepted. Occupying so congenial a position. Dr. Fleming entered heartily into its duties, and while instructing his class he continued those studies by which natural science might be improved, and new discoveries made in it. In this manner he quietly continued his course from year to year, and although the life of an Aberdonian professor is seldom abundant in incident, his investigations continued to enlarge the boundaries of knowledge, and add to his reputation. This was manifested in 1840, when Agassiz and Buckland visited him at Aberdeen: on this occasion the celebrated Swiss naturalist acknowledged that Dr. Fleming had the merit of being the first who had dis- covered the traces of fossil fishes in the old red sand- stone. This important scientific discovery, which he had started in earlier life, and prosecuted step by step with increasing conviction, while each fresh convic- tion had been made the subject of a public announce- ment, was finally confirmed beyond question by the remains of a fish which he found connected with a bed of coal in Clackmannan. I lis account of the discovery is interesting, as it shows the patient watch- fulness with which he regarded these phenomena of nature, and the caution with which he advanced to a conclusion. Writing of the process and its result to Professor Jameson, he says: — "When this organism was first exhibited to me, I was at no loss to recog- nize the resemblance between the plates or scales with which it was invested, and which occur in natural juxtaposition, and objects of a similar form JOHN FLEMING. «9 and structure, though detached or unconnected, which twenty years before I had procured in the county of Fife, from a bed covering the marine or mountain limestone on whicli the coal-formation of that district rests as its fundamental rock. As the consideration of the form, structure, and composition of the organisms from Fife had induced me to con- sider them as the scales of a fish, I was led, under the influence of this opinion, and observing the scales of the Clackmannan pertrifaction occupying both sides of the specimen, to seek for traces of the ap- pearance of the vertebral column, and I soon satisfied myself as to the indications of its existence at both extremities of the mass. In this conviction I de- spatched the example to Edinburgh, with directions to the lapidary for making a section confirmatory of the views of its nature which I entertained. When in the hands of the lapidary it was inspected by several members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, whose zeal in the study of organic remains had re- ceived a fresh impulse from the numerous specimens which had been found in the limestone of Burdie House. In the opinion of more than one member of the society, labouring at the time under saurian or sauroid prejudices, my specimen was pronounced to \>i. the fragment of a reptile, not of a fish." In 1840, the Aberdeen Philosophical Society having been formed. Professor Fleming felt much interest in its progress, and at its first meeting, on the 7th of February, read to it a paper "On a Vein of Animal Origin occurring on a Reef of Rocks called Skerry Vore, on the West Coast of Scotland." In 1841 he communicated to the Edinburgh Philosophical your- nal a paper on a more important subject, which was the "Description of a Species of Skate new to the British Fauna." The next subject that occupied the mind of Dr. Fleming was a proposal in which natural science was to be made subservient to the interests of humanity. While residing at Aberdeen he be- came aware of the yearly loss of life that occurred on the east coast, from the want of safe harbours for vessels overtaken by a storm. In this case he com- municated in an extended form, to the Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, a paper which he had pre- viously read to the Aberdeen Philosophical Society, "On the Expediency of forming Harbours of Refuge on the East Coast of Scotland, between the Moray Frith and the Frith of Forth." In this communi- cation his geological knowledge was employed both in pointing out the localities which should be chosen and those that were to be avoided, while his patriot- ism was indignant, and his causticity called forth by the indifference of our government authorities to an evil that had so long invoked the remedy. "That no public inquiry," he said, "should have been insti- tuted respecting the exposed state of the east coast of Scotland, with a view to the formation of harbours of refuge, when it was granted elsewhere, may seem inexplicable, unless we bear in mind that lamentable apathy exhibited by our representatives in parliament whenever Scottish interests of a general character are concerned. " Attention, although tardily, was directed to the subject, and it is hoped that the appeal will not finally be in vain. Although Dr. Fleming was so devoted a follower of science, he had never been neglectful of the duties of his clerical office; and this was attested by the affection with which his parishioners of Bressay, Flisk, and Clackmannan had successively regarded him, and the regret they had shown in parting with him. Even when he became a professor, also, he never ceased to remember that he had been a min- ister, or to be indifferent about the welfare of the church. And now that the church was in difficulties from which a disruption was inevitable, he was pre- pared to show, by his sacrifice both of position and emolument, how deeply he had felt upon the ques- tion at issue. It is tme, indeed, that while the ten years' conflict was going on he had continued his studies as before, and only raised his head at inter- vals to ascertain the movements of the parties: but it must be remembered that he had neither talent nor liking for controversies of ecclesiastical polity, and he saw that the field was occupied by those who were better fitted for such contests. He therefore con- tinued to find "sermons in stones," and not only sermons, but profound scientific truths, and calmly to announce them to the world while the battle was raging around him. When the time approached he was resolved to join the retiring party, and not abide by his professorship until he should be thrust out of it by those who had won the victory. But must he therefore abandon his beloved pursuits, in which he had hitherto been so successful, and commence life anew ? Even this kind of martyrdom he was resolved to endure for what he considered the cause of con- science, and the inalienable rights of the church. Writing to Dr. Chalmers in 1843, soon after the Disruption had occurred, and announcing the likeli- hood of his departure from King's College, he thus expresses himself in regard to his prospects for the future: — "Now it becomes a measure of necessity to look the evil in the face and provide against it, especially after what has taken place in the House of Lords. ... I might recommence preaching, and, although an old razor and rather rusty, I might yet get a call and be usefully employed. But while I labour under the conviction that in such a station I could not do much good to the Free Church, I have strong bodily and mental objections to such a course, as you may easily conceive, after having been nine years absent from a parish charge." He then sug- gests the mode in which he might be employed more profitably to the cause and the interests of religion at large. "Were a Free Church College started in Edinburgh, I could, in the chair of natural history, bring an amount of influence in that department, in which I formerly published a good deal, likely to be highly useful to the institution. Were a chair of natural theology attached to the Divinity Hall, I think I could occupy it with considerable advantage to the Free Church." He then gives his views of a course of this kind extending over three years, of which the first year should comprise the inorganic kingdom; the second biology and phytology, or the structure, functions, and distribution of plants; and the third, zoology. After mentioning the subjects that should be treated under each head of the three years' course, he proceeds to state the advantages that would result from it. "Such a course would qualify for conversing with farmers, miners, fisher- men, &c. , not merely by a knowledge of facts, but by an acquaintance with the philosophy of the sub- ject, and, viewed in this light, it would give a certain amount of authority, as you are well aware, to a parish minister. But to a missionary what a power would be acquired ! . . . I need not expatiate to you on the influence which such a course would exercise on the minds of the students of the Free Church, or the power of pulpit illustration which it would furnish. Multitudes do not see God in hjs works because they are not qualified to read the book of nature. They have not studied the subject suffi- ciently in its details to philosophize safely. Now, were the facts sufficiently numerous and varied in their character, the conclusions would be useful and stable. Such a course would supply to the divinity student the place of classes of mineralogy and geo- JOHN FLEMING ROBERT FLEMING. logy, phytology and zoology, and constitute a theo- logical commentary on tiie earth, its contents and inhabitants." After this enthusiastic but not over- strained description of the benefits which such a course would imjjart to the future teachers of religion. Dr. Fleming disinterestedly adds, "I beg of you, in judging of this scheme of a natural theology chair, to keep me out of view, and to determine respecting it wholly as a new branch of e•'• A^f ffit»»^ /©•jy.'»Vl**>5 ALEXANDER FORBES. 37 tunity of making his escape to France; and it required the utmost caution on his part to elude the search tliat was made for him. To such an extremity was he reduced, that he was actually obliged on one oc- casion to conceal himself in a hollow place in the earth, under the arch of a small bridge at Craigmaud, upon his own estate, about nine miles up into the country from Fraserburgh, and about two and a half from where New Pitsligo now is, which was scarcely large enough to contain him; and this most uncom- fortable place seems to have been selected for his re- treat just because there was little chance of detection, as no one could conceive it possible that a human being could be concealed in it. At this time he lay sometimes in the daytime concealed in the mosses near Craigmaud, and was much annoyed by the lap- wings flying about the place, lest they should attract notice to the spot, and direct those who were in search of him in their pursuit. "As yet, the estate of Pitsligo was not taken posses- sion of by government, and Lady Pitsligo continued to reside at the castle. Lord Pitsligo occasionally paid secret visits to it in disguise. The disguise that he assumed was that of a mendicant, and Lady Pit- sligo's maid was employed to provide him with two bags to put under his arms, after the fashion of the Edie Ochiltrees of those days. He sat beside her while she made them, and she long related with wonder how cheerful he was while thus superintend- ing this work which betokened the ruin of his fortune and the forfeiture of his life. "When walking out in his disguise one day, he was suddenly overtaken by a party of dragoons scouring the countrj' in pursuit of him. The increased exertion, from his desire to elude them, brought on a fit of asthmatic coughing which completely over- powered him. He could proceed no further, and was obliged to sit down by the road-side, where he calmly waited their approach. The idea suggested by his disguise and infirmity was acted upon, and, in his character of a mendicant, he begged alms of the dragoons who came to apprehend him. His calmness and resignation did not forsake him, no perturbation betrayed him, and one of the dragoons stopped, and, with great kindness of heart, actually bestowed a mite on the venerable old man, condoling with him at the same time on the severity of his cough. "On another occasion Lord Pitsligo had sought and obtained shelter in a shoemaker's house, and shortly after a party of dragoons were seen approach- ing. Their errand was not doubtful; and the shoe- maker, who had recognized the stranger, was in the greatest trepidation, and advised him to put on one of the workmen's aprons and some more of his clothes, and to sit down on one of the stools and pretend to be mending a shoe. The party came into the shop in the course of their search; and the shoemaker, observ- ing that the soldiers looked as if they thought the hands of this workman were not very like those of a practised son of King Crispin, and fearing that a narrower inspection would betray him, with great presence of mind gave orders to Lord Pitsligo, as if he had been one of his workmen, to go to the door and hold one of the horses, which he did accordingly. His own composure and entire absence of hurry allayed suspicion, and he escaped this danger. He used afterwards jocularly to say, 'he had been at one time a Buchan cobbler.' "One of the narrowest escapes which he made from discovery, when met in his mendicant's dress by those who were in search of him, was attended with circumstances which made the adventure singularly romantic and interesting. At that time there lived in that district of the country a fool called Sandy An- nand, a well-known character. The kindly feelings of the peasantry of Scotland to persons of weak in- tellect are well known, and are strongly marked by the name of 'the innocent,' which is given to them. They are generally harmless creatures, contented with the enjoyment of the sun and air as their highest luxuries, and privileged to the hospitality of every house, so far as their humble wants require. There is often, too, a mixture of shrewdness with their folly, and they are always singularly attached to those who are kind to them. Lord Pitsligo, disguised as usual, had gone into a house where the fool happened to be at the time. He immediately recognized him, and did not restrain his feelings as others did in the same situation, but was busily employed in showing his respect for his lordship in his own peculiar and gro- tesque manner, expressing his great grief at seeing him in such a fallen state, when a party entered the house to search for him. They asked the fool who was the person that he was lamenting thus? What a moment of intense anxiety both to Lord Pitsligo and the inmates of the house ! It was impossible to ex- pect any other answer from the poor weak creature but one which would betray the unfortunate noble- man. Sandy, however, with that shrewdness which men of his intellect often exhibit on the most trying occasions, said, ' He kent him aince a muckle farmer, but his sheep a' dee'd in the '40.' It was looked upon as a special interposition of Providence which put such an answer into the mouth of the fool. "In March, 1756, and, of course, long after all apprehension of a search had ceased, information having been given to the commanding officer at Fraser- burgh that Lord Pitsligo was at that moment in the house of Auchiries, it was acted upon with so much promptness and secrecy, that the search must have proved successful but for a very singular occurrence. Mrs. Sophia Donaldson, a lady who lived much with the family, repeatedly dreamed on that particular night that the house was surrounded by soldiers. Her mind became so haunted with the idea, that she got out of bed, and was walking through the room in hopes of giving a different current to her thoughts before she lay down again, when, day beginning to dawn, she accidentally looked out at the window as she passed it in traversing the room, and was astonished at ac- tually observing the figures of soldiers among some trees near the house. So completely had all idea of a search been by that time laid asleep, that she sup- posed they had come to steal poultrj' — ^Jacobite poultry yards affording a safe object of pillage for the English soldiers in those days. Under this impression Mrs. Sophia was proceeding to rouse the servants, when her sister having awakened, and inquired what was the matter, and being told of soldiers near the house, exclaimed in great alarm that she feared they wanted something more than hens. She begged Mrs. So- phia to look out at a window on the other side of the house, when not only soldiers were seen in that direction, but also an officer giving instructions by signals, and frequently putting his fingers on his lips, as if enjoining silence. There was now no time to be lost in rousing the family; and all the haste that could be made was scarcely sufficient to hurry the venerable man from his bed into a small recess behind the wainscot of an adjoining room, which was concealed by a bed, in which a lady. Miss Gor- don of Towie, who was there on a visit, lay before the soldiers obtained admission. A most minute search took place. The room in which Lord Pit- sligo was concealed did not escape. Miss Gordon's bed was carefully examined, and she was obliged to suffer the rude scrutiny of one of the party by feeling her chin, to ascertain that it was not a man in a 38 DUNCAN FORBES. lady's night-dress. Before the soldiers had finished their examination in this room, the confinement and anxiety increased Lord Pitsligo's asthma so much, and his breathing became so loud, that it cost Miss Gordon, lying in bed, much and violent cough- ing, which she counterfeited in order to prevent the high breathings behind the wainscot from being heard. It may easily be conceived what agony she would sufTer, lest, by overdoing her part, she should increase suspicion and in fact lead to a discovery. The ruse was fortunately successful. On the search through the house being given over. Lord Pitsligo was hastily taken from his confined situation, and again placed in bed; and as soon as he was able to speak, his accustomed kindness of heart made him say to his servant, 'James, go and see that these poor fellows get some breakfast, and a drink of warm ale, for this is a cold morning; they are only doing their duty, and cannot bear me any ill will.' When the family were felicitating each other on his escape, he pleasantly observed, 'A poor prize, had they ob- tained it — an old dying man.'" After this he resided constantly at Auchiries, over- looked, or at least unmolested, by the government, till the 2ist of December, 1762, when he breathed his last in peace, in the eighty-fifth year of his age. He left behind him a work entitled. Thoughts con- cerning Man^s Condition and Duties in this Life, and his Hopes in the World to Come, the production evi- dently of a calm and highly devotional mind, but nowise remarkable in other respects. FORBES, Duncan, a man whose memory is justly entitled to the veneration of his country, was born at Bunchrew, in the neighbourhood of Inverness, on the loth of November, 1685. His great-grand- father, Duncan Forbes, was of the family of Lord Forbes, through that of Tolquhoun, and purchased the barony of CuUoden from the laird of Mackintosh in 1625. His great-grandmother was Janet Forbes, of the family of Corsindy, also descended from Lord Forbes. But this early patriot was not more dis- tinguished for honourable descent, than for public spirit and nobility of conduct during the struggle for religion and liberty that marked the reign of Charles I. , in which he took a decided part against the court; and, being a member of parliament, and lord-provost of Inverness, must have been a partisan of no small consequence. He died in 1654, leaving his estate to his eldest son, John, who inherited his offices as well as his principles. Having acted in concert with the Marquis of Argyle, he was, upon the Restoration, excepted from the act of indemnity, and had a large share of the barbarous inflictions which disgraced the reign of the restored despot. He somehow, however, contrived . to accumulate money, and about the year 1670 doubled his landed estate by jiurchasing the Ijarony of Ferintosh and the estate of Bunchrew. He dierT]N(l IN TFIF, AL') VO ( 'A T R H lilBKABy £E 1 IKUiitSOrN, GbASGOW. EDINBURGH . pTHf DUNXAN FORBES. 39 and is said to have lost the greater part of his little patrimony by an unguarded or an unfortunate specu- lation; yet it is certain that he lived in a splendid and rather expensive manner, the first wits and the highest noblemen of the age finding their enjoyments height- ened by his company; and it is equally certain that the fruits of his professional toil were all that he could depend upon for supporting a spirit that breathed nothing but honour, and a state that knew nothing but the most stubborn independence. His business, however, rapidly rose with his rising re- putation, and his fortune probably kept pace with his fame, and he very soon added to his domestic felicity, by forming a matrimonial connection with Mary Rose, daughter to the laird of Kilravock, to whom he had been warmly attached almost from her earliest infancy.' She was a lady of great beauty, and highly accomplished; but she died not long after th-'ir marriage, leaving him an only son, John, who eventually succeeded to the estate of Culloden. The early demise of this lady, for whom Mr. Forbes seems to have had more than an ordinary passion, deeply affected him, and he never again entered into the married state. Domestic calamity, operating upon a keen sensi- bility, has often withered minds of great promise, and cut off the fairest prospects of future usefulness. Happily, however, Mr. Forbes did not resign him- self to solitude and the indulgence of unavailing sorrow. The circumstances of his family, and of his country, in both of which he felt a deep interest, did not indeed allow him to do so, had he been willing. The violence of party had been very great ever since the Revolution: it had latterly been heightened by the Union, and had reached nearly its acme at this time, when the unexpected death of the queen opened the way for the peaceable accession of the new dynasty. With a very few exceptions, such as the Grants, the Monroes, and the Rosses, who had been gained over by the Forbeses of Culloden, the Highland clans were engaged to devote their lives and fortunes in behalf of the expatriated house of Stuart; and only waited for an opportunity of asserting the cause of the Pretender. The loyal clans, and gentlemen, and particularly Forbes of Culloden, were of course highly obnoxious to the Jacobite clans; and, for their own preservation, were obliged to be continually on the watch, and frequently saw the brooding of the storm, when others apprehended no danger. This was eminently the case in the year after the accession of the house of Brunswick; and, accordingly, so early as the month of February, we find Monro of Fowlis writing to Culloden: — "I find the Jacobites are werie uppish, both in Edinburgh and in England, so that, if ye go to the parliament, as I hope ye will, you will recommend to some trusty, faithful friend, to take care of your house of Culloden, and leave orders with your people at Ferintosh, to receive directions from me, or from your cousin George (my son), as you are pleased to call him, which you may be sure will be calculate to the support of your interest, in subordination to the public cause;" — and he adds, in a postscript to the same letter, — " The vanity, in- solence, arrogance, and madness of the Jacobites is beyond all measure insupportable. I believe they must be let blood. They still have the trick of pre- suming upon the lenity of a moderate government. It seems God either destines them for destruction, or infatuates others to allow them to be pricks in our sides and thorns in our eyes. I have accounts from ' Her husband is said to have composed, in her honour, the beautiful Scottish song, Ah, ClilorU. very good hands from Edinburgh, that, to their cer- tain knowledge, saddles were making in that city for dragoons to serve the Pretender, and that all the Popish lords, and very many Popish and Jacobite gentlemen, are assembled there now; so that all iriends and loyal subjects to his present majesty are advised to be upon their guard from thence against an invasion or an insurrection, which is suddenly expected, which the Jacobites expect will interrupt the meeting of the parliament." In the month of March, the same year, Culloden, writing to his brother, the subject of this memoir, has the fol- lowing observation: — " Vou say you have no news; but we abound with them in this country. The Pretender is expected ever)' moment, and his friends all ready; but since our statesmen take no notice of this, I let it alone, and wish they may not repent it when they cannot help it. " Culloden was returned a member of parliament, and went up the following month (April) to London, whence he again writes to his brother as follows: — "As for your Highland neighbours, their trusts and meetings, I know not what to say; I wish we be not too secure: I can assure you the Tories here were never higher in their looks and hopes, which they found upon a speedy invasion. ^Vhatever be in the matter, let things be so ordered, that my house be not surprised." Had those who were intrusted with the government been equally sharp-sighted, much of the evil that ensued might undoubtedly have been prevented; but they were so intent upon their places, and the pursuit of little, low intrigues, that they were caught by the insurrection, in Scotland at least, as if it had been a clap of thunder in a clear day. John Forbes's direction, however, must have been attended to; for, when his house was surrounded by the insurgents, under Mackenzie of Coul, and Macintosh, with their retainers, his wife refused all accommodation with them, saying, with the spirit of an ancient Roman, "She had received the keys of the house, and the charge of all that was in it, from her husband, and she would deliver them up to no one but himself." In the absence of his brother, Duncan Forbes dis- played, along with Hugh Rose of Kilravock, the most indefatigable zeal, and great judgment in the disposal of the men they could command, who were chiefly the retainers of Culloden, Kilravock, Culcairn, and the Grants, and by the assistance of Lord Lovat and the Erasers finally triumphed over the insurgents in that quarter. Nothing, indeed, could excel the spirit displayed by the two brothers of Culloden, the eldest of whom, John, spent on the occasion upwards of ;i^3ooo sterling out of his own pocket for the public service ; of which, to the disgrace of the British government, he never received in repayment one single farthing. Though they were ardent for the cause of religion and liberty, and zealous in the hour of danger, yet, when that was over, the two brothers strongly felt the impropriety of tarnishing the triumphs of order and liberality by a violent and vindictive inquisition into the conduct of persons, for whom so many cir- cumstances conspired to jjlead, if not for mercy, at least for a candid construction of their motives. As a Scotsman and lawyer, Duncan Forbes was averse to the project of carrying the prisoners out of the country to be tried by juries of foreigners, and he wrote to Lord Hay, when he heard of a design to appoint him lord-advocate, in order to carrv' on these prosecutions, that he was determined to refuse that employment. He also wrote to his brother in be- half of a contribution for the poor prisoners who had been carried to Carlisle, and were there waiting for trial. "It is certainly Christian," says he, "and by 4p DUNCAN FORBES. no means disloyal, to sustain them in their indigent state until they are found guilty. The law has brought them to England to be tried by foreign juries — so far it is well — but no law can hinder a Scotsman to wish that his countrymen, not hitherto condemned, should not be a derision to strangers, or perish for want of necessary defence or sustenance out of their own country." To the forfeitures he was also decidedly hostile, and some of his reasons for this hostility threw a particular light upon the state of Scotland at that period. "There are," he says, "none of the rebels who have not friends among the king's faithful subjects, and it is not easy to guess how far a security of this kind, unnecessarily pushed, may alienate the affections even of these from the government. But in particular, as this relates to Scotland, the difficulty will be insurmount- able. I may venture to say, there are not two hun- dred gentlemen in the whole kingdom who are not very nearly related to some one or other of the rebels. Is it possible that a man can see his daughter, his grandchildren, his nephews, or cousins, reduced to beggary and starving unnecessarily by a government, without thinking very ill of it? and where this is the case of a whole nation, I tremble to think what dis- satisfactions it will produce against a settlement so necessary for the happiness of Britain. If all the rebels, with their wives and children and immediate dependants, could be at once rooted out of the earth, the shock would be astonishing ; but time would commit it to oblivion, and the danger would be less to the constitution than when thousands of innocents, punished with misery and want for the offences of their friends, are suffered to wander about the country sighing out their complaints to Heaven, and drawing at once the compassion and moving the indignation of every human creature." "To satisfy," he adds, "any person that the forfeitures in Scotland will scarce defray the charges of the commission, if the saving clause in favour of the creditors takes place, I offer but two considerations that, upon inquiry, will be found incontestable. First, it is certain, that of all the gentlemen who launched out into the late rebellion, the tenth man was not easy in his circumstances, and if you abate a dozen of gentlemen, the remainder, upon paying their debts, could not produce much money clear; nor was there anything more open to observation, than that the men of estates, however disaffected in their principles, kept themselves within the law, when at the same time men supposed loyal, in hopes of bettering their low fortunes, broke loose. Besides, it is known that the titles by which almost all the estates in Scotland are possessed are diligences upon debts affecting those estates purchased in the proprietors' own name or in that of some trustee: now, it is certain, that when the commissioners of inquiry begin to seize such estates, besides the debts truly due to real creditors, such a number of latent debts will be trumped up, not distinguishable from the true ones by any else than the proprietors, as will make the inquiry fruit- less and the commission a charge upon the treasury, as well as a nuisance to the nation. Such were the arguments, drawn from expediency and the state of the country, by which forbearance on the part of the government was recommended by this excellent man, though it appears that they had little effect but to excite a suspicion of his own loyalty. In spite of all this, his character made him too powerful to be resisted. In 1716 he was rewarded for his services by the office of advocate-depute; that is, he became one of the inferior prosecutors for the crown. On the 20th of March he is found writing thus to his principal, the lord-advocate: — "Yester- day I was qualified, the Lord knows how, as your depute. The justice-clerk shows a grim sort of civility towards me, because he finds me plagitey stubborn. I waited upon him, however, and on the other lords, to the end they might fix on a dyet for the tryall of the Episcopall clergy. The justice-clerk does not smile on their prosecution, because it is not ^ his own contrivance; and declared it could not come on sooner than the first of June; but I told him that if, as I understood was designed, the May circuit were suspended this year by act of parliament, I would require his lordship to assign a dyet sooner." In 1722, with the acquiescence of the ministry, he was returned to sit in parliament for the Inverness district of burghs; and in 1725 he obtained the high and responsible appointment of lord-advocate. As the office of secretary of state for Scotland was at this time discontinued, it became part of his duty to carry on with his majesty's ministers, the correspon- dence regarding the improvements necessary to be made in her civil establishments, which he did in a manner highly creditable to himself, and with the happiest effect for his country. The year in which he was appointed lord-advocate was marked by the introduction of the malt-tax into Scotland, and the mob at Glasgow, known by the name of Shawfield's rabble, by which its introduction was attended. This was a riot of a very scandalous character (the magistrates of the city being deeply implicated in fomenting it), in which nine persons were killed out- right, and the soldiers, who had been brought from Edinburgh for its suppression, were chased out of the city, and were glad to take refuge in Dumbarton Castle. General Wade, who was in Edinburgh at the time, on his way to the Highlands, was imme- diately ordered to Glasgow with all the troops he could muster, and he was accompanied by the lord- advocate in person, who first committed the whole of the magistrates to their own tolbooth, and after- wards, under a strong guard, sent them to Edinburgh, where they were thrown into the common jail, and it was certainly intended to proceed against them before the justiciary court. Doubts, however, were entertained of the legality of the proceedings, and whether the lord-advocate had not exceeded his powers in committing the whole magistracy of a city, upon the warrant of a justice of peace, to their own jail; public feeling at the same time recovering strongly in their favour, they were by the justiciary admitted to bail, nor was their case ever again called. In 1734 he lost his brother, John Forbes, in con- sequence of whose death he fell heir to the extensive and valuable estate of Culloden. In 1 736 a disgrace- ful affair, termed the Porteous mob, occurred in Edinburgh, in consequence of which it was resolved to deprive the city of her privileges. Mr. Forbes, on this occasion, exerted himself to the utmost in behalf of the city, and was successful in procuring many modifications to be made upon the bill before it passed the two houses of parliament. When we contemplate the condition of Scotland in those days, we scarcely know whether to wonder most at the good which Forbes was able to achieve, or the means by which he accomplished it. The period might properly be called the dark age of Scottish history, though it contained, at the same time, the germs of all the good that has since sprung up in the land. The pretensions of the house of Stuart were univer- sally received, either with favour from direct affection to their cause, or at least without disfavour, the re- sult of a justifiable disgust at the political status into which the country had been thrown by the union, and the unpopularity of the two first Brunswick DUNCAN FORBES. 41 princes. The commencement of a strict system of general taxation was new; while the miserable poverty of the country rendered it unproductive and unpopu- lar. The great families still lorded it over their de- pendants, and exercised legal jurisdiction within their own domains, by which the general police of the kingdom was crippled, and the grossest local oppres- sion practised. The remedy adopted for all these evils, which was to abate nothing and to enforce everything, under the direction of English counsels and of Englishmen, completed the national wretched- ness, and infused its bitterest ingredient into the brim- ful cup. How Forbes got his views or his character amidst such a scene, from the very heart of the very worst part of which he came, it is difficult to conceive; for with only one or two occasional exceptions, his papers prove that he had scarcely an associate, either in his patriotic toils or enjoyments.^ However, it is sometimes true in the political, as it generally is in the commercial world, that supply is created by de- mand; and the very degradation of the country held out an immense reward to the man who should raise it up. No man, especially the hired servant of a disputed monarchy, could have achieved this work, except one whose heart was as amiable as his judg- ment was sound, and whose patriotism was as pure as it was strong. Forbes cultivated all these quali- ties, and not only directed the spirit of the nation, but conciliated its discordant members with a degree of skill that was truly astonishing. The leading objects of his official and parliamentary life were suggested to him by the necessities of the country, and they are thus ably summed up in the work just quoted: — 1. To extinguish the embers of rebellion, by gain- ing over the Jacobites. He did not try to win them, however, in the ordinary way in which alleged rebels are won; but by showing them what he called the folly of their designs, by seeking their society, by ex- cluding them from no place for which their talents or characters gave them a fair claim, and, above all, by protecting them from proscription. It is delight- ful to perceive how much this policy, equally the dictate of his heart and of his head, made him be consulted and revered even by his enemies; and how purely he kept his private affections open to good men, and especially to old friends, in spite of all political acrimony or alienation. He derived from this habit one satisfaction, which seems to have greatly diverted him, that of being occasionally abused by both sides, and sometimes suspected of secret Jacobitism by his own party. 2. Having thus, by commanding universal esteem as an upright and liberal man, enabled himself to do something for the country at large, his next object seems to have been, to habituate the people to the equal and regular control of the laws. It may ap- pear at first sight unnecessary or inglorious to have Ijcen reduced to labour for an end so essential and obvious in all communities as this. But the state of Scotland must be recollected. The provincial despotism of the barons was common and horrid. Old Lovat, for example, more than once writes to him, as lord-advocate, not to trouble himself about certain acts of violence done in his neighbourhood, because he was very soon to take vengeance with his own hands. Nor was this insubordination confined to indivi- duals or to the provinces, for it seems to have ex- tended to the capital, and to have touched the seats ' We here pursue a train of remarks in the Edinburgh Review of the CuUoden papers, an ample collection of the letters, &c., of the lord-president, published in 1816, of justice. There is a letter from Forbes to Mr. Scroope, in the year 1732, in which he complains "that it would surely provoke any man living, as it did me, to see the last day of our term in exchequer. The effect of every verdict we recovered from the crown, stopped upon the triflingest pretences that false popularity and want of sense could suggest. If some remedy be not found for this evil we must shut up shop. It's a pity, that when we have argued the juries out of their mistaken notices of popularity, the behaviour of the court should give any handle to their relapsing." He persevered to prevent this by argument, and by endeavouring to get the laws, es- pecially those concerning the revenue, altered, so as to be less unacceptable to the people. It is chiefly on account of his adherence to this principle, that it is important to notice this subject as a distinct part of his system. If he had been dis- posed to govern, as is usual in turbulent times, by mere force, he had pretences enough to have made scarlet uniforms deform every hamlet in the kingdom — but, except when rebellion or riot was raging, we cannot discover from his papers that he ever, on any one occasion, required any other assistance ex- cept the ordinary authority of which law is always possessed, when administered fairly. He rigidly in- vestigated, though he did not severely punish, popu- lar outrages; but he was unsparing in his prosecution of the provincial injustice by which the people were generally oppressed. The consequence of this was, that he not only introduced a comparative state of good order, but made his name a sanction that what- ever he proposed was right, and that in him the injured was sure to find a friend. When Thomas Rawlinson, an Englishman who was engaged in a mining concern in Glengarry (and who by-the-bye is said to have been the first person who introduced the philibeg into the Highlands), had two of his ser- vants murdered by the natives there, the lord-advo- cate was the only individual to whom it ever occurred to him to apply for protection. But his power in thus taming the people can only be fairly estimated by perceiving how universally he was feared by the higher ranks, as the certain foe of all sorts of partial, sinister, unfair, or illiberal projects. Few men ever wrote, or were written to, with less idea of publica- tion than he. His correspondence has only come accidentally to light about seventy years after his death. Yet we have not been able to detect a single one of his advices or proceedings, by the exposure of which even a private gentleman of the most delicate honour and the most reasonable views, would have cause to feel a moment's uneasiness. On the contrary, though living in ferocious times — in public life — the avowed organ of a party — and obliged to sway his country by managing its greatest and greediest families, he uniformly maintains that native gentleness and fairness of mind with which it is probable that most of the men who are afterwards hardened into corruption, begin, and resolve to con- tinue their career. How many other public men are there, of whose general correspondence above 500 letters could be published indiscriminately, without alarming themselves if they were alive, or their friends if they were dead? Having thus freed himself from the shackles of party, and impressed all ranks with a conviction of the necessity of sinking their subordinate contests in a common respect for the law, his next great view seems to have been, to turn this state of security to its proper account, in improving the trade and agri- culture of the kingdom. Of these two sources of national wealth, the last seems to have engaged the smallest portion of his attention; and it was perhaps 42 DUN'CAN FORBES. natural that it should do so. For, though agricul- ture precedes manufactures in the order of things, yet, for this very reason, that the cultivation of the land has gone on for ages, it is only in a more ad- vanced era of refinement that the attention of legis- lators is called to tlie resources it supplies and the virtues it inspires. Uut projectors are immediately attracted towards improvements in manufactures, which are directly convenient by employing industry, and highly captivating, because their commencement and growth can be distinctly traced ; so that they appear more the result of preparation and design than agriculture does; as to which, one generation seems only to follow the example of another, in passively taking what the scarcely assisted powers of nature give. Several efforts at trade had been made by Scotland before Forbes appeared; but it was both the cause and the evidence of the national poverty, that, slender as they were, they had failed, and that their failure almost extinguished the com- mercial hopes of the people. He was no sooner called into public life, than he saw what trade, chiefly internal, could do, by giving employment to the hordes of idlers who infested the country, by in- teresting proprietors in the improvement of their estates, and by furnishing the means both of pay- ing and of levying taxes, and thereby consolidat- ing the whole island into one compact body, in- stead of keeping the northern part a burden on the southern. His exertions in prosecution of this great object were long and unceasing. We cannot enter here into any details ; and therefore we shall only state, in general, that he appears to have made himself master of the nature and history of almost every manufacture, and to have corresponded largely both with the statesmen, the philosophers, and the mer- chants of his day, about the means of introducing them into Scotland. The result was that he not only planted the roots of those establishments which are now flourishing all over the country, but had the pleasure (as he states in a memorial to government) of seeing "a commendable spirit of launching into new branches " excited. He was so successful in this way, that the manufactures of Scotland are called, by more than one of his correspondents, "his ain bairns ;" — an expression which he himself uses in one of his letters to Mr. Scroope, in which he says that one of his jMoposals "was disliked by certain chiefs, from its being a child of mine. " Notwithstanding the immense good which he thus accomplished, and the great judgment and forbear- ance he evinced in furthering his improvements, it is amusing to observe the errors into which he fell with respect to what are now some of the clearest principles of taxation and of political economy. These, in general, were the common errors of too much regulation, errors which it requires the firmest hold of the latest discoveries in these sciences to re- sist, and which were peculiarly liable to beset a man who had been obliged to do so much himself in the way of direction and planning. One example may suffice, being the strongest we have been able to find. In order to encourage agriculture by promot- ing the use of malt, he presented to government a long detailed scheme for preventing, or rather punish- ing, the use of tea. "The cause," says he, "of the mischief we com- plain of is evidently the excessive use of tea; which is now become so common, that the meanest families, even of labouring people, particularly in boroughs, make their morning's meal of it, and thereby wholly disuse the ale which heretofore was their accustomed drink: and the same drug supplies all the labouring women with their afternoon's entertainments, to the exclusion of the twopenny." The remedy for this is, to impose a prohibitory duty on tea, and a penalty on those who shall use this seducing poison, "if they belong to that class of mankind in this country whose circumstances do not permit them to come at tea that pays the duty." The obvious difficulty attending this scheme strikes him at once, and he removes it by a series of provi- sions calculated to describe those who are within the tea line, and those who are beyond it. The essence of the system is, that when any person is suspected, "the o)ins probandi of the extent of his yearly income may be laid on him;" and that his own oath may be demanded, and that of the prosecutor taken. "These provisions," the worthy author acknowledges, "are pretty severe;" and most of his readers may be inclined to think them pretty absurd. But it must be recollected that he is not the only person (espe- cially about his own time, when the first duty of a statesman was to promote the malt-tax) who has been eloquent and vituperative on the subject of this famous plant. Its progress, on the contrary, has been something like the progress of truth: suspected at first, though very palatable to those who had cour- age to taste it; resisted as it encroached; abused as its popularity seemed to spread; and establishing its triumph at last, in cheering the whole land, from the palace to the cottage, only by the slow and resistless efforts of time and its own virtues. Nor are the pro- visions for enforcing his scheme so extraordinary as may at first sight appear. The object of one half of our existing commercial regulations is to insure the use of our own produce and the encouragement of our own industry; and his personal restrictions, and domiciliary visits, are utterly harmless when com- pared with many excise regulations of the present day; and still more so when contrasted with certain parts of the earlier system for levying the tax upon property. We have noticed this example chiefly for the sake of showing that Forbes's views were as sound upon these subjects as those of the persons by whom he has been succeeded, and that if we could oftener withdraw our eyes from the objects of their habitual contemplation we should oftener see the folly of many things, which appear to us correct merely because they are common. Being appointed president of the Court of Session in 1737, he applied himself with great zeal to a duty which has conferred lasting service on his country, that of improving the regulations of his court. Pre- viously the chief judge, by having it in his power to postpone a cause, or to call it at his pleasure, was enabled sometimes to choose a particular time for its decision, when certain judges whom he knew to have made up their minds were absent. Forbes put an end to this flagrant error in the constitution of the court, by rendering it impossible for the judges to take up a case except as it stood on the roll. He also exerted himself to prevent any accumulation of undetermined causes. The character of the Highlanders, and the improve- ment of the Highlands, had all along been objects of the first magnitude with the lord-president, nor did he lose sight of them when his elevation to the first place in Scottish society brought him to be con- versant with others equally important. Viewing the aspect of the political horizon, and aware that the clans, in such times as appeared to be approaching, could scarcely fail to fall into the hands of political agitators, he digested a plan (the very same for which Chatham received so much applause for carrying into effect) for embodying the most disaffected of them into regiments, under colonels of tried loyalty, but DUNCAN FORBES. 43 officered by their own chieftains, who would thus be less liable to be tampered with by the emissaries of the Stuarts, and be insensibly led to respect an order of things which, it might be presumed, they disliked chiefly because they did not comprehend it, and from which, as yet, they did not suppose they had derived any benefit. This proposal the lord-president com- municated to the lord justice-clerk, ^Iilton, who re- ported it to Lord Hay, by whom it was laid before Sir Robert Walpole, who at once comprehended and admired it. When, however, he laid it before the council, recommending it to be carried into im- mediate effect, the council declared unanimously against it. "Were the plan of the Scottish judge," said they, "adopted, what would the patriots say? Would they not exclaim. Sir Robert Walpole had all along a design upon the constitution? lie has already imposed upon us a standing army, in addi- tion to which he is now raising an army of barba- rians, for the sole purpose of enslaving the people of England." Walpole was too well acquainted with the temper of the patriots, as they called themselves, not to feel the full force of this reasoning; and the measure was given up, though he was fully convinced that it was conceived in wisdom, and would have been infallibly successful in its operation. Though his advice was neglected, the event showed that his suspicions were well founded. The disturbed state of Europe encouraged the Jacobites, particularly in the Highlands, to sign an association for the re- storation of the Pretender, which was sent to him at Rome, in the year 1742. During the following years there was a perpetual passing and repassing between the court of France, the Pretender, and the association, without the knowledge of the most vigi- lant observers on the part of the government. So cautiously, indeed, did the Highland chieftains con- duct themselves, that even the lord-president, who was intimately acquainted with their characters and propensities, seems to have been perfectly unaware of any immediate rising, when he was acqiiainted by a letter from Macleod of jNIacleod, that Charles was actually arrived, and had by young Clanronald sum- moned himself and Sir Alexander Macdonald to join his standard. The truth was, both Macleod and Macdonald had pledged themselves to Prince Charles; but a French anny to accompany him, and military stores, were positive parts of the engagement, which, not being fulfilled, led them to hesitate, and they were willing to fortify their hesitation by the advice of the president; whom they had long found to be an excellent counsellor, and whose views upon the sub- ject they were probably anxious in a covert way to ascertain. Macleod of course wrote to the president that such a person was on the coast, with so many Irish or French officers, stating them greatly beyond the real number, and he adds, " His views, I need not tell you, was to raise all the Highlands to assist him. Sir Alexander Macdonald and I not only gave no sort of countenance to these people, but we used all the interest we had with our neighbours to follow the same prudent method, and I am persuaded we have done it with that success, that not a man north of the Grampians will give any sort of assistance to this mad rebellious attempt. As it can be of no use to the public to know whence you have this informa- tion, it is, I fancy, needless to mention either of us; but this we leave in your own breast, as you are a much better judge of what is or what is not proper to be done. I have wrote to none other, and as our friendship and confidence in you is without reserve, so we doubt not of your supplying our defects pro- perly. Sir Alexander is here and has seen this scrawl. Young Clanronald has been here with us, and has given us all possible assurances of his prudence." The above letter was dated August 3d, 1745, ^^d speaks of Charles as only on the coast, though he had in reality landed, and the assurance of young Clanronald's prudence was a perfect farce. It was indeed, for obvious reasons, the aim of the rebels to lull the friends of government in their fatal security, and we have no doubt that Clanronald, acting upon this principle, gave the assurance to Macleod and Macdonald for the very purpose of being communi- cated to the lord-president, and it has been supposed that the misstatements in this letter laid the founda- tion for that pernicious counsel which sent Sir John Cope to the north, leaving the low country open to Charles, in consequence of which he overcame at once the most serious difficulties he had to contend with — want of provisions and want of money, made himself master of the capital of Scotland, and, to the astonishment of himself as well as of all Europe, penetrated into the very heart of England. Being now certain that there was danger, though its extent was cautiously concealed from him, the lord-president, after pointing out to the Marquis of Tweeddale, who at that time was a principal man- ager in Scottish affairs, a few things necessary to be done in order to give full effect to his exertions, has- tened to the north, and arrived at Culloden House on the 13th of August, six days before Charles un- furled his standard in Glenfinnan, and while many of his most devoted admirers were yet at a great loss whether to come forward to his assistance, or to re- main undeclared till circumstances should enable them more accurately to calculate probabilities. To all these nothing could have been more unwelcome than the presence of the lord-president, to whom they, almost to a man, were under personal obliga- tions. Lovat waited upon and dined with his lord- ship the very day after his arrival, and requested his advice, assuring him that his wishes, as well as his interest, still led him to support the present royal family. Macleod of Macleod and Sir Alexander Macdonald of Skye also wrote to him immediately on his arrival, in a loyal strain, though their presence was certainly expected at the unfurling of the insur- gent standard at Glenfinnan, which was so soon to take place. The letters are not so very explicit as might have been wished, and, till the advice and the presence of the lord-president encouraged them, these gentlemen were undoubtedly not cordial for the government. Lovat most certainly was not, and had Charles, according to his advice, come east by Inverness, he would no doubt have joined him on the instant. But the clans having rushed down into the Lowlands, while Sir John Cope, with the whole regular troops that were in Scotland, came north, added weight to the lord-president's remon- strances, and for a time neutralized all who were not previously committed, till the unfortunate affair of Gladsmuir gave a new impulse to their hopes. Sir Alexander Macdonald and Macleod of Macleod were assured by a special messenger, that their past conduct was not imputed to any want of zeal for the cause or want of affection to the person of Charles, who considered their sers'ices to be now more useful to him than ever, and was ready to receive them as his best friends. Lovat had a message of the same kind, and, sure that now his right master, as he called him, would prevail, set him- self to forward the marching of his Erasers without delay. Still he continued his correspondence with the president, and laboured hard to keep up the farce of loyalty, as did Macleod of Macleod, at the very moment when he was pledging his faith to that arch-hypocrite to send his Macleods to join the 44 DUNCAN FORBES. Frasers, the Mackintoshes, and the Mackenzies at Corrj'arrack, within a given number of days. Happily for Macleod, he was greatly under the influence of Sir Alexander Macdonald, whose judgment the lord- president had completely opened upon the subject, and he not only did not fulfd his engagement with Lovat, but actually raised and headed his men to fight on the opposite side. The Frasers, in the meantime, formed a scheme for seizing upon the house of Culloden, and either killing or making the president a prisoner. The execution of this plot was intrusted to the laird of Foyers, who made the attempt on the night of Tues- day, the 15th of October, the day when the clans were engaged upon honour to assemble at the pass of Corryarrack, for the purpose of reinforcing the army of Charles at Edinburgh. The president, however, who, had arms been his profession, would probably have been as celebrated a soldier as he was a lawyer, knew his situation, and the men he lived among, better than to suffer himself to be so surprised. The castle itself was naturally strong; several pieces of cannon were planted upon its rampart; and it was occupied by a garrison able and willing to defend it; so that, leaving behind them one of their number wounded, the assailants were obliged to content themselves with carrying off some sheep and cattle, and robbing the gardener and the house of an honest weaver, who, it w'ould appear, lived under the pro- tection of the president. Like all other projectors of wicked things which fail in the execution, Lovat seems to have been very much ashamed of this affair, and he was probably the more so, that the Macleods, the Macdonalds, &c., who, that same day, were to have joined his clan at Corryarrack, had not only not kept their word, but were actually on the road tj take their orders from the president, which com- pelled him once more to send, in place of troops, an apology to Charles, with an abundance of fair pro- mises, in which he was at all times sufficiently liberal. The president had assured him that, by killing and eating his sheep in broad daylight, the men who had made the attack upon his house were all known, but that if they did no more harm he forgave them; only he wished they would send back the poor gar- dener and weaver their things, and if they sent not back the tenant his cattle, they knew he must pay for them. Lovat, with well-affected concern and high eulogiums upon his lordship's goodness, declares the actors in this villanous attempt to have been ruffians without the fear of God or man, and that he has ordered his son, and Gortuleghis kinsman and factor, to send back all the plunder, particularly his lord- ship's sheep, which he was ready to give double value for, rather than that his lordship should want them, and, in case they should not be found, offered to divide with him one hundred fat wedders, seeing that he was under greater obligations to him and his family than all the sheep, oxen, cows, and horses he ever possessed were worth. "And I beg, my lord," he adds, "that you may not be in the least apprehensive that any of those rogues, or any in my country, go and disturb your tenants, for I solemnly swore to Gortuleg that if any villain or rascal of my country durst presume to hurt or disturb any of your lordship's tenants, I would go personally, though carried in a litter, and see Hum seized and haui^ed. So, my dear lord, I beg you may have no apprehen- sion that any of your tenants will meet with disturb- ance so long as I live in this country; and I hope that my son that represents me will follow my ex- ample: so let monarchies, government, and common- wealths take up fits of revolutions and wars, for God's sake, my dear lord, let us live in good friend- ship and peace together." It was but a short time when, after the retreat from England, Charles was met at Glasgow by a messenger from Lovat, re- questing him to send north a party to seize Inverness, and if possible secure the lord-president, who, he affirmed, had done him more harm than any man living, having by his influence prevented more than 10,000 men from joining him. Circumstances of another kind than Lovat's advice or request brought Charles to Inverness, and the lord-president, along with Lord Loudon, was under the necessity of taking refuge in the Islantl of Skye, where he remained till after the battle of Culloden, when he returned to reap, as many other good men have done, neglect and ingratitude for all his services. Of these services and of this neglect the reader will not be displeased to find the following graphic description from his own pen. It is a letter to Mr. George Ross, then at London, inclosing letters on the same subject to Mr. Pelham, Mr. Scroope, and the Duke of New- castle, date Inverness, May 13th, 1746. "Dear George, my peregrinations are now over. Some account of my adventures you surely have had from different hands ; to give an exact one is the work of more time than I can at present afford. The difficulties I had to struggle with were many ; the issue, on the main, has been favourable; and, upon a strict review, I am satisfied with my own conduct. I neither know nor care what critics, who have en- joyed ease in safety, may think. The commissions for the independent companies I disposed of in the way that, to me, seemed the most frugal and profit- able to the public; the use they have already been of to the public is very great; preventing any accession of strength to the rebels, before they marched into England, was no small service; the like prevention, in some degree, and the distraction of their forces when the duke was advancing, was of considerable use; and now they are, by the duke, employed, under the command of E. Loudon, in Glengarry, and must be the hands by which the rebels are to be hunted in their recesses. My other letter of this date gives the reason why the returns of the officers' names, &c. , was not sooner made. I hope the certificate will be sufficient to put them upon the establishment, and to procure the issuing of money for them. The returns of the several companies in the military way E. Loudon will take care of \Vhat distressed us most in this country, and was the real cause why the rebels came to head after their flight from Stirling, was the want of arms and money, which, God knows, had been enough called for and expected. Had these come in time, we could have armed a force sufficient to have prevented them looking at us on this side Drumachter. The men were prepared, several hundreds assembled in their own counties, and some hundreds actually on the march; but un- luckily the ship that brought the few arms that were sent, and the sum of money that came, did not ar- rive in our road sooner than the very day on which the rebels made themselves master of the barrack of Ruthven. It was then too late to fetch unarmed men from distances, it was even unsafe to land the arms and the money ; so we were forced to suffer them remain on board and to retreat with the force we had, to preserve them for the further annoyance of the enemy. Another ill consequence the scrimp- ing us of money had, was that — as there were a great many contingent services absolutely necessary, and as all the money that could be raised upon Lord Loudon's credit and mine was not sufficient to an- swer these extraordinary services — we were obliged to make free with the cash remitted for the subsist- ence of the companies. This at the long run will DUNCAN FORBES. 45 come out as broad as it is long when accounts are made up and allowances made for the con- tingent expense ; but in the meantime it saddles us with the trouble of settling and passing an account. "If any one will reflect on the situation I was in, and consider what I had to do, he will soon be con- vinced that the expense I laid out could not be small. So far as I could command money of my own, you will easily believe it was employed without hesita- tion ; and of that I say nothing at present. But when the expedient proposed by the Marquis of Tweeddale of taking bills to be drawn on Mr. Pel- ham failed, I had no resource but to take up money where I could find it, from well-disposed persons, on my own proper notes. That money so picked up was at the time of great service ; and now that peace is restored, the gentlemen with great reason expect to be repaid. You can guess how ill I like a dun, and I should hope now that the confusions are over, there can be no great difficulty in procuring me a remittance, or leave to draw upon Mr Pelham or some other proper person, to the extent of the sum thus borrowed, which does not exceed ;^i5oo sterling. ... I am heartily tired of this erratic course I have been in, but as the prevention of any future disturbance is a matter of great moment, and which requires much deliberation and some skill, if those on whom it lies to frame the scheme for that purpose imagine I can be of any use to them, I should not grudge the additional fatigue of another journey; but it is not improbable their resolutions may be already taken," &c. There is in this letter an honest feeling, and a frankly ex- pressed conviction of the value of his services; and though possessed with a prophetic anticipation of their being latterly to be overlooked, an equally open and straightfor\vardly expressed determination to continue them as long as they should be useful to his country, strongly indicative of that high-minded de- votion to the best interests of his species, which peculiarly characterized this great man. At the same time, there is manifested the most delicate feeling with regard to the money part of the transaction. What portion, and that was a large one, had been advanced from his own treasury he makes for the present no account of; but he pleads in the most gentlemanly manner in behalf of those who had assisted him at the time, and could scarcely be ex- pected to have the same disinterested regard to the public service, and the same degree of philosophic patience. They expect with reason, he remarks, to be paid, and he interposes in the most delicate man- ner his own repugnance to be dunned, as the most pressing of all arguments in their favour. Surely never was so small a request, and so exceedingly well founded, so modestly prepared, yet never per- haps did a reasonable one meet with a more careless reception. Upwards of a month elapsed before he had an answer from George Ross, with a bill for ;i{'500, which perhaps was not for his own use. It has been generally said that he never received one farthing, and to his generous spirit, if he received only this small portion, which we dare not affirm he did, taken in connection with the manner in which he did receive it, it must have been nearly, if not more mortifying than if he had not. His grace of Newcastle took no notice of his letter till he was under the necessity of writing to him upon another subject, two months afterwards, and then in the most cold and formal manner imaginable. Of any reply from Pelham and Scroope we have not found a ves- tige, and would fondly hope that, courtiers as they were, they had so much grace remaining as to be unable to put pen to paper upon a business so dis- graceful. To a mind so pure and so gentle as was that of President Forbes, this ingratitude on the part of the government must have been exceedingly painful; but we do not believe that it was the only or the prin- cipal thing that weighed down his spirit. To the morality of courts and the gratitude of courtiers he was, in theory at least, no stranger, and as a prudent and practical man, must have been in some measure prepared to grapple with them; but for the base duplicity and the ingratitude of his friends and neigh- bours, many of whom had betrayed his confidence in the grossest manner, he could scarcely be prepared, and they must have affected him deeply. These, while they wrung his heart with the most pungent feelings of sorrow, furnished to the ignorant, the suspicious, and the envious, fruitful topics of detrac- tion and misrepresentation, against which, he must have been aware, the best intentions and the most upright actions have too often been found to afford no protection. The care of the Highlands had been imposed upon him for many years, he had been a father and a friend to almost every principal family they contained, and, with few exceptions, these families had in return made the strongest professions of loyalty to the government, and of friendship and affection to himself This they had done too with such apparent sincerity, as induced him to report them perfectly loyal at the very moment they were signing associations, purchasing arms, and ready to appear in the field against the government. How must he have felt to see the very men he had saved from total destruction, procured them the favourable notice of the government, and even high and honour- able situations, rushing, from mistaken views of their own or their country's interests, upon the ruin of both! It was this, we have no doubt, gave the secret but incurable wound, which, though he continued to per- form the duties of his station with inflexible firmness, and with imperturbable patience, brought him by slow degrees to an untimely grave. Though the lord-president continued to discharge his office with his usual fidelity and diligence, and though he uttered no complaints, it had long been matter of grief to his friends to observe his health rapidly declining, and in the month of November it was judged necessary to send for his son from Eng- land, who arrived only in time to receive his last ad- vice and blessing. He died on the loth day of De- cember, 1747, in the sixty-second year of his age. The same day he died the following memorandum was made by his son: — "My father entered into the everlasting life of God, trusting, hoping, and be- lieving through the blood of Christ, eternal life and happiness. \Vhen I first saw my father upon the bed of death, his blessing and prayer to me was — ' My dear John, you have just come in time to see me die. Alay the great God of heaven and earth bless and preserve you ! You have come to a very poor fortune, partly through my own extravagance, and partly through the oppression of power. I am sure you will forgive me, because what I did was with a good intention. I know you to be an honest- hearted lad. Andrew Mitchell loves you affection- ately ; he will advise you, and do what he can for you. I depend upon Scroope, too, which you may let him know. I will advise you never to think of coming into parliament. I left some notes with the two William Forbeses in case I had not seen you. They are two affectionate lads, and will be able to help you in some affairs better than you would have done yourself John Hossack will help you in your affairs in the north. My heart bleeds for poor John 48 PATRICK FORBES. come so powerful an organ for the diffusion of sound medical information, was in its earliest state so ably conducted by Dr. Forbes, that in literary power alone it was as able and distinguished as the highest quarterly reviews of the day. In its management it mainly owed its rise to the assiduity of Forbes, who introduced into it articles written by the most emi- nent anil ingenious medical writers of the period — and to his independent spirit, which would admit nothing inferior into its pages, however influentially patronized. But this very disinterestedness and in- dependence of spirit not only created umbnage, but occasioned him pecuniary loss, and he retired from the editorship of the British and Fureii^n Medical Quarterly before he could reap the fruits of its success. lie was not allowed, however, to depart into ob- scurity, or remain unrewarded. In 1S40 he removed to London, where his well-established professional reputation had preceded his arrival, and he was ap- pointed physician in ordinary to her majesty's house- ii(dd, and physician extraordinary to his royal high- ness I'rince Albert. He was early elected a fellow of the Royal Society, and had the degree of Doctor of Laws conferred upon him by the university of Oxford. The last years in the life of Sir John Forbes were crowned with the honours he had merited, and passed in activity and usefulness. His love of litera- ture abode with him to the last, and this he indulged by writing works of a lighter description than those in which he had hitherto been engaged. In 1849 he published A Physiciaii's Holiday, or a Afoiith in S^oit- zerland, containing an interesting account of the principal localities in that romantic country. In 1852 he published an account of a tour he made in Ireland, under the title of Memoranda made in Ire- land in the Autumn of 1852; and in 1 856 the notice of another tour, under the title of Sightseeing in Ger- vtany and the Tyrol, in the Auttunn of 1855. Re- verting again more immediately to his profession and past studies, he published in 1857 his treatise on Nature and Art in the Cure of Disease, which may be regarded as a confession of his medical creed ; with this his public labours may be said to have terminated. He had already been subject to vertigo, from the sudden attacks of which he sometimes fell to the ground; his memory was impaired, so that he had but a dim recollection of objects and places ; and he had a tendency to turn to the right side. Under such circumstances it was necessary to re- linquish his practice, and this he did three years be- fore he died, presenting at the same time his large and valuable library to Marischal College, Aber- deen, where he had first been educated. In the same spirit of benevolence and mindfulness of early bene- fits, he had two years before that period, in conjunc- tion with Sir James Clark, established a library at Fordyce, where he had received his education as a school-boy. Sir John died at Whitchurch, Oxford- shire, on the 13th of November, 1861, aged seventy- four years. FORBES, Patrick, an eminent prelate, was by ])irlh laird of Corse and O'Neil, in Aberdeenshire, and descended from Sir Patrick Forbes (third son of James, second Lord Forbes) armour-bearer to King James II., from whom in 1482 he got a charter of the barony of O'Neil. From the same branch of the noble family of Forbes are descended the Forbeses baronets of Craigievar, and the P'orbeses earls of Granard in Ireland. The subject of this memoir was born in 1564, and received the rudiments of his education under Thomas Buchanan (nephew of the author of The History of Scotland), who was then schoolmaster of Stirling. He next studied philosophy under Andrew Melville at Glasgow; and when that eminent reformer and learned man was removed to be principal of .St. Andrews, Forbes followed him thither, and was his pupil in Hebrew and theology. Such was the progress he made in these studies, and such his gravity, wisdom, and blamelessness of life, that at an uncommonly early age he was solicited to become a professor in the college. His father, how- ever, suddenly recalled his son, in order that he might settle in life as a country gentleman; and he soon after married Lucretia Spens, daughter of David Spens of Wormiston, in Fife. He lived for some time in rural retirement near Montrose, where his learning and piety attracted a great concourse of visitors, especially of the clergy. At the death of his father he removed to the family seat of Corse, where, to use the quaint phrase of his Latin biographer. Garden, he at once cultivated his books and his fields, regularly perform- ing the duties of a clergyman every Sunday before his domestics. At the time when Patrick Forbes entered into public life, the reformed Church of Scotland had not settled down into any regular system of ecclesiastical polity, and sometimes things were allowed to be done which would now be considered as at least ec- centric, if not indecent. At the same time, the pro- fession of a clergj'man, though holding forth little pecuniary advantage, was invested with so much popular power as to be highly inviting. We hence find, in the instances of Erskine of Dun, Bruce of Kinnaird, and others, that it had temptations even for gentlemen of good estates. It appears that, in the loose system of polity then acted upon, the laird of Corse, merely because he was a devout man, and possessed of some territorial influence, \vas repeatedly entreated to perform the duties of a clergyman, as if it had been supposed that any little deficiency in point of clerical ordination that could be urged against him would be fully compensated by his weight as the laird of Corse. He accordingly did act tem- porarily as a minister during the time when the clergymen who had attended the proscribed General Assembly at Aberdeen in 1605 were suffering exile from their parishes. Instead of this exciting episcopal interference, we are told that Patrick Blackburn, Bishop of Aberdeen, no sooner heard of the excellent ministrations of the laird of Corse than he, in con- currence with the synod of his diocese, entreated him to take ordination, and become the minister of his own parish. Although this request was made oftener than once, Forbes steadily resisted it, alleging as a reason his sense of the weight of the priestly duties, and of the difficulty of the times. These things, however, being conveyed by some malevolent per- son to the ear of the primate (Gladstones, Archbishop of St. Andrews), that dignitary sent an order pro- hibiting Corse from preaching any more until he should take ordination. Having no alternative, the laird returned to his former practice of family wor- ship, attending the church every Sunday as a private individual, and afterwards exercising upon a portion of the Scriptures before his servants. He went on thus for seven years, and was so far from exciting schism by his well-meant exertions, that no one in the neighbourhood was a more regular or respectful attendant upon parochial ordinances. At length the neighbouring gentlemen, and even the clergy, fre- quented the family worship at Corse, where they heard most able elucidations of the epistles of St. Paul, and also those commentaries on the Revela- tions of which an abridgment was afterwards pub- lished. At the end of the period alluded to the minister of Keith, though a pious and worthy man, fell into a I 1 HecrT' fioDinsoii . DLLQAM FOUB OF PITSLTGO. ■,AKr Alii/ ''I.AJiT{i:)l,v i^ATRICK FORBES fit of melancholy, and, after suffering for some time, made an attempt upon his own life. He had hardly inflicted the fatal wound when he was overtaken by deep remorse, and, having sent for the laird of Corse, was immediately attended by that devout man, who proceeded to reason with him in so earnest a manner as to open his soul fully to a sense of spiritual in- fluences. The unfortunate man with his dying breath renewed the request which had so often been proffered to Forbes, that he would consent to undertake the pastoral charge of the parish; which request, taking place under such impressive circum- stances, and enforced at the same time by the elo- quence of the neighbouring clerg>'men and gentrv, at length prevailed, and the laird of Corse imme- diately became minister of Keith. He was at this time forty-eight years of age. In i6i8 Forbes was appointed Bishop of Aber- deen, with the sincere approbation of all classes of the people. Attached from principle to the Episcopal form of church government, he concurred in the five articles of Perth, which were that year imposed upon the Scottish church. It does not appear, how- ever, that Bishop Forbes used any severe means to carry these articles into practice, for we are informed by Burnet {Life of Bedell) that, by his remarkable prudence, he "greatly allayed, and almost conquered, not only the distempered judgments, but the per^'erse and turbulent humours, of divers in his diocese." In his whole conduct as a bishop he appears to have been uniformly influenced by an honest and conscientious regard to the obligations of the character which he had assumed, and what he conceived to be the best means of promoting the interests of piety and virtue. He was not only careful to fix worthy clerg}-men in his diocese, but to make proper provision for their support and that of their successors. He succeeded in recovering many of the revenues which, in the tumults of the reforming period, had been lost or neglected; and he used all proper methods with heri- tors and titulars of teinds and others to make aug- mentation of stipends, which he had no sooner effected in some cases than he dissolved the pernicious union of parishes, and established a clerg)Tnan in each. Even from his o\vti income, limited as it must have been, he bestowed much upon the poorer clergy. He was very strict in examining those who applied for ordination, and thus secured for future times a superior body of clergj'. He was also indefatigable in visiting and inspecting the clergj-men of his dio- cese— a duty which he generally performed in a some- what singular manner. "It was his custom," says Burnet, "to go without pomp or noise, attended only by one servant, that he might the more easily be in- formed of what belonged to his cure. When he was told of the weakness or negligence of any of his clergy, he would go and lodge near his church on Saturday, in the evening, without making himself known, and the next day, when he was in the pulpit, he would go and hear him, that by this he might be able to judge what his common sermons were; and as they appeared to him, he encouraged or admon- ished him." Sometime after his promotion to the bishopric he was appointed chancellor of King's College, Aberdeen, which institution he raised from a state of utter desolation and neglect, to be one of the most flourishing in the kingdom. He fully repaired the buildings; he increased the library, revived the pro- fessorships of divinity, canon law, and physic; and procured the addition of a new professorship in divinity. At length, finding himself drawing near his latter end, he sent for all the clergy of Aberdeen to receive the sacrament along with him, and two VOL. II. SIR WILLIAM FORBES. 4^ days after, March 28th, 1635, breathed his last, with the most pious expressions of hope, and full of re- ligious consolation. At his funeral, which took place in the cathedral church of Aberdeen, Dr. Barron preached an appropriate sermon to a numerous auditor)', which was afterwards published.' This great ornament of the Episcopal church in Scotland is characterized, in the manner of the time, as a man of singularly clear genius, solid judgment, the highest prudence, piety, and integrity, of much authority in counsel, and invincible fortitude and constancy of mind. Bishop Burnet informs us that he "scarce ever suffered any man of merit to ask anything at his hands, but anticipated them; while those whose characters would not bear a severe scrutiny never dared to solicit him. He had a quick eye and sprightly countenance, which proved an additional ornament to his expressions, which were grave and majestic, and of peculiar insinuation and grace. In parliament he was elected one of the lords of the articles, and his judgment there and ia council was considered as an oracle." FORBES, Sir William, of Pitsligo, an eminent banker and citizen, was bom at Edinburgh on the 5th of April, 1739. He was descended, by the father's side, from a younger branch of the ancient and respectable family of Forbes of Monmusk, the proprietors, at the close of the seventeenth century, of the noble barony of that name on the banks of the Don, in Aberdeenshire ; and by his paternal grandmother, from the still older and more dignified family of the Lords Pitsligo, in the same county. His mother was also a branch of the family of Forbes of Monmusk, one of the first families in Scotland who were invested with the badge of Nova Scotia baronets, which still is worn by their descendants. His father, who was bred to the bar, and was rising into eminence in that profession, died when he was only four years of age, leaving his mother, then a young woman, with two infant sons, and ver)' slender means of support.. She lived at first at Milne of Forgue, on the estate of Bogny in Aberdeenshire, with the proprietor of which territory' she was con- nected through her mother, and afterwards fixed her residence at Aberdeen with her two sons, where she remained for several years, superintending their edu- cation. While there the younger son, who is repre- sented as having been a most engaging boy, died, leaving her remaining hopes to centre on Sir William, then her only child. Though reared in straitened circumstances. Sir William had not only the benefit of an excellent education, but was under the immediate care and superintendence of the most respectable gentlemen in Aberdeenshire. His guardians were Lord Forbes, his uncle Lord Pitsligo, his maternal uncle Mr. Morrison of Bogny, and his aunt's husband Mr. Urquhart of Meldrum, who were not only most attentive to the duties of their trust, but habituated him from his earliest years to the habits and ideas of good society, and laid the foundation of that highly honourable and gentlemanlike character which so remarkably distinguished him in after-life. It has been often observed, that the source of ever)thing which is pure and upright in subsequent years, is to be found in the lessons instilled into the infant mind by maternal love; and of this truth the character of Sir William Forbes affords a signal example. He ' The only works of Bishop Forbes which have been pub- lished, are his Commentary on the Re-jelation, printed at London in 1613 republished in Ladn after his death by his son ; and a treatise entitled Exercitationes an apprentice into their highly respectable banking-house — among the earliest establishments of the kind in Edinburgh. The mother and son did not, in the first instance, keep house for themselves, but boarded with a respectable widow lady; and it is worthy of being recorded as a proof of the differ- ence in the style of living and the value of money between that time and the present, that the sum paid for the board of the two was only ;,^40 a year. At Whitsunday, 1 754, as .Sir William was bound an apprentice to the banking-house, she removed to a small house in P'orrester's Wynd, consisting only of a single floor. Even in these humble premises she was visited by persons of the very first distinction in .Scotland, and frequently entertained them at tea parties in the afternoon — a mode of seeing society which, although alm<3st gone into disuse with the increasing wealth and luxury of modern manners, was then very prevalent. At that period also, when dinner or supper parties were given by ladies of rank or opulence, which was sometimes though seldom the case, their drawing-rooms were fre- quented in the afternoon by the young and the old of both sexes, and opportunities afforded for the acquisition of elegance of manner, and a taste for polite and superior conversation, of which Sir William did not fail to profit in the very highest degree. It was an early impression of Sir William's, that one of his principal duties in life consisted in restor- ing his ancient but now dilapidated family; and it was under this feeling of duty that he engaged in the mercantile profession. His apprenticeship lasted seven years, during which he continued to live with Lady Forbes in the same frugal and retired manner, but in the enjoyment of the same dignified and ex- cellent society which they had cultivated upon their first coming to Edinburgh. After its expiry he acted for two years as clerk in the establishment, during which time his increasing emoluments enabled him to make a considerable addition to the comforts of his mother. In 1761 his excellent abilities and ap- plication to business induced the Messrs. Coutts to admit him as a partner, with a small share in the banking-house, and he ever after ascribed his good fortune in life to the fortunate connection thus formed with that great mercantile family. But without being insensible to the benefits arising from such a connection, it is perhaps more just to ascribe it to his own undeviating ])urity and integrity of character, which enabled him to turn to the best advantage those fortunate incidents which at one time or other occur to all in life, but which so many suffer to escape from negligence, instability, or a mistaken exercise of their talents. In 1763 one of the Messrs. Coutts died; another retired from business through ill health, and the two others were settled in London. A new company was therefore formed, consisting of .Sir William Forbes, Sir James Hunter Blair, and .Sir Robert Herries; and although none of the Messrs. Coutts retained any connection with the firm, their name was retained out of respect to the eminent gentlemen of that name who had preceded them. The business was conducted on this footing till 1773, when the name of the firm was changed to that of Forbes, Hunter, & Co., which it has ever since retained; Sir Robert Herries having formed a separate establish- ment in St. James Street, London. Of the new firm Sir William Forbes continued to be the head from that time till the period of his death; and to his sound judgment and practical sagacity in business, much of its subsequent prosperity was owing. His first care was to withdraw the concern altogether from the alluring but dangerous speculations in corn in which all the private bankers of Scotland were at that period so much engaged, and to restrict their transactions to the proper business of banking. They commenced issuing notes in 1783, and rapidly rose, from the respect and esteem entertained for all the members of the firm, as well as the prudence and judgment with which their business was conducted, to a degree of public confidence and prosperity almost unprecedented in this countiy. In 1770 he married Miss Elizabeth Hay, eldest daughter of Dr. (after- wards Sir James) Hay — a union productive of un- broken happiness to his future life. This event obliged him to separate from his mother, as her habits of privacy and retirement were inconsistent with the more extended circle of society in which he was now to engage. Blessed with a serene and contented disposition, enjoying the kindness, and gratified by the rising prosperity and high character which her son had obtained; and fortunate in seeing the for- tunes of her own and her husband's family rapidly reviving under his successful exertions, she lived happy and contented to an extreme old age, until she died on the 26th December, 1789. The benevolence of Sir William Forbes' character, his unwearied charity and activity of disposition, naturally led to his taking a very prominent share in the numerous public charities of Edinburgh. The first public duty of this kind which he undertook, was that of a manager of the charity workhouse, to which he was appointed in 1771. At this period the expenditure of that useful establishment was greater than its income, and it was necessary for the managers to communicate for several years after with the magis- trates and other public bodies, as to providing for the deficits, and the state and management of the poor. Sir William P'orbes was one of the sub- committee appointed by the managers to arrange this important matter, and upon him was devolved the duty of drawing up the reports and memorials res]iecting that charity, ^^■hich, during the years 1 772 and 1773, were printed and circulated to induce the public to come forward and aid the establishment — a duty which he performed with equal ability and success. The means of improving this institution, in which he ever through life took the warmest in- terest, occupied about this period a very large share of his thoughts, and in 1777 he embodied them in SIR WILLIAM FORBES. 51 tlie form of a pamphlet, which he published in re- ference to the subject, abounding both in practical knowledge and enlightened benevolence. Another most important institution about the same period was deeply indebted to his activity and per- severance for the successful termination of its diffi- culties. The high-school having become ruinous, and unfit for the increasing number of scholars who attended it, a few public-spirited individuals formed a committee in conjunction with the magistrates of the city, to build a new one. Of this committee .Sir William Forbes was chairman; and besides con- triljuting largely himself, it was to his activity and perseverance that the success of the undertaking was mainly to be ascribed. The amount subscribed was £22,00, a very large sum in those days, but still in- sufficient to meet the expenses of the work. By his exertions the debt of £1 100 was gradually liquidated, and he had the satisfaction of laying the foundation- stone of the edifice destined to be the scene of the early efforts of .Sir Walter .Scott, and many of the greatest men whom Scotland has produced. He was admitted a member of the Orphan Hos- pital directory on the 8th of August, 1774) ^-nd acted as manager from 1783 to 1788, and from 1797 to 1801. He always took a warm interest in the con- cerns of that excellent charity, and devoted a consi- derable part of his time to the care and education of the infants who were thus brought under his super- intendence. He became a member of the Merchant Company in 1784, and in 1786 was elected master — • an office which, though held only for a year, was repeatedly conferred upon him during the remainder of his life. He always took an active share in the management of that great company, and was the promoter of a plan adopted long after, of rendering the annuities to widows belonging to it a matter of right, and not of favour or solicitation. The same situation made him a leading member of the com- mittee of merchants, appointed in 1772, to confer with Sir James Montgomery, then lord-advocate, on the new bankrupt act introduced in that year, and many of its most valuable clauses were suggested by his experience. In that character he took a leading part in the affairs of the Merchant Maidens' Hospital, which is governed by the officers of the Merchant Company, and was elected governor of that charity in 1786. The same causes made him governor of Watson's Hospital during the year that he was pre- sident or as.sistant of the Merchant Company; and president of the governors of Gillespie's Hospital, when that charity was opened in 1802. He faith- fully and assiduously discharged the duties connected with the management of these hospitals during all the time that he was at their head, and devoted to these truly benevolent objects a degree of time which, considering his multifarious engagements in business, is truly surprising, and affords the best proof how much may be done, even by those most engaged, by a proper economy in that important particular. From the first institution of the .Society of Anti- quaries, and the Royal Society in 1783, he was a constituted member of both, and took an active share in their formation and management. From 1785 downwards he was constantly a manager of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, and was indefatigable in his endeavours to ameliorate the situation and assuage the sufferings of the unfortunate inmates of that admirable establishment. At his death he left ;i^20O to the institution, to be applied to the fund for the benefit of patients. In 1787 he was appointed one of the trustees for the encouragement of manufactures and fisheries, of which his friend Mr. Arbuthnot was secretary, and he continued for the remainder of his life to be one of its most active and efficient members. One of the greatest improvements which Edinburgh received was the formation of the .South Bridge in 1784, under the auspices and direction of his friend Sir James Hunter Blair. In the management and guidance of this great work that enterprising citizen was mainly guided by the advice of his friend .Sir William Forbes, and he was afterwards one of the most active and zealous trustees who, under the 25 Geo. HI. c. 28, carried into full execution after his death that great public undertaking. In selecting the plan to be adopted, the more plain design which afforded the accommodation required was preferred to the costly and magnificent one furnished by the Messrs. Adams: and with such judgment and wisdom was the work carried into effect, that it was com- pleted not only without any loss, but with a large surplus to the public. Of tliis surplus ;i^3000 was applied to another very great improvement, the draining of the Meadows, while the ten per cent, addition to the land-tax, which had been levied under authority of the act as a guarantee fund, and not being required for the purposes of the trust, was paid over to the city of Edinburgh for the use of the com- munity. When these results are contrasted with those of similar undertakings of the present age, the sagacity of the subject of this memoir and his partner, Sir James Hunter Blair, receives a new lustre far above what was reflected upon them even at the time when the benefits of their exertions were more im- mediately felt. In 1785 he was prevailed on to accept the situation of chairman of the sub-committee of delegates from the Highland counties for obtaining an alteration of the law passed the year before in regard to small stills within the Highland line. Nearly the whole labour connected with this most important subject, and all the correspondence with the gentlemen who were to support the desired alteration in parliament, fell upon Sir William Forbes. By his indefatigable efforts, however, aided by those of the Duke of Athol, the object was at length attained, and by the 25 Geo. HI. this important matter was put upon an improved footing. Ever alive to the call of humanity and the suffer- ings of the afflicted, he early directed his attention to the formation of a lunatic asylum in Edinburgh — an institution the want of which was at that time severely felt by all, but especially the poorer classes of society. Having collected the printed accounts of similar institutions in other places, he drew up a sketch of the intended establishment, and an ad- vertisement for its support, in March, 17S8. Though a sufficient sum could not be collected to set the de- sign on foot at that time, a foundation was laid, on which, under the auspices of his son. Sir William, and other benevolent and public-spirited individuals, the present excellent structure at Morningside was ultimately reared. The benevolent Dr. Johnston of I.eith having formed in 1792 a plan for the establishment of a blind asylum in Edinburgh, Sir William Forbes, both by liberal subscription and active exertion, greatly contributed to the success of the undertaking. He was the chairman of the committee appointed by the subscribers to draw up regulations for the estab- lishment, and when the committee of management was appointed, he was nominated vice-president, which situation he continued to hold till the time of his death. Without descending farther into detail, it is sufficient to obser\'e that, for the last thirty years of his life, Sir William was either at the head. 52 SIR WILLIAM FORBES. or actively engaged in the management, of all the charitable establishments of Edinburgh, and that many of the most valuable of them owed their exist- ence or success to his exertions. Nor was it only to his native city that his beneficent exertions were confined. The family estate of Pit- sligo having been forfeited to the crown in 1746, was brought to sale in 1758, and bought by Mr. Forbes, Lord Pitsligo's only son. His embarrassments, however, soon compelled him to bring the lower barony of Pitsligo to sale, and it was bought by Mr. Garden of Troup : Sir William Forbes being the nearest heir of the family, soon after purchased seventy acres of the upper barony, including the old mansion of Pitsligo, now roofless and deserted. By the death of Mr. Forbes in 17S1 Sir William succeeded to the lower barony, with which he had now connected the old mansion house, and thus saw realized his early and favourite wish of restoring to his ancient family their paternal inheritance. The acquisition of this property, which, though extensive, was, from the embarrassments of the family, in a most neglected state, opened a boundless field for Sir William's active benevolence of disposi- tion. In his character of landlord he was most anxious for the improvement and happiness of the people on his estates, and spared neither time nor expense to effect it. He early commenced their im- provement on a most liberal scale, and bent his at- tention in an especial manner to the cultivation of a large tract of moss which still remained in a state of nature. With this view he laid out in 1 783 the vil- lage of New Pitsligo, and gave every assistance, by lending money, and forbearance in the exaction of rent, to the incipient exertions of the feuars. Numbers of poor cottars were established by his care on the most uncultivated parts of the estate, most of whom not only paid no rent for the land they occu- pied, but were pensioners on his bounty — a mode of proceeding which, although it brought only burdens on the estate at first, has since been productive of the greatest benefit by the continual application of that greatest of all improvements to a barren soil — the labour of the human hand. The value of this pro- perty, and the means of improvement to the tenantry, were further increased by the judicious purchase in 1787 of the contiguous estates of Pittullie and Pitten- drum, which, by their situation on the sea-shore, af- forded the means of obtaining in great abundance sea-ware for the lands. The liberal encouragement which he afforded soon brought settlers from all quarters ; the great improvements which he made himself scrv'ed both as a model and an incitement to his tenantry; the formation of the great road from Peterhead to Banff, which passed through the village of New Pitsligo, and to which he largely contributed, connected the new feuars with those thriving sea- ports; and before his death he had the satisfaction of seeing assembled on a spot which, at his acquisition of the estate, was a barren waste, a thriving popula- tion of 300 souls, and several thousand acres smiling with cultivation which were formerly the abode only of the moor-fowl or the curlew. In order to encourage industry on his estate, he established a spinning-school at New Pitsligo, intro- duced the linen manufacture, and erected a bleach- field — undertakings which have since been attended with the greatest success. At the same time, to pro- mote the education of the young, he built a school- house, where the Society for the Propagation of Christian Knowledge established a teacher ; and in order to afford to persons of all persuasions the means of attending that species of worship to which they were inclined, he built and endowed not only a chapel of ease, with a manse for the minister, connected with the Established Church, but a chapel, with a dwelling-house for an Episcopal clergj'man, for the benefit of those who belonged to that persuasion. Admirable acts of beneficence, hardly credible in one who resided above two hundred miles from this scene of his bounty, and was incessantly occupied in pro- jects of improvements or charity in his own city ! To most men it would appear that such support and attention to these multifarious oljjects of benevo- lence, both in Edinburgh and on his Aberdeenshire estates, would have absorbed the whole of both his fortune and his time which could be devoted to ob- jects of beneficence. But that was not Sir William Forbes' character. Indefatigable in activity, un- wearied in doing good, he was not less strenuous in private than in public charity ; and no human eye will ever know, no human ear ever learn, the exten- sive and invaluable deeds of kindness and benevolence which he performed, not merely to all the unfortunate who fell within his own obser\'ation, but all who were led by his character for beneficence to apply to him for relief. Perhaps no person ever combined to so great a degree the most unbounded pecuniary generosity with delicacy in the bestowal of the gift, and discrimination in the mode in which it was ap- plied. Without giving way to the weakness of in- discriminately relieving all who apply for charity, which so soon surrounds those who indulge in it with a mass of idle or profligate indigence, he made it a rule to inquire personally, or by means of those he could trust, into the character and circumstances of those who were partakers of his bounty: and when he found that it was really deserved, that virtue had been re- duced by suffering, or industry blasted by misfortune, he put no bounds to the splendid extent of his bene- factions. To one class in particular, in whom the sufferings of poverty are perhaps more severely felt than by any other in society, the remnants of old and respectable families who had survived their relations, or been broken down by misfortune, his charity was in a most signal manner exerted ; and numerous aged and respectable individuals who had once known better days would have been reduced by his death to absolute ruin if they had not been fortunate enough to find in his descendants the heirs not only of his fortune, but of his virtue and generosity. Both Sir William's father and mother were of Episcopalian families, as most of those of the higher class in Aberdeenshire at that period were; and he was early and strictly educated in the tenets of that persuasion. He attended Chief-baron Smith's chapel in Blackfriars' Wynd, of which he was one of the vestry, along with the esteemed Sir Adolphus Ough- ton, then commander-in-chief in Scotland. In 177' it was resolved to join this congregation with that of two other chapels in Carruber's Close and Skinner's Close, and build a more spacious and commodious place of worship for them all united. In this under- taking, as in most others of the sort, the labouring oar fell to Sir William Forbes; and by his personal exertions, and the liberal subscriptions of himself and his friends, the Cowgate Chapel was at length com- pleted, afterwards so well known as one of the most popular places of worship in Edinburgh. When the new bankrupt act, which had been en- acted only for a limited time, expired in 1783, Sir William Forbes was appointed convener of the mer- cantile committee in Edinburgh, which corresponded with the committees of Glasgow and Aberdeen, of which Provost Colquhoun and Mr. Milne were re- spectively conveners; and their united efforts and intelligence produced the great improvement upon the law which was effected by that act. By it the SIR WILLIAM FORBES. 53 sequestration law, which under the old statute had extended to all descriptions of debtors, was confined to merchants, traders, and others properly falling under its spirit; the well-known regulations for the equalization of arrestments and poindings within sixty days, were introduced; sequestrations, which included at first only the personal estate, were ex- tended to the whole property; and the greatest im- provement of all was introduced, namely, the restric- tion of what was formerly alternative to a system of private trust, under judicial control. Sir William Forbes, who corresponded with the London solicitor who drew the bill, had the principal share in sug- gesting these the great outlines of the system of mercantile bankruptcy in this country; and accord- ingly, when the convention of royal burghs, who paid the expense attending it, voted thanks to the lord- advocate for carrying it through parliament, they at the same time (loth July, 1783) directed their preses to "convey the thanks of the convention to Sir William Forbes, Hay Campbell, Esq., solicitor- general for Scotland, and Mr. Milne, for their great and uncommon attention to the bill." On the death of Mr. Forbes of Pitsligo, only son of Lord Pitsligo, in 1782, whose estate and title were forfeited for his accession to the rebellion in 1745, Sir William Forbes, as the nearest heir in the female line of the eldest branch of the family of Forbes, claimed and obtained from the lyon-court the designation and arms of Pitsligo. He was the heir of the peerage under the destination in the patent, if it had not been forfeited. Hitherto Sir William Forbes' character has been considered merely as that of a public-spirited, active, and benevolent gentleman, who, by great activity and spotless integrity, had been eminently prosperous in life, and devoted, in the true spirit of Christian charity, a large portion of his ample means and valuable time to the relief of his fellow- creatures, or works of public utility and improvement ; but this was not his only character — he was also a gentleman of the highest breeding, and most dignified manners; the life of every scene of innocent amusement or re- creation, the head of the most cultivated and elegant society in the capital; and a link between the old Scottish aristocratical families, to which he belonged by birth, and the rising commercial opulence with which he was connected by profession, as well as the literary circle with which he was intimate from his acquirements. His intimate acquaintance with the first literary characters of the day, and the exten- sive correspondence which had fallen into his hands, probably suggested to Sir William Forbes the idea of writing the life of Dr. Beattie, one of his earliest and most valued friends, and whose eminence was not only such as to call for such an effort of bio- graphy, but whose acquaintance with all the eminent writers of the time, rendered his life the most favour- able opportunity for portraying the constellation of illustrious men who shed a glory over Scotland at the close of the eighteenth century. He executed this work accordingly, which appeared in 1805, shortly before his death, in such a way as to give the most favourable impression of the distinction which he would have attained as an author, had his path in general not lain in a more extended and pe- culiar sphere of usefulness. It rapidly went through a second edition, and is now deservedly ranked high among the biographical and historical remains of the last century. One peculiar and most salutary species of benevo- lence was practised by Sir William Forbes to the greatest extent. His situation as head of a great banking establishment led to his receiving frequent applications in the way of business for assistance, from young men not as yet possessed of capital. By a happy combination of caution with liberality in making these advances, by inquiring minutely into the habits and moral character of the individuals as- sisted, and proportioning the advance to their means and circumstances, he was enabled, to an almost in- credible extent, to assist the early efforts of industry, without in the least endangering the funds committed by others to his care. Hundreds in every rank in Edinburgh were enabled, by his paternal assistance, to commence life with advantage, who otherwise could never have been established in the world ; and numbers who afterwards rose to affluence and pro- sperity, never ceased in after-years to acknowledge with the warmest gratitude the timely assistance which first gave the turn to their heretofore adverse fortunes, and laid the foundation of all the success which they after\vards attained. The benevolence of his disposition and the warmth of his heart seemed to expand with the advance of life and the increase of his wealth. Unlike most other men, he grew even more indulgent and humane, if that were possible, in his older than his earlier years. The intercourse of life, and the experience of a most extensive business, had no effect in diminishing his favourable opinion of mankind, or cooling his ardour in the pursuit of beneficence. Viewing others in the pure and unsullied mirror of his own mind, he im- puted to them the warm and benevolent feelings with which he himself was actuated; and thought they were influenced by the same high springs of conduct -which directed his own life. It was an early rule with him to set aside every year a certain portion of his income to works of charity, and this proportion increasing with the growth of his fortune, ultimately reached an almost incredible amount. Unsatisfied even with the immense extent and grow- ing weight of his public and private charities, he had, for many years before his death, distributed large sums annually to individuals on whom he could rely to be the almoners of his bounty; and his revered friend Bishop Jolly received in this way ;[^ioo a year, to be distributed around the remote village of Fraser- burgh, in Aberdeenshire. These sums were bestowed under the most solemn promise of secrecy, and with- out any one but the person charged with the bounty being aware who the donor was. Numbers in this way in every part of the country partook of his charity, without then knowing whose was the hand which blessed them; and it frequently happened that the same persons who had been succoured by his al- moners, afterwards applied to himself; but on such occasions, he invariably relieved them if they really seemed to require assistance; holding, as he himself expressed it, that his public and private charities were distinct ; and that his right hand should not know what his left hand had given. But the end of a life of so much dignity and use- fulness, the pattern of benevolence, refinement, and courtesy, was at length approaching. He had a long and dangerous illness in 1791, from which, at the time, he had no hopes of recovery; and which he bore with the resignation and meekness which might have been expected from his character. Though that complaint yielded to the skill of his medical friends, it left the seeds of a still more dangerous malady, in a tendency to water in the chest. In 1802 he had the misfortune to lose Lady Forbes, the loved and worthy partner of his virtues; which sensibly affected his spirits, though he bore the be- reavement with the firmness and hope which his strong religious principles inspired. In May, 1S06, shortly after his return from London, whither he 54 JOHN DE FORDUX DAVID FORDYCE. had been summoned as a witness on Lord Melville's trial, he began to feel symptoms of shortness of breath; and the last house where he dined was that of his son. Lord Medwyn, on occasion of the christ- ening of one of his children, on the 2Sth of June, 1806. After that time he was constantly confined to the house; the difficulty of breathing increased, and his sufferings for many months were very severe. During all this trying period not a complaint ever escap^ his lips. He constantly prayed for assist- ance to be enabled to bear whatever the Almighty might send; and at length death closed his memor- able career, on the 12th November, 1806, when surrounded by his family, and supported by all the hopes and consolations of religion, amidst the tears of his relations, and the blessings of his country. Sir William Forbes was succeeded in his title and estates by his son. Sir William, a man of the most amiable and upright character, who ha\-ing been cut ofiF in the middle of his years and useful- ness, was succeeded by his son, Sir John Stuart Forbes. The subject of our memoir left two other sons, Mr. John Hay Forbes {Lord Medwyn) ahd Mr. George Forbes, and five daughters, four of whom were married: Lady Wood, wife of Sir Alexander Wood; Mrs. Macdonald of Glengarry-; Mrs. Skene of Rubislaw; and Mrs. Mackenzie of Portmore. We close this notice of Sir William Forbes, in the words of Sir Walter Scott, who, in his notes to Marmion, remarks of him, that he was "unequalled, perhaps, in the degree of individual affection entertained for him by his friends, as well as in the general esteem and respect of Scotland at large;" and who, in that noble poem, commemorates his virtues with equal truth and tenderness: — '■' Far may we search before we find \ heart so manly and so kind! " FORDUX, or DE FORDUN, John, the cele- brated author of the Scotkhroiticon, was probably born about the middle of the fourteenth century, and at the village of Fordun, in Kincardineshire, from which he seems to have taken his name. Walter Bower, the continuator of his historv-, speaks of him as a simple man, who never graduated in the schools. It would appear, however, that he possessed sufficient learning to fit him for the profession of a priest and the composition of a Latin historv', as these two various kinds of labour were then practised. He was a priest of the diocese of St. Andrews, and a canon of the church of Aberdeen, where he is said to have resided at the time when he composed his history. This great composition was in progress, as he himself informs us, in the reign of Richard II. of England, which extended between the years 1387 and 1399 ; and this, vague as it is, is one of the few dates that can be supplied respecting the life of the chronicler. The work produced by Fordun, though deformed by the superstitious and incorrect ideas of the age, is nevertheless a respiectable production, fally qualified to bear comparison with the works of the contemporary English historians. The merit of the author is increased in no mean degree by the motive which prompted him to undertake the com- ptosition — a desire of supplying the want of those historical monuments which Edward I. carried away to England. To quote the quaint words of a monkish writer :* " After the loss of these chronicles, a venerable Scottish priest, by name John Fordun, arose, and feeling his heart titillated and effer%escent with patriotic zeal, he applied his hand boldly to ' .\s translated by Mr. P. F. Tytler, in his Lh-es of Scottish Worthies, article "Fordun." the work ; nor did he desist from the undertaking until, by the most laborious study and perseverance, traversing England and the adjacent provinces of his own country, he had recovered so much of the lost materials as enabled him to compose five vol- umes of the delectable gests of the Scots, which he drew up in a sufficiently chronicle-like style, as they are to be found in the great volume entitled the ScotichronUon. In this undertaking it is impossible to refrain from bestowing great praise upon the in- dustry of the author. For, adverting to the fact that to commit all the records of past ages to the memory is the attribute of God rather than man; he, upon this consideration, travelled on foot, like an un- wearied and investigating bee, through the flower)' meadows of Britain, and into the oracular recesses of Ireland ; taking his way through provinces and towns, through universities and colleges, through churches and monasteries, entering into conversa- tion, and not unfrequently sharing at bed and board, with historians and chronologists; turning over their books, debating and disputing with them, and prick- ing down, or intitulating in his descriptive tablets, all that most pleased him; in this manner, and by pur- suing indefatigable investigation, he became pos- sessed of the knowledge which was before unknown to him, and collecting it with studious care in the revolving sinuosities of his parchment code, Hke rich honeycombs in a historical hive, he, as I have already premised, divided them into five books of elegant composition, which brought down the history to the death of the sainted King Da^id." The result of Fordun's labours is, that we possess an account of several ages of Scottish historj- which otherwise would have been in a great measure blank. The two first of the five books into which he di\-ide5 his work may be laid aside as relating only to the fabulous part of the narrative; the last re- fers to the period between 1056 and 1153, and is a valuable piece of histor)-. Posterior to the year last mentioned Fordun has only written detached notes, which, however, are themselves of no small value for the facts which they contain. When the vener- able canon found himself too infirm to continue his labours, he committed the materials which he had collected to Walter Bower, who, as noticed else- where, became abbot of Inchcolm in 141 8, and by whom the work was brought down to the year 1436. The Scotkhronkon was afterwards copied in various monasteries, and has accordingly been handed down in several shapes, each slightly different from the other, under the titles of the Book of Scone, the Book of Paisley, and other denominations. Finally, the earlier part formed a substructure for the ampli- fied work of Hector Boece, and the elegant one of Buchanan. The work itself has been twice printed, first at Oxford, by Heame, in five vols. 8vo, and afterwards at Edinburgh in one volume folio, \»ith a preface by Goodal ; but a translation is still a desider- atum in Scottish historical literature. FORDYCE, D.A.VID, professor of philosophy in the Marischal College, Aberdeen, and author of several esteemed works, was one of the tvventy-one children of Provost Fordyce of that city, and whose wife was a sister of Alexander and Thomas Black- well, whose lives have appeared previously in this work. The father of the Blackwells was professor of di\-inity, Dr. Thomas Blackwell became professor of Greek, and his widow founded a chemical chair in Marischal College, which has thus become identi- fied with the history of both the Fordyces and the Blackwells. Da%-id Fordyce was bom in 1711, and was the second son of his parents. To quote the GEORGE EORDYCE. 53 only accessible authority respecting him' — -After be- ing educated at the grammar-school of his native city, he was entered of Marischal College in 1724, where he went through a course of philosophy under Professor Daniel Jarden, and of mathematics under Mr. John Stewart. He took his degree of A.M. in 1728, when he was but little more than seventeen years old. Being intended for the church, his next application was to the study of divinity, under the professor of that branch, Mr. James Chalmers, a man of great learning and piety, and ancestor of the individuals who have so long carried on the Aber- dan JourmiL newspaper. Mr. Fordyce studied divinity with great ardour, and in time obtained a license as a preacher of the gospel, though he was not so fortunate as to procure a living. In 1742 he was appointed professor of moral philosophy in Marischal College, a chair which then demanded a greater range of accomplishments than now. It was the duty of Mr. Fordyce, not only to deliver the usual philosophic lectures, but to give instructions in a similar manner on natural history, chronology, Greek and Roman antiquities, mechanics, optics, and astronomy; and it is acknowledged that he ac- quitted himself of this laborious task in a very respect- able manner. The connection of some of his col- leagues with the literary system of the metropolis appears to have introduced Mr. Fordyce to the celebrated Dodsley, by whom he was employed to write the article "Moral Philosophy" for the Modern Preceptor; a task which he performed in so creditable a manner, that it was afterwards found necessary to publish his work in an independent form, under the title of lyie Elements of Moral Philosophy. It ap- peared in 1754, and was undoubtedly the most ele- gant and useful compendium of moral science which had then been given to the public. Previously to this, Mr. Fordyce had attracted some notice as an author, though without his name, in Dialogues con- cerning Education, the first volume of which was published in 1745, and the second in 1748. It is a work of very considerable merit, but somewhat tinged by the fopperies of the school of Shaftesbury, although entirely free from its more injurious notions. He was engaged in other literary designs, and af- forded the promise of rising to great eminence in the world, when he was cut off by a premature death. In 1750 he made a tour through France, Italy, and other countries, with a particular view to visit Rome, and was returning home in 1 751 when he unhappily lost his life in the forty-first year of his age, by a storm on the coast of Holland.' His death is pathe- tically noticed by his brother Dr. James Fordyce, in his Addresses to the Deity, and an epitaph from the same pen, conceived in a somewhat bombastical style, will be found in the Gentleman's Magazine for 1796. FORDYCE, George, a distinguished physician and lecturer on medicine, was born at Aberdeen, November 18, 1736, and was the only and post- humous child of Mr. George Fordyce, a brother of the other three distinguished persons of the same name recorded in the present work, and the pro- prietor of a small landed estate, called Broadford, 1 An unpublished article of the Biographia Brilannica, quoted in Chalmers' Getieral Biographical Dictionary. * The posthumous works of this ingenious person were — Tkeoiiorus, a Dialogtie concertiiiig the Art 0/ Preaching, i2mo, which is a work of considerable uti'ity to young divines, and has been repeatedly printed, along with his brother. Dr. James Fordyce's sermon on The Eloquence of the Pulpit; and Tlu Temple of I'irtue, a Dream, which was given to the world in 1757, with some additions by the same distinguished relative. in the neighbourhood of that city. Ilis mother, not long after, marrying again, he was taken from her, when about two years old, and sent to Foveran, at which place he received his school education. He was removed thence to the university of Aberdeen, where he was made M.A. when only fourteen years of age. In his childhood he had taken great delight in looking at vials of coloured liquids which were placed at the windows of an apothecary's shop. To this circumstance, and to his acquaintance with the learned Alexander Garden, M.D., many years a phy- sician in South Carolina, and latterly in London, but then apprentice to a surgeon and apothecary in Aberdeen, he used to attribute the resolution he vei7 early formed to study medicine. He was in consequence sent, when about fifteen years old, to his uncle, Dr. John Fordyce, who, at that time, practised medicine at Uppingham, in Northampton- shire. With him he remained several years, and then went to the university of Edinburgh, where, after a residence of about three years, he received the degree of M.D., in October, 1758. His inaugu- ral dissertation was upon catarrh. While at Edin- burgh, Dr. Cullen was so much pleased with his diligence and ingenuity, that, besides showing him many other marks of regard, he used frequently to give him private assistance in his studies. The pupil was ever after grateful for this kindness, and was accustomed to speak of his preceptor in terms of the highest respect, calling him often "his learned and revered master." About the end of 1758 he came to London, but went shortly after to Leyden, for the purpose chiefly of studying anatomy under Albinus. He returned in 1759 to London, where he soon de- termined to fix himself as a teacher and practitioner of medicine. When he made known this intention to his relations, they highly disapproved of it, as the whole of his patrimony had been expended upon his education. Inspired, however, with that confidence which frequently attends the conscious possession of great talents, he persisted in his purpose, and, before the end of 1 759, commenced a course of lec- tures upon chemistry. This was attended by nine pupils. In 1 764 he began to lecture also upon materia Tuedica and the practice of physic. These three sub- jects he continued to teach nearly thirty years, giving, for the most part, three courses of lectures on each of them every year. A course lasted nearly four months ; and, during it, a lecture of nearly an hour was delivered six times in the week. His time of teaching commenced about seven o'clock in the morn- ing, and ended at ten ; his lecture upon the three above-mentioned subjects being given, one imme- diately after the other. In 1765 he was admitted a licentiate of the College of Physicians. In 1770 he was chosen physician to St. Thomas's Hospital, after a considerable contest with Sir William (then Dr.) Watson ; the number of votes in his favour being 109, in that of Dr. Watson 106. In 1774 he became a member of the Literary Club ; and in 1776 was elected a fellow of the Royal Society. In 1787 he was admitted a fellow of the College of Physicians. No circumstance can demonstrate more strongly the high opinion entertained of his abilities by the rest of the profession in London, than his reception into that body. He had been particularly active in the dispute which had existed about twenty years before between the fellows and licentiates, and had, for this reason, it was thought, forfeited all title to be ad- mitted into the fellowship through favour. But the college, in 1787, were prejiaring a new edition of their Pharmacopa-ia ; and there was confessedly no one of their own number well acquainted with phar- maceutical chemistry. They wisely, therefore, sup« 56 GEORGE FORDYCE JAMES FORDYCE. pressed their resentment of his former conduct, and, by admitting him into tiicir body, secured his assist- ance in a work wliicli tliey were unaljle to perform well themselves. In 1793 he assisted in forming a small society of physicians and surgeons, which after- wards published several volumes, under the title of lih'dual and Chirurgical Transactions; and continued to attend its meetings most punctually till within a month or two of his death. Having thus mentioned some of the principal events of his literary life, we shall next give a list of his various medical and philosophical works; and first, of those which were published by himself: — I. Elciiunts of AgriciiUure and I'egetalion. lie had given a course of lectures on these subjects to some young men of rank ; soon after the close of which one of his hearers, Mr. Stuart Mackenzie, presented him with a copy of them from notes he had taken while they were delivered. Dr. Fordyce corrected the copy, and afterwards published it under the above-mentioned title. — 2. Elements of the Prac- tice of Physic. This was used by him as a text-book for a part of his course of lectures on that subject. — 3. A Treatise on the Digestion of Food. It was ori- ginally read before the College of Physicians as the Guelstonian Lecture. — 4. Four Dissertations on Fever. A fifth, which completes the subject, was left by him in manuscript, and afterwards published. His other works appeared in the Philosophical Transactions, and \.\\ii. Medical ami Chirurgical Transactions. In the former are eight papers by him, with the follow- ing titles: — I. "Of the Light produced by Inflam- mation." 2. "Examination of various Ores in the Museum of Dr. W. Hunter." 3. "A New Method of assaying Copper Ores." 4. "An Account of some Experiments on the Loss of Weight in Bodies on being Melted or Heated." 5. "An Account of an Experiment on Heat." 6. "The Cronian Lec- ture on Muscular Motion." 7. "On the Cause of the Additional Weight which Metals acquire on being Calcined." 8. "Account of a New Pendulum, being the Bakerian Lecture." His papers in the Medical and Chirnrgical Transactions are: — I. "Ob- servations on the Small-pox, and Causes of Fever." 2. "An Attempt to improve the Evidence of Medi- cine." 3. Some Observations upon the Composi- tion of Medicines." He was, besides, the inventor of the experiments in heated rooms, an account of which was given to the Royal Society by Sir Charles Bladgen; and was the author of many improvements in various arts connected with chemistry, on which he used frequently to be consulted by manufacturers. Though the subject of this memoir had projected various literary works in addition to those which have been mentioned, nothing was left by him in manuscript, except the Dissertations on /mv- already spoken of, and two introductory lectures, one to his course of materia tnedica, the other to that of the practice of physic. This will not ajipear extraordin- ary to those who knew what confidence he had in the accuracy of his memory. He gave all his lectures without notes, and perhaps never possessed any; he took no memorandum in writing of the engagements he formed, whether of business or pleasure, and was always most punctual in observing them; and when he composed his works for the public, even such as describe successions of events bound together, as far as we can perceive, by no necessary tie, his materials, such at least as were his own, were altogether drawn from stores in his memory, which had often been laid up there many years before. In consequence of this retentiveness of memory, and of great reading and a most inventive mind, he was, perhaps, more generally skilled in the sciences which are either directly subser\'ient to medicine, or remotely con- nected with it, than any other person of his time. One fault in his character as an author ])robably arose, either wholly or in part, from the very excel- lence which has been mentioned. This was his de- ficiency in the art of literary composition, the know- ledge of which he might have insensibly acquired to a much greater degree than was possessed by him, had he felt the necessity in his youth of frequently committing his thoughts to writing, for the purpose of preserving them. But, whether this be just or not, it must be confessed that, notwithstanding his great learning, which embraced many subjects no way allied to medicine, he seldom wrote elegantly, often obscurely and inaccurately ; and that he fre- quently erred with respect even to orthography. His language, however, in conversation, which confirms the preceding conjecture, was not less correct than that of most other persons of good education. As a lecturer, his delivery was slow and hesitating, and frequently interrupted by pauses not required by his subject. Sometimes, indeed, these continued so long, that persons unaccustomed to his manner were apt to fear that he was embarrassed. But these dis- advantages did not prevent his having a considerable number of pupils, actuated by the expectation of re- ceiving from him more full and accurate instruction than they could elsewhere obtain. His person is said to have been handsome in his youth ; but his countenance, from its fulness, must have been always inexpressive of the great powers of his mind. His manners too were less refined, and his dress in gene- ral less studied, than what most p.ersons in this coun- try regard as proper for a physician. From these causes, and from his spending no more time with his patients than what was sufficient for his forming a just opinion of their ailments, he had for many years but little private employment in his profession ; and never, even in the latter part of his life, when his reputation was at its height, enjoyed nearly so much as many of his contemporaries. It is worthy of men- tion, however, that the amount of his fees during the year immediately preceding his decease, was greater, notwithstanding his advanced age and infirm health, than it had ever been before in the same space of time. He had always been fond of the pleasures of society ; and in his youth, to render the enjoyment of them compatible with his pursuits after knowledge, he used to sleep very little. He has often, indeed, been known to lecture for three hours in a morning without having undressed himself the preceding night. The vigour of his constitution enabled him to sustain, for a considerable time, with- out apparent injury, this debilitating mode of life. But at length he was attacked with gout, which afterwards became irregular, and for many years frequently affected him with excniciating pains in his stomach and bowels. In the latter part of his life, also, his feet and ancles were almost constantly swollen; and, shortly before his death, he had symp- toms of water in the chest. But these he disregarded, and uniformly attributed his situation, which for several weeks previous to his death he knew to be hopeless, to the presence of the first-mentioned disease. Death ultimately relieved him from his sufferings. May 25, 1802, when he was in the sixty- fourth year of his age. By his wife, who was the (laughter of Charles Stuart, Esq., conservator of Scots privileges in the United Netherlands, and whom he had married in 1 762, he left four children — two sons and two daughters. FORDYCE, James, D.D., author of the Sermofis to } 'otnig Women, was a younger brother of the sub- JAMES FORDYCE. 57 jects of two separate articles, and the fourth son of his parents. He was born at Aberdeen in 1720, and received the education requisite for a minister of the Scottish church at the Marischal College. In 1752 he was appointed minister of Brechin, but soon after was removed to Alloa, where at first he had many prejudices to encounter, though his popular manners and captivating style of pulpit oratory enabled him very speedily to overcome them. During his brief residence in this parish he published three occasional sermons, which attracted much notice; and in 1760 he increased his fame to a great degree by a discourse On the Folly, lu/amy, and Muery of Unla'wful Plea- sures, which he preached before the General Assembly, and afterwards gave to the public. The novelty of this sermon in a country where all the best sermons were evangelical, and the elegance of its style and sentiments, produced a great impression throughout the country. The preacher soon after went to Lon- don, and notwithstanding the difference between the Scottish Confession of Faith and the tenets of the English dissenters, offered himself on a vacancy at the meeting in Carter Lane, but without success. About this time he received the degree of D.D. from the university of Glasgow, and was invited by the meeting in Monkwell Street to be co-pastor with Dr. Lawrence, then aged and infirm. This invita- tion he accepted, and upon Dr. Lawrence's death, which happened soon after, he became sole pastor, and entered into the enjoyment of a very respectable income. During his ministry in this place he ac- quired a higher degree of popularity than probably ever was attained by the same means. The strong force of his eloquence drew men of all ranks and all persuasions to hear him. His action and elocution were original and peculiarly striking, being not a little assisted by his figure, which was tall beyond the common standard, and by a set of features which in preaching displayed great variety of expression and animation. Besides his regular attendants, who subscribed to his support, his meeting was frequented by men curious in eloquence; and it is said that the celebrated David Garrick was more than once a hearer, and spoke of Dr. Fordyce's skill in oratory with great approbation. With respect to his theo- logical sentiments, he appears to have possessed that general liberality which is civil to all systems, with- out being attached to any. From his printed works it would be easier to prove that he belonged to no sect, than that he held the principles of any. As to the matter, morality appears to have been his chief object ; and as to the manner, he ardently studied a polish and a spirit which was then seldom met with in English pulpits, although it had not been unusual in those of France. In 1771 Dr. Fordyce married Miss Henrietta Cum- myngs; and in 1775 he was involved in an unhappy dispute with his coadjutor, Mr. Toller, son-in-law to Dr. Lawrence. This misunderstanding originated in some omission of ceremonial politeness between the two reverend gentlemen, and from the want of inutual concession the breach widened, till reconcilia- tion became impossible. Dr. Fordyce appears, in- deed, to have been of an irritable temper, which led him on this occasion to be guilty of an act which ultimately he had reason deeply to regret, as it proved most injurious to his own interest. For, on undertaking to perform the whole duty of the chapel, he possessed sufficient influence to have Mr. Toller ejected from the pastoral charge. The consequence was, that the congregation became dissatisfied, split into parties, and gradually dispersed, when Dr. For- dyce was obliged to resign the ministry. It is true that bad health and the infirmities of old a<:e had their share in constraining him to this ste]>, but the congregation had previously almost entirely deserted the chapel, which was soon after shut up. Findmg himself no longer useful as a preacher. Dr. Fordyce, in the year 1783, left London, and retired first to Hampshire, and finally to Bath, where he continued to reside until his death, which took place on the 1st of October, 1796, in the seventy-sixth year of his age. We have in the following letter from Mrs. Fordyce a very interesting and instructing narrative of this melancholy event, while it presents, at the same time, a lively picture of Dr. Fordyce's piety and of some of the more amiable traits of his char- acter. "My dear Sir, — Being now able to sit up, I can only say, that had the state of my health when your last soothing but affecting letter came to hand ad- mitted of my writing at all, such a letter from a favourite friend would have impelled me to give it an immediate reply. Accept, dear sir, of my gratitude for what it contained, especially for that sympathy I so much stand in need of; it is the balm of true friendship; and though it reaches me from various quarters, still the wound bleeds, and will continue to bleed till God shall heal it by that re- union of souls which must take place ere long. "Hardly two people accost each other without a eulogium on his character, and a sigh for his death; but death it was not. To all human appearance he was translated. We spent a most agreeable evening together in my dressing-room, in which he was fond of sitting, on account of the fine air of the vale behind and the prospect; for he still kept his relish for all that was beautiful in nature. We were both engrossed with William Cowper's sermon to the Jews. "I read the hymns and psalms in the little pam- phlet. 'Ah!' said he, 'this carries me back to Monkwell Street, where we sang it together with my beloved flock; the strain shall be exalted when next we sing it.' Then turning to me, he said, 'We have read enough for to-night; before you call for supper let us have some music' My niece is a very fine performer; she immediately sat down to accom- pany him in some of his favourite airs on the piano- forte; and a very fine cadence she sung so delighted him, that he made her do it over again, and turning to me, he said, 'How many things have we to be grateful for ! The musical ear is a gift peculiar to some, withheld from others; there are many things in life richly to be enjoyed; all that leads up to God we may delight in, but whatever has no reference to him we should avoid. There are books called reli- gious offices, preparations for the sacrament, and preparations for death, &c. ; but for my own part, I never could think that such preparations consisted in such times being set apart for offices, and then re- turning to the world as having done with heaven for the time being. A man is not truly prepared for death unless by the tenor of his life he feels himself so wholly given up to God that his mind is in heaven before he goes hence; and he can only bring himself to that by the perpetual silent reference in all his words, thoughts, and actions to his Creator, which I have so often mentioned to you.' I replied, 'That indeed, doctor, is the test or criterion to judge himself by, for a man dare have no reference or appeal for his actions to God if his deeds condemn him to his own conscience.' 'God be praised!' said he; 'if I should leave you, I desire you may avail yourself of them. In addition to religion and the Scri[>tures there are books, friendships, and music : I would name more, but these are sufficient ; cast yourself on God through your Redeemer. He will care for you 58 JAMES FORDYCE JOHN FORDYCE. and raise you up friends.' I aimed at changing; the conversation, and said, ' But you are better, my dear. ' 'I am certainly easier,' he replied, 'and have had less pain and better symptoms for two or three weeks past; and I assure you, my beloved, I am not tired of life at all: for though the Almighty knows I have been long ready for the summons, yet if it is his pleasure to let the lamp of life burn on a little longer, I am satisfied, and I am his.' " He sat his usual time after supper, which he par- took of in a moderate way, without any disrelish. About eleven he rang for the servants, who with my niece and myself attended him everj' night to his bed-chamber. To my unspeakable joy it seemed to cost him much less effort than common to mount the stairs, which formerly was so painful a task, that at every landing-place a chair was set for him to rest on ere he could ascend to the ne.xt. He joined us all in observing with gratitude and wonder that he should gain more ease by living longer. He and I conversed in a very pleasing style on various subjects till about one o'clock, and then he urged my going to bed, lest I should be hurt by such late hours. He also for- bade me to get up in the night, as an.xiety about him had often made me do, unless I should hear him call me; he made me promise I would not, after which we embraced. I left him very happy, comfortable, and serene, I might add even cheerful. We both slept in our different apartments, and mine had a door of communication with his, so he could not stir without my hearing. He awoke about two o'clock and lighted a wa.x bougie at his lamp, one of which stood on a dumb-waiter at his bed-side with his medicines and cordials. He lighted it to take the ethereal spirit; but forgetting to blow it out, it un- luckily took fire in the bunch, the smell of which awoke him perhaps in some alarm. He then called to me, who was just in my first sleep, and springing up eagerly in the dark I stumbled, and struck my head against the door ; the blow for a kw minutes stunned me, and made me reel in coming up to him. I affected to be well that he might not be alarmed. ' I called to you, my love, lest the smell of fire which the bougie occasioned might have frightened you. You have paid dear for coming to me by this blow.' Saying so he got up, and calling the women with a firm voice three or four times, they and my niece were all at once with us. I was praying him to re- t irn to bed, but he refused until he should get me, from their hands, some sal volatile. He then said, '.\re you better?' I answered, 'O well, well.' 'God be praised,' said he, raising his hands, and with the words in his mouth he fell in our arms without a groan, a sigh, or so much as the rattle in the throat. The spirit was instantly fled, and for ever, to the God that gave it. He was taken from my arms who will ever live in my heart, and I saw him no more." Dr. Fordyce's first literary attempt was made as editor of the posthumous work of his brother, Mr. David Fordyce, published in 1752, entitled The Art of Preaching. But he is best known to the world by the ingenious and elegant sermons which he addressed to young women, and his addresses to young men. He was author, however, of several other publica- tions, ' and was remarkable for the energy and use- ' The following is a list of Dr. Fordyce's works: — 1. ''The Eloquence of the Pulpit, an Ordination Sermon, to which is added a Charge," lamo, 1752. 2. "An Essay on the Action proper for the Pulpit," lamo. Both these are published at the end of "Theodonis, a Dialogue concerning the Art of Preaching, by David Fordyce," 3d edition, ismo, 1755. 3. "The Method of Edification by Pub'ic Instruction," an Ordination Sermon, to which is added a Charge, i2mo, 1754. fulness of his pulpit instructions. His piivate char- acter was amiable, his manners those of a gentleman and Christian. He blended great cheerfulness with sincere and ardent piety. He possessed a cultivated understanding, a warm heart, and great liberality of sentiment. He was a steady friend of civil and reli- gious toleration— not from indifference, but from a true spirit of Christian philanthropy. FORDYCE, Colonel John, a brave and pious officer, who fell in the Kaffir war in 185 1, was the eldest son of Thomas J. Fordyce, Esq., of Ay ton, Berwickshire, an extensive landed proprietor of great worth and intelligence. Under the parental roof he was trained from his earliest years in the best lessons of a religious education. His accom- plished and truly Christian mother, who "had no greater joy than to see her children walking in the truth," was her son's faithful instructress in that knowledge which maketh wise unto salvation. A portion of the .sacred volume was committed each morning to memory, and around the family altar prayer was offered daily to the Lord. At the age of twelve the subject of this memoir had mastered several of the higher Latin classics, and acquired a tolerable knowledge of Greek. For the acquisition of languages he discovered peculiar aptitude, analyz- ing with much facility the passages of his favourite authors. It was manifest, from the enthusiasm with which he followed Caesar and Hannibal, and other heroes of antiquity, through their respective fields of conflict, that he was destined for a militarj' life. The v.Titer of these observations has a vivid recol- lection of the graphic skill with which, after rising from the pages of Livy or Tacitus, he described the successes or discomfitures of the combatants, and pronounced on the equity or injustice of the causes of warfare. Before leaving home for a private semi- nary in England, he was thoroughly conversant with the works of our best modem historians, travellers, and poets. After his return, he completed his literary curriculum in Edinburgh, and was resident for some time with Doctor (now Bishop) Terrot, enjoying under his able superintendence advantages equivalent to those of an English university. His first commission as an ensign in the 34th regi- ment was dated in 1828. He served with that corps (then in Nova Scotia) until 1832, when he obtained an unattached lieutenancy. The same year, how- ever, he returned to full pay, first in the 94th, and soon after in the 21st. He served with the 21st North British fusiliers until 1836, when he obtained his company in the 35th regiment, from which he These were delivered at the ordination of Mr. John Gibson, minister of St. Ninians, May 9th, 1754. 4. "The Temple of Virtue," a Dream, i2mo, 1747. 2d edition, much altered, 1755. 5. "The Folly, Infamy, and Misery of Unlawful Pleasures," a Sermon preached before the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, 25th May, 1760 — 8vo, 1760. 6. "A Sermon occasioned by the Death of the Rev. Dr. Samuel Lawrence, who departed this Life ist October, 1760, with an Address at his Interment," 8vo, 1760. 7. "Sermons to Young Women," 2 vols. i2mo, 1766. 8. "The Character and Conduct of the Female Sex, and the Advantages to be derived by Young Men from the Society of Virtuous Young Women;" a Discourse in three parts, delivered in Monkwell Street Chapel, ist January, 1776; 8vo, 1776. 9. "Addresses to Young Men," 2 vols. i2mo, 1777. 10. "The Delusive and Persecuting Spirit of Popery:" a .Sermon preached in the Monkwell Street Chapel on the loth of February, being the day appointed for the General Fast, 8vo, 1779. 11. "Charge delivered in Monkwell Street Chapel, at the Ordination of the Rev. James Lindsay," Svo, 1783. Printed with the Sermon delivered by Dr. Hunter on that occasion. 12. "Addresses to the Deity," i2mo. 13. " Poems," i2mo, 17S6. JOHN FORDYCE. 59 exchanged into the nth foot in 1S39. Having in 1844 obtained liis step as major in the latter regi- ment, he exchanged the same year into the 74th Highlanders. In 1846 he became lieutenant-colonel and commanding officer of this regiment, in wiiich important position he gained the esteem of the miH- tai-y authorities, and the affection of all who served under him. Though possessed of a good private fortune, so strong was his esprit de corps, that in March, 1S51, he embarked with his regiment for the Cape of Good Hope, where, after months of severe and harassing warfare, he fell at the head of his beloved Highlanders, in the prime of manhood, and with a name already one of renown. Endowed with a masculine understanding, a capa- cious and retentive memory, an indomitable perse- verance, ample promise was afforded of literary dis- tinction. Highly gifted as was his intellect, which, as if by intuition, separated the accessories from the essentials of any subject, his moral qualities com- manded still higher admiration. His bosom was the very home of honour and generosity. "Truth in the inward parts, "manly independence in forming his opinions, and unflinching courage in expressing them, were united with the meekness of wisdom and an unaffected modesty of demeanour which shrank with sensitive aversion from all ostentatious display. In personal appearance Colonel Fordyce was consider- ably above the ordinaiy height, with a high mas- sive forehead, and a countenance which revealed profound thought, calm decision of purpose, and delicate sensibility. There was frequently also a look of pensive reflection, which indicated that he had been no stranger to the afflictions and sorrows of life. By a stranger, indeed, he might sometimes appear chargeable with a degree of reserve, border- ing even on haiitciir ; but those who knew him thoroughly could best appreciate the depth and con- stancy of his friendships, and his warm-hearted sym- pathy with his fellow-men, both "of high and of low degree." Deprived in youth of his excellent parents, to whom he was ever a dutiful and loving sort, he ful- filled with unwearied fidelity and tenderness the part of an elder brother towards all the other mem- bers of the family. In no feature of character was Colonel Fordyce more remarkable than in his strict conscientiousness. Every transaction, private or public, was conducted with a sacred regard to the authority and the glory of God. This profound sense of responsibility for his stewardship distinguished him not only in the more prominent departments of duty, but in the most minute details of every-day life. As an officer who had been called to occupy a high position in the British army, he was ardently and indefatigably de- voted to his professional avocations ; cheerfully ex- pending time and strength and pecuniary resources in promoting the temporal and spiritual welfare of the regiment which he commanded. Whilst sta- tioned in Glasgow, opportunities were incidentally afforded for marking the solicitude which he evinced in regard to the intellectual and moral improvement of soldiers' children ; using all practicable means, by week-day and Sabbath schools, that they might be trained to a virtuous life. The 74th, with their gallant colonel, were ordered from Glasgow to Clonmel, Ireland. The following n jtice from the Rev. Mr. Dill testifies to the estima- tion in which he was held in that place : — "Sir, — The death of Lieutenant-colonel Fordyce, 74th Highlanders, has been felt as a personal be- reavement by all who knew him. Clonmel was the last home-station of the 74th, where, after eight months' residence, they received orders for foreign service in November, 1850. To those even slightly acquainted with the army it will not sound strange to hear, in the published accounts from the Cape, 'that the whole colony deplores the loss of this noble officer. Both men and officers feel his loss severely, and at this juncture the loss the service has sustained is incalculable.' But those who knew Colonel Fordyce, not only as a soldier but as a man and a Christian, can truly estimate his loss to his regiment and his country. As chaplain to the 74th High- landers I had frequent opportunity of meeting and observing him. I can truly say that under God he devoted himself to his regiment and the service. Though not a member of the Presbyterian church, he was never absent from his pew on the Lord's-day. I continually found him superintending the regimental Sabbath and week-day schools, and could trace his kind advice and charity everj'where among the sick in hospital, the families and recruits of his regiment. On the evening before the 74th Highlanders left Clonmel for the Cape of Good Hope he called, and handed me ;^io for charitable purposes, requesting that I should not give his name as the donor. Be- sides this he had given, through my name, within the three preceding months, ;^I5 to other charities. What his other donations were I know not. From what I have heard they must have been numerous, as I am sure they w'ere unostentatious. The la- mentable death of Colonel Fordyce affords me the sad pleasure of acknowledging the benevolence and worth which he would not permit to be made known while he was alive. I feel his death as if it were a personal bereavement, and I pray that our army may be blessed by many such officers. — I remain, yours truly, John Dill. "Manse, Clonmel, loth Jan. 1852." As evincing the Christian and philanthropic spirit by which Colonel Fordyce was animated, one or two extracts from his letters to the writer of these lines may be given. The following was received after a domestic bereavement : — "My dear , — My having been sent from Dublin with a flying column in pursuit of Smith O'Brien and other rebels must be my apology for not having written to acknowledge the receipt of the announcement of the deprivation you have sustained, and to assure you of my unfeigned sympathy. I may express my hope that, sustained by the same consola- tions which you have been so long the honoured instalment of imparting to others, your own bodily health and ability for active exertion may remain unimpaired. "I need not trespass upon you at this time with any notice of the treasonable proceedings here. The newspapers have given a full account of everjthing that has occurred ; and so far as we (the column of troops) are concerned, we have seen no enemy ex- cepting the continual rain, which is, of course, a very disagreeable one, as we have been marching about and encamped since the 28th July. O'Brien is, as you know, captured, and quietly lodged in jail, and I have no doubt that all thought of open armed rebellion is at an end for the present. " However it may fare with this unfortunate country, any one of common obsers'ation must see that the whole European world is in an unprece- dented state ; and that whatever may be our exact place in the series of predicted events, some great overwhelming change in the whole structure of human society is impending. My reading of Elliot's I/ora: Apocalyptia^ has been interrupted by my pres- ent occupations, before I could get beyond the first volume, or form any opinion as to his system of in- 6o JOHN FORDYCE SIR WILLIAM FORDYCE. terpretation of unfulfilled prophecy. Amidst all the chanj^es, present and coming, upon this world, we have individually many warnings to place our hopes on a world where change and cares are alike un- known,— considerations which it is superfluous in me to suggest to your matured and practised mind, but which rise naturally as the great subjects of the day and hour. A tent does not afford a good writing- table, and dani]) paper renders my writing more than usually illegible. I trust that Mrs. is well; and again assuring you of my good wishes, beg you to believe me ever faithfully and sincerely yours, "J. FORDYCE. "Tipperary, nth August, 1 848." The next extract is from a communication sent after the death of General Sir John Buchan, Colonel P'ordyce's uncle, and brother of the venerable Mr. Buchan of Kelloe: — " Although I take a Glasgow newspaper, the Scottish Guardian, in which there is a full account of the debates in your General Assembly, I have been too much occupied with other matters to look at them since my return, but I glanced at one speech of Dr. Duff's regarding the Indian missions, which appeared to be one of remarkable eloquence and power. He must be indeed gifted with no common energy of character, in addition to genius, eloquence, and many acquirements, to be able to resist the de- pressing lassitude of an oriental climate for so many years, and now to electrify and command a critical audience, as he appears to have done for hours during the late meeting of the assembly." A subsequent letter, of date Nov. 8, 1850, in- closing a generous donation for the benefit of certain Free Church students who were scantily provided, contains the following remarks: — "I have read Dr. Buchanan's book (the Ten Years' Conflict) with great interest; and although I may confess to you that, as to my personal taste, I prefer the liturgy and forms of the Church of England, and cannot quite see that principle required such a sacrifice as the disruption of the Church of Scotland, I sincerely believe now that the cause of the Free Church is in Scotland the cause of Christianity, and that even persons who have not the strong personal motives which I have to look favourably upon its exertions, should, with a cardinal at Westminster, sink all minor dif- ferences in their support of Protestant Christianity." "No one," writes his excellent brother. Major Fordyce, who had shared along with him the toils and perils of the disastrous struggle, "knew my brother's state of mind better than I did; for I had for a long time been constantly with him, and I knew that he was a faithful follower of Christ, and he is now where there is no more sorrow — no more pain. What a great thing it is to have such consolation! How much more dreadful would have been the sad b.-reavement if we could not have felt the confidence we do that he died a Christian, and that his removal from this world was the end of all trial to him, and the commencement of an eternity of joy!" The following particulars of the death of this brave ofTicer, who fell whilst fighting against the Kaffirs at tlie Cape, are gleaned from letters which appear in the Grahanistoion Journal, of 15th November: — "Fort Beaufort, Tuesday. — After the publica- tion of our extra, the following came to hand, and contains an account of the melancholy fate of the gallant Colonel Fordyce: — "November 6. — This being the promised day, all eyes were directed to the hills, which we knew to have been planted with the instruments of thunder. The clouds, however, lay piled in heaps long after sunrise; but no sooner had the rays of his refulgence escaped from the clouds which intercepted them, than the curtain gradually rose, and by seven o'clock the frequent report announced that another act of the dull tragedy had commenced. Peal after peal continued to reverberate among the steep acclivities of the rocky eminences which rise above the dark bush that conceals the enemy. Towards mid-day the wind changed to the south-east, which wafted the sounds from this direction. All were anxiously awaiting the arrival of intelligence from the scene of strife, as we had reason to believe that, from the rapid reports, the conflict was maintained with obstinacy and resolution. Hour succeeded hour, until long after, when in broken accents it was re- vealed that Colonel Fordyce had fallen. But as this report rested upon the authority of a private letter brought in by two mounted Fingoes, hopes were entertained that, in the heat and bustle of the moment, some mistake might have occurred. About nine at night, however, the event was confirmed by an eye-witness to the melancholy fact, from whom it appears that the colonel was leading his men into Waterkloof in column, when suddenly his march was arrested by a rocky precipice which flanked him in the form of a semicircle; here he found the rebels in considerable force, who knew too well the rules of military tactics to let so favourable an opportunity escape for inflicting a penalty. The bayonets of our brave countrymen in such a position were powerless; they had therefore to contend against an enemy con- cealed among inaccessible rocks, whom they could not assail; and thus fell, while showing to his men by example the first duties of a soldier, the good and the gallant Fordyce. Thus fell the father of his distinguished regiment, to the honour of which all his impulses were directed. The soldier, the women and children, to whose comforts he devoted himself with parental solicitude, will long cherish his re- membrance. It is to be regretted that so valuable a life should have been sacrificed in so ignoble a strife." Extract from the leading article of the A'aval and Milita)y Gazette, Februar)', 1852. . . . "And here we may observe that there must have been something singularly attractive in the noble soldier who fell at the head of the 74th Highlanders, which, in the short time (six months) he had been in the colony, and in Grahamstown in particular, should have so impressed and so endeared him to the in- habitants that the journals of that town announcing his death should be margined with black, and the bell of their distant church has tolled his funeral knell ; while the colours, half-mast high, floated languidly in the air, in token of a hero's fall!" FORDYCE, Sir William, F.R.S., a distin- guished physician, was a younger brother of David and James Fordyce, whose lives have already been recorded, and was born in the year 1 724. Like his brethren, he was educated at the Marischal College, of which he died lord-rector. At the age of eighteen he finished his academic studies, in which he had distinguished himself particularly by his proficiency in Greek and mathematics, the most solid as well as the most ornamental parts of academic knowledge. Having studied physic and surgery under a native practitioner, he joined the army as a volunteer, and afterwards served as surgeon to the brigade of guards on the coast of France and in all the military trans- actions which took place in Germany. The warm support of his military friends co-operated with his own merit in early recommending him to distinguished practice in London. His publications, particularly his treatise on fevers and ulcerated sore throat, ROBERT FORREST WILLIAM FORSYTH, 6t greatly extended his fame ; and he was sent for to greater distances, and received larger fees, than ahnost any physician of his time. The wealth which he thus acquired he liberally expended in benevolent actions, and was thus the means of doing much good as well as some harm. Having patronized his brother Alexander, who was a banker in London, he enabled that individual to enter upon an unusually extensive series of transactions, which, though sound in them- selves, exposed him to a malevolent combination of his brethren in trade, and hence the great bankruptcy of Fordyce & Co., which may be termed one of the most important domestic events in Britain during the latter part of the eighteenth century. Besides the losses which Sir WiUiam Fordyce thus incurred, he soon after became engaged for j{^io,C)00 more, which was lost by his brother in the project of a manufacture which totally failed ; and had it not been for the generosity of the Messrs. Drummond, bankers, who advanced him the necessary sum, he must have sub- mitted to a loss of personal liberty. Notwithstand- ing these severe shocks to his fortune, Sir William continued to maintain two poor families whom he had taken under his patronage, and who had no other resource. It is also to be mentioned, to the honour of this excellent man, that, besides his own losses by Alexander, he repaid those incurred by his brother James, amounting to several thousand pounds. The benevolence of Sir William Fordyce was a kind of enthusiasm. When he heard of a friend being ill, he would run to give him his advice, and take no fee for his trouble. His house was open to all kinds of meritorious persons in distressed circumstances, and he hardly ever wanted company of this kind. He was also indefatigable in his good offices towards young Scotsmen who had come to London in search of employment. His address had much of the courtly suavity of a past age, and his conversation, while unassuming, was replete with elegant anecdote and solid information. His eye beamed gentleness and humanity, ennobled by penetration and spirit. Al- though originally of a delicate constitution, by tem- perance and exercise he preserved his health for many years, but suffered at last a long and severe ill- ness, which ended in his death, December 4, 1792. Sir William, who had been knighted about 1787, wrote a treatise on the Venereal Disease; another, as already mentioned, on Fez'ers, and a third on Ulcer- ated Sore Throat; besides which he published, im- mediately before his death, a pamphlet on The Great Importance and Proper Method 0/ cultivating Rhubarb in Britain for Medicinal Uses. FORREST, Robert. This self-taught sculptor was born at Carluke, Lanarkshire, in 1790. He was bred as a stone-mason in the quarries of Carluke; but, having a spirit beyond his mechanical occupa- tion, he employed his leisure hours in the higher departments of stone-carving, imtil he obtained notice and some distinction as a sculptor. This recognition brought him occupation in the honour- able profession he had adopted, and his first public work was a statue of Sir William Wallace, executed in 1 81 7, and which occupies a niche in the steeple of Lanark parish church. After this he was com- missioned to form the colossal statue, fourteen feet in height, of the first Viscount Melville, which sur- mounts the pillar copied from Trajan's Column at Rome, and is erected in the centre of St. Andrew's Square, Edinburgh. Another of his public works, executed about the same time, was the statue of John Knox which rears its commanding form in the Necropolis of Glasgow, with an admonitory gesture towards the ancient cathedral. Stimulated by the public approbation which these specimens produced, Robert Forrest opened in 1832 his public exhibition of statuary on the Calton Hill, Edinburgh, with four equestrian statues, under the patronage of a royal association of contributors to the national monument. This was but the com- mencement of a bold adventure, as thirty groups of statues at last occupied his galler)-, all of them exe- cuted by Forrest himself. In these not only the remarkable industry, but the talent and genius, of the artist are exhibited; the figures being exact in their proportions, admirable in their attitudes, and distinguished by their spirit and expressiveness. In consequence of these merits F'orrest's exhibition on the Calton Hill became a frequent resort of the in- habitants of Edinburgh, and one of the lions of the sight-seers who visited the metropolis. Besides these, a statue from his chisel of the late Mr. Ferguson of Raith, erected in 1843 at Haddington, is considered as one of the best of his works. After an illness of six weeks Robert Forrest died at Edinburgh, on the 29th of December, 1852, in the sixty-third year of his age. FORSYTH, William, distinguished in the science of arboriculture, was born at Old Meldrum in Aber- deenshire, in 1737. Having been bred to the busi- ness of a gardener, he went to London in 1763, and soon after became a pupil of the celebrated Philip Miller, gardener to the company of apothecaries at their physic-garden in Chelsea. In 1 771 he suc- ceeded his master in this respectable situation, in which he remained till 1 784, when he was appointed by George III. chief superintendent of the royal gardens at Kensington and St. James's, which em- ployments he held till his death. About the year 1768 Mr. Forsyth paid particular attention to the cultivation of fruit and forest trees, and turned his thoughts more especially to the dis- covery of a composition to remedy the diseases and injuries incident to them. After repeated trials he at length succeeded in preparing one which fully an- swered his expectations; and in the year 1789 the success of his experiments attracted the notice of the commissioners of the land revenue, upon whose re- commendation a committee of both houses of parlia- ment was appointed to report upon the merits of his discovery. The result of their inquiries was a perfect conviction of its utility, and in consequence an address was voted by the House of Commons to his majesty, praying that a reward might be granted to Mr. For- syth upon his disclosing the secret of his composi- tion to the public; which was accordingly done: and in 1 79 1 Mr. Forsyth published his Obserz'ations on the Diseases, Defects, and Injuries of Fruit and Forest Trees, which also contains the correspondence between the commissioners of the land revenue, the committee of parliament, and himself. In 1802 he published the final result of his labours in A Treatise on the Culture and Management of Fruit Trees. In this work, or in Fees^ Cyclopedia, article "Composition for Trees," may be found a complete account of Mr. Forsyth's discoveries and mode of treating in- jured wood. It may be sufficient here to mention that his composition or medicament was foiTned ac- cording to the following receipt: "Take one bushel of fresh cow-dung, half a bushel of lime-rubbish of old buildings (that from the ceilings of rooms is pre- ferable), half a bushel of wood-ashes, and a sixteenth part of a bushel of pit or river sand; the three last articles are to be sifted fine before they are mixed, then work them well together with a spade, and aftenvards with a wooden beater, until the stuff is verj- smooth, like fine plaster used for the ceilings of rooms." 62 ROBERT AND ANDREW FOULIS. Mr. Forsyth, who was a member of the Antiqua- rian, Linnx-an, and other societies, died July 25, 1804. He enjoyed the honours paid to him for liis useful invention with an unaffected modesty, which gave them a higher grace; and his benevolence and private worth were warmly attested by his friends. A particular genus of plants has been named For- sythia in honour of his name. FOULIS, Robert and Andrew, emhient printers in the eighteenth century, were natives of Glasgow, and were born, the elder brother on the 20th of April, 1707, and the younger on the 23d of Novem- ber, 1 71 2. Their mother, who seems to have pos- sessed shrewdness and intelligence beyond her station, educated them at first under her own care, and had not Robert's talents attracted attention they would probably never have proceeded farther in the acqui- sition of knowledge. At an early age Robert was sent an apprentice to a barber; it would even seem that he afterwards practised the art on his own account for some time. While thus humbly employed, he came under the notice of the celebrated Dr. Francis Hutcheson, then professor of moral philosophy in Glasgow university. This acute observer discovered his talents, inflamed his desire for knowledge, and suggested to him the idea of becoming a book- seller and printer. Foulis did not, however, receive a complete university education, although he attended his patron's lectures for several years, and his name is so enrolled in the matriculation book. Andrew, who seems to have been designed for the church, entered the university in 1727, and probably went through a regular course of study. For some years after they had determined to follow a literary life the brothers were engaged in teaching the languages during the winter, and in making short tours into England and to the Continent in sum- mer. These excursions were of great advantage to them; they brought them into contact with eminent men, enabled them to form connections in their busi- ness, and extended their knowledge of books. On some of these occasions they made considerable col- lections, which they sold at home to good account. Thus prepared, the elder brother began business in Glasgow as a Vjookseller about the end of 1739, and in the following year published several works. Three years afterwards his connection with the university commenced. In March, 1743, he was appointed their printer, under condition, "that he shall not use the designation of university printer without al- lowance from the university meeting in any books excepting those of ancient authors."' The fust pro- ductions of his press, which were issued in 1742, were almost exclusively of a religious nature, many of them relating to the well-known George White- field. In 1742 he published Demetrius Plialereus de Elocutioiie, apparently the first Greek work printed in Glasgow, although we are certain that there ex- isted a fount of Greek letters there nearly a century before. It would be tedious to notice each work as it appeared: the immaculate edition of Horace, an edition of Cicero's works in twenty volumes, Crcsar's Commentaries in folio, Callimachus in tlje same size, with engravings executed at their academy, form but a small part of the splendid catalogue of their classics. The succcess which had attended their exertions as printers induced the elder P'oulis to attem])t the establishment of an academy for the cultivation of the fine arts, a scheme for which Scotland was but ' The date . -It which Andrew joined him in business is some- what uncertain. ill prepared by the dissensions which had followed the Union, and which had been succeeded by the re- bellions of 1715 and 1745. In 1751 he went abroad, partly with the view of extending his commercial connections, but principally with the intention of arranging for the establishment of this institution. After remaining on the Continent for about two years, and sending home several artists whom he had engaged in his service, he returned to Scotland in 1753. His design was considered romantic; many of his friends exerted all their eloquence to persuade him to desist. Hut Foulis, who possessed a degree of determination which might perhaps not unjustly be termed obsti- nacy, was fixed in his "high resolve," and although he must have observed with mortification that {to use his own expression) "there seemed to be a pretty general emulation who should nin the scheme most down," he established his academy in the course of the same year. He soon found that he had embarked in an undertaking of no common difficulty. From a letter in the Scots Magazine for 1759 it appears that the selection of proper teachers had cost him much trouble and anxiety. He had to contend, be- sides, with the national prejudices in favour of the works of foreign artists; and after amassing a con- siderable collection, he found it extremely difficult to dispose of it to advantage. In the same year it was proposed that such persons as were willing to support the institution should advance certain sums yearly, for which they should be entitled to select prints, designs, paintings, &c., to the amount of their sub- scriptions. In the meantime, the operations of their press went on with increasing vigour. If we may judge from the catalogue of their books, the period between 1750 and 1757 seems to have been the most flourish- ing era in their trade. During that time "proposals for publishing^ by subscription the whole works of Plato" were issued, and considerable progress made in collating MSS. in the Vatican and national libra- ries. But the embarrassments occasioned by the ill- fated academy seem to have prevented the publica- tion of this as well as many other works which might have added much both to their fame and their wealth. Yet while we condemn the obstinacy with which this institution was carried on when it was a daily source of anxiety and pecuniary difficulties, it should be re- membered that it was the means of bringing forward the "Scottish Hogarth" David Allan, and Tassie the medallist. The latter of these, while a stone- mason, acquired a relish for the arts in visiting the academy on a holiday, when the pictures were gene- rally exhibited gratis. It would be foreign to the purpose of the present work to notice the various books which issued from the Foulis press at this and subsequent periods. It may be sufficient to say, that in the latter part of their history the brothers seem to have lost much of their original energy, and the celebrity of their press may be considered as expiring with their folio edition of Milton, published in 1770. They continued, in- deed, to print till the death of Andrew, which took place suddenly on the 1 8th of September, I775> ''"' many of the works published at that period were of inferior workmanship. We shall close the history of these remarkable but * As a curious estimate of the expense of classical reading in these days, we extract the first article in the proposals: — " I. In nine volumes in quarto, of which the Greek in six volumes and the Latin translation with the notes in three. The price to subscribers, one penny sterling per sheet. The whole will be contained in about 500 sheets, so the price will be about £,1, IS. Stt. in quires, on a fair paper. A number will be printed ou a fine large paper at twopence sterling per sheet." LORD FOUNTAIXITALL unfortunate men in a few words. After the death of the younger brother it was determined to expose the works belonging to the academy to public sale. For this purpose Robert, accompanied by a confi- dential workman, went to London about the month of April, 1776. Contrary to the advice of the auc- tioneer and at a period when the market was glutted by yearly importations of pictures from Paris, his collection was sold off — and, as the reader may have anticipated, greatly under their supposed value. Ir- ritated at the failure of this his last hope, and with a constitution exhausted by calamities, he left London and reached Edinburgh on his way homeward. On the morning on which he intended setting out for Glasgow he expired almost instantaneously, in the sixty-ninth year of his age. Robert Foulis was twice married. From his second marriage, with a daughter of Mr. Boutcher, a seedsman in Edinburgh, was descended Andrew Foulis, who died at Edinburgh, in great poverty, in 1S29. lie had, besides, by his first marriage, with Elizabeth Moor, a sister of the celebrated Grecian, five daughters. Of the Scottish works produced at the Foulis press the greater number were ballads, some of them original, and all of them since published in the col- lections of Bishop Percy, Ritson, Cromek, &c. The '■'■ Memorials and Letters Relating to the History of Britain in the reigns of James I. and Charles I., published by Lord Hailes, principally from the Denmylne ^ISS. in the Advocates' Library," were also published at Glasgow. But the greatest service that they could have performed for Scottish history would have been the publication of Calderwood's MS. history. This they undoubtedly had in view. It appears from the records of the university of Glas- gow that they got permission to borrow their MS.^ in September, 1768. They did not, however, accom- plish their patriotic purpose, and this valuable work remained unpublished until the task was fulfilled, in 1845, by the Wodrow Society. ROBERT ERASER. 63 FOUNTAINHALL, Lord. See Lauder, Sir John. ERASER, Ja:mes Baili.ie. This distinguished traveller, popular writer, and accomplished country gentleman belonged to a family of consequence in its own locality, and was born in the county of Inver- ness in 1784. In early life he was engaged in the civil service of the East India Company, in which he rose to distinction by his talents and activity. Upon one occasion, while employed in a diplomatic mis- sion of the East India Company to the Persian court, he rode on horseback from Constantinople to Ispa- han ; but the fatigues and hardships of such a jour- ney were too much for even his Highland constitu- tion, and gave it the first shock, which a further residence in the East tended to confirm. When the Persian princes visited England, Mr. Eraser, from his position and accomplishments, and his knowledge of Persia and its language, was requested by our government to accompany them, and take charge of them ; this task he satisfactorily accomplished, and when the princes returned to their own country, he accompanied them as far as Constantinople. As his health had suffered from the eastern climate he finally returned to England, and, abandoning the toils of active public service, devoted the rest of his life to the charms of literature, and the improve- ment of his Highland estate of Reelick, in Inverness- shire. These improvements were so effectual that the property, considering its limited extent, was 1 It is not, however, the original MS, scarcely to be equalled in the Highlands for its magnificent woods and romantic scenery. It was not, however, by such occupations alone that the active mind of Eraser could be satisfied, and having acquired much knowledge of the East by personal experience, he was desirous to communicate it to the world at large. Accordingly he wrote A Toitr througli the Sno7oy Range of the I/iinalaya Mountains, which was published in 1820; "y/ A'arra- tivc of a Journey into Khorasan in the years 1821 and 1822, including an Account of the Countries to the North-east of Persia," which was published in 1825; and Travels and Adventures in the Persian Provinces, published in 1826. Finding, however, that tlie pop- ular taste for foreign lands, characters, and manners preferred the medium of imaginative writing to that of plain matter-of-fact narrative; and inspired by the example of his friend Morier, who opened up Persia and its people to the English public by a series of fascinating novels, Mr. Eraser in 1828 produced The Kuzzilbash, a Talc of Khorasan. This novel, which was very attractive in its day, has shared the fate of its contemporaries, notwithstanding the stirring ad- ventures it recorded, and the terrible deeds of Nadir Shah, its predominant personage ; and, like many other interesting fictions of the period, we can only say of the Kuzzilbash, that it lived its allotted hour of sunshine, and then passed away. The next work of Eraser was A Winter Journey f-orn Constantinople to Teheran, with T?'avels tlirough Various Parts of Persia, which appeared in 1838. His last work was a memoir of the distinguished Colonel Skinner, who had been the intimate friend of his brother William Eraser. Like himself, William had entered the civil service of the East India Company, where he had risen to distinction, and been appointed com- missioner at Delhi, but there he was assassinated by a native prince in 1835. In 1823 Mr. James Baillie Eraser married a daughter of Lord Woodhouselee, and sister of Patrick Eraser Tytler, author of the History of Scotland, &c. In his retirement he was a deputy-lieutenant of the county of Inverness. He died in the beginning of 1856, at the age of seventy-two. FRASER, Robert. This poet, linguist, and journalist, who was chiefly remarkable for his pur- suit of knowledge under difficulties, was the son of a mariner, and was born in the village of Pathhead, parish of Dysart, Eifeshire, on the 24tli of June, 1 798. W'hen only four years old he commenced his education in the village school, at which he continued eighteen months ; afterwards he went to another school, where he remained about four years ; and finally was sent to the school of Pathhead, at which, in 1809, he commenced the study of Latin. It was that simple course of ordinary education without which a young Scot at home can scarcely hold his own, but with which, when abroad, he can start in the career of life better equipped than his fellows, and win his way to fame and fortune. In 1812 Robert Eraser was apprenticed to a wine and spirit merchant in Kirkcaldy, in whose employ he continued four years; but in I Si 3, being afflicted with an abscess in his right arm, which confined him to the house for several months, he betook himself to that course of study in earnest which afterwards gave him a place in literature. He matured his school-boy knowledge of Latin, made considerable proficiency in Greek, and to these added French and Italian, at a period when the study of such languages was somewhat rare among the common ranks in Scotland. In addition to these studies he cultivated an acquaintanceship with general literature. His apprenticeship in the meantime to 64 SIMON FRASER. the wine and spirit merchant continued until 1817, when, on its termination, he abandoned the trade ahogether, and became clerk to a respectable iron- monger in Kirkcaldy. In 1819 he commenced the business of ironmonger in Kirkcaldy on his own ac- count, in partnership with a Mr. James Robertson; and in March, 1820, before he had completed his twenty-second year, he married a lady whose name was iNliss Ann Gumming. The cares of business and domestic life did not, however, abate his love of study, which was directed chiefly to general literature and the acquirement of languages; and in 1825 he commenced the study of the German tongue, to which he afterwards added the Spanish, and of both of these languages he acquired such mastery as to translate from them various pieces of poetry, which, with some original productions of his own, were published in the pages of the Edinburgh Lilera>y Gazette, the Edinburgh Literary Journal, and several newspapers of the day. It was while pursuing these honourable literary recreations that Fraser's worldly concerns were be- coming unprosperous. The first serious shock was from a robbery, which no prudence could have pre- vented. About six years after he had opened his shop it was broken into during the night, and jewel- lery to the value of jC200 was carried away, while no trace could be obtained either of the property or the thieves. In 1833, having dissolved partnership and commenced business on his sole responsibility, he, in 1836, was so deeply involved in pecuniary difficulties through the sudden death of a friend, that his health succumbed, and, notwithstanding his stout-hearted attempts to rally, the state of his affairs was so hope- less that he was obliged in the following year to compound with his creditors. Such is too often the fate of a mind divided between the study and the shop: the union is so uncongenial, that one or the other occupation must go to the wall, and in such a collision the desk, from its superior attractiveness, is usually the conqueror of the counter. But Fraser's character for honour and industry was so well estab- lished, that the most respectable traffickers of the town offered to become his securities for the com- position. Fraser having nothing left him but his talents and reputation, soon found them an available capital, for they obtained for him the editorship of the Ei/e Herald, to which he was appointed in 1838. On leaving Kirkcaldy a large party of its townsmen showed their esteem for his worth by entertaining him at a public dinner, and presenting him with a copy of the seventh (at that time the latest) edition of the Encyclopirdia Britaitniea. But it was only for a very short time that he was able to discharge his editorship of the Ei/e Herald, for his constitution was already broken, so that he was obliged to employ a literary friend as his substitute. His last acts were in accordance with the tenor of his literary life: while confined to bed, and during the intervals of acute pain, he revised and arranged his poems for the press, and a short time before he died he dictated to an amanuensis his translations from certain Danish and Norwegian writers. I lis death occurred on the 22d of May, 1839. Such was his brief history — a history of hundreds of his countrymen in lowly life, who, with equal talents and worth, have passed away into oblivion because there was no one to preserve their memory. The Poetical Remai}is of Robert Fraser, with a memoir of their author, were published soon after his death by David Vedder. FRASER, Simon, twelfth Lord Lovat, a per- son too remarkable in history to be overlooked in this work, though his want of public or private virtue might otherwise have dictated his exclusion, was the second son of Thomas Fraser of Beaufort, by Sybilla Macleod, daughter of the laird of Mac- leod, and was born at Beaufort, near Inverness, in the year 1667. Of his early years we have no very distinct account. He has himself asserted that, at the age of thirteen, he was imprisoned for his exertions in the royal cause, though we do not well see how this could happen. That his elder brother, however, was in the insurrection of the Viscount Dundee, and himself, after the death of Dundee, in that under General Buchan, is certain. After all the pains his lordship has been at to set forth his extreme zeal for the Stuarts, nothing can be more evident than that, from his earhest days, the sole puq^ose of his life was to promote his own power by all feasible means, this end being the only object of his solicitude. Agreeably to this view of his character we find him, in the year 1694, while yet a student at the university of Aberdeen, accepting of a commission in the regiment of Lord Murray, afterwards Earl of Tullibardine. This commission had been procured for him by his cousin Hugh Lord Lovat, who was brother-in-law to Lord Murray, with the express view of bringing him "forward most advantageously in the world ;" and though he professed to have scruples in going against the in- terest of King James, these were all laid asleep by an assurance on the part of Lord Murray, that the regiment, though ostensibly raised, and in the mean- time to take the oaths to, and receive the pay of King William, was really intended for King James, who would not fail to be in the country to lay claim to and revive his rights in the course of the succeeding year. No sooner had young Beaufort received this assurance than he led into the regiment a complete company, almost entirely made up of the young gentlemen of his clan. In the course of the succeed- ing year Lord Murray was, by the favour of King William, appointed secretary of state for Scotland, and, in place of doing anything for King James, in- forced upon every officer in his regiment the oath of abjuration. Being a young man, at liberty to follow out his education, and in the regular receipt of his pay, Beaufort, it might have been supposed, would have found his situation comfortable, and been in some measure content ; but his spirit seems to have been naturally restless, and anything like an under part in the drama of life did not square with his disposi- tion. In the course of the year 1696, a company of Lord Murray's regiment being stationed at the castle of Edinburgh, where the earl-marischal. Lord Drummond, and other of the Jacobite lords were imprisoned, a visit from the Pretender being at the time expected, Simon, the subject of this narrative, entered into an engagement with the rebel lords to seize upon the castle, and to hold it under the earl- marischal for the French and King James. In this project, which appears not to have been executed only because the P'rench were unable to make the promised demonstration, Beaufort was to have been assisted by another captain of the same regiment, who seems to have been equally faithless and equally servile with himself. B>ut while he was thus careful to watch the tides, and to take advantage of every wind that might ruffle the ocean of politics, his eye was steadily fixed upon the estate of Lovat, which, as his cousin Hugh Lord Lovat had but one child, a daughter, he had already marked out as his own. For this end he seems to have embraced every opportunity of ingratiating himself with his cousin, who appears to have been a SIMON FRASER. man of a facile and vacillating disposition, and to have been considerably under the influence of Lord Murray, his brother-in-law. Of this influence Simon of Beaufort was perfectly aware, and watched with the utmost carefulness an opportunity to destroy it. This opportunity Lord Murray himself afforded him in the affair of the colonelcy of the regiment, which, upon his appointment to the office of secretary, it was e.xpected he would have given up to his brother- in-law Lord Lovat. Nor is it at all unlikely that such was originally his lordship's intention ; for in the year 1696 he sent for him to London, apparently with the intention of doing so after having presented him to the king. Lovat unfortunately carried along with him his cousin Simon, whose character must by this time have been pretty well known to King William, and whose companionship, of course, could be no great recommendation to the royal favour. Lovat was, however, presented to the royal presence, most graciously received, and gratified with a pro- mise of being provided for. As this was all that Lovat expected, he took leave of his majesty, along with Lord Murray, leaving no room for William to suppose, for the present at least, that he either wished or had any occasion for a further interview. This his cousin Simon highly resented, telling him that it was a contrivance of Lord Murray's to deprive him of an opportunity of soliciting a regiment for him- self, and he prevailed with him instantly to demand of Lord Murray the reason for which he had brought them at this time to London, at such an enormous expense. Lord Murray frankly told him that it was his design to have resigned to him the command of his regiment, but that the king had positively en- joined him to keep it till such time as the nmiours of an invasion should subside, when he should cer- tainly surrender it into his hands. Had Lovat been left to himself this answer would most probably have been altogether satisfactory; but it did not satisfy Simon nor his friends Lord Tarbat and Alexander Mackenzie, son to the Earl of Sea- forth, both of whom were at that time in London, and were of service to Beaufort in persuading Lord Lovat that Lord Murray had been all along his mortal enemy. By the advice of all three Lovat sent back to Lord Murray two commissions, that of cap- tain and lieutenant-colonel, which he held under him, expressing at the same time in strong language his resentment of his treachery, and his fixed resolu- tion never more to see him nor any individual of his family, excepting his own wife. At the same time that the poor old man was thus eager in casting off his old friends, he was equally warm in his attach- ment to the new. "Impressed with the tender affection of the laird of Beaufort, and the resolution he manifested never to leave him, he declared that he regarded him as his own son;" and as he had executed at his marriage some papers which might perhaps be prejudicial to the claims of this said adopted son, he obliged him to send for an attorney, and made a universal bequest to him of all his estates, in case he died without male issue. This affectionate conduct on the part of Lord Lovat deeply, according to his own account of the matter, affected our hero, who pretended "that he would for ever consider him as his father." In consequence of so much anxious business, so much chagrin and disappointment, with a pretty reasonable attendance on taverns. Lord Lovat fell sick; but after conva- lescing a little, was brought on his way home as far as Edinburgh by his affectionate Simon, where he left him, proceeding by the way of Dunkeld to meet with his wife. He had not been many days at Dunkeld when he again fell sick, and retired to an VOL. II. inn at Perth, where he was again waited on by Simon of Beaufort, and, in a state of distraction, died in his arms the morning after his arrival. Though, as we have seen, the subject of this memoir had got a deed executed by a London attorney under the direction of his cousin, the late Lord Lovat, constituting him heir to the estate, it was judged by him the more prudent method to put forward his father as the nearest male heir to take possession of the estate, with the honours, contenting himself with the title of Master of Lovat. No sooner, however, had he assumed this title than he was questioned on the subject by his colonel, now Lord Tullibardine, who made him the offer of a regiment with other preferments, which should be to him an ample pro- vision for life, provided he would execute a formal sun-ender of his claim to that dignity. This produced a violent altercation between them, which ended in the master of Lovat throwing up his commission, which he bade his lordship, if he pleased, bestow upon his own footman. Through the friendship of Sir Thomas Livingston, however, he received another company in the regiment of Macgill, and his father having taken possession of the estate and the honours of Lovat without much apparent opposition, he must have been, in some degree, satisfied with his good fortune. In order, however, to secure it, and to render his claims in every respect unexceptionable, he made love to the heiress of his cousin, the late Lord Lovat, and had succeeded in persuading her to marry him without the knowledge of her friends, when one of his agents betrayed trust, and she was carried out of his way by the I^Iarquis of Athol after the day of the marriage had actually been appointed. The Marquis of Athol, late Lord Tullibardine, probably aware that he had an adversary of no common activity to deal with, lost no time in con- cluding a match for the heiress with Lord Salton or Eraser, whom he also took measures for having de, clared head of the clan Eraser. The first part of his plan was not difficult to have been executed; but the latter part, for which the first was alone contemplated, was not of so easy a character, being opposed to the spirit of Highland clanship. A considerable time, however, was spent in attempting to bring it to bear. A few Erasers only could be tempted to engage in it; whose treachery no sooner came to the ears of the lord and the master of Lovat, than orders were issued to apprehend and punish them according to their deserts; and it was only by a timely and well- concerted flight that they escaped being hanged. A letter was at the same time sent to Lord Salton, signed by the principal men of the clan, begging him not to attempt forcing himself upon them, and thus destroying their tranquillity and endangering his own life. Salton returned a soft answer; but, confident in the power of the Marquis of Athol, and at any rate, in love with the consequence attached to the fair estate of Lovat, whether he was in love with the heiress or not, persevered in following out his plan, and with a considerable train of retainers came to Beaufort, at that time the residence of the dowager of Lovat, whose son-in-law he intended to be. Thomas Lord Lovat happened to be at this time on the Stratherrick estate — a district which stretches along the south bank of Loch Ness, and was requested by his son Simon to cross the lake by the nearest way to Lovat, which is only three miles from Beaufort, in order to meet with Lord Salton, while he himself hastened to the same place by the way of Inverness. At Inverness the master learned that Lord Salton, persevering in his original design, had fully matured his plans at the house of the dowager Lady Lovat, whence he intended next day to return 40 66 SIMON FRASER. into his own countn', calling at Athol and manning; the heiress of Lovat by the way, without waiting to see either the lord or the master of Lovat. Irritated as well as alarmed by this intelligence, he wrote by a special messenger to Lord Salton, calling upon him to adhere to his word " passed both to his father and himself, and to meet him next day at two o'clock in the afternoon, three miles from Beaufort, either like a friend, or with sword and pistols, as he pleased. " This letter Lord Salton received at six o'clock in the evening, and returned for answer that he would meet the master of Lovat at the time and place appointed as his good friend and humble servant. In the meantime it was concluded by him and his followers to break up from their present quarters, and to pass the bridge of Inverness before the master of Lovat could have any suspicion of their being in motion, and thus escape a meeting with him for the present. The master, however, was too good a calculator of probabilities in this sort of intercourse to be thus taken in, especially as his messenger to Lord Salton, from what he had observed at Beaufort, had strong suspicions of what was intended. He was accord- ingly at the road very early in the morning, attended by six gentlemen and two servants, all well mounted and armed, and meeting Lord Salton, Lord Mungo Murray, and their followers, to the number of forty, issuing from a defile in the wood of Bunchrive, about five miles from Inverness, disarmed and dismounted them; first Lord Mungo Murray, then Lord Salton, and the rest singly as they came forward, without stroke of sword or the firing of a single musket. Though the party of the master of Lovat was so inconsiderable at the outset, Lord Salton and his party soon found themselves surrounded by some hundreds of enraged enemies, by whom, under the direction of the master, they were carried prisoners to the castle of Fanellan, where they were closely shut up under a certification that they should be all hanged for their attempt to intrude themselves into the inheritance, and to deprive the owner of his law- ful and hereditary rights. Nor had they any assured ground to consider this as a mere bravado: the history of clan wars could easily furnish them with numerous examples of such barbarous atrocity where there was not greater provocation. Having thus completely marred the marriage of Lord Salton, the master of Lovat immediately set about the celebration of his own. The heiress of Lovat was safe in the hands of her friends at Athol; but the dow.ager, her mother, was in the house of Beaufort, every avenue to which he beset with his followers, so that it was out of her power to inform her friends of anything that was going on; then, en- tering the house with a parson, whether Catholic or Episcopal is unknown, he matle the lady go through the form of marriage with himself, had her forcibly undressed and put to bed, whither he as forcibly followed her before witnesses, thus constituting it, as he supposed, a lawful marriage. This is one of the most atrocious of the many revolting actions in the life of this prolligate nobleman, though one to which he has given a fiat denial in the memoir which he has written of himself. The truth is, it was as foolish as it was wicked; and, after the purpose for ■which it was committed, viz. to remove the enmity of the Athol family, had utterly failed, he himself must have been heartily ashamed of it. There is indeed a total falsehood in one reason that he insists upon as proving its improbability. She was old enough, he says, to have been his mother. Now she was only four years older than himself, having died at Perth in the year 1 743, in the eightieth year of her age. She had been either so frightened by him, or so cajoled, as to offer, if we may believe the Duke of Argyle, writing to the Rev. Air. Carstairs, to give her oath before the court of justiciary that all that had passed between her and Lovat was voluntar}', and as much her inclination as his; and she lived to hear him deny his being at all concerned with her, and to see him twice afterwards married. But to return from this short digression. Having, as he supposed, put himself in a fair way for being acknowledged by the house of Athol, the master of Lovat abandoned the idea of hanging so many of the members and allies belonging to it as he had in custody in his castle of Fanellan, contenting himself with extorting a bond from Lord Salton for ;[^8ooo, with four low-country barons as his sureties, if he ever again interfered with the affairs of the estate of Lovat, or if ever he or the Marquis of Athol pro- secuted any one individual for anything that had been transacted in this whole affair. This was only a little more of the same folly which had guided him through the whole business, and tended but to excite the wonder of his friends and the hatred and contempt of his enemies, the latter of whom, on a representa- tion to the pri\7-council, had him intercommuned, and letters of fire and sword issued out against him and all his clan. This, though perfectly in the natural order of human affairs, was altogether im- expected by the master of Lovat, and seems to have reduced him to great extremity. Besides the family of Athol, which was much more powerful than his own, troops were ready to pour in upon him from all quarters, and even those upon whom he depended for counsel and assistance seem at the time to have declared against him. To the laird of Culloden we find him writing from Beaufort in the month of October, 1697. " Thir Lds. att Inverness, w*. ye rest of my implacable enemies, does so confound my wife, that she is uneasy till she see them. I am afraid they are so mad with this disappointment, that they will propose something to her that's dan- gerous, her brother having such power with her; so that really till things be perfectly accommodate, I do not desire they should see her, and I know not how to manage her. So I hope you will send all the advice you can to your obliged, &c. &c. I hope you will excuse me for not going your length, since I have such a hard task at home." The advice given him by Culloden has not been preserved; but that it was not to his mind we learn from a letter written by that gentleman from Inverlochy about ten or twelve days after. "I am much concerned," says he, "that your neighbour Beaufort hath played not the fool, but the madman. If, by your persuasion, he cannot be induced to deliver up the so much abused lady upon assurance of pardon, in all probability he will ruin both himself and his friends. 'Tis not long since he was here and promised me other things; but since he has run a quite contrary course, and stands neither to his own nor the proposals of any other, I have sent down 200 men," t\;c. &c. This view of the matter is still further confirmed by an- other letter from Lovat to Culloden, a few days after the above, when he seems to have felt that he was pretty much in the power of his enemies. "I pray you receive the inclosed account of my business, and see if your own conscience in the sight of God do not convince you that it is literally true. I had sent to you upon Saturday last, but you were not at home; however, I sent it that day to the laird of Calder, who, I hope, will not sit down upon me, but transmit it to my best friends; and I beseech you, sir, for God's sake, that you do the like. I know the chancellor is a just man, notwithstanding his friendship for TuUibardine. I forgive you for be- SIMON FRASER. C7 traying of me; but neither you nor I, nor, I hope, God himself, will not forgive them that deceived you, and caused you do it. I am very hopeful in my dear wife's constancy if they do not put her to death. Now I add no more, but leaves myself to your discretion," &c. At the same time his father. Lord Lovat, wrote to the Duke of Argyle an ex- planatory letter upon the subject, signed by himself and all the principal Frasers. The great benefit of the marriage to the estate of Lovat is chiefly insisted on in this letter, and represented as the sole cause of the enmity of the Athol family, who, it states, wished to appropriate that fair domain to themselves. Argyle, on the receipt of this letter, wrote to Mr. Carstairs, who was King William's principal adviser in all that related to Scotland, and after a consider- able length of time was gratified by receiving the pardon he had solicited for all the treasons with which his client had been charged, leaving the stoiy of the rape for a subject of future investigation. For this, also, had there been a little patience and prud- ence exercised, there cannot be a doubt but he would have obtained a full remission. To be out of the way of this storm at its commence- ment. Lord Lovat had taken shelter in the island of Skye, with his brother-in-law the laird of Macleod, where he died in the beginning of 1698. Simon, who had defended himself in the best manner he could, then assumed the title of Lord Lovat, but, to escape the rage and superior strength of his enemies, was also under the necessity of taking refuge in the isles, where he remained till the following year, when the Duke of Argyle, with the promise of a pardon, brought him to London. Delays took place, however, in procuring his remission to pass the Scot- tish seals, till the king set out for the United Pro- vinces, and Lovat took an excursion into France for the purpose of lodging at the court of St. Ger- mains a complaint against the Marquis of Athol, and soliciting James' protection against the malignity of his powerful family. Having obtained his request, and been enjoined by the exiled monarch to ^vait on and make his peace with King William, Lovat pro- ceeded by the way of London to the court of that sovereign at Loo, being favoured with a letter from the Duke of Argyle to Mr. Carstairs, through whom he received a remission, he himself says, of all crimes that could be imputed to him, but restricted by Sea- field in passing the Scottish seals, as has been above stated. With this remission, such as it was, he ven- tured to make his appearance in public, had a cita- tion served upon the ^L'^rquis of Athol and his family for falsely accusing him, and for devastating his estates; and making a progress through the north, returned to Edinburgh with 100 gentlemen as hon- ourable as himself to support his charges, and bear witness to the innocence and integrity of his character; or rather to browbeat the authorities, and extort from fear a decision which he well knew could never be procured from the voice of truth and justice, find- ing, however, that he had undertaken what would fail him in the issue, he once more set out for London, the day before the trial should have come on, and was nonsuited in his absence; and thus, by his im- prudent temerity, lost the opportunity of being fairly instated in the estate and honours of Lovat, as he would certainly have been, through the interest of Arg)'le and his other friends, had he allowed them to do their own work in their own way. The restoration of King James was now Lovat's sheet anchor; and, lest the Murrays, whom he suspected of being warmer friends to James than he was himself, should also be before him here, it was necessary for him to be peculiarly forward. Accord- ingly, on the death of King William in the early part of the year 1702, he procured a commission from several of the principal Scottish Jacobites to the court of St. Germains, declaring their being ready to take up arms and hazard their lives and fortunes for the restoration of their lawful prince; as usual, paying all manner of respect to the court of Versailles, and requesting its assistance. With this he pro- ceeded by the way of England and Holland, and reached the court of St. Germains about the begin- ning of September, 1702, just in time to be par- ticularly useful in inflaming the contentions that distracted the councils of James VHL, for the direc- tion of whose affairs there was a most violent struggle among his few followers. He had for his fellow- traveller his cousin-german Sir John Maclean, well known in the history of the intrigues of that time, who, leaving him at Paris, was his precursor to the court of St. Germains, whence in two days he returned to conduct him into the presence of the Duke of Perth, from whom he received private in- structions how to conduct himself towards the queen. The principal of these was to request of the queen that she should not make known any part of what he proposed to Lord Middleton, who, at the time, was the rival of Lord Perth for the supreme direction of their affairs, which might be said to lie chiefly in sending out spies, fabricating reports, and soliciting pensions. Nothing could be more agreeable to Lovat, the very elements of whose being seemed to be mystery, and with whom to intrigue was as natural as to breathe. To work he went, exacted the queen's promise to keep everything secret from Middleton; and by the aid of the Marquis de Torcy, the Marquis Callieres, and Cardinal Gualterio, the pope's nuncio, fancied himself sole administrator of the affairs of Scotland. The queen herself was so much pleased with the opening scene, that she glad- dened the heart of Lovat by telling him she had sent her jewels to Paris to be sold in order to raise the 20,000 crowns he had told her were necessary for bringing forward his Highlanders in a properly effective manner. But she was not long true to her promise of secrecy; and Middleton at once depicted Lovat as "the greatest traitor in the three kingdoms:" nor did he treat his favourite Highlanders with any more respect, representing them as mere banditti, excellent at plundering the Lowlanders and carrying off their cattle, but incapable of being formed into a regular corps that would look a well-appointed enemy in the face. From this day forward Lovat seems to have fallen in the opinion of Mary d'Este, who was a woman of rather superior talents, though he seems to have gone on well with De Torcy, Cal- lieres, and Gualterio, who found in him, as they supposed, a very fit tool for their purpose of raising in Scotland a civil war, without much caring whether it really promoted the interests of James or not. After much intriguing with Perth and Middleton, as well as with the French ministry, Lovat obtained a commission to visit Scotland in 1703, but rather as an emissary of the French government than an accredited agent for James. The object of the French government was to have an immediate di- version created in the Highlands, and they furnished his lordship with 6000 francs (;({;250) to defray the expenses of his journey, and a commission to be a major-general, with power to raise troops and ap- point officers, as he should find needful. At the same time, to lie the witness of his behavour, they joined with him John Murray of Abercairney, a rrentleman who ought to have been ashamed of such a companion as Lovat, and had the address to send James Murray, brother to Murray of Stanhope, so ^8 SIMON FRASER. as to be in Scotland at least a month before him, where he told it openly that Lovat was on his way as agent for the pope and the King of France, to raise a civil war in Scotland, contrary to the positive orders of the king and his mother the queen. Owing to this and the well-known character of Lovat, many of the Jacobites were shy of communicating with him, though he certainly found a few willing to depend upon his promises, and to enter into his pro- jects. His principal object, however, most probably was to see if there were yet any openings whereby he might reconcile himself with the government, and be allowed to take possession of the estate of Lovat, the first and the last grand object of his ambition. He accordingly threw himself in the way of Queensberr}', to whom he betrayed all — perhaps more than he knew respecting his old friend Lord Murray, now, by the death of his brother and the queen's favour, Duke of Athol, and his associate in politics, the Duke of Hamilton ; but his best friend the Duke of Argyle dying at this time, he appears to have obtained nothing more than a free passport, and perhaps some promises in case of further dis- coveries; and with this he passed again into France. Having, while in London, fallen in with, or rather been introduced to, a well-known Jacobite, William Keith, and the well-known framer of plots, Ferguson, who was shortly after taken up, the whole of his transaction took air before he had time to reach Paris. The companion of his travels, too. Sir John Maclean, coming to England about the same time, surrendered himself prisoner, and, in consideration of obtaining his liberty and a small pension, laid open the whole of Lovat's proceedings from first to last, so that he was discovered to both courts at the same time. The reader, however, if he supposes that Lovat felt any pain at these discoveries, is in a great mistake. They were unquestionably the very events he wished, and from which he expected to rise in worldly estimation and in wealth, which is too often the chief pillar upon which that esti- mation is founded. There was at this period, among all parties, a thirst for emolument which was perfectly ravenous, and scrupled at no means by which it might attain its gratification. Of this fatal propensity the present affair is a remarkable instance. Lovat had received from King James the present of his picture, which, with a com- mission for a regiment of infantry, he had in- closed in a box made for the purpose. This, on leaving Scotland, he committed to his friend Camp- bell of Glendaruel, to keep for him, and his back was scarcely turned when Glendaruel went to the Duke of Athol, and offered him the box, with its contents, provided he would give him a company in a regiment that was held by Campbell of Finab, and was worth about ;,^I70 a year, which he at once obtained, and the box with its contents was in a short time lodged in the hands of Queen Anne. Lovat, in his memoirs, relates the transac- tion, and exclaims against its treachery, though it was wholly his own contrivance; the box being given for the express purpose of procuring a pension for his friend, and giving Anne and her ministers ocular demonstration of his own importance. On his arrival in France Lord Lovat found the Earl of Middleton and the exiled queen as much opposed to him and his projects as ever, but he con- tinued his assiduities with the French courtiers, who informed him that he miglit expect very soon to be the first of the Scottish nobility, since he would be called on to head the insurrection not only as a general officer to King James, but as a general officer in the army of France; everything necessary for the success of the expedition — land forces, a squadron of ships, arms, and ammunition — being already pre- pared, and nothing remaining to be done but the form of carrying it through the privy-council, which a day or two would accomplish. In a day or two it was proposed in the council, when the king himself de- clared that, though he had the highest opinion of the excellence of the proposed plan, the Queen of England had positively refused to sign commissions for her subjects to engage in it, and therefore, for the present, it was necessarj' to lay it aside. This was a sad blow to the hopes of Lovat; and being always fond of letter-writing, he wrote a letter to the queen, in which he told her that she had at one blow overturned a project which he had sacrificed his property and exposed his life to bring to perfec- tion ; and he affirmed that, so long as her majesty followed implicitly the advice of the people who were at the head of the English parliament, Jesus Christ would come in the clouds before her son would be restored; and he concluded by saying, that, for his own part, he would never draw a sword for the royal cause so long as the regency was in her majesty's hands. In consequence of this letter Lord Lovat was, at the queen's instance, imprisoned thirty-two days in a dark dungeon, three years in the castle of Angouleme, and seven years in the city of Saumur. In the mean- time the project was not abandoned. Colonel Hooke succeeded to the part that Lovat had played or attempted to play. A large armament, under Ad- miral Forbin, was fitted out in the year 1708, and in which James himself embarked and had a sight of the Scottish shore, when, meeting with Admiral Byng, and afterwards encountering a violent storm, the whole was driven back upon the French coast with great loss. In this expedition the friends of Lovat had requested James to employ him, and they had received the most determined refusal, which finally, with the failure of the expedition, cut off all his hopes from that quarter. What added greatly to the bitterness of his reflections, the heiress of Lovat was now married to Mr. Alexander Mackenzie (son of Lord Prestonhall), who had assumed the title of Fraserdale, with the estate of Lovat settled on him for life, with remainder to the heirs of the marriage, who were to bear the name of Eraser, and of which there were already more than one. Thus circum- stanced, he confessed that he "would not merely have enlisted himself in the party of the house of Hanover, which was called to the crown of Scotland, England, and Ireland by all the states of the king- dom, but with any foreign prince in the universe who would have assisted him in the attainment of his just and laudable design of re-establishing his family, and proclaiming to all Scotland the barbarous cruelty of the court of St. Germains." In this state of mind he formed the resolution of escaping from Saumur, in company with some English prisoners, and throwing himself at the feet of the Dukes of Marlborough and Arg)-le, entreating them to inter- pose in his favour with Queen Anne. This design circumstances prevented him from executing, but he transmitted on various occasions letters to the Duke of Argyle and others of his friends upon whom he supposed he could depend, stating the determination he had come to, and requesting their good offices to effect his reconciliation with the queen. Some of these letters were returned to the court of St. Ger- mains, shown to the court of France, and nearly oc- casioned his being shut up in the Bastile for life. He was very soon, however, engaged in forming another plan for the invasion of Scotland, in which he expected to be employed; but the terrible cam' SIMON FRASER. 69 paigns of 17 10 and 171 1 put it out of the power of the court of France to attend to anything beyond domestic concerns; and the Marquis de la Fuziliere, the principal friend he possessed at the French court, dying at the same time, rendered all his prospects in that country hopeless. The conclusion of peace, and the appointment of the Duke of Hamilton to represent Queen Anne at the court of Versailles, filled him with still more gloomy apprehensions, from which he was not delivered till he read in the public papers the fatal duel that had been fought between that nobleman and Lord Mohun, when he again took courage, and applied once more to the French court to be set at liberty. The person he employed, how- ever, had no success; his character seemed to be los- ing rather than gaining at that court, and he was ad- vised to make his escape. Others, certain that the king would be immediately restored by Anne and her ministers, and was even now on the point of setting out for Scotland to be at hand when wanted, assured him that to depart for Scotland without his permis- sion was only to rush upon inevitable destruction. This seems to have filled him with great apprehen- sion, and he laboured to be reconciled to the Pre- tender with the greatest but the most fruitless industry, till he was driven to utter despair by the death of Queen Anne, and tidings that all the Jacobite clans in the north were arming in behalf of James, who had again and again declared that, without the con- sent of the Duke of Athol, he would never hear of his name. In this dilemma one of the Frasers arrived to request his presence with the clan, and advising him to join the party of Argj'le, who was their old friend, and the only one that was likely to be able to afford them protection. He had pre%aously to this written to Argj-le, but does not seem to have had any reply. He now despatched a trusty ser\-ant to consult with him and Ilay, Culloden, Grant, Kil- ravock, and other of his old friends, who stated, that if he could make his way safely to London, the business was done. This at once determined him to set out for England, taking the best precautions he could to avoid being arrested. On the 1st of No- vember, 1 7 14, after an imprisonment of ten years, he arrived at Dover, where, on account of extreme fatigue, he rested for one night. He then by a jour- ney of two days arrived safely in London. Here his first care was to despatch his trusty friends James and Alexander Eraser for the Earl of Ilay and Brigadier-general Grant. The brigadier lost not a moment in waiting on him, expressed great joy to see him safe and well, and assured him of every good office in his power. Ilay, on the contrary, expressed considerable regret at his having quitted the provision which, amid all the severe treatment he met with, had been made for him in France, while in England he had not even the security of his life; but he engaged to bring his case before the king and the prince that very night, and to let him know the result next day. The circumstances in which Lovat had thus placed himself were by no means pleasant. In Scotland there was a sentence of death in full force against him, and a price set upon his head, while he had nothing to rely upon but a precarious promise from a few friends, who, after all, might neither have the will nor the power to protect him. He was, how- ever, too deeply embarked to draw back, and he de- termined, regardless of consequences, to throw him- self upon the protection of the Duke of Arg}le and the Earl of Ilay, to take no step in his affairs but by their direction, and to live and die in their service. How happy had it been for his lordship had he never lost sight of this prudent determination ! Next day Ilay informed him that he had spoken of his case both to the king and the prince, who were well dis- posed towards him, but, without some security for his future loyalty, were not willing to grant him a free pardon. It would therefore be necessary for him to present an address to the king, signed by all his friends who were well affected towards the present government, and that, in this address, they should enter into an engagement for his loyalty in any sum the king pleased. Such an address as would be proper Ilay promised to draw up, which he ac- cordingly did two days after; and Lovat, by his trusty friend James Eraser, immediately despatched it to the north, with the following letter to his old friend John Forbes of Culloden, who was at the time can- vassing for the county of Inverness. "Much honoured and dear Sir, — The real friend- ship that I know you have for my person and family makes me take the freedom to assure you of my kind service, and to entreat of you to jo!n with my other friends betwixt Spey and Ness to sign the address the court requires in order to give me my remission. Your cousin James, who has generously exposed him- self to bring me out of chains, will inform you of all the steps and circumstances of my affairs since he saw me. I wish, dear sir, you were here; I am con- fident you would speak to the Duke of Arg)-le and to the Earl of Ilay to let "them know their own interest and their reiterated promises to do for me. Perhaps they may have sooner than they expect a most serious occasion for my service. But it's needless now to preach that doctrine to them, they think themselves in ane infallible security. I wish they may not be mistaken. However, I think it's the interest of all those who love this government betwixt Spey and Ness to see me at the head of my clan, ready to join them, so that I believe none of them will refuse to sign ane address to make me a Scotchman. I am persuaded, dear sir, that you will be of good example to them on that head. But secrecy, above all, must be kept, without which all may go wrong. I hope you will be stirring for the parliament, for I will not be reconciled to you if you let Prestonhall outvote you. Brigadier Grant, to whom I am infinitely obliged, has written to Foyers to give you his vote, and he is an ingrate villain if he refuses him. If I was at home, the little pitiful barons of the Aird durst not refuse you. But I am hopeful that the news of my going to Britain will hinder Prestonhall to go north, for I may meet him when he least thinks of me. I am very impatient to see you, and to as- sure you most sincerely how much I am, with love and respect, right honourable," &c. The above is a fair specimen of Lovat's manner and address in complimenting those whom he had an interest in standing well with. He had indeed use for all his activity on this occasion. The secrecy which he recommends was also very necessary, for Fraserdale no sooner heard of his intention of coming down to Scotland, which was only a few days after this, than he applied to the lord-justice clerk for an extract of the process and sentence against him, no doubt with the intention of putting it in execution before his friends should be able to interpose any shield of legal authority in his defence. All his friends, however, especially Culloden, were particu- larly active. The address and bond of security to the king was speedily signed by all the Whig gentle- men of consequence in the north, and remitted to Lord Ilay, who carried it to London in the month of March, 1 715. Culloden, in the meantime, had, through his brother Duncan Forbes, afterwards lord- president, transmitted, to be presented by Lord Ilay, a most loyal address to the king, signed by the Fraseis, with a tender of their clan to Arg\le as their SIMON FRASER. chief. This was intended to counterbalance the ad- dress of the Jacobites that had been transmitted to the Earl of Marr, but which he durst not present, and to strengthen the interest of Argyle, which the other was calculated to weaken. Through the oppo- sition of the Duke of Montrose, however, who had been gained over by Prestonhall and the Duke of Athol, Lovat's business was protracted till the month of July, 1 715, when the news of the preparations of the Pretender for an invasion of Great Britain, trans- mitted by the Earl of Stair, then ambassador at Paris, and the general ferment that prevailed through the country had aroused the fears of tlie government. Hay availed himself of these circumstances for turning the attention of the English minister more particu- larly to that too long delayed affair. The addresses which had been obtained in his favour were then given in to his majesty, whose gracious pardon he obtained; and in October, making the best of his way for the north, he was arrested by a loyal party at Dumfries as a Jacobite. Referring for his char- acter to the Marquis of Annandale, who happened to be in the neighbourhood, and to whom he was known, he was immediately set at liberty. Here he volunteered his services to lead a party of the towns- men in attacking the rebels in their quarters at Loch- maben, but the attack, after it had been resolved on, was abandoned through the prudent advice of the Marquis of Annandale, who was afraid of the con- sequences both to themselves and the good cause in which they were engaged. Leaving Dumfries, his lordship found his way into the north, where tlie insurgents were nearly trium- phant, being in possession of the whole country save the shires of Sutherland, Ross, and Caithness, with perhaps a detached castle or two in some of the neighbouring counties. Among these was the castle of Culloden. The Grants and the Munroes had also been able in some measure to preserve their own ter- ritories, but the rebels were everywhere around them in great force. The first of Lovat's proceedings was to hold a counsel with his general, as he long after called him, Duncan Forbes, and his brother the laird of Culloden, who was perhaps the most trust- worthy man in the north, after which he went home, where he was waited upon by a considerable number of Erasers, with whom he marched for Stratherrick, one of his estates, and by the way compelled the clan Chattan to lay down their arms and disperse to their homes. Macdonald of Keppoch, too, who had 300 men assembled on the braes of Abertarf, dis- missed them the moment he was apprised of Lovat's approach. At Stratherrick he was waited upon by Eraser of Foyers and Eraser of Culduthill, with their retainers; and to prevent the Macdonalds from reaching the other side of Loch Ness, he himself crossed over at Bonat, and with 200 picked men marched, according to agreement, for Inverness by Kinmayles. Colonel Grant, with a number of his own, Elcheiz's, and Knockandow's men. Captain Grant with 300 Grants, and all the other gentlemen engaged in the enterprise, were at the same time ap- proaching the nortiiern capital in order to rescue it from the hands of the rebels. P^or this end it was proposed that the gentlemen of Moray, in conjunction with Lord Lovat and the Grants, should set upon it from the south, while the Earl of Sutherland, Lord Rae, the Munroes, and the Rosses should attack it on the north. These latter gentlemen, however, having some of tliem upwards of fifty miles to march, besides ferries to cross, it was not thought advisable to wait for them. Captain Arthur Rose, brother to Kilravock, was therefore ordered to enter the town, while those that were already come up proceeded to invest it in the best manner they could. Lord Lovat, with his detachment, was stationed on the west end of the bridge; Captain Grant on the south side, to enter by Castle Street; and the Moray lieutenants, Kilravock, Letham, Brodie, Sir Archibald Campbell, Dunphail, &c., were to attack the east part. The a tack was led on with great spirit by Captain Arthur Rose, who was unfortunately killed pressing on in the front of his men; and Sir John Mackenzie, the rebel governor, seeing himself about to be over- powered, abandoned the place, escaping with his men across the frith in a number of boats, which but a few days before he had intended to destroy, in order to cut off all communication by the ferry. This was upon Saturday, the 12th of November, tlie day before the battle of Sheriffmuir and the surrender of Preston. Thus the rebels were com- pletely broken in the north, and it was a triumph obtained with very little loss. Much of the credit of the achievement was given to Lovat, much more indeed than was his due; but he was in want of something to elevate his character, and his friends were willing to give him all advantages. The im- mediate consequence of the honour he acquired on this day was the desertion of 300 Erasers, who, under Eraserdale, were in Marr's camp at Perth ; but now denying his authority to lead them, put themselves under the charge of Lord Lovat at Inver- ness, where they remained till the rebellion was finally put down by the Earl of Argyle and General Cadogan. But there was another consequence not very remote and of far greater importance; it secured him at once in the estate and all the honours of Lovat, which it had been the great object of his whole life to compass, but which, without some such strange event, joined to the false step of his rival in joining the rebel standard, was most certainly for ever beyond his reach. Prestonhall had married the heiress of Lovat, in whose person, by a decree of the Court of Session, so far back as the year 1702, rested the honours and dignity of Lovat. He had assumed in consequence the name of Eraser and the title of P'raserdale, and had a numerous offspring to inherit as heirs of marriage the estate which he had so long possessed, and had he maintained his loyalty, nothing but a revolution, with singular folly on his own part, could have dispossessed him of the property. Most fortunately for Lovat, when he arrived in the north, Eraserdale was with the Earl of Marr at Perth, and there was nothing to prevent him from executing his purpose of taking immediate possession of his estates, which he did before proceeding to act vigorously in behalf of the government, every mem- ber of which knew that such was the reward he ex- pected. The fortunate issue of this his first action too called forth all the natural arrogancy and pre- sumption of his character. We find him in the en- suing March, only four short months after, writing to Duncan Forbes in the following style: — "My dear general, I send you the inclosed letter from the name of RLacleod, which I hope you will make good use of, for it's most certain I kept the Macleods at home, which was considerable service done the government." How had he kept the Macleods at home, when the rebellion was at its height before it was so much as known if ever he would be allowed to enter it? But he goes on to speak of his own achievements still more boastingly, and of the recalling of Argyle, which, he says, has made him sick. "I hope, my dear general, you will take a start to London to serve his grace and do something for your poor old cor- poral (meaning himself); and if you suffer Glengarry, Eraserdale, or the Chisholm to be pardoned, I will never carrj' a musket any more under your command, SIMON FRASER. 7i though I should be obliged to go to Afric. How- ever, you know how obedient 1 am to my general's orders; you forgot to give the order signed by you and the other deputes to meddle with Fraserdale's estate for the king's service. I entreat you send it me, for is afraid to meddle without authority." How his lordship wished Fraserdale to find no mercy is obvious from what is above stated; but why should Glengarry and the Chisholm find none for the very same reason? Their estates lay contiguous to those of Fraserdale; and if they could be all escheated to the king, why might not Lovat for his own extraor- dinary services have got all the three as well as one? Fraserdale was escheated, and Lovat had only to wait till the month of August, when a grant passed his majesty's privy-seal of Scotland "for the many brave and loyal services done and performed to his majesty by Simon Lord Lovat, particularly for the zeal and activity he showed in suppressing the late unnatural rebellion in the north of Scotland, and for his known affection to his majesty's person and government, giving, granting, and disponing the escheat of all goods, gear, debts, and sums of money, jewels, gold, silver, coined or uncoined, utensils and domecills, horse, nolt, sheep, corns, cattle, bonds, obligations, contracts, decreets, sentences, compro- mitts, and all other goods and gear escheatable, which belonged to Alexander Mackenzie of Fraser- dale, together with the said Alexander Mackenzie his life-rent escheat of all lands, heritages, tenements, annual rents, tacks, steadings, rooms, possessions, as also ;^5oo of sterling money, fallen in the king's hands by the said sentence," «S:c. This was certainly an abundant reward, though Lovat had been a much better man, and his services more ample than they really were. It was nothing more, however, than he expected, and it excited no gratitude, nor did it yield anything like content. Fraserdale's plate he had attempted to secure, but it fell into the hands of General Wightman, who, it was at the time remarked, had a happy knack of keeping what he got. However, he engaged to re- turn it, Lovat paying him the one half in money, the whole being only valued at ;Ci50 sterling. In the month of April he was, on his own request, allowed to come to London, to look after all those great af- fairs that were then going on; and his mode of writ- ing about them gives a curious view of a worldly man's morality: — "I want," he says to his friend Duncan Forbes, "but a gift of the escheat to make me easy. But if it does not do, you must find some pretence or other that will give me a title to keep possession, either by the tailie my lord provost has, or by buying off some creditors; in short, you must make a man of it one way or other." He was also at this time on the eve of his marriage with Margaret Grant, daughter of Ludovick Grant, of Grant; and his moral feeling on this subject is equally interesting to that which regarded the estate of Lovat : — "I spake to the duke and my Lord Hay about my marriage, and told them that one of my greatest motives to the design, was to secure the joint interest of the north. They are both fully for it, and Argyle is to speak of it, and propose it to the king. But Hay desired me to write to you, to know if there would be any fear of a pursuit of adherence from the other person (the dowager of Lovat), which is a chimerical business, and tender fear for me in my dear Hay. But when I told him that the lady denied before the justice court that I had anything to do with her, and that the pretended marriage had been declared null, which Hay says should be done by the commissaries only; yet when I told him that the minister and witnesses were all dead, who had been at the pre- tended marriage, he was satisfied they could make nothing of it, though they would endeavour it. However, I entreat you, write to me or Mr. Stewart a line on this head, to satisfy my Lord Hay's scruple." This puts an end to all doubt respecting the rape charged upon his lordship, of which he had often before, and did often again declare, that he was as innocent as the child unborn. All was now, how- ever, forgiven; the Duke of Argj-le wrote in his fa- vour to the Grants, recommending the match, and in the course of the next year he obtained the young lady for his bride. Lovat might now have been, if worldly success could make any man so, a very happy man. He had been, for many years, an exile and a prisoner, proscribed at home and abroad, and alike odious to both parties in the state, and both claimants of the crown. He had ventured home at the hazard of his life, had obtained the grace of the reigning prince, the countenance of all his friends, possession of the inheritance of his fathers, two honourable commis- sions among his countrymen, a young and beautiful wife, and a handsome pension ; yet he was the same as before, querulous and discontented. In the beginning of the year 1717 we find him re- suming the subject of the grant, and he requests Duncan Forbes to employ Sir Walter Pringle, and any one else he pleases, and consult together of some legal way for his keeping possession of his estate; "for," says he, "I must either keep violent posses- sion, which will return me my old misfortunes, or I must abandon the kingdom and a young lady whom my friends have engaged me to marrj'. So, my dear general, I beg you may give me some prospect of not being again forced to leave the kingdom, or to fight against the king's forces. The one or the other must be, if I do not find any legal pretence of pos- sessing the estate but by this gift. " And all this was because a Mr. Murray or a Lord Murray had made a motion in the House of Commons for a redeem- ing clause to be added in favour of Fraserdale's lady, which occasioned a few hours' debate, and was im- proved for making remarks on Lord Lovat's char- acter and conduct, but at last came to nothing. Perhaps he was also a little disturbed by the move- ments of the Spanish court in favour of James, which were still more contemptible than any party motion that ever was made in the House of Commons. For a number of years after this Lovat was fully occupied with the legal campaigns which he carried on under the direction of Duncan Forbes, for the final settlement of the Lovat estate, during all which time the affairs of the Pretender gave him no trouble; nay, they seem to have been totally forgotten. After the lapse of a number of years, however, when he had got ever)'thing secured in his own way, we then find him again treating with the Pretender for a generalship and a dukedom, and all his old uneasi- nesses returning upon him. Having no more to ex- pect from his "dear general" the lord-president, he ceased to correspond with him; and on the break- ing up of the Black Watch, one of the companies of which had belonged to him, he withdrew his affec- tions entirely from the existing government, and became ready once more to act for the exiled family of Stuart. The nation was now involved in war; and the friends of the Pretender, stirred up by the emissaries of the court of France, which protected him for no other purpose than to make him a tool on such oc- casions— began to bestir themselves. Lovat, whose political views were very limited, never doubted but that France had at all times the power to restore the Pretender, if she had but the will; and now that her 72 SIMON FRASER. promises were so magnificent, he fell at once into the snare, and was the first to sign, in the year 1740, that association which brought entire niin upon the cause, antl nearly all that had connected themselves with it. Still he acted upon the old principle : he stipulated that he was to have a patent creating him a duke, and a commission constituting him lieutenant of all the Highlands, and of course elevating him above even the great Argjle. Though Lovat had now committed himself, and was fairly in the way of "having all his old troubles returned upon him," common sense, as in most cases, did not forsake him all at once. He was employed in making preparations for the new scenes of gran- deur that to his heated fancy lay before him, but he did not run the hazard of disappointment by any ridi- culous parade, or any weak attempts prematurely to realize them. When Prince Charles landed at Boradale, accompanied, not, as had been agreed upon with the association at the head of which Lovat had unfortunately placed his name, by 13,000 men with all necessary equipments, but with seven persons and a few domestics, his friends were per- fectly astonished, and none of them more so than Lovat. Accordingly, when he received Lochiel's letter stating that Charles was come, and that he had brought the papers stipulated upon, viz. the patent for the dukedom and the general's commission, Lovat returned a cold and general answer, that he might rely upon what he had promised. Lochiel, however, being led to take part in the enterprise, drew in some of his neighbours, and when the gathering had begun, who could tell where it would end? It might be at last successful, and all who had been backward at the outset might expect no mercy in the end. Still Lovat was cautious. He only sent one of his distant relations, "mad Tom of Gortuleg," to meet Charles at Invergarry, and to advise him to come by Stratherrick to Inverness, and by the time he reached the latter place Sir Alexander Macdonald and Macleod would have time to come up; besides, he might expect to be there joined by the Grants, the Mackenzies, and the Mackintoshes. These were all engaged to come for- ward as well as Lovat, who was now, from a num- ber of circumstances, doubtful of their constancy, and, while he preserved the character of a leader, wished to see them all committed before he began to play his part. All hh/i/icssc, however, was of no avail. Charles took other advice. Sir Alexander Macdonald, and his powerful neighbour Macleod, stood entirely aloof; and to crown all, his "dear general," the lord-president, to whom he owed all that he possessed in the world, and to whose acute powers of perception he was no stranger, became his next-door neighbour, with the almost avowed purpose of watching his every action. All these circumstances reduced him to the necessity of acting with the utmost caution, and at the same time sub- jected him to the most tormenting anxiety. His preparations for joining the Pretender he dared not entirely suspend, lest some inferior neighbour might rise to that pre-eminent place in the prince's favour, which, in case he were successful, it was the dearest wish of his soul to occupy, and he knew not how to proceed, lest he might stand fairly committed, and be compelled to abide by the consequences. He did, however, what he could : he compelled his son to leave his studies with a view to make him the leader of his clan; and he employed, in an underhand way, his dependants to bring all matters connected with the expedition into a state of forwardness, while he himself wrote letters to the lord-president, filled with lamentations for his unhappy countrj', and his more unhappy situation, as having to do with such mad people, and such an untoward and ungrateful son. After the brilliant affair at Gladsmuir, how- ever, when he saw "that as sure as God was in the heavens, the mad young man would prevail," he took a little more courage, and sent to congratulate him on the victory, and to say that, being an old man, he could not come himself with 5000 men, as he had originally intended, but that he would send his son, which he hoped would be regarded the same as if he had come himself. As the course of events seemed to favour or frown upon the attempt, his lordship's conduct 'continued to be more open, or more con- cealed, till Lord Loudon found it to be his duty to take him into custody. Still, as he appeared unde-- cided, and but few of his men had gone south, and it was hoped he might still countermand them, his confinement was only nominal. In an evil hour he made his escape from Lord Loudon, and, when it was utterly useless, threw the whole weight of his influence into the rebellion. The master of Lovat had a share in the affair of Falkirk, but was only coming up with his reinforcements to join the army of Charles, when he met it, totally routed, a few miles from the fatal field of Culloden. On the evening of that fatal day Lovat was petrified with the first and the last sight he ever had of Charles. This was at Gortuleg, where the unfortunate prince arrived about sunset, a miserable fugitive, accom- panied by his Irish counsellors, Sheridan, Sullivan, O'Neil, and his secretary John Hay. Lovat, on be- ing told of his approach in this forlorn condition, poured forth against him the bitterest execrations, as having brought utter ruin on the house of Lovat, and on the entry of his unexpected visitant he is said to have run about the house in a state of distrac- tion, calling upon his domestics to chop off his aged head. Charles, however, who possessed the art of flattery in great perfection, soothed him by the pro- mise of another and better day with the elector, ob- serving, at the same time, that he had already had two, while the elector had but one. That one, how- ever, unluckily for him and Lovat, was better than all the days either of them had seen, or were ever again to see. But the joke satisfied the old man; supper was hastily prepared, as hastily eaten, and at ten o'clock Charles changed his dress, and bade his entertainer an everlasting farewell. Lovat had now abundance of leisure to reflect upon his folly in rejecting the sound advice of his friend the lord-president; but as he could have little hope of being again pardoned, he studied to prolong his liberty and life in the best manner he could, first by proposing a mountain campaign, which was found impracticable, and then by betaking himself to the fastnesses of his country, with which he was well acquainted. From one of these retreats he had the misery of seeing his house of Castledownie laid in ashes, and his estates everywhere plundered, the cattle driven off, the shielings set on fire, and the miserable inmates driven to the mountains. He had also the misfortune to see it given over by commis- sion from the Duke of Cumberland to James Fraser of Castle Cullen for the behoof of the government, which, considering what it had cost him, and the value he set upon it, must have been worse than many deaths. As he had been so long a conspicuous character, and one of the most active movers of this rebellion, the search after him was continued with the utmost keenness and perseverance, and he was at last found upon an island in Loch Morar, where he was living comfortably with Macdonald of Morar, the proprietor of the island, without any suspicion of being found out, having carried all the boats SIMON FRASER. 73 upon the loch into the island, and being at a con- siderable distance from the sea. Information, how- ever, having been obtained. Captain Ferguson, of his majesty's ship Furnace, sailed round till directly- opposite the island, when the men-of-war boats were carried overland and launched into the loch. Most of those that were upon the island fled l)y their boats and escaped; but Lovat, being totally lame, was unable to escape in this manner. He was, however, carried upon his bed into the woods, and was not found till after a search of three days. Being in no condition to make any resistance, he surrendered himself at once, delivered up his arms and his strong box, was carried aboard Captain Ferguson's ship, and brought round to Fort-William, where he wrote a letter to the Duke of Cumberland boasting of the extraordinary services he had per- formed for his family, of the great kindnesses he had then met with, and of the vast benefits he was still capable of bestowing, should he be made a par- ticipant of the royal mercy. Of this letter the duke took no notice, but he treated him with much kind- ness. A litter having been provided for him, he was brought to Fort- Augustus on the 15th of June, 1746. On the 15th of July he was sent to Stirling Castle, where he remained some days. P"rom Stirling he was sent to Edinburgh, and thence by Berwick to London, the journey being divided into twenty stages, one only of which he was required to travel in a day. In this easy way he reached Barnet on the 14th of August, and on the 15th, the Friday before the execution of the Lords Kilmarnock and Balmerino, he arrived in London. On his way to the Tower he passed the scaffold that had been erected for the execution of those noblemen, which he looked at with some emotion, exclaiming, " Ah ! is it come to this!" When brought to the Tower he was received by General Williamson and con- ducted to the apartment prepared for him, where, as his trial did not come on till the beginning of next year, he had abundance of leisure to contem- plate the ruin he had brought upon himself and his house by indulging a most insatiable avarice and a ridiculous ambition. He, however, took possession of his dreary habitation with a degree of fortitude and an equanimity of mind worthy of a better man and a better cause. On the nth of December he was impeached of high treason by the House of Commons, a committee of which was appointed to draw up the articles and prepare evidence. He was subsequently brought to the bar of the House of Lords and the articles read to him. On this occasion his lordship made a long speech, in which he expressed the highest esteem for his majesty and all the royal family, enumerating at great length the many services he had performed for them during the rebellion in 17 15, and singular favours bestowed upon him in return by the late king and his ministers. He then enlarged with great eloquence upon his age and infirmities, particularly his deafness, in consequence of which he said he had not heard one word of the charges preferred against him. They were of course read over to him again, when he presented a petition praying that he might have a copy of them, and that counsel and solicitors might be assigned him. He also acquainted their lordships that his estate had been taken forcible pos- session of, in consequence of which he had nothing either to support him or to bear the expenses of his trial. Their lordships gave orders that he should be allowed the income of the estate for his subsist- ence. He also petitioned for his strong box, but this was refused. On this day his lordship displayed great ability and excited considerable sympathy. On the 13th of January, 1747, his lordship was again placed at the bar, and gave in an answer to the articles of impeachment, every one of which he denied. After making a very long speech, his trial was fixed for February the 23d. He was this day carried back to the Tower amid the hissings and execrations of a vast mob that attended him. In consequence of a petition from his lordship, his trial was put off till the 5th, and on a second petition till the 9th of March, on which day [Monday] it com- menced, and was continued till Thursday the 19th, when it was concluded, his lordship having been found guilty by a unanimous vote of his peers, by the lord-chancellor pronouncing upon him the awful sentence of the law. To give any particular account of this trial would be to give a history of the rebellion. Suffice it to say that on W^ednesday, the sixth day occupied by his trial, his lordship read his defences, which were drawn up with all that sarcastic shrewdness for which he was remarkal)le, and displayed his talents to very great advantage. After being sentenced the old man made a short speech, begging their lordships to recommend him to his majesty's mercy. Turning to the commons at the same time, he said, that he hoped the worthy managers, as they were stout, would be merciful. Going from the bar he added, "My lords and gentlemen, God Almighty bless you all. I wish you an everlasting farewell, for we shall never all meet again in one place." Though he was sentenced on the 19th of March, there were no orders issued respecting his execution till the 3d of April, when it was fixed for the 9th of that month. He had been in the meantime to all appearance perfectly at his ease, and indifferent alike to life or death. Being importuned to petition his majesty for a pardon, he replied he was so old and infii-m that his life was not worth asking. He presented, however, a petition for the life of his son, who was a prisoner in the castle of Edinburgh, and who had been drawn into the rebellion solely by his counsels. The notification of his death he received with perfect composure, drank a glass of wine to the health of the messenger who brought it, and en- tertained him for a considerable time with a most cheerful conversation, assuring him that he would not change situations with any prince in Europe. Next day he talked freely of his own affairs, and took praise to himself for having been concerned in all the schemes that had been formed in behalf of the Stuarts since he was fifteen years of age, and boasted that he never betrayed a private man nor a public cause in his life. He added, perhaps with more trath, that he never shed a drop of blood with his own hand, nor ever struck a man except one young nobleman [meaning, we suppose. Lord For- trose in a public meeting at Inverness] whom he caned for his impertinence and impiety. On the Sabbath he talked of his family, and showed to his attendants a letter he had written to his son in a style affectionate and pious, breathing the resignation of a martyr. Being asked this day some question about his religion, he answered that he was a Roman Catholic, and would die in that faith. Wednesday, the day before his execution, he awoke early and prayed for a considerable time with great fervency, but was very merry during the day, talking generally of public affairs, particularly of the bill that was in its progress through parliament for abolishing heritable jurisdictions, which he highly reprobated. Thursdav, the day of his execution, he awoke about three in the morning, and prayed with great fervour. At five he rose, called as usual for a glass of wine and water, and, being placed in his chair, sat and SIMON FRASER JOHX FULTON. read till seven, when he called for another such re- freshment. The barber shortly after brought him his wig, which he found fault with for not being jviwdered so deeply as usual, saying that he went to the block with pleasure, and if he had a suit of velvet, would put it on for the occasion. He then ordered a purse to put money in for the executioner, which, when brought, was not to his taste, "yet he thought no man could dislike it with ten guineas in it." At nine he called for a plate of minced veal, of which he ate heartily, and afterwards in wine and water drank the healths of several of his friends. In the meantime the crowd was collecting on Tower Hill, where about ten o'clock the fall of a scaffold con- verted many idle spectators into real mourners, upwards of twenty persons being killed and a vast number maimed. Lovat, it is said, made the remark that "the more mischief the better sport." About eleven the sheriff came to demand the body, and he was conducted to a house near the scaffold, where he delivered to his lordship a paper, saying he might give the word of command when he pleased and he would obey. He then said a short prayer, desired that his clothes might be given to his friends along with his body, took a little brandy and bitters, and was conducted to the scaffold, in going up to which he looked round him and exclaimed, "God save us! why should there be such a bustle about taking off an old gray head, that can't get up three steps with- out two men to support it?" Observing one of his friends very much dejected, his lordship clapped him on the shoulder, saying, " Cheer up, man, I am not afraid: why should you?" On the scaffold the first object of his attention was the executioner, to whom he gave his purse with ten guineas, bidding him do his work well. He then felt the edge of the axe, saying he believed it would do, looked at his coffin, on which was written "Simon Uominus Fraser de Lovat decollat. April 9, 1747, Jetat. suce 80," and sitting down in a chair set for him, repeated from Horace, " Dulce et decorum est pro patrla mori," and from Ovid, " Nam genus et proavos et quse non fecimus ipsi Vix ea nostra voco." He then said a short prayer, called for his solicitor, \Yilliam Fraser, to whom he gave his gold-headed cane and his hat, and refjuested him to see that the executioner did not touch his clothes. Being un- dressed he kneeled to the block, gave the signal in half a minute, and the executioner at one blow severed his head from his body. Thus died Simon Lord Lovat, one of the most extraordinary characters recorded in Scottish history. He was possessed of good natural talents, which, considering the age in which he lived, and the troubled life he led, had been considerably cultivated, but he was totally destitute of that which alone con- stitutes true dignity of character — moral worth. His private character, as may well be conceived from what we have detailed of his public one, was vicious, his appetites coarse, and his pleasures low and un- scrupulous. He had, however, seen much of the world, possessed great address, and when he had a purpose to serve, could make himself peculiarly agreeable. Few men have ever been so very for- tunate, and as few have recklessly thrown their good fortune from them. ' ' A protracted course of wicked- ness," one writer has remarked, "seems at last to have impaired his natural shrewdness; he digged a pit into which he himself fell, spread a snare with his own hands in which he was caught, and in the just judgment of God his hoary hairs came to the grave with blood." Besides his early affair with the dowager of Lovat, his lordship was twice married, first to Margaret, daughter to the laird of Grant, and secondly to Primrose, daughter to John Campbell of Mamore. This latter marriage was singularly unfortunate, and after the most unheard-of barbarities exercised upon the lady, his lordship was under the necessity of granting her a separate maintenance. By his first wife he had three children, two sons and one daughter; and by the second one son, who even- tually succeeded to the estate of Lovat. FULTON, George, the author of an improved system of education, was born February 3, 1752- He served an apprenticeship to a printer in Glasgow, and afterwards worked as journeyman with Mr. Willison of Edinburgh. He also practised his pro- fession for a time at Dumfries. In early life he married the daughter of Mr. Tod, a teacher in Edinburgh. His first appearance as a teacher was in a charity-school in Niddry's Wynd, which he taught for twenty pounds a year. There an ingeni- ous and original mind led him to attempt some im- provements in what had long been a fixed, and, we may add, sluggish art. Adopting his ideas partly from the system of Mr. Sheridan, and partly from his late profession, he initiated his pupils with great care in a knowledge of the powers of the letters, using movable characters pasted on pieces of wood (which were kept in cases similar to those of a com- positor in a printing-house), the result of which was, a surprising proficiency generally manifested by his scholars, both in the art of spelling and in that of pronouncing and reading the English language. Having thus given full proof of his qualifications as an instructor of youth, Mr. Fulton was appointed by the town-council one of the four teachers of English under the patronage of the city corporation, in which situation he continued till about the year 1790, when a dispute with the chief magistrate in- duced him to resign it, and set up on his own ac- count. He then removed from Jackson's Close in the old town to more fashionable apartments in Hanover Street, where he prospered exceedingly for more than twenty years, being more especially patronized by Thomas Tod, Esq., and Mr. Ramsay of Bamton. In teaching grammar and elocution, and in conveying to his pupils correct notions of the analogies of our language, Mr. Fulton was quite unrivalled in his day. Many teachers from other quarters became his pupils, and were successful in propagating his system; and he had the honour to teach many of the most distinguished speakers of the day, both in the pulpit and at the bar. During the long course of his professional life he was in- defatigable in his endeavours to improve his method and simplify his notation ; and the result of his studies was embodied in a pronouncing dictionary, which was introduced into almost all the schools of the kingdom. Mr. Fulton was an eminent instance of the union of talent with frugal and virtuous habits. Having realized a considerable fortune by teaching, he re- signed his school to his nephew Mr. Andrew Knight, and for the last twenty years of his life enjoyed othivi citm dif^iiitaU at a pleasant villa called Summerfield (near Newhaven), which he purchased in 1806. In the year 1820 Mr. Fulton married, for the second wife. Miss Eliza Stalker, but had no children by either connection. He died September I, 1 83 1, in the eightieth year of his age. FULTON", John. While the records of humble life abound with the names of self-taught geniuses in JOHN FULTON — SIR ARCHIBALD GALLOWAY, 75 poetr}', languages, and tlie fine arts, tlio list of those who have distinguished themselves by their profici- ency in the exact sciences and skill in their practical application, is very limited. And for this the diffi- culty of learning astronomy or mathematics not only without instructors but without the necessary imple- ments, will sufficiently account. Of the few, how- ever, who contrived to surmount such obstacles, the name of John Fulton may claim an honourable place. He was the eldest son of a shoemaker in the village of Fenwick, Ayrshire, and was born there in 1800. His education at the parish school was confined to the ordinary acquirements of reading and writing, after which he took his place upon the shoemaker's stall, and followed the craft of his father. While thus employed, however, his studies showed that he was fit for something better than the mechanical oc- cupation of making and cobbling shoes; and after a course of self-teaching in astronomy and mechanics he constructed a planetary machine, which was so highly appreciated that it was purchased by the Phi- losophical Society of Kilmarnock. At a later period he took a principal part in the construction of a small gaswork, and made a velocipede for a lame lad in Fenwick. He also studied botany chiefly by way of recreation, and made in it no mean proficiency. But his principal study still continued to be the science of astronomy, in which his chief aim w-as to con- struct a complete orrery. To this laborious and complicated task he addressed himself when scarcely more than twenty-two years of age, with scanty means and limited time and opportunity — and after ten years of earnest application the task was accom- plished. This orrery, a wonder of mechanical and scientific genius coming from the hands of a village shoemaker, was exhibited in the principal towns of Scotland and England, and at Edinburgh the talents of Fulton were acknowledged by the presentation to him of the medal of the Society of Arts for Scotland, of the value of ten sovereigns. After this achievement the scientific mechanist was to find a sphere and an occupation better suited to his studies and pursuits; for he went to London and entered into the employ of Mr. Bates, the mathema- tical instrument maker to King William IV. In this establishment he distinguished himself by his ingenuity and skill in the more delicate parts of the profession, especially in making balances for the royal mint, and theodolites for the Pacha of Egypt. But his restless inquiring mind did not confine itself to the exact sciences, or the falirication of those in- struments which their application demands: he was also a self-taught student of languages, and made himself an excellent Greek, French, Italian, and German scholar, without the instructions of a master. It was a love of learning for its own sake; and while he was becoming so rij)e a scholar both in science and literature, that the halls of a university might have been proud to receive him, he was contented with his present position, and also with his wages as a workman, which ranged only from 25J. to 30^'. a week. But this literary application, which would have been enough for a man's entire time, instead of his occasional hour of relaxation, began to tell upon the health and brain of poor Fulton; and although he had been of a robust constitution, he broke down when he had only completed his fiftieth year. In 1 85 1 he had to be removed to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, and there, after kind treatment, he was able in the following year to return to his native P'enwick, where he died in 1853. G. GALL, RlCH.\RD, a poet of considerable merit, was the son of a notary in the neighbourhood of Dunbar, where he was born in December, 1776. He received a limited education at Haddington, and at the age of eleven was apprenticed to his maternal uncle, who was a house-carpenter and builder. A decided repugnance to this mechanical art induced him soon after to abandon it and enter the business of a printer, which was only a degree more suitable to his inclinations, from its connection with litera- ture, to which he was already much attached. In the course of an apprenticeship to Mr. David Ram- say, the liberal and enlightened printer of the Edin- burgh Evening Coiu-ant, he made great advances in knowledge, and began at length to attempt the com- position of poetry in the manner of Burns. At the expiry of his time he had resolved to abandon even this more agreeable profession, as affording him too slight opportunities of cultivating his mind, when fortunately he obtained the appointment of travelling clerk to Mr. Ramsay, an employment which pro- mised him much of that leisure for literary recreation of which he was so desirous. He continued to act in this capacity till his death by abscess in his breast, May 10, 1 801, when he wanted still some months to complete his twenty-fifth year. In the course of his brief career Mr. Gall had se- cured, by his genius and modest manners, the friend- ship of various literary characters of considerable eminence, in particular Mr. Alexander Murray, after- wards professor of oriental languages; Mr. Thomas Campbell, author of the Pleasures of Hope; and Mr.' Hector Macneill, author of many admired poems in the Scottish dialect. His own poetical remains were published in 1819, in one small volume, and include some pieces which have retained their place in the body of our popular poetry, though in general they are characterized by a tameness of thought and lan- guage which will for ever prevent their author from ranking in the same class with Fergusson, Ramsay, and Bums. GALLOWAY, Sir Archibald, K.C.B., an approved soldier and excellent writer, was bom at Perth in 1780, and was the son of Mr. James Gallo- way of that city. Having chosen arms for his pro- fession, and India for his destination, Archibald Galloway was nominated a cadet in 1 799, and ap- pointed to the 58th native infantry, of which he finally became colonel in 1S36. During this long period of military service in India, extending over thirty-five years, he was present in several engage- ments, as well as six sieges and seven storms, in four of which he took a very active share. When Delhi, defended by a handful of British troops, maintained itself against a besieging army of 70,000 men and 130 pieces of cannon, Galloway was one of the brave defenders, and fully shared in the honours of that remarkable resistance. He was also present at the siege of Bhurtpore, conducted by Lord Lake. Cap- 75 JOHN GALT. lain Galloway's post on that occasion was especially the post of danger, for it was that of the sappers — a corps so constantly under the enemy's fire, and so frequently employed in the most perilous operations during the siege, that all its officers, and most of its men, were either killed or wounded. On two occa- sions he headed it in the attack as part of the forlorn hope, and on the last he was dangerously wounded. Besides active services, which are too numerous to specify, and in which his share was that of a fearless, indefatigable, and skilful inferior officer, he was em- ployed on important commissions on the staff, and for several years held high charges in India in the military engineer department, the last of which was that of member of the Military Board under its new constitution, to which he was appointed by the governor-general. Lord William Bentinck. In this responsible office he so ably acquitted himself as to be honoured, at his departure from India, with the highest approval of the governor-general in council. General Galloway's various ser\'ices, during his mili- tary career, were also publicly acknowledged by several of our Indian commanders-in-chief upon nine different occasions — by the supreme government of India on twenty-one, and by the court of directors and superior authorities in England on eleven — making an amount of distinction sufficient to show that he only required a separate command, and an oppor- tunity, to raise his name to the highest rank in the annals of our Anglo-Indian warfare. In authorship General Galloway also obtained a distinction which will perhaps outlast the remem- brance of his soldiership. At a time when such knowledge was most needed by our military gover- nors and civilians in the East, he wrote a commen- tary on the Mahometan Law, and another on the Lm.w, Constitution, and Goz'ernment of l7idia. He also wrote a work on Indian Sieges, which was so highly esteemed that it was reprinted by the court of directors, and used as a te.\t-book in their mili- tary college, as well as distributed for general use throughout our Indian army. In addition to these he was author of several military treatises. He was nominated a Companion of the Bath in 1838, and a Knight Commander in 1848; and besides these public honours, he was elected a director of the East India Company in 1846, and officiated as its chairman in 1849. His death, which was sudden, being after a few hours' illness, occurred at his house, 18 Upper Harley Street, on the 6th of April, 1850. GALT, John*. This popular novelist and multi- farious writer was bom at Irvine, in Ayrshire, on the 2d of May, 1779, and was the son of a sea-captain who was employed in the West India trade. The stay of young Gait in a district with which he after- wards made the world so well acquainted was not long-continued, as his parents removed to Greenock when he was eleven years old. In this town of com- mercial bustle and enterprise his education was soon finished, as he was destined to follow the occupation of a merchant ; and by way of acquiring a proper knowledge of his future profession, he was, in the first instance, employed as a clerk in the custom- house of Greenock, and afterwards in a counting- house in the same town. This was unfavourable training for that life of authorship which he followed with such ardour in after-periods; but his diligence and perseverance in self-education during the hours of leisure not only formed the groundwork, but the incitement, of his future literary undertakings. His first attempts, as is usual with young aspirants, were in poetry; and one of these, a tragedy founded on the historj- of Mary Queen of Scots, he sent to Constable for publication, but had the MS. returned unread. He was consoled, however, for this disap- pointment by having his smaller lucubrations occa- sionally published in the Greenock Advertiser and one or two of the Scottish magazines. He thus saw himself in print, and the consequences it is easy to divine — his enthusiasm would expand into full-grown authorship. Undismayed by the rejection of his tragedy. Gait next attempted an epic, the title of which was The Battle of Largs. It was written in octo-syllabic rh)Tne, and he prided himself not a little on the fact that, in this matter at least, he had preceded Sir Walter Scott. This poem, written in five cantos, was enabled partly to struggle into light in consequence of detached portions of it having been published in the Scots Magazine for 1803 and 1804. It is as well that the world was not troubled with it in toto, as the following invocation to Lok, which is in "Ercles' vein," will sufficiently testify: — "The hideous storm that dozing lay Thick blanketed in clouds all day, Behind sulphureous Hecla, we Roused to this wrecking wrath for thee. And sent hira raging round the world, High in a thund'ring chariot hurl'd; Whose steeds, exulting with their load. As the grim fiend they drag abroad, \Vhisk with their tails the turrets down Of many a temple, tower, and town." Or take the following description of Erie, one of the Norse Eumenides, in which the sudden alternations of rising and sinking can scarcely be paralleled even by Sir Richard Blackmore : — " Her looks sulphureous glow — Her fumace-e)-es, that bum'd below A dismal forehead, glaring wide. Like caves by night in Hecla's side, And what her fangs for staff did grasp, 'Twas fired iron — Hell's hatchway's hasp, At length she stood. And scowling o'er the weltering flood, That louder rag'd, she stretch'd her hand, Clutching the red Tartarean brand Aloft, and as the black clouds sunder'd. Dared the high heavens till they thunder'd." It was in London that this poetical attempt was made. He had gone to the metropolis in 1803 or 1804, and there a few months of leisure at his first entrance had encouraged those desperate concep- tions in Runic mythology which he extended through five mortal cantos. It was not, however, by writing epics that he could support himself in London. He therefore commenced business in good earnest, and entered into partnership with a young countn-man of his own: but they soon disagreed; their affairs were unsuccessful, and in about three years the concern became bankrupt. This combination of poetr)- and business was not sufficient for the versatile mind of Gait; other subjects of study occupied his attention, among which were astrolog}-, alchemy, histon,-, and political economy. Was it wonderful then that his name, before it figured in authorship, should have found a place in the bankrupt list? After this mercantile disaster Gait tried to re- establish himself in business, along with a brother; but this attempt also proved abortive. Sick of mer- chandise, and impatient to trj' something else, he re- solved to devote himself to the profession of law, and for this purpose entered himself at Lincoln's Inn. He was soon overtaken by a ner\-ous indisposition that unfitted him for the dry studies of Coke upon Littleton; and, by way of solace, until the malady should pass away, he sat down to write a book. The subject was ready to his hand ; for, in a walk with some friends through the colleges of Oxford in 1805, he had felt indignant that Cardinal Wolsey, the founder of Christ Church College, should have JOHN GALT. 77 been allowed to bequeath such a boon without a fitting commemoration from its learned disciples; and since better might not be, he had resolved, alien though he was, at some time or other to repair the deficiency. That season had now arrived; and accordingly, about the beginning of 1809, he com- menced a life of Cardinal Wolsey, and finished it in a very few months. The short time that he took for the necessary reading and research, as well as writing, which such a subject required, will give an adequate conception of the natural impetuosity of his intellect. But with this haste and hurry there was curiously combined the grave methodical arrange- ment of the counting-house: he transcribed upon one part of his writing-paper the historical facts extracted from Cavendish, Fiddes, and Hume, and wove round them, upon the margin and between the interstices, his own remarks and deductions, until a gay parti- coloured web was the result, after which he systema- tized the whole into a continuous narrative. "I was desirous," he says of it, "to produce a work that would deserve some attention." This work, which he afterwards improved and extended, was not pub- lished till three years afterwards. As his health did not improve, he now resolved to try the effects of travel before being called to the English bar; and in 1809 he left England for a tour, which extended over three years. The result of this long journey was two separate works at his return. The first was entitled Voyages a?id Travels in the Years 1809, 1810, and 181 1, containing Statistical, Commercial, and AIiscel~ laneons Observations on Gibraltar, Sardittia, Sicily, Malta, and Turkey; and the second, Letters from the Levant, containing Viaus of the State of Society, manners, Opinions, and Commerce in Greece and Several of the Principal Lslands of the Afxhipelago. These were not theonly works which Gait published on his return to England. His poetical inspiration still haunted him, but so much sobered down, that during his tour he had been employing himself in writing dramas on the plan of Alfieri, where the sim- plicity of the plot and fewness of the characters were to be compensated by the full force of nature and poetic excellence. This was certainly a great sacrifice in one whose imagination so revelled in plot, and was so fertile in incident. The volume, which was pub- lished in 1812, contained the tragedies of " Maddalen," "Agamemnon," "Lady Macbeth," "Antonia," and '"Clytemnestra," and as only 250 copies were printed, the work being published on his own account, it had little chance of undergoing the test of public opinion. Even as it was, however, it was roughly handled in the Quarterly Reiiira) by an ironical criticism, in which Gait was elevated to the rank of a second Shakspeare. Soon after his return he married Eliza- beth, daughter of Dr. Tilloch, editor of the Philoso- phical Magazine, and proprietor of the Star, a news- paper on which Gait had been for some time em- ployed. In the same year also (181 2), so prolific in his publishing adventures, he sent through tlie press his Reflections on Political and Coni7nercial Subjects. Having now abandoned all thoughts of devoting himself to the bar. Gait was compelled to have re- course to authorship until something more stable should occur. He therefore wrote in the Monthly Magazine and other periodicals of the day. He also projected, with Mr. Colbum the publisher, aperiodical which, under the title of the uVeiv British Theatre, should publish the best of those dramatic productions which the managers of the great play-houses had re- jected. It was hoped that in this way deserving talent would be rescued from oblivion, and "many a gem of purest ray serene" be made to glitter in the eye of a delighted world, instead of being trampled among the dust of the green-room. It was a most benevolent and hopeful speculation, of which Gait, the proposer, was appointed editor. But little diil he anticipate the flood-gates of mud which such a proposal opened. There was an instant jail-delivery of manuscript plays, enough to have converted the country into a literary Botany Bay or Alsatia; and Gait, amidst the heap of dramatic matter under which he was well-nigh smothered, was obliged to confess at last that the managers of theatres were not such reckless or unjust rejectors as they had been called. The work at its commencement was successful, but soon aftersvards fell off, although the plan was im- proved by the admission of plays that had been written but not presented. Before it expired Gait possessed and availed himself of the opportunity of inserting some of his own dramatic productions, among which was the tragedy of The Witness, after- wards performed in several towns with altered titles. After this his career for some years was one of active business, combined with authorship. During his travels he had conceived the idea of importing British goods through Turkey, in spite of the conti- nental blockade by which Napoleon endeavoured to exclude our commerce; and upon this plan he em- ployed himself diligently for some time both in Eng- land and Scotland. But the conception appeared too bold and hazardous to those traders who were invited to the risk; and his efforts ended in disap- pointment. Another occupation with which he was commissioned was to superintend a bill through the House of Commons intrusted to him by the Union Canal Company. As enough of leisure was afforded him in London during the suspense of this bill, he wrote the Life and Studies of Bc7ija77ii7t West. He also wrote a romance, of which the hero was the Wandering Jew. Of this work two considerable editions were sold, although it had never been re- viewed. This neglect the author, who affectionately clung to the remembrance of his Wandering Jew to the last, regarded with some surprise. "How the work," he says, "should have been so long unnoticed, while others which treat of the same subject have attracted considerable attention, I cannot say ; but this I know, that many of my own far inferior pro- ductions, in originality and beauty, have been much applauded, and yet I doubt if they have sold so well." We suspect that few of our readers have been among the purchasers of this wonderful myth, or have even heard its name till now. Amidst all the toil and struggle of these literary attempts, John Gait had not yet discovered where his strength lay. History, biography, travels, epic and dramatic poetry, romance— he had tried them all, but attained success in none. His over-boiling imagination and erratic fancy were too much even for fiction, whether in prose or verse; and when he attempted sober narrative, his love of originality was ever leading him into some startling paradox which the facts of history were unable to make good. The eccentricity of his political opinions had also given not a little offence to the still predominant party; for although a Tory in theory, he seemed a very Radical in practice, and had more than once run a muck against the powers that be, when he found them stopping up his way. On this account he had also brought down upon his head the ire of the Quarterly Rtinew, whose censure was enough to blight the popularity of an authoramong Tory readers, and throw him out upon neutral ground. Thus, up to 1820, his attempts were a series of literary blunders, and his production of that year. The Earthquake — a stern sombre novel in three volumes, which has shared the fate of his other productiorts written 78 JOHN GALT. before this period, should, in ordinar}' circumstances, have been his last attempt in authorship. But in his long search in the dark he had hit upon the right vein at last. It was not in the wild and wonderful that he was to excel, but in the homely, the humorous, and the caustic. "The hero's harp, the lover's lute," with which he had tried to enchant the world, but to no purpose, were to be exchanged for the vulgar bag- pipe and stock-and-horn. His first attempt in this way was the Ayrshire /.^jnUes — a work which origin- ated in mere accident. One of his enjoj-ments was to "show the lions" to such strangers as were intro- duced to him in London; and of these, as might be expected, were many original characters from the far north, whose sensations among the wonders of the great metropolis were a rich feast to his keen observ- ant eye and quick sense of the ludicrous. It soon occurred to him that these peculiarities might be em- bodied in particular personages, and illustrated by correspondent adventures; the whole materials were before him like those of a rich landscape, and only needed artistic selection and combination to form a ver>' choice picture. Upon this idea he set to work, and without any formal plot for his story, scene after scene grew upon his hand as it was needed, until the Ayrshire Lej:;at,:es was the result. It was in this way that Iliiviphrcy Clinker was produced — the best of all Smollett's productions. As fast as the chapters of Gait's new attempt were written, they were pub- lished in BUukiuood^s Magazine of 1820 and 1821, and their appearance excited universal attention, while they continued to rise in popularity to the last: so that, when finished, they were published separately, and eagerly devoured by the novel-reading public. It was a style of writing which had been so long dis- used as to have all the charms of originality, while the truthfulness of the different characters was such as to impart to fiction all the charms of reality. Gait found that he had succeeded at last, and fol- lowed up his success with the Annals of the Parish, which was published in 1821. This work, however, although so late in its appearance, was, properly speaking, the first of Gait's Scottish novels, as it had been written in 1813, but laid aside, until the success of the Ayrshire Legatees encouraged him to commit it to the press. In this work also he had not troubled himself about the construction of a regular plot, and, like its predecessor, it was all the better for the omission. Long before he commenced the Annals his ambition had been to "write a book that would be for Scotland what the 'Vicar of Wakefield is for England;" and this was the result. He certainly could not have adopted a better model. No one can imagine that the pen of Gait, so in- defatigable when success was against it, would now relapse into idleness. In the Annals of the Parish he had exhibited the progress of improvement in a rural district of the west of Scotland; he was now desirous of describing the same progress in a town. Such was the origin of the Proz'ost, which was jniljlished in 1822. He had now learned the true secret of novel-writing, as is evident from the follow- ing statement: "In the composition of the Prorost I followed the same rule of art which seemed to me so proper in the Annals of the Parish, namely, to bring impressions on the memory harmoniously together; indeed, I have adhered to the principle in all my subsequent compositions, and sometimes I fancy that the propriety of doing so may be justified by nature. I think no ingenuity can make an entirely new thing. Man can only imagine the old together; join legs, and arms, and wings as he may, only the forms of previously-created things can be imitated. The .whole figure may be outre, and unlike anything in the heavens, or the earth, or the waters under the earth; but the imitations of the human hand in the details will ever be evident. ... In my youth I wrote a poem called the Legend of St. Anthotty, which I undertook with the intention of depicting comical phantasms; but I had not proceeded far till I was induced to change my mind, by observing that my most extravagant fancies were only things of curious patchwork, and that the same defect might be discerned in all those things in which the 'creative' power of genius was said to be more indisputable. ... I therefore give up all pretension to belonging to that class who deal in the wild and wonderful; my wish is, to be estimated by the truth of whatever I try to represent." The next work of Gait was the Steam-boat, a novel, published originally in Blactiuood, in which he wished to give such an account of the coronation of George IV. as an "abortive bailie" from Scotland might be likely to do. This was followed by Sir Andrezii IVyllie, in which he wished to exhibit the rise and progress of a humble Scotchman in London. In this tale, however, he gave way to his literary be- setting sin, a fault of which he was afterwards fully conscious; and he says of it very justly, "The inci- dents are by far too romantic and uncommon to my own taste, and are only redeemed from their extra- vagance by the natural portraiture of the characters." But, indeed, either accurate conception or finished execution could scarcely be expected from Gait in his writings at this period, when we remember that the three last-mentioned works, viz. the Proi'ost, the Steam-boat, and Sir Andre'LO Wyllie, were all published in 1822. In the following year he pro- duced his Gathering of the West, which was also published in the first instance in Blackwood'' s Maga- zine. The subject was the visit of George IV. to Scotland — an event that appeared in so many ludicrous aspects to the mirthful satirical mind of Gait, that he could not repress his profane chuckling at this great avatar, even when he endeavoured to look the most composed. He therefore says of the Gathering, and its kindred work the Steam-boat — "Notwithstanding the deference for magnates and magnificence under which these works were written, the original sin may be detected here and there peep- ing out, insomuch that those who consider Tor}dsm as consisting of the enjoyment of at least pensions, must be dreadfully shocked to think even a moderate politician of any sort could be so far left to himself as to speak so irreverently of things which concerned the affairs of empires and burgh towns." We have already alluded to Gait's exuberance in the productions of 1822; but that of the following year was still more excessive, so that it might well be said of him, I'ij-es acqiii7-it cundo. Thus the Entail, Ringan Gilhaize, and the Spaeivife — each a three-volumed novel — were published during this year of portentous abundance. The first of these novels was founded upon an incident related by the lord-provost of Glasgow to Gait. It was in this way that he was accustomed to make the most of everj'thing that he had heard or witnessed, by either laying it down as the groundwork of a tale, or intro- ducing it as an amusing episode; and in this faculty of adaptation lay much of the excellence of his popular works. Thus his vigorous and picturesque description of the northern coast of Scotland in the Entail, was expanded from an interesting account of the locality given to him by a daughter of Sir John Sinclair; while many of the grotesque events and humorous jokes with which his other tales abound had long previously enlivened the firesides of the peasantry. In him, however, it was no small JOHN GALT. merit that he should have introduced them so happily, and told them so well. As a proof of the accepta- bility of his last-mentioned work, Gait tells us, in his Literary Life and Miscellanies, that Sir Walter Scott had read it thrice, and Lord Byron as often. Of Ringan Gilhaizc he also tells us that it received the unique and distinguished honour of being recom- mended from the pulpit by one of the ministers of Aberdeen. This tale, in which the narrator, a per- secuted Covenanter, relates the history of his grand- father, gives a sketch of the rise and progress of the Reformation in Scotland, from the days of Knox and Murray to the close of the reign of the Stuarts; and for the purpose of collecting materials, and pre- serving the accuracy of the narrative. Gait went to Rinsory House to gather traditions, and collected several relics of the battle of Killiecrankie. The cause which incited him to write such a work was indignation at the popularity of Old Mortality, in which the Covenanters were held up to ridicule; and he was animated with a chivalrous zeal to vindi- cate the character of these heroic but much vilified sufferers in the cause of conscience and religion. But unfortunately Ringan Gilhaize was no match for Balfour of Burley. In this tale Gait very rashly abandoned his own field of broad reality and plain everyday life, for one where nothing but history and imagination could aid him; and therefore it exhibited a marked deficiency both in execution and popular interest. It was still worse, however, with the Spae- ivife, where he went back from the Covenanting periods, with which the Scottish public can still sympathize, to the fifteenth century of Scottish history, about which they know little and care still less; and v/ith all his attempts at the sublime, which often swelled into the turgid, he could not interest his readers one jot in the Duke of Albany and his worth- less brood, or even in James I., our heroic minstrel king. It was certainly an over-ambitious attempt, and as such it failed. At this period the empire of historical romance belonged to Sir Walter Scott, and to him alone, without peer or rival. But that such an attempt was the opening of a safety-valve, and that the work would have exploded in some fashion or other, is manifest from the following state- ment of the author: — "The fate of James I. of Scot- land early seemed to me possessed of many dramatic capabilities ; and in the dream of my youth, to illustrate by tales, ballads, and dramas the ancient history of my country, it obtained such a portion of my attention that I have' actually made a play on the subject. In riper life, many years after, I wrote the novel ; and my knowledge of the age in which the transactions lie enabled me to complete the story in such a manner that, merely as an anti- quarian essay, it merits consideration." To the Sparuiife succeeded Rothelan, in which, not content with going back so far as to the reign of Edward III., Gait transferred the scene to England, where his great yyri't' as a Scottish novelist had to be utterly laid aside; and Rothelan was a failure. Among the manifold aims of the author's ambition, that of being a good musical composer happened to be one; and in Rothelan Gait had not only written two songs, but also set them to music. But it unfortu- nately happened that the printer was smitten with the same ambition, and not liking the tunes, he substituted two of his own, which were printed in the work. "At the time," says Gait, "I was staying with a friend, and a copy of the book was left for me in the morning. On going down stairs I found it in the librar}', where we usually break- fasted; and as pleased at the sight as a hen with her egg, of which she cannot keckle enough to the world about, I lifted the volumes, and turned to the tunes. Courteous reader, sympathize! Instead of my fine airs, with an original inflection that had been much admired by a competent judge, I beheld two that surely had been purchased at the easy charge of a halfpenny a-piece from a street piper ! I looked aghast, and almost fainted. There was a grand piano in the drawing-room. I rushed, book in hand, upstairs in a whirlwind. It was of no use — the piano too was a particeps criniinis, and would only pronounce the Highland coronachs which stand in the publication even to this day; and the worst of it was, my friend, instead of taking out his handker- chief and condoling becomingly, only gave vent to 'uncxtinguishable laughter,' and paid no attention to my pathetic appeals at the figure I must cut, being really no deacon among musicians, at the thought of having two such horrid frights affiliated to me." A change once more occurred in the life of Gait, in which the active laborious author was to be trans- fonned into the equally active and enterprising man of business. Besides being reckoned only inferior to Sir Walter Scott as a delineator of Scottish character and manners, his reputation stood high as one well acquainted with the principles and practice of com- merce; and on this account the inhabitants of Canada commissioned him as their agent to prosecute their claims on the home government for the losses they had sustained during the occupation of the province by the army of the United States. During the ne- gotiations which occurred in consequence, a proposal to sell crown -lands in Upper Canada for the in- demnification of the sufferers was made by Mr. Gait, and adopted by government; and a Canada company was incorporated in 1826 to purchase land and colo- nize it. During the previous year he had been em- ployed in valuing the lands that were to be exposed to sale, after which he had returned to England; but in the autumn of 1826 he went back to Canada, where he was employed by the company as their superintendent. His able and active management soon secured the confidence of his constituents; new settlements were founded, a village was called by his name, and the township of Guelph was his entire creation. But unfortunately Gait's activity was not balanced by an equal amount of prudence, and in the ardour of his proceedings he managed to involve himself in quarrels with the colonial government, and with Sir Peregrine Maitland, who was at its head. Such is too often the folly and the fate of those who go forth as the reformers of our colonies ; they enter their new sphere of action with their heads filled with magna charta and the rights of British citizen- ship, forgetful all the while of the distance of these colonies from the parent seat of government, and the necessity of a more stringent rule than would be tolerated in London or Edinburgh. This seems to have been the error of Gait ; and in consequence of the complaints that were sent home against him he was superseded by the directors of the company. But, whether in the bustle of action or the chagrin of disappointment, his pen could not lie idle ; and during this period he produced the Omen, a tale that was favourably reviewed in Blackiuood's Magazine by Sir Walter Scott, and the Last of the Lairds, a novel which he meant to be the continuation of a class that has the Annals of the Parish for its commencement. For the encouragement of the drama in Quebec he also wrote a farce, entitled Visitors, or a Tf-ip to Quebec, which was acted with great success by an amateur company. Another, which he wrote for New York, to propitiate the Americans, who had taken offence at his Visitors, was entitled An Aunt in Virginia, and was after^vards published in Blacks So JOHN GALT FRANCIS G.\RDEX. waatfs Afagasitu, with tbe scene txansfeTTed firom New York to LcMidoii. He intended to write a third for his own town of Goelph, where his dwelling- house was to be conTerted into a theatre, and the drama intzodnced into this inhnt settlement; bat his des^ was suspended by more urgent demands, and the necessitj of his speedj return to £i^;land. This event ocamed in 1S29, after he had been two years and a half in America. On his retom, without a situation and ahnost penniless, Gait's creditors became urgent, and he was obliged, in omd- sequence, to avail himself of the insolvent dditots' act. The world was to be commenced anew; but the dasticitj of youth and the ardour of hope were exhausted, and Gait, now at the age of fifty, had already done mme than most men have achieved at that period. And yet he must ocmtinue an author, no loiter, however, from dhoice but necesaty; fix- of an that he had possessed nothing but his pen re- mained. And Ixavely he girded himsdf for the task, and pnUished in succession Zaarrie Todd, SmtUun- nan, and the Life of Lard Bjmm. They were written with his wonted rapidity, being produced in 1S29 and l8jO; but the spirit that formerly ani- mated him had become languid, so that these works, CTcePent though they are, will not stand compari- son with his former nords that so hi^y interested the Scottish public While he was occupied with the Life of Lord Bjrort, a caustic production, in whidi his lordship meets with somewhat rou|^ en- tertainment; Gait accepted the editorship of the Courier, a new^nper of hi^ Tory principles But however well adapted in many wajs for sudh an office, it is easy to guess that he could not omtiinie long to hold it, and that the same indqiendence of ^irit which wrecked him in Canada would mar hun as the Coryjdiens of any political partfwhateva- in the journalism of London. ''The ts (hastate of society that is isqudly passing away. In this d^iartment the name of John Gait win be perpetuated as a naticmal rememlxance; and his descriptions be prized ■wlien the livisff realitv K?s d^tarted, GAin)EN. 77 ■ -- - - ;, tue 2.\-i or J vrn-a. 1 ~2 : Alexander Garden o£ 1 Jsae. daug^bter of Sir f the judges of th . : ie Tsnal course -jniveibity, .-samembe: benevialent irund ga. hilarity: had he liv have turned these c but they suited will became the prince reached that period . ings generally make :. with bittemesson tz . contented mind lo^ : ^aDg!a able to indu! gences of others wi v. same overflown^ c. the body was disa'i social cude. Mac been preserved of h his eaidy |xactice :-\ dnring the time w'~ : in possession oi "L im^^iain {afterwarci preferred wine and FRAN'CIS GARDEN. 8l ing, that, when sent as a patrol by Sir John Cope to watch the coast towards Musselburgh, instead of proving a protection to the army, they were them- selves taken prisoners, just when the feast was at its highest, by a single individual, who happened to be prowling in the neighbourhood. It must, however, be allowed, that at that period there were not many inducements to exertion held out to Scotsmen of the higher rank. There were few men eminent for their genius, or even for the more passive acquirements of classical learning which distinguished the neighbour- ing country. The bar was the only profession which, from its respectability and emoluments, offered itself as a resource to the younger sons of the landed pro- prietors, then sufficiently poor; and while the learn- ing and information at that time required by its members in their professional capacity were not great, the jealousy of England, just after the union, allowed but to one family in Scotland the rational prospect that time and labour might be well spent in preparing for the duties of a statesman. The state of the country and its political influence were singularly discouraging to the upper classes, and from many naturally active spirits being left unem- ployed, they turned to indolence or unprofitable amusements those talents which might have rendered them the best ornaments of their country. The nation had then, indeed, begun by degrees to shake off its lethargy, and by the time the subject of this memoir had advanced a little in life, he became one of the most admired and beloved social members of a circle of illustrious philosophers and historians, whose names are dear to the memory of their coun- trymen as those who first roused their slumbering energies. On the 14th of July, 1744, Mr. Garden was made sheriff of Kincardineshire, and he soon after showed the soundness of his perception and the liberality of his mind, by stretching forth his hand to assist the modest talent and elegant taste of the author of TJie Minslrel. To those who may, from its lately extinct remnants, have formed any idea of the stately cold- ness preserved by the higher classes in Scotland towards their inferiors in the middle of the eighteenth century, it will operate as no small e\'idence of the discernment and kindness of the judge, that he began his acquaintance with the poet and philo- sopher when that individual was only a cotter boy sitting in a field writing with a pencil. In August, 1759, Mr. Garden was chosen one of the legal assessors of the to\^'n of Edinburgh; and as a higher step in professional advancement, in April, 1761, accepted office in the latter days of Mr. Pitt's administration, as joint solicitor-general of Scotland, along with Mr. James Montgomery, afterwards lord chief-baron. What were his professional attainments as a la\v)-er it is at this distance of time difficult to determine, as he has left behind him no professional work, the only index which can lead to a knowledge of his mere technical attainments as a barrister. As a pleader, however, we know he was highly estimated — as his connection with a renowned lawsuit, which spread its fame over all Europe, and created in Scot- land a ferment of disputation inferior only to the heat of religious controversy, has well shown. The ap- pearance made by Mr. Garden in the Douglas cause rendered his name better known, and his talents more appreciated, than generally falls to the lot of a mere forensic pleader. He was early connected with the proceedings of this great case, in the Toumelle process in France, where he appeared as senior to his future friend and literary associate, the classical Burnet of Monboddo, and is generally reported to have left behind him a high opinion of his learning, VOL. II, and the powers of his eloquence, even when clothed in a foreign language. He became connected with the case on its transference to England, but amidst its multifarious changes he was raised to the bench as successor to Lord Woodhall on the 3d of July, 1764, in time to act as a judge on the case, then very different in its aspect and material from what it was when he performed the part of a counsel. In 1762 Mr. Garden had purchased the estate of Johnston in Kincardineshire, and in 1765 he com- menced those improvements on his estate which, if not among the most brilliant acts of his life, are per- haps among those which deserve to be longest and best remembered. At the time when the estate of Johnston was purchased, the village of Lawrencekirk, if a village it could then be called, contained but fifty-four inhabitants, living there, not because it was a centre of commercial or industrial circulation, but because chance had brought a few houses to be built in each other's vicinity. Lord Gardenstone caused a new line of street to be planned out on his own property ; he gave extremely moderate leases of small farms, and giound for building upon, to the last, for the period of 100 years; he established a linen manu- factory, built an inn, and with a singular attention to the minute comforts and happiness of his rising flock, seldom equalled by extensive projectors, he founded a library for the use of the villagers. To assist the progress of society in reducing men dispersed over the country into the compact limits of a town, is an easy, and generally a profitable process, but to found to\\Tis or villages where there is no previous spirit of influx, is working to a certain degree against nature, and can only be accomplished by labour and expense. Although the benevolent mind of Lord Gardenstone produced a mutual understanding and kindness betwixt himself and his tenants, which mere commercial speculators fail in producing, yet many of his best-formed plans for the prosperity of the village proved unavailing, and he was frequently subject to disappointment anc^ needless expense. He seems, however, to have felt the pleasure of being kind without profiting himself At much ex- pense he supported a printfield and manufacture of stockings, and purchased a royal charter erecting Lawrencekirk into a burgh of barony, vdih. a regular magistracy. He had the satisfaction before his death to find the population increase to 5CX3 souls, and in a letter to the inhabitants which he published late in life, he says — "I have tried in some measure a variety of the pleasures which mankind pursue; but never relished anything so much as the pleasure arising from the progress of my village." In 1776 Lord Gardenstone, in addition to his seat on the civil bench, was appointed to fill the office of a lord-commissioner of justiciar)-, or ordinary judge in the criminal court, as successor to Lord Pitfour. Nine years afterwards, having succeeded, by the death of his elder brother, to the extensive estate of Troup, he relieved himself for ever from some of his laborious judicial duties, and for a time from them all, and resolved to attempt to recruit his failing constitution, by making a pleasure tour through the Continent. Accordingly, in 1786, he passed into France by Dover, visiting Paris and Lyons, remaining during part of the winter at Mar- seilles. In the ensuing spring he passed to Geneva, where he saw the ruined remnant of Voltaire's vil- lage at Femey, from which he was able to draw a comparison much in favour of his own, where the people enjoyed permanent political rights, which would render them independent of any future superior who might not be disposed to imitate the beneficence of the original patron. Lord Gardenstone spent the 41 82 FRANXIS GARDEN JAMES GARDINER. remainder of his allotted time in traversing the Netherlands, Germany, and Italy; making, in his progress, a collection of natural curiosities, and com- mitting to writing a number of cursory remarks on the men and manners he encountered, and the works of art he had seen on his tour, or met anywhere else, part of which were submitted to the world in two duodecimo volumes, denominated Travdliiig Alcmor- aiiiiiDiis madcin a Tour upon the Continent of Europe in the year 1792, and a remaining volume was pub- lished after his death. About the same time he published Miscellanies in Prose and Verse, a collec- tion of petty productions which had given him amuse- ment, either in composing or hearing, during his earlier days. Perhaps without affectation, the gravity of tlie judge might have restrained the man from giving to the world a publication which could not have raised the better part of his reputation. Lord Gardenstone was either not a poet born, or his ima- gination had not stood the ordeal of a profession which deals in fact and reason. His serious verses have all the stiffness of the French school, without either the loftiness of Pope or the fire of Dryden. The author had, to be sure, an ever-teeming mind, which never emitted anything common or contempt- ible, but it is to be feared that the merits his verses possess are those of rhetoric rather than of poetry; for, though constructed in the same work- shop which formed words and ideas that thrilled through the minds of a subdued audience, they are certainly very flat and inelegant as poetical produc- tions. The satirical pieces have a singular pungency and acnteness, and are fine specimens of the early natural powers of the author; but they are rather destitute of the tact acquired by professed satirists. A biographer who seems to have been intimate with his lordship,* describes him as having expressed great contempt for the affectation of those who ex- pressed disgust at the indelicacies of Horace or Swift, and it must certainly be allowed that, in his hum- orous fragments, he has not departed from the spirit of his precepts, or shown any respect for the feelings of these weaker brethren. Lord Gardenstone spent the latter days of his life, as he had done the earlier, in an unrestricted benevolence and a social inter- course with the world, indulging in the same prin- ciples, which years had softened in their activity, but had not diminished. He was still an ornament and a useful assistant to the circle of great men which raised the respectability of his country. He con- tinued to use his then ample fortune, and his prac- tised acuteness, in giving encouragement to letters, and in useful public projects, the last of which ap- pears to have been the erection of a building over the mineral spring of St. Bernard's, in the romantic vale of the water of Leith, a convenience which seems to have been much more highly appreciated formerly than now, and is always mentioned as one of the chief incidents of the judge's life. He died at Morningside, near Edinburgh, on the 22d of July, 1793. The village which had afforded him so much Ijcncvolent pleasure exhibited, for a considerable period after his death, the outward signs of grief, and, what seldom happens in the fluctuations of the world, the philanthropist was mourned by those who had experienced his public munificence as a private friend. In person. Lord Gardenstone is described as having been a commanding man, with a high forehead, features intellectually marked, and a serious penetrat- 1 Life introductory to vol. 3d of Travelling Mcmoratidmns, the only life of Gardenstone hitherto published— at least the one which, mutatis luuinniiis, has been attached to his name ia biographical dictionaries. ing eye. He was generally a successful speaker, and differed from many orators in being always pleas- ing. The effect appears to have been produced more by a deep-toned melodious voice, a majestic ease and carelessness of manner, which made him appear unburdened with difficulties, and a flow of language, which, whether treating of familiar or of serious subjects, was always copious — than by the studied art of forensic oratory. His political princi- ples were always on the side of the jieople, and, so far as may be gathered from his remarks, he would have practically wished that every man should enjoy every freedom and privilege which it might be con- sonant with the order of society to allow, or which might with any safety be conceded to those who had been long accustomed to the restraints and opinions of an unequal government. From all that can be gathered from his life and character, it is to be regretted that Lord Gardenstone, like many other eminent persons of his profession in Scotland, should have left behind him no permanent work to save his memory from oblivion. His Travelling J\Iemora7t- dums display the powers of a strongly thinking mind, carelessly strewed about on imworthy objects; the ideas and information are given with taste and true feeling; but they are so destitute of organization or settled purpose, that they can give little pleasure to a thinking mind searching for digested and useful information, and are only fit for those desultory readers who cannot, or, like the author himself, will not, devote their minds to any particular end. The .author's criticisms, scattered here and there through his memorandums, his letters to his friends in the Edinburgh Magazine, and numberless pencil marks on the margins of his books, are always just and searching, and strikingly untrammelled by the pre- judices of the day, a quality well exhibited in his praises of Shakspeare, then by no means fashion- able, and of the satellites of the great bard, Shirley, Marlow, Massinger, and Beaumont and Fletcher, who were almost forgotten. GARDINER, James, a distinguished military officer and Christian hero, was born at Carriden in Linlithgowshire, January II, 1688. Of this remark- able person we shall abridge the pleasing and popu- lar memoir written by Dr. Doddridge, adding such additional particulars as have fallen under our ob- servation in other sources of intelligence. Colonel Gardiner was the son of Captain Patrick Gardiner, of the family of Torwoodhead by Mrs. Mary Hodge, of the family of Gladsmuir. The captain, who was master of a handsome estate, served many years in the army of King William and Queen Anne, and died abroad with the British forces in Germany, shortly after the battle of Hoch- stet, through the fatigues he underwent in the duties of that celebrated campaign. He had a company in the regiment of foot once commanded by Colonel Hodge, his brother-in-law, who was slain at the head of that regiment at the battle of Steinkirk, 1692. Mrs. Gardiner, the colonel's mother, was a lady of a very valuable character; but it pleased God to exercise her with very uncommon trials ; for she not only lost her husband and her brother in the service of their country, but also her eldest son, Mr. Robert Gardiner, on the day which completed the l6th year of his age, at the siege of Namur in 1695. She took care to instruct her second son, the sub- ject of this memoir, at a very early period of his life in the principles of Christianity. He was also trained up in human literature at the school of Lin- lithgow, where he made a very considerable progress JAMES GARDINER. 83 in the languages. Could liis mother, or a very re- ligious aunt, of whose good instructions and exhorta- tions he often spoke with pleasure, have prevailed, he would not have thought of a military life. But it suited his taste ; and the ardour of his spirit, ani- mated by the persuasions of a friend who greatly urged it, was not to be restrained. Nor will the reader wonder that, thus excited and supported, it easily overbore their tender remonstrances, when he knows that this lively youth fought three duels before he attained to the stature of a man; in one of which, when he was but eight years old, he re- ceived from a boy much older than himself a wound in his right cheek, the scar of which was always very apparent. The false sense of honour which instigated him to it might seem indeed something excusable in those unripened years, and considering the profession of his father, brother, and uncle; but he was often heard to mention this rashness with that regret which the reflection would naturally give to so wise and good a man in the maturity of life. He served first as a cadet, which must have been very early; and when at fourteen years old he bore an ensign's commission in a Scots regiment in the Dutch service; in which he continued till the year 1702, when he received an ensign's commission from Queen Anne, which he bore in the battle of Ramil- lies, being then in the nineteenth year of his age. In this memorable action, which was fought May 23, 1706, our young officer was of a party in a forlorn hope, commanded to dispossess the French of the churchyard at Ramillies, where a considerable num- ber of them were posted to remarkable advantage. They succeeded much better than was expected; and it may well be supposed that Mr. Gardiner, who had before been in several encounters, was glad of such an opportunity of signalizing himself. Accord- ingly, he had planted his colours on an advanced ground ; and while he was calling to his men he re- ceived a shot into his mouth ; which, without beat- ing out any of his teeth, or touching the fore-part of his tongue, went through his neck, and came out about an inch and a half on the left side of the vertebrce. Not feeling at first the pain of the stroke, he wondered what was become of the ball, and in the wildness of his surprise began to suspect he had swallowed it; but dropping soon after, he traced the passage of it by his finger, when he could discover it no other way. This accident happened about five or six in the evening; and the army pursuing its ad- vantages against the French, without ever regarding the wounded (which was the Duke of Marlborough's constant method), the young officer lay all night in the field, agitated, as may well be supposed, with a great variety of thoughts. When he reflected upon the circumstances of his wound, that a ball should, as he then conceived it, go through his head with- out killing him, he thought God had preserved him by miracle ; and therefore assuredly concluded that he should live, abandoned and desperate as his state seemed to be. His mind, at the same time, was taken up with contrivances to secure his gold, and he had recourse to a Veiy odd expedient, which proved successful. Expecting to be stripped, he first took out a handful of that clotted gore of which he was frequently obliged to clear his mouth, and putting it into his left hand, he took out his money (about nineteen pistoles), and shutting his hand and besmearing the back part of it with blood, he kept it in this position till the blood dried in such a man- ner that his hand could not easily fall open, though any sudden surprise should happen. In the morn- ing the French, who were masters of that spot, came to plunder the slain ; and seeing him to appearance almost expiring, one of them was just applying a sword to his breast, when, in the critical moment, a Cordelier, who attended the plunderers, intcqiosed, taking him by his dress for a Frenchman; and said, "Do not kill that poor child." Our young soldier heard all that passed, though he was not able to speak one word ; and, opening his eyes, made a sign for something to drink. They gave him a sup of some spirituous liquor, and afterwards carried him to a convent in the neighbourhood, where he was cured by the benevolent lady-abbess in the course of a few months. He received a great many devout admonitions from the ladies there, and they would fain have persuaded him to acknowledge what they thought so miraculous a deliverance, by embracing the Catholic Faith, as they were pleased to call it. But they could not succeed : for though no religion lay near his heart, yet he had too much of the spirit of a gentleman lightly to change that form of religion which he wore, as it were, loose about him. He served with distinction in all the other glorious actions fought by the Duke of Marlborough, and rose through a course of rapid and desers'cd promo- tion. In 1706 he was made a lieutenant, and very quickly after he received a cornet's commission in the Scots Greys, then commanded by the Earl of Stair. On the 31st of Jannaiy, 17 14-15, he was made captain-lieutenant in Colonel Ker's regiment of dragoons. At the taking of Preston in Lanca- shire, 1 715, he headed a party of twelve, and, ad- vancing to the barricades of the insurgents, set them on fire, notwithstanding a furious storm of musketry, by which eight of his men were killed. A long peace ensued after this action, and Gardiner, being favourably known to the Earl of Stair, was made his aid-de-camp, and accompanied his lordship on his celebrated embassy to Paris. When Lord Stair made his splendid entrance into Paris, Captain Gar- diner was his master of the horse ; and as much of that admirably well-adjusted ceremony fell upon him, he gained great credit by the manner in which he conducted it. Under his lordship's favour a captain's commission was procured for him, dated July 22, 1 715, in the regiment of dragoons com- manded by Colonel Stanhope, then Earl of Har- rington ; and in 1 7 1 7 he was advanced to the majority of that regiment; in which office he continued till it was reduced, November 10, 171S, when he was put out of commission. But his majesty King George I. was so thoroughly apprised of his faithful and important services, that he gave him his sign-manual entitling him to the first majority that should become vacant in any regiment of horse or dragoons, which happened about five years after to be in Croft's regi- ment of dragoons, in which he received a commission, dated June 1st, 1724; and on the 20th of July, the same year, he was made major of an older regiment, commanded by the Earl of Stair. The remainder of his military appointments may be here summed up. On the 24th January, 1 729-3°. he was advanced to the rank of lieutenant-colonel in the same regiment, long under the command of Lord Cadogan, with whose friendship this brave and vigilant officer was also honoured for many years; and he continued in this rank and regiment till the 19th of April, 1743, when he received a colonel's commission over a new regiment of dragoons, at the head of which he was destined to fall, about two years and a half after he had received it. Captain Gardiner lived for several years a veiy gay and dissolute life, insomuch as even to distinguish himself at the dissolute court of the Regent Orleans. His conduct was characterized by every species of 84 JAMES GARDINER. vice, and his constitution enabled him to pursue his courses with such iitsouciaiice of manner, that he acquired the name of "the happy rake." Still the checks of conscience, and some remaining principles of good education, would break in upon his most licentious hours, and I particularly remember, says Dr. Doddridge, he told me that when some of his dissolute companions were once congratulating him on his distinguished felicity, a dog happening at that time to come into the room, he could not forbear groaning inwardly, and saying to himself, "Oh that I were that dog!" But these remonstrances of rea- son and conscience were in vain ; and, in short, he carried things so far, in this wretched part of his life, that I am well assured some sober English gentle- men, who made no great pretences to religion, how agreeable soever he might have been to them on other accounts, rather declined than sought his com- pany, as fearing they might have been ensnared and corrupted by it. The crisis, however, of this course of wickedness arrived at last. I am now come, says his biographer, to that astonishing part of his story, the account of his conversion, which I cannot enter upon without assuring the reader that I have sometimes been tempted to suppress many circumstances of it ; not only as they may seem incredible to some, and en- thusiastical to others, but I am very sensible they are liable to great abuses; which was the reason that he gave me for concealing the most extraordinar}' from many persons to whom he mentioned some of the rest. This memorable event happened towards the middle of July, 17 19; but I cannot be exact as to the day. The major had spent the evening (and, if I mistake not, it was the Sabbath) in some gay company, and had an unhappy assignation Avith a married woman, of what rank or quality I did not particularly inquire, whom he was to attend exactly at twelve. The company broke up about eleven; and not judging it convenient to anticipate the time appointed, he went into his chamber to kill the tedious hour, perhaps with some amusing book, or some other way. But it very accidentally happened that he took up a religious book which his good mother or aunt had, without his knowledge, slipped into his portmanteau. It was called, if I remember the title exactly, T/u Christian Sohiier, or Heaven taken by Storm ; and was written by Mr. Thomas Watson. Guessing by the title of it that he should find some phrases of his own profession spiritualized, in a manner which he thought might afibrd him some diversion, he resolved to dip into it ; but he took no serious notice of anything he read in it : and yet, while this book was in his hand, an impression was made upon his mind (perhaps God only knows how) which drew after it a train of the most impor- tant and happy consequences. There is indeed a possibility, that while he was sitting in this solitude, and reading in this careless and profane manner, he might suddenly fall asleep, and only dream of what he apprehended he saw. But nothing can be more certain than that, when he gave me this relation ['739]i he judged himself to have been as broad awake during the whole time as he ever was in any part of his life ; and he mentioned it to me several times afterwards as what undoubtedly passed, not only in his imagination, but before his eyes. lie thought he saw an unusual blaze of light fall on the book while he was reading, which he at first imagined might happen by some accident in the candle. But lifting up his eyes he apprehended, to his extreme amazement, that there was before him, as it were suspended in the air, a visible re- presentation of the Lord Jesus Christ upon the cross, surrounded on all sides with a glory ; and was im- pressed as if a voice, or something equivalent to a voice, had come to him, to this effect (for he was not confident as to the very words), "Oh sinner! did I suffer this for thee, and are these the returns?" But whether this were an audible voice, or only a strong impression on his mind equally striking, he did not seem very confident, though, to the best of my remembrance, he rather judged it to be the former. Struck with so amazing a phenomenon as this, there remained hardly any life in him, so that he sank down in the arm-chair in which he sat, and continued, he knew not exactly how long, insensible; which was one circumstance that made me several times take the liberty to suggest that he might pos- sibly be all this while asleep; but however that were, he quickly after opened his eyes, and saw nothing more than usual. It may easily be supposed he was in no condition to make any obser\'ation upon the time in which he had remained in an insensible state. Xor did he, throughout all the remainder of the night, once recollect that criminal and detestable assignation which had before engrossed all his thoughts. He rose in a tumult of passions not to be conceived, and walked to and fro in his chamber, till he was ready to drop down in unutterable astonishment and agony of heart ; appearing to himself the vilest monster in the creation of God, who had all his lifetime been crucifying Christ afresh by his sins, and now saw, as he assuredly believed, by a miraculous vision, the horror of what he had done. \Vith this was con- nected such a view, both of the majesty and good- ness of God, as caused him to loathe and abhor him- self, and to repent as in dust and asJies. He imme- diately gave judgment against himself, that he was most justly worthy of eternal damnation : he was astonished that he had not been immediately struck dead in the midst of his wickedness : and (which I think deserves particular remark) though he assuredly believed that he should ere long be in hell, and set- tled it as a point with himself for several months, that the wisdom and justice of God did almost ne- cessarily require that such an enormous sinner should be made an example of everlasting vengeance, and a spectacle as such both to angels and men, so that he hardly durst presume to pray for pardon ; yet what he then suffered was not so much from the fear of hell, though he concluded it would soon be his portion, as from a sense of that horrible ingrati- tude he had shown to the God of his life, and to that blessed Redeemer who had been in so affecting a manner set forth as crucified before hint. The mind of Major Gardiner continued from this remarkable time till toward the end of October (that is, rather more than three months, but especially the two first of them) in as extraordinar)' a situation as one can well imagine. He knew nothing of the joys arising from a sense of pardon; but, on the contrar)', for the greater part of that time, and with very short inter\-al3 of hope towards the end of it, took it for granted that he must in all probability quickly perish. Nevertheless, he had such a sense of the evil of sin, and of the goodness of the Divine Being, and of the admirable tendency of the Christian revelation, that he resolved to spend the remainder of his life, while God continued him out of hell, in as rational and as useful a manner as he could; and to continue casting himself at the foot of divine mercy, every day, and often in a day, if peradventure there might be hope of pardon, of which all that he could say was, that he did not absolutely despair. He had at that time such a sense of the degeneracy JAMES GARDINER. SS of his own heart tliat he hardly durst form any determinate resokition against sin, or pretend to engage himself by any vow in the presence of God; l)ut he was continually crying to him that he would deliver him from the bondage of corruption. lie perceived in himself a most surprising alteration with regard to the dispositions of his heart; so that, though he felt little of the delight of religious duties, he extremely desired opportunities of being engaged in them; and those licentious pleasures which had before been his heaven, were now absolutely his aversion. And indeed, when I consider how habitual all those criminal indulgences were grown to him, and that he was now in the prime of life, and all this while in high health too, I cannot but be astonished to reflect upon it, that he should be so wonderfully sanctilled in body, as well as in soul and spirit, as that, for all the future years of his life, he, from that hour, should find so constant a disinclination to, and abhorrence of, those criminal sensualities, to which he fancied he was before so invincibly impelled by his very constitution, that he was used strangely to tliink and to say, that Omnipotence itself could not reform him, without destroying that body and giving him another. Nor was he only delivered from that bondage of corruption which had been habitual to him for many years, but felt in his breast so contrary a disposition, that he was grieved to see human nature, in those to whom he was most entirely a stranger, prostituted to such low and contemptible pursuits. He, there- fore, exerted his natural courage in a very new kind of combat, and became an open advocate for religion, in all its principles, so far as he was acquainted with them, and all its precepts, relating to sobriety, right- eousness, and godliness. Yet he was very desirous and cautious that he might not run into an extreme, and made it one of his first petitions to God, the very day after these amazing impressions had been wrought in his mind, that he might not be suffered to behave with such an affected strictness and pre- ciseness, as would lead others about him into mis- taken notions of religion, and expose it to reproach or suspicion, as if it were an unlovely or uncomfort- able thing. For this reason he endeavoured to ap- pear as cheerful in conversation as he conscientiously could; though, in spite of all his precautions, some traces of that deep inward sense which he had of his guilt and misery would at times appear. He made no secret of it, however, that his views were entirely changed, though he concealed the particular circum- stances attending that change. He told his most intimate companions freely, that he had reflected on the course of life in which he had so long joined them, and found it to be folly and madness, unworthy a rational creature, and much more unworthy persons calling themselves Christians. And he set up his standard, upon all occasions, against principles of infidelity and practices of vice, as determinately and as boldly as ever he displayed or planted his colours, when he bore them with so much honour in the field. Such is the account given by an exceedingly honest, able, and pious writer of the remarkable conversion of Colonel Gardiner; an account too minute and curious to be passed over by a modern biographer, whatever credence may be given to the circumstances of which it is composed. While the minds of our readers will probably find an easy explanation of the "phenomenon" in the theories which some late writers have started respecting such impressions of the senses, we shall present a remarkably interesting notice of the pious soldier which was written twenty years before his death, and a still longer period antecedent to Doddridge's publication, and must therefore be considered as entitled to particular at- tention and credit. It is extracted from a journal of the historian Wodrow [MS. Advocates' Library^], where it appears under date May, 1725, as having just been taken down from the mouths of various in- formants : "From him and others I have a very pleasant ac- count of Major (Jardiner, formerly master of horse to the Earl of Stair, and now lately, on the death of Craily from liis father's occupation, a taste for botany; but it was j^erhaps as much by accident as design that he subsequently de- voted his life to the science. He commenced the study of medicine in tlie An- dersonian university of Glasgow, and continued, during the winter and summer sessions of 1829-1832, to pursue his studies with a degree of zeal and per- severing industry which won for him high distinction in college honours. He also, in 1829-1831, attended the classes of anatomy, surgery, chemistry, materia medica, &c., in the university, where he likewise •listinguislied himself in the prize-list. In 1S30 he joined llie Glasgow Medical Society and during that year and 1 83 1, 1832, his attendance at the Royal Infirmary was unremitting. Still, amidst these severer studies, he foinid leisure to indulge liis early bias for botany. His first rudiments of the science were obtained from Dr. Rattray, and he continued to improve himself by botanizing rambles in the country, and frequent visits to the Botanical Garden, with the curator of which, Mr. Stewart Murray, he formed a friendship which continued to the day of his death. Through Mr. Murray, and from his having discovered in one of his rambles the rare A'lipliar niiiiiina or pinnila, growing in Mugdock Loch, he became known to Sir William J. Hooker, the eminent professor of botany in the university of Glasgow. He now attended Sir William's botani- cal lectures and that truly amiable gentleman soon formed a high estimate of his character and talents. As a student he made several botanical excursions to the Highlands with the professor and his class; and to the intimacy thus produced may be attributed the important change in his future career. From the Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, Gardner obtained his diploma as surgeon, with high marks of distinction. Meanwhile he had made himself acquainted with the flowering plants of Scotland, and stutlied cryptogamic botany so suc- cessfully that, in 1836, he brought out a work en- title, that he might have leisure to study, and especially to imjirove himself in his knowledge of the Spanish and Portuguese lan- guages. So far from being offended, the duke mag- nanimously sent him a draft for ;^50 in lieu of the free passage. In the summer of 1S36 Gardner sailed from Liver- pool, and, after a favourable passage, arrived at Rio de Janeiro, with the appearance of which and the surrounding scenery he was perfectly captivated, and wrote home in glowing terms, descriptive of his first impressions. Amidst scenes so tempting to a natu- ralist Gardner did not long remain inactive. He made frequent excursions in the vicinity of Rio, and particularly to the Organ Mountains, and his first collection of plants, seeds, and specimens for the herbarium was drawn chiefly from this quarter. These came home in excellent condition and proved highly interesting. They contained many new or- chids, liliaere, palms, &c. He subsequently pene- trated into the interior, and spent a considerable time in exploring the diamond regions. Five years — from 1836 till 1 841 — were passed in Brazil. Be- fore returning home, which he did in the latter year, he paid a parting visit to the Organ Mountains, his object in doing so being, as he himself says in one of his letters, to "make a collection of some of the fine shrubs and herbaceous plants which are to be found principally on the higher levels" of that range, to take home with him in the living state. After penetrating into the interior, he found the diffi- culty of sending home living plants almost insur- mountable; yet he continued to preserve large col- lections for the herbarium, which with seeds and such living plants as could endure the inland journey prior to their long voyage, were sent home as oppor- tunity offered. Some of the melastomaceoe, as Fleroma benthamianum and mitltijJora may be men- tioned among the number as now ornamenting every good collection of hot-house plants; also, many beautiful franciscas, &c. Although botany was, of course, his chief pursuit, Gardner had always an eye to what might be of in- terest in other departments of natural history — hence his collections were swelled with minerals, recent and fossil shells, preserved skins of birds, fishes, &c. He at the same time did not neglect his medical ac- quirements. Throughout his extended journeyings, he carried his surgical instruments along with him, and performed several important operations with en- tire success, which not only improved his finances, but gained him many friends — thus securing a degree of respect, comfort, and in some cases safety, among the native tribes, which only a medical man might expect to enjoy. Amidst his multifarious labours he kept up his home correspondence with surprising regularity, writing often to Sir William Hooker and Mr. Murray, and occasionally communicating with the more distinguished foreign botanists of the day. Several of his papers and letters were inserted by Sir William in the yournal of Botany. In one of these, dated Province of Minas, September 3, 1840, he refers to the death of his "generous patron, the GEORGE GARDNER Duke of Bedford," in terms which bespeak the deep gratitude by which he was actuated. Nor did he overlook the claims of his own relations to a share in his epistolary attention; and even his juvenile friends, such as Dr. Joseph Hooker, and Mr. IMurray's family, were not forgotten. In 1842, not long after his return, Gardner was elected professor of botany in the Andersonian Uni- versity, and had prepared a course of lectures; but he did not retain that appointment, seeing, at the tmie, little prospect of the class being well attended. Meanwhile he occupied himself in arranging the materials of his Brazilian yottrnal with a view to publication. The work, however, was still incom- plete, when, in 1843, '^^ '^^'^s appointed to Ceylon, as island botanist and superintendent of the botanic garden there, by the colonial government. This situation he owed to the influence of his never-failing friend Sir William Hooker, who had himself been, some time previously, promoted to the office of director-general qf the Royal Gardens at Kew. On arriving in Ceylon his first consideration was bestowed on the botanic garden, which he repaired, re-arranged, and greatly improved. He then began to make botanical excursions over the island, thus enriching the garden with the fruits of his journeys. He also transmitted to the botanic gardens in Britain, especially Kew, such plants and seeds as were likely to prove acceptable, obtaining in return the produc- tions of other climes — South America, the West Indies, &c., for the Ceylon garden. During his rambles he discovered the upas tree, which was not previously known to exist in Ceylon. A writer in one of the Ceylon papers, whose article was copied into Chambers's Joicrnal, says: — "When returning to Kornegalle we were most fortunate in the plea- sure of having for a companion Dr. Gardner, the eminent botanist, in whose company the most insig- nificant plant or flower has an interest, in relation to which he has always something instructive to tell. On our journey back to Kandy, he discovered the upas tree, growing within a few miles of Kornegalle. It was not known before that it grows in Ceylon. " Gardner's position and eminence as a botanist led him into an extensive correspondence, notwith- standing which, and his multifarious official duties, he so regulated his labours as to be able, not long after his arrival in Ceylon, to finish the arrangement of his Brazilian papers, which were published in London, by Reeves Brothers, in 1846. The work, 562 pp. 8vo, is entitled Travels in the Interior of Brazil, principally through the Northern Provinces and the Gold Districts, during the Years 1836-41." It was very favourably received, being sufficiently popular in its style to interest the general reader, whilst it did not disappoint the expectations of the man of science. Lord Torrington, governor of Ceylon, proved a kind friend and patron to Gardner, thereby enabling him greatly to extend his botanical labours ; so also did Sir James Emmerson Tennent, the secretary. Both of these honoured names are often mentioned with grateful feelings in his letters. It was at Xeuria Elba Rest-house, the residence of Lord Torrington, that his demise took place. He arrived there on the loth of March, 1849, about 3 o'clock p.m., and, after luncheon with Lord and Lady Torrington, retired to rest in his room, his lordship and Dr. Fleming riding out meanwhile. Next day the party was to have gone on an excursion to the Horton Plains. Lord Torrington and the doctor had not proceeded far when they were recalled by express, Gardner having been attacked by a severe fit of apoplexy. Everything was done which medical WILLIAM GED. t;9 science could suggest, but all to no purpose; he died at 1 1 o'clock at night, surrounded by a circle of deeply grieved friends. He was in the prime of life, and, as remarked at luncheon by Lady Tor- rington, never seemed in better health and s]iirits. He had been remarkable throughout life for abstin- ence. Even during three years of constant travel- ling, irregularity, and fatigue, while exploring the interior of Brazil, he drank nothing stronger than tea, of which he had secured a good supply before leaving Pernambuco. Lord Torrington, in communicating the affiicling intelligence to Sir William Hooker, thus warmly eulogizes the character of the deceased: "I can honestly say that the colony, and the public in gene- ral, have experienced a severe loss in this talented and excellent man — one who was loved by all ; never did I see so amiable a person, one who pos- sessed more benevolence, or was more ready to im- part information to those who asked for it." Thus the science of botany \\as deprived of an enthusiastic student, and able expositor, in the prime of life and the vigour of intellect. It is believed by those who best knew him, that his end was hastened by excessive mental labour. Amongst his numerous MSS. is one in a finished state, which he was about to send to press, designed as an elementaiy work on the botany of India; and, as stated by Sir W. Hooker, in noticing his death in the ycurnal of Botany, he had made extensive collections towards a complete Flora Zeylanica. As a matter of general interest, it is not unworthy of notice that Gardner had taken out a patent for preparing coffee leaf, so as to afford a beverage, by infusion, "forming an agreeable, refreshing, and nutritive article of diet." According to Gardner's will, his books and her- barium were to be offered to the Ceylon government, to form part of the establishment at Peradinia, at a certain valuation; and, if not accepted, to be for- warded to his executor in Britain, Sir W. Hooker. The government having declined the offer, they were accordingly placed at the disposal of Sir William, by whose disinterested efforts the herbarium realized prices much beyond what could have been expected. GED, William, the inventor of stereotype print- ing, was a goldsmith in Edinburgh, in the early part of the eighteenth century. He is said to have first attempted stereotyping in the year 1725. The in- vention, as may be generally known, consists in cast- ing, by means of a stucco mould, a representation of the superficies of arranged types, which, being fitted to a block, may be used under the press exactly as types are used, and, being retained, may serve at any time to throw off an additional impression. As the metal required for this process is very little com- pared to that of types, stereotpying is accomplished at an expense, which, though it might come hard upon ordinary jobs, is inconsiderable in others, where it may be the means of saving a new com- position of types for subsequent impressions. In the case of a book in general use, such as the Bible, and also in cases where the pubHcation takes place in numbers, and one number is in danger of being sold to a greater extent than another, the process suggested by Ged is of vast utility.^ In July, 1729, 1 A use which certainly the inventor never contemplated has been found for this valuable handmaid to the printing art, in facilitating the rapid production of works of verj' large circula- tion. Some weekly periodicals of the present (1854; day, are only able to produce the enormous numbers required of them by casting several sets of stereotype plates, and employing various printing machines on the same sheet at the same time. By this means periodicals having acirculation even of half a mil- lion weekly are enabled to be issued with the utmost regularity. QO ALEXANDER GEDDES. Mr. Ged entered into a partnership with William Fenner, a London stationer, and, for the purpose of carrying his invention into practice, allowed Fen- ner half the profits, in consideration of his advancing the necessary funds. After\vards Mr. John James, an architect, was taken into the scheme for the same purpose, as was likewise Mr. Thomas James, a letter-founder, and Mr. James Ged, tlie inventor's son. In 1730 the association applied to the univer- sity of Cambridge for printing Bibles and Common- prayer Books, by stereotype, and, in consequence, the lease was sealed to them, April 23, 1731. In their attempt they sank a large sum of money, and finished only two prayer-books, so that it was forced to be relinquished, and the lease was given up in 1738. Ged imputed his disappointment to the villany of the pressmen, and the ill treatment of his partners, particularly Fenner, whom John James and he were advised to prosecute, but declined. In 1733 this ingenious man returned with blighted prospects to Edinburgh. Afterwards, however, by the advice of his friends, he gave to the world a specimen of his invention, in an edition of Salhist, finished, it is said, in 1736, but not published till 1744, as the following imprint on the title-page testi- fies : — Edinbiirgi, Guliebniis Ged, Aurifaber, Edin- ensis, non typis mobilibiis, ut vulgo fieri solet, sed tab- ellis sen laminis fusis, excudebat, MDCCXLIV. James Ged, his son and former partner, engaged in the insurrection of 1745 as a captain in the Duke of Perth's regiment, and being taken at Carlisle was condemned, but, on his father's account, by Dr. Smith's interest with the Duke of Newcastle, was released in 1745. He afterwards went to Jamaica, where he settled, and where his brother William was already established as a printer. William Ged, the inventor of an art which has been of incalculable advantage to mankind, experienced what has been the fate of too many ingenious and useful men; he died, October 19, 1749, in very indifferent circum- stances, after his utensils had been shipped at Leith for London, where he intended to renew partnership with his son James. The Misses Ged, his daughters, lived many years after in Edinburgh, where they kept a school for young ladies, and were much patronized by the Jacobite gentry.^ Another mem- ber of the family, by name Dougal, was a captain in the town-guard, or military police, of Edinburgh, in the days of Fergusson the poet. GEDDES, Alexander, celebrated as a poet, a critic, and miscellaneous writer, was born at Arra- dowl, in the parish of Ruthven, Banffshire, in the year 1737. Ilis father, Ale.xander Geddes, rented a small farm on the Arradowl estate, and, in common with that class of people in Scotland at that time, was in very poor circumstances. His mother was of the Mitchells of Dellachy, in the neighbouring parish of Bellay, and both were of the Roman Catholic persuasion. The parents being anxious to procure for their son the benefits of learning, he was, with a view to the service of the church, at a very tender age, put to learn his letters under a woman who kept a school in the village, of the name of Sellar. Here he learned to read the English Bible, which seems to have been the only book his parents possessed, and which, contrary to the general practice of people of their communion, they encouraged him "to read 1 Among the curiosities preserved in Fingask Castle, Perth- shire, the seat of Sir Peter Murray Threipland, Bart., is a page of the stereotypes of Ged's Sallnst, which had probably been obtained from the inventor or his family by Sir .Stewart Threipland, who was a distinguished partisan of the family of Stuart. with reverence and attention." In perusing this book young Geddes took a singular delight, and by the time he was eleven years of age had got the historical parts of it nearly by heart. At this period the laird of Arradowl having engaged a tutor of the name of Shearer, from Aberdeen, for his two sons, was look- ing about him for three boys of promising parts, whom he might educate gratuitously along with them, and who might aftenvards be devoted to the service of the church. Voung Geddes, already celebrated for his talents and for his love of study, immediately attracted his notice, and, along with a cousin of his own, John Geddes, who afterwards became titular Bishop of Dunkeld, and another boy, was taken into the house of Arradowl, where he enjoyed all the advantages peculiar to the laird's superior situation in life, and we may reasonably suppose, though we have not seen it noticed, that his improvement was correspondent to his privilege. From the hospitable mansion of Arradowl he was, by the influence of the laird himself, admitted into the Catholic free semi- naiy of Sculan, a seminary intended solely for young men who were to be afterwards sent abroad to re- ceive holy orders in sofne of the foreign universities. No situation was ever better chosen for the educating of monks than Sculan, standing in a dismal glen, overhung with mountains on all sides, so high as to preclude the sun from being seen for many months in the year. "Pray, be so kind," said Geddes, writing from that drearj' spot to one of his fellow- students, who had obtained leave to visit his friends, " as to make particular inquiries after the health of the sun. Fail not to present my compliments to him, and tell him I still hope I shall one day be able to renew the honour of personal acquaintance with him." Flere, to a knowledge of the vulgar English Bible, he added a knowledge of the vulgar Latin one, which appears to have been all the benefit he received by a seven years' seclusion from the sun, and from the world which he illuminated. Having attained the age of twenty-one he was removed to the Scots College at Paris, where he completed his knowledge of the Latin language, to which he added Hebrew, Greek, Italian, French, Spanish, German, and Low Dutch. Theology and biblical criticism were the principal objects of his attention, for he had already formed the design of making a new transla- tion of the Bible for the use of his Catholic country- men, to the accomplishing of which all his studies seem to have been directed from a very early period of his life. When he had completed his course in the Scots College at Paris, he was solicited to take a share of the public labours of the college, and to fix, of course, his residence in that gay metropolis. This, however, after some hesitation, he declined, and, after an absence of six years, returned to his native country in the year 1764. Having entered into orders, Geddes, on his arrival in Scotland, was by his ecclesiastic superior ordered to reside at Dun- dee, as officiating priest to the Catholics of Angus. This situation he did not long fill, being invited by the Earl of Traquair to reside in his family at Tra- quair House, whither he repaired in the month of May, 1765. Here Mr. Geddes was situated as happily as his heart could have wished; he had plenty of time, with the use of an excellent library, and he seems to have prosecuted his favourite study with great diligence. He had been in this happy situation, however, little more than a year, when the openly-displayed affec- tion of a female inmate of the house, a relation of the earl, rendered it necessary for him, having taken the vow of perpetual celibacy, to take an abrupt de- parture from the Arcadian scenerj' of the Tweed. ALEXANDER GEDDES. 91 Leaving with the innocent autlior of his misfortune a beautiful httle poem, entitled The Confessional, he again bade adieu to his native land, and in the varie- ties and volatilities of Paris endeavoured to forget his pain. Even in this condition, however, he did not lose sight of his great object, as during the time he remained in Paris he made a number of valuable extracts from books and manuscripts which he con- sulted in the public libraries. Paris never was a place much to his mind, and it was less so now than ever, when it presented him with no definite object of pursuit. He therefore returned to Scotland in the spring of the year 1769. He had by this time recovered, in some degree, possession of himself; but he dared not encounter the fascination of the beloved object, or re-engage in the domestic scenes from which he had found it necessary to flee. Turning, therefore, to the scenes of his early life, he was offered the charge of a Catholic congregation at Auchinhalrig, in the county of Banff, which he accepted. The members of this little community were poor, their chapel was in ruins, and the most inveterate rancour subsisted among themselves, and between them and their Pro- testant neighbours. Mr. Geddes, however, was not to be appalled by the prospect of difficulties, how- ever numerous and formidable. His first object was to pull down the old chapel, and to build a new one on the spot. His own house, too, which his bio- grapher dignifies with the name of a parsonage- house, he found necessary to repair almost from the foundation, and he added to it the luxury of an ex- cellent garden, from which he was able, on many occasions, to supply the necessities of his people. In these proceedings Mr. Geddes was not only useful in directing and overseeing the workmen, but as a workman himself, many of the most important operations being performed with his own hands. Plaving thus provided for the assembling of his con- gregation, his next object was to coiTect that extreme bigotry by which they were characterized. For this end he laboured to gain their affections by the most punctilious attention to every part of his pastoral duty, and by the mjost unbounded charity and bene- volence. The ceremonies of Popery he despised as heartily as any Presbyterian. The Scriptures he earnestly recommended to his people, and exhorted them to think for themselves, and to allow the same privilege to others. Many of the peculiarities of Popery, indeed, he denounced as most iniquitous, and utterly repugnant to the spirit of genuine catho- licity. In his judgment of others Geddes himself showed the utmost liberality; and he even ventured to appear as a worshipper in the church of a neigh- bouring parish on different occasions. By these means, if he did not convert to his views the Papists of Auchinalrig, which we believe he did not, he ac- quired a vei-y high character to himself, and formed many valuable friendships among men of all descrip- tions. Than this conduct nothing could be better fitted to attain the object which the Papists were by this time very generally beginning to entertain — that of obtaining political power and influence; and in this respect Geddes, by dereliction of principle, did more for their cause than all other men beside: yet their zeal could not be restrained, even for this most obvious purpose, and he had the mortification to find that he was provoking very generally the resent- ment of his clerical brethren. His diocesan bishop. Hay, threatened him with suspension if he did not behave with greater circumspection, particularly in regard to the dangerous and contaminating influence of heretical intercourse; but having no supreme court before which to bring the refractory and rebellious priest, the bishop was under the necessity of letting the controversy drop. Unfortunately the poor priest had become personally bound for considerable sums expended in building the chapel and repairing the manse, for the payment of which he had tnisted to the liberality of his people. There was no appear- ance of his expectations being realized, and his creditors — a class of people whom he could not so easily set at defiance as the bishoj) — becoming cla- morous, a "charge of homing" was likely to suspend him more eff"ectually than the order of his diocesan, when, through the friendship of the Earl of Traquair, he was introduced to the notice of the Duke of Nor- folk, who, having learned the extent of the obliga- tions he had come under in his pastoral capacity, claimed the privilege of discharging them as an earnest of future friendship. Geddes was thus re- lieved from serious embarrassments, but his income was far too scanty to supply his necessities, .though they were by no means so numerous as those of many others in his situation. In order to provide for him- self without burdening his congregation, he took a small farm at Enzie in Fochabers, in the vicinity of Auchinalrig, which he stocked by means of a loan, built a little chapel upon it, where he proposed to officiate as well as at Auchinalrig, and in imagina- tion saw himself already happy and independent. There have been men of letters who have been at the same time men of business. They have been, however, but few; and Geddes was not of the num- ber. It was in the year 1775 that he commenced his agrictdtural speculations, and by the year 177^ he found himself in a still deeper state of embarrass- ment than w-hen he had been relieved by the Duke of Norfolk. The expedient he adopted on this occa- sion, was one that was much more likely to have added to his embarrassments than to have relieved them. He published at London ^^ Select Satires of Horace, translated into English verse, and for the most part adapted to the present times and manners." This publication, contrary to all human probability, succeeded so well that it brought him a clear profit of upwards of ;!f 100, which, with some friendly aid from other quarters, set him once more clear of pecuniary embarrassments. The remark of one of his biographers on this circumstance ought not to be suppressed: — "To be brought to the brink of ruin by farming and kirk-building, and to be .saved from it by turning poetaster, must be allowed to be rather out of the usual course of events. " Finding that his pen was of more service to him than his plough, Mr. Geddes now seriously thought of quitting his retirement, and trj'ing his fortune in London. He was, however, so strongly attached to his flock, that it might have been long before he put his design into execution, had not a circumstance occurred to give it new vigour. Lord Findlater had about this time married a daughter of Count IMurray of Mlegnm, who, being educated abroad, was unacquainted with English. Mr. Geddes was employed by his lordship to teach her that language. In the house of his lordship he was introduced to the Rev. Mr. Buchanan, who had been tutor to his lordship, and was now minister of the parish of Cullen, with whom he formed a most intirnate acquaintance, and did not scniple to attend occasion- ally upon his ministry in the church of Cullen. This latter circumstance rekindled the long-smothered ire of Bishop Hay, who sent him an angry remon- strance, which he followed up by suspending him from all his ecclesiastical functions. This at once dissolved the tie between Mr. Geddes and his con- gregation, from whom, in the end of the year 1779. he took an affectionate leave; and selling off what 92 ALEXANDER GEDDES. property he possessed at Enzie by public roup, prepared, without regret, to leave once more his native country. His people testified their affection for him by buying up, with extraordinary avidity, everything that belonged to him, even to the articles of broken cups and saucers. Nor were his Pro- testant friends wanting to him on this occasion. Through their joint intluence the university of Aber- deen stepped forward with praiseworthy liberality, and conferred on him the degree of Doctor of Laws. Leaving Enzie Dr. Geddes devoted a few weeks to visits of friendship, and in company with Lord Traquair repaired to London in the beginning of the year 17S0. Through the intluence of Lord Traquair he was almost immediately nominated to be othciating priest in the chapel of the imperial ambassador. The literary fame he had already ac- quired by his imitations of Horace, and the letters with which he was honoured by his friends in the north, introduced him at once to the most celebrated literary characters of the day, which gave great elasticity to his naturally buoyant spirits. Several libraries, too, both public and private, being thrown open to him, he resumed with redoubled ardour his early project of translating the Bible for the use of his Roman Catholic countrymen. Through the Duchess of Gordon he was also introduced to Lord Petre, who was like himself a Catholic, and was anxious to have a translation of the Bible such as Dr. Geddes proposed to make. To enable him to go on without any interruption, his lordship gener- ously allowed him a salary of ;i^200 a year till the work should be finished, besides being at the expense of whatever private library he might find necessary for his purpose. This was encouragement not only beyond what he could reasonably have hoped for, but equal to all that he could have wished; and the same year he published a sketch of his plan, under the title of A>i Idea of a A'eio I'ersion of the Holy Bible, for the Use of the English Catholics. This Idea in general, for we have not room to be parti- cular, was "a new and faithful translation of the Bible, from corrected te.xts of the original, unaccom- panied with any gloss, commentary, or annotations, ijut such as are necessary to ascertain the literal meaning of the text, and free of every sort of inter- pretation calculated to establish or defend any par- ticular system of religious credence." At the close of this year he ceased to officiate in the imperial ambassador's chapel, the establishment being sup- pressed by an order from the emperor Joseph IL He continued to preach, however, occasionally at the chapel in Duke Street, Lincoln's Inn Fields, till the Easter holidays of 1782, when he found his time so completely taken up by his literary projects, especially his translation, that he voluntarily with- drew from every stated ministerial function. The following year Dr. Geddes paid a visit to Scotland, during which he wrote Linton, a Tweeddale Pastoral, in Honour of the Birth of a Son and Heir to the jVoble House of Traquair. He passed with the earl and his countess on a tour to the south of France, came back with them to Scotland, and shortly after returned to London. He was about this time intro- duced to Dr. Kennicot, by whom he was introduced to Dr. Lowth, and both of them took a deep interest in his undertaking. At the suggestion of the latter Dr. Geddes wrote a new prospectus, detailing more fully and explicitly the ]>lan he meant to follow. This was given to the public in 17S6 : it had a very general circulation, and was well received. In the year 1785 he was elected a corresponding member by the Society of Scottish Antiquaries — an honour which he acknowledged in a poetical epistle to that respectable body. This epistle is printed in the first volume of the Transactions of the society, as also a dissertation on the Scoto-Saxon dialect, with the first eclogue of Virgil, and the first idyllium of Theocritus, translated into Scottish verse. He was now advancing with his translation ; but in the year 1787 he published an appendix to his prospectus, in the form of a Letter addressed to the Bishop of London, containing Queries, Doubts, and Difficulties relative to a Vernacular Version of the Holy Scriptures. He published the same year a letter to Dr. Priestly, in which he attempted to prove, by one prescriptive argument, that the divinity of Jesus Christ was a primitive tenet of Christianity. About the same time he published his letter on the case of the Protestant Dissenters. In the year 1788 he en- gaged as a contributor to the Analytical Peviezv, for which he continued to furnish many valuable articles during the succeeding five years and a half It was during the year just mentioned that he issued Pro- posals for Printing by Subscription a A'e7U T'ansla- tion of the Holy Bible, &c. His General Anszuer to the Counsels and Criticisms that have been communi- cated to hitn since the Publication of his Proposals for Printing a A'ew Translation of the Bible, appeared in the year 1790. Of the same date was his Ans-u'cr to the Bishop of Comands Pastoral Letter, by a Pro- testing Catholic, followed by A Letter to the R.R. the Archbishop and Bishops of England, &c., Carmen Seculare p7-o Gallica, &c., and an Epistola Macaronica ad Fratrem, &c. In the year 1791 he was afllicted with a dangerous fever, and on his recover}- accepted of an invitation to visit Lord Petre at his seat at Norfolk. This journey produced A Norfolk Tale, or a Journey from London to A'oi-icnch, with a Pro- logue and an Epilogue published in the following year. The same year he published An Apology for Shwery, a poem entitled HAvocat du Diablc, &c., and The First Book of the Iliad of Homer, verbally rendered into English Verse, &c. Amidst these multifarious avocations he was still proceeding with his translation, and in the year 1792, though his subscription list was far from being filled up, he published The First Volume of the Holy Bible, or the Books accounted Sacred by Jcd'S and Christians, oiht~r%vise called the Books of the Old and A'ew Co-ve- nants, faithfully Translated from Corrected Texts of the Originals, iLi every place, we would ask how much we are the wiser. He professed to believe in Jesus Christ, and in the perfection of his code; but he held Moses to have been a man to be compared only with Numa and Lycurg\is; a man who like them pretended to personal intercourse with the Deity, from whom he never received any immediate com- munication; a man who had the art to take advan- tage of rarely occurring natural circumstances, and to persuade the Israelites that they were accomplished under his direction by the immediate power of God; a man, in short, conspicuous above all men as a juggling impostor. Now, to the divine mission of Moses we have the direct testimony of Jesus Christ himself, with the express assurance that without be- lieving in Moses it was impossible to believe in him. l>ut we cannot here follow out the subject, nor can we enter into any particular analysis of his works, to which the eccentricities of his character, the singu- larity of his opinions, and the peculiar circumstances of his life, gave for a time an interest to which they were not at any time entitled. His translation of the Bible, after all the professions he had made, the means he had accumulated, and the expectations he had excited, was a complete failure, and has only added another demonstration to the thousands that had preceded it, how much more easy it is to write fluently and plausibly about great undertakings than to perform them. We intended here to have noticed more particularly his translation of the first book of the Iliad of Homer, which he undertook for the purpose of demonstrating his superiority to Cowper, but upon second thoughts have forborne to disturb its peaceful slumbers. Upon the whole, Dr. Geddes was unquestionably a man of learning and of genius, but from an unhappy temper, and the preponderating influence of arrogance and vanity in his constitution, they were of little avail to himself, and have not been greatly useful to the general interests of mankind. GEDDES, J.\MES, an advocate at the Scottish bar, was born in the county of Tweeddale about the year 17 10, and being the son of a gentleman in good circumstances, was educated by tutors under his father's roof. The progress which he made in the learned languages and philosophy was considered extraordinary; and he fulfilled every promise at the university of Edinburgh, where he distinguished him- self, particularly in mathematics, which he studied under the celebrated Maclaurin. Having prepared himself for the bar, he entered as an advocate, and soon acquired considerable reputation. His labours as a lawyer did not prevent him from devoting much time to his favourite studies — the poets, philosophers, and historians of antiquity; and in 1748 he published at Glasgow his Essay on the Composition and Alaiincr of Writing of the Ancients, particularly Plato. The year after this publication he died of lingering con- sumption, much regretted, both on account of his learning — the fruits of which had not been fully given to the world — and for his manners and disposi- tion, which were in the highest degree amiable. GEDDES, Michael, a distinguished divine of the Church of England, and author of some admired works, was educated at the university of Edinburgh, where, in 1671, he took the degree of Master of Arts, in which he was incorporated at Oxford, on the nth of July, in the same year. He was one of the first four natives of Scotland who were permitted to take advantage of the exhibitions founded in Baliol Col- lege, Oxford, by Bishop Warner, with the view of promoting the interests of the Episcopal church in Scotland. Geddes, however, did not return to pro- pagate or enforce the doctrines of that body in his native country. He went in 1678 to Lisbon as chaplain to the English factor}', the exercise of which function giving offence to the Inquisition, he was sent for by that court in 1 686, and forbidden to con- tinue it. This persecution obviously arose from the attempts now making by King James at home to establish Popery. The English merchants, resenting WALTER GEIKIE. 95 the violation of their privileije, wrote on the 7t^^ of September to the Bishop of London, representini^ their case, and their right to a chaplain, as established by the commercial treaty between England and Por- tugal; l)ut before this letter reached its destination, the bishop was himself put into the same predica- ment as Mr. Geddes, being suspended from his func- tions by the ecclesiastical commission. Finding that his case had become hopeless, Geddes returned to England in May, l688, where he took the degree of Doctor of Laws, and after the promotion of Uurnet to the bishopric of Salisbury, was made by him chancellor of his church.^ During his residence at Lisbon he had amassed a great «[uantity of docu- ments respecting Spanish and I'ortuguese history, which enabled him, in 1694, to publish a volume, styled The Church History of Malabar. Of this work Archbishop Tillotson says, in a letter to Bishop Burnet, dated June 2Sth, 1694, "j^ir- Geddes' book finds a general acceptation and approbation. I doubt not but he hath more of the same kind, with which I hope he will favour the world in due time." lie was accordingly encouraged in 1696 to publish The Church History of Hithiopia, and in 1697 a ]-)amphlet entitled The Coiuicil of Trent Plainly Discovered not to have been a Free Assembly. His great work, however, was his Tracts on Divers Sub- jects, which appeared in 1 7 14, in three volumes, being a translation of the most interesting pieces which he had collected at Lisbon, and of which a list is given in Moreri's Grand Dictionnaire Histor- ique, a.rt. "Geddes." The learned doctor must have died previous to the succeeding year, as in 171 5 appeared a posthumous volume of tracts against the Roman Catholic church, which completes the list of his publications. GEIKIE, Walter. It has often been observed that the Scottish national character abounds in con- tradictions. Poetical though it be, it has never pro- duced a Milton ; and in spite of all its wisdom and sagacity, it has not as yet exhibited a first-rate states- man. The same inconsistency is perceptible in the fine arts; so that, in spite of the imaginative and the humorous, by which that character is distinguished, Scotland has been barren of caricaturists. From the time of Hogarth to that of H. B., England has so plentifully abounded with such artists as to be eminently the land of caricature delineation ; but Scotland, with all its shrewd observation, its per- ception of the ludicrous, and quiet love of fun, which constitute the chief elements in this department of pictorial art, has as yet produced no specimens of it except those of poor Walter Geikie — the very man, too, be it observed, from whom, on account of his physical disqualifications, productions of this kind were least to be expected. Walter Geikie, whose droll and homely sketches are to be found upon the table of every Edinburgh drawing-room, was the son of Mr. Archibald Geikie, perfumer, and was born in Charles Street, George Square, Edinburgh, on the 9th November, 1795. Before he had completed his second year he was attacked by a dangerous ear disease ; and although he recovered, it was at the expense of being deaf and dumb for life. It was too much the fashion at this time in Scotland to consider dumbies as incap- able of education, so that they were generally allowed to go at large, and vegetate as they best might; but happily, Walter was the son of a pious and intelli- gent father, who had a better sense of his paternal responsibility: he taught his bereaved boy the alpha- ' Birch's Life of Tillotson, 334. bet, so that the latter not only learned to read, but to understand what he read. Writing and arithmetic followed, in which Walter showed himself an apt scholar. When he had thus acquired the rudiments of education, it happened, fortunately for him, that Mr. Braidwood, the successful teacher of the deaf and dumb, was invited to Edinburgh, to open an institution there, and Geikie became one of his earliest pupils. In this new school the boy's pro- ficiency was so rapid that he was soon employed as a monitor. He showed also that he was no mere commonplace learner, for he was in the practice of writing down extracts of the passages that best pleased him in the authors whose works he perused. While he was thus storing his mind with knowledge, and qualifying himself, notwithstanding his defects, for a life of usefulness, his path was determined. While yet a child, he had been in the practice of cutting out representations of the objects that struck him on paper ; aftenvards he had attempted to por- tray them with chalk on floors and walls; and rising higher still in pictorial art, he at length betook him- self to the use of the pencil. He did not, however, satisfy himself, like other young sketchcrs, with merely copying the pictures of others : instead of this, he would be satisfied with nothing short of the original object; and therefore he often roamed about the suburbs of Edinburgh, or among the fields, trans- ferring into his note-book whatever most pleased his fancy. This was the form of language in which he found he could best express himself, and there- fore it is not to be wondered at that he should culti- vate it so carefully. At the age of fourteen he was sent to learn drawing by regular rule, under Mr. Patrick Gibson, and such was his progress, that in 1 81 2 he was admitted a pupil of the Academy of Drawing, established for the encouragement of Scot- tish manufactures, where he had for his preceptor Mr. Graham, the teacher of Allan and Wilkie. By this course of training the future profession of Walter Geikie was confirmed. He was to be an artist; and it remained to be seen in what department his excellence was to consist. It was not certainly in painting, for he soon discovered that his attempts in oil were decidedly inferior to those of others in warmth and harmony of colouring; and although his Itinerant Fiddlers, All-Halloiu Fair, and the Grass- market, now in the collection at Hopetoun House, were the best specimens of his painting in oil, they scarcely exceed the efforts of a mere fourth-rate artist. It was in sketching that he best succeeded, while the subjects of his preference were not the beautiful or the sublime, but the homely and the ludicrous. He would rather sketch a pig-sty than a palace, and an odd face had more attraction in his eyes than all the ideal beauty of the Venus de Medicis. It was upon this predilection that he acted. He hunted about in quest of singular visages, at which, with his ready pencil, he would take a flying shot as he passed along the street; and as such commodities are by no means scarce in Edinburgh, his collection was soon both rich and varied. This kind of sportsmanship, however, was not without its dangers, for those who were best fitted for the artist's purposes were generally the least disposed to have their effigies pcqietuated. One amusing incident of this kind is related by his biographer. Geikie had become desperately en- amoured of the turned-up nose, rhinoceros upper lip, and pot-belly of a porter of the Grassmarket, and longed to appropriate them in such a way as not to impoverish their lawful owner. But the porter, who had seen his hungry look, and suspected his purpose, had continued to dodge him, until one day he found himself all but fixed upon the artist's paper. 96 ALEXANDER GERARD. Enraged at the discovery, he stormed, swore, and threatened; but Geikie, who was in ecstasy with his rich attitudes, and could not liear the tlireats, con- tinued the drawing, until he saw his model rushing upon him like a maddened bull in the arena. He took to his heels, but was so hotly pursued that he had to take refuge in a common stair; and the porter, thinking that his tormentor was housed, resolved to await his coming forth. Geikie, in the meantime, who was watching every movement tlirough a dingy window in the stair, contrived to finish his sketch, and- crown it with the last touch. But how to get out when his work was finished! This seemed beyond the power of strategy, for there stood his merciless enemy on the watch ; and there he remained for hours. Some lucky cliance at last called away the bearer of burdens, aud Geikie stole from his con- cealment when he found the coast clear. He had caught the porter, and saved his own bones. The fastidious object of his sketch forms a conspicuous figure in the group of the Street Auctioneer. The mirthfid spirit of the artist, which drew him so powerfully to congenial subjects, was not confined to drawing; it found vent also in buoyant mimicry, in which he could act the droll characters of his daily search, as well as draw them. In this way, though deprived of the power of utterance, he could deliver jokes that set the company in a roar. It is gratifying also to add, that with all this mirthfulness there was a soundness of moral principle and depth of religious feeling within him that aimed at nobler ends than the harmless amusement of society. From infancy he had received a religious education, and it was all the more endeared to him, perhaps, from the diffi- culty which he must have found in acquiring those spiritual ideas of which he saw so few visible symbols. Sacred and sincere, indeed, must be the devotion of the deaf and dumb ! He was also eager to impart what he had learned, and therefore with two friends under the same bereavement as himself he estab- lished a religious meeting of the deaf and dumb, to whom, on the Sabbaths, he preached and expounded by signs. After an uninterrupted course of good health a short illness of a few days occurred, under which Geikie died on the 1st of August, 1837. He was buried in the Grayfriars' churchyard. Of his productions it is unnecessary to enter into farther analysis, as these, ninety-four in number, illustrative of Scottish character and scenery, have been pub- lished in one volume, and are familiarly known to almost every class. They are also accompanied with explanations, and a biographical introduction by Sir Thomas Dick Lauder, from which the fore- going facts have been chiefly derived. GERARD, Alexander, D.D., an eminent divine and writer, was the eldest son of the Reverend Gil- bert Gerard, minister of the chapel of Garioch, a parish in Aberdeenshire, where he was born on the 22d of P'ebruary, 1728. He was removed at the period destined for the commencement of his educa- tion to the parish of Foveran, in the same county, the humble schoolmaster of which appears to have possessed such superior classical attainments, that the reverend gentleman felt justified in delivering his son up to his care — a preference which the future fame of that son, founded on his correctness of acqui- sition and observation, must have given his friends no cause to regret. At the age of ten, on the death of his father, he was removed to the grammar-school of Aberdeen, whence he emerged in two years, quali- fied to enter as a student of Marischal College. Having there performed his four years of academical attendance in the elementary branches, he finished his career with the usual ceremony of "the gradua- tion," and appeared before the world in the capacity of Master of Arts at the age of sixteen — not by any means the earliest age at which that degree is fre- quently granted, but certainly at a jjeriod sufficiently early to entitle him to the character of precocious genius. Immediately after finishing these branches of education, he commenced in the divinity hall of Aberdeen his theological studies, which he after- wards finished in Edinburgh. In 1748 he was a licensed preacher of the Church of Scotland, and about two years thereafter Mr. D. Fordyce, professor of natural philosophy in Marischal College, having gone abroad, he lectured in his stead; and on the regretted death of that gentleman by shipwreck on the coast of Holland, just as he was returning to his friends, Mr. Gerard was ap- pointed to the vacant professorship. At the period when Mr. Gerard was appointed to a chair in Mar- ischal College, the philosophical curriculum, com- mencing with logic, proceeded immediately to the abstract subjects of ontology and pneumatics, the course gradually decreasing in abstruseness with the consideration of morals and politics, and terminating with the more definite and practical doctrines of natural philosophy. Through the whole of this varied course it was the duty of one instructor to lead his pupils, mathematics and Greek being alone taught by separate professors. The evils of this system suggested to the professors of Marischal Col- lege the formation of a plan for the radical alteration of the routine, which has since been most beneficially conducive to the progress of Scottish literature. A very curious and now rare pamphlet from the pen of Dr. Gerard exists on this subject; it is entitled Plan of Education in the Marischal College and University of Aberdeen, ivith the Reasons of it, drazvn up by Order of the Faculty, printed at Aberdeen in 1755 — a little work of admirable perspicuity and sound logical reasoning. The rationale of the ancient system was founded on the presumption that, as it is by the use of logic and the other metaphysical sciences alone that we can arrange, digest, and reason upon the facts which come under our observation, these must be committed to the mind as rules of manage- ment before any facts collected can be applied to their proper purposes, and that before any knowledge of nature, as it exists, is stored in the intellect, that intellect must be previously possessed of certain regulations, to the criterion of which the knowledge gained must be submitted. A quotation from Dr. (jerard's little work will afford one of the best speci- mens of the now pretty generally understood confuta- tion of this fallacy. Speaking of logic he says : — "This is one of the most abstruse and difficult branches of philosophy, and therefore quite improper to begin with. It has a strict dependence on many parts of knowledge : these must of consequence be premised before it can be rightly apprehended; the natural history of the human understanding must be known, and its phenomena discovered; for without this the exertions of the intellectual faculties, and their application to the various subjects of science, will be unintelligible. These phenomena must be not only narrated, but likewise, as far as possible, explained; for without investigating their general laws, no certain and general conclusions concerning their exercise can be deduced: nay, all sciences, all branches of knowledge whatever must be premised as a groundwork to genuine logic. History has one kind of evidence, mathematics another; natural phil- osophy one still different; the philosophy of nature another distinct from all these ; the subordinate branches of these several parts have still minuter ALEXANDER GERARD. 97 peculiarities in the evidence appropriated to them. An unprcjmliced mind will in each of these be con- vinced by that species of argument which is peculiar to it, though it does not reflect how it comes to be convinced. By being conversant in them one is pre- pared for the study of logic, for they supply them with a fund of materials: in them the different kinds of evidence and argument are exemplified: from them only those illustrations can be taken, without which its rules and precepts would be unintelligible. . . . In studying the particular sciences, reason will spontaneously exert itself: if the proper and natural method of reasoning is used, the mind will, by the native force of its faculties, perceive the evi- dence, and be convinced by it, though it does not reflect how this comes to pass, nor explicitly con- sider according to what general rules the under- standing is exerted. By afterv.-ards studying these rules one will be farther fitted for prosecutmg the several sciences; the knowledge of the grounds and laws of evidence will give him the security of reflec- tion against employing wrong methods of proof and improper kinds of evidence, additional to that of in- stinct and natural genius." The consequence of this acknowledgment of the supremacy of reason and practice over argumentation and theory was the establishment of a course of lectures on natural and civil history, previously to inculcating the correspond- ing sciences of natural and mental philosophy — an institution from which, wherever the former part con- sists of anything better than a blundering among ex- plosive combustibles, and a clattering among glass vessels, or the latter is anything superior to a cir- cumstantial narrative of ancient falsehoods and modern dates — the student derives a basis of sound and useful information, on which the more meta- physical sciences may or may not be built, as circum- stances or inclination admit. It is a striking instance of the propensity to follow with accuracy the beaten track, or to deviate only when some powerful spirit leads the way, that the system has never advanced further than as laid down by Dr. Gerard; — according to his system, jurisprudence and politics are to be preceded by pneumatology and natural theology, and are to be mixed up "with the perasal of some of the best ancient moralists." Thus the studies of juris- prudence and politics, two sciences of strictly modem practical origin, are to be mixed with the dogmas of philosophers, who saw governments but in dreams, and calculated political contingencies in the abstract rules of mathematicians; and the British student finds that the constitutional information for which he will at a more advanced period of life discover that his country is renowned is the only science from which the academical course has carefully excluded him, and which he is left to gather in after-life by desul- tory reading or miscellaneous conversation and prac- tice. The change produced by Dr. Gerard was suf- ficiently sweeping as a first step, and the reasons for it were a sufficient victory for one mind over the stubbornness of ancient prejudice. It is to be also remembered that those admirable constitutional works on the government and constitutional laws of Eng- land (which have not even yet been imitated in Scot- land), and that new science by which the resources of governments and the relative powers of different forms of constitutions are made known like the cir- cumstances of a private individual — the work of an illustrious Scotsman — had not then appeared. In 1 756 a prize offered by the Philosophical Society of Edinburgh, for the best essay on taste, was gained by Dr. Gerard, and in 1 759 he published this essay, the best and most popular of his philosophical works. It passed through three English editions and two VOL. II, French, in which language it was published by Eidous, along with three dissertations on the same subject by Voltaire, D'Alembert, and Montesquieu. This essay treats first of what the author calls taste, resolved into its simple elements, and contains a sort of analytical account of the different perceptible qualities, more or less united, to be found in anything we admire: he then proceeds to consider the progress of the formation of taste, and ends with a discussion on the existence of a standard of taste. The author follows the system of reflex senses propounded by Hutchinson. The system of association, upon which Mr. Alison afterwards based a treatise on the same subject, is well considered by Gerard, along with many other qualifications, which he looks upon as the sources of the feeling — qualifications which other writers, whose ideas on the subject have not yet been confuted, have referred likewise to the prin- ciples of association for \.\\t\Tflrst cause. Longinus, in his treatise on sublimity, if he has not directly maintained the original influence of association — or in other words, the connection of the thing admired, either through cause and effect, or some other tie, with what is pleasing or good — as an origin of taste, at least in his reasonings and illustrations, gives cause to let it be perceived that he acknowledged such a principle to exist. ^ The first person, however, who laid it regularly down and argued upon it as a source of taste, appears to have been Dr. Gerard; and his theory was admitted by Sir Joshua Reynolds (in as far as maintaining that beauty consists in an aptness of parts for the end to which they are assigned may be considered an admission of the principle of asso- ciation), at a period when one of an inversely oppo- site nature was supported by Burke and Price. To those who have followed these two, the name of Dugald Stewart has to be added ; while that emi- nent scholar and great philosopher Richard Payne Knight has, amidst the various and rather ill-ar- ranged mass of useful information and acute remark accumulated in his inquiry into the principles of taste, well illustrated the theoiy propounded by Dr. Gerard; and it has been finally enlarged and systema- tized by Dr. Alison, and the author of a criticism on that work in the Editibitrgh Rezieiu, one of the most beautiful and perfect specimens of modern composition. At the period when Dr. Gerard produced this work, he was a member of a species of debating institution half-way betwixt a society and a club, subject neither to the pompous formality of the one nor the free-and-easy style of the other. This society is well known in Scottish literary historj' as embrac- ing among its members many of the first men of the time. More or less connected with it were the clas- sical Blackwell; and Gregory; and Reid, the parent of that clear philosophy which has distinguished the country; and Beattie, who, though his merits have perhaps been too highly rated, was certainly fit to have been an ornament to any association of literary' men. The use of literary societies has been much exagger- ated; but still it cannot be denied, that wherever a spot becomes distinguished for many superior minds, there is one of these pleasing sources of ac- tivity and enjoyment to be found. That it is more the effect than the cause may be true. Such men as Gerard, Reid, and Blackwell would have been distinguished in any sphere of life ; but if the prin- ciple should maintain itself in no other science, it is at least true of philosophy, that intercommunica- tion and untechnical debate clear and purify the ' This is particularly remarkable at the commencement of the seventh section. 42 98 ALEXANDER GERARD. ideas previously formed, and ramify them to an extent of which the thinker had never previously dreamed. It must have been grateful beyond con- ception to the members of this retired and unosten- tatious body, to have found learning and elegance gradually brightening under their influence, after a dreary and unlettered series of ages which had passed over their university and the district — to feel that, though living apart from the grand centres of literary attraction, they had the enjoyments these could be- stow beside their own retired hearths and among their own professional colleagues — and to be con- scious that they bestowed a dignity on the spot they inhabited, which a long period of commercial pros- perity could never bestow, and gave a tone to the literature of their institution which should continue when they were gone. In June, 1760, Dr. Gerard was chosen professor of divinity in Marischal College, being at the same time presented to the living of the Grayfriars' Church, in Aberdeen. During his tenure of these offices he published his Dissertations on the Genius and Evidences of Christianity, a subject which he treated with more soundness, reason, and gentle- manly spirit, than others of the same period have chosen to display. In June, 1771, he resigned both these situations, and accepted the theological chair of King's College, and three years afterwards pub- lished An Essay on Genius: this production is stamped with the same strength of argument and penetrating thought everywhere to be found in the productions of the author. The heads of the subject are laid down with much philosophical correctness, and followed out with that liberal breadth of argument peculiar to those who prefer what is reasonable and true to what supports an assumed theory. The language is not florid, and indeed does not aim at what is called elegant writing, but is admirably fitted to convey the ideas clearly and consistently, and seems more intended to be understood than to be admired. It commences with a discussion on the nature of "genius," which is separated from the other mental powers, and particularly from "ability," with which many have confounded it. Genius is attributed in the first process of its formation to im- agination, which discovers ideas to be afterwards subjected to the arbitration of judgment ; memory, and the other intellectual powers, being considered as subsidiary aids in instigating the movements of imagination. Dr. Gerard afterwards presented to the world two volumes of sermons, published in 17S0-S2. He died on his sixty-seventh birth-day, 22d Feb. 1795. A sermon was preached on his funeral, and after- wards published, by his friend and pupil Dr. Skene Ogilvy of Old Aberdeen, which, along with the adulation common to such performances, enumerates many traits of character which the most undisguised flatterer could not have dared to have attributed to any but a good, able, and much esteemed man. A posthumous work, entitled Pastoral Care, was pub- lished by Dr. Gerard's son and successor in 1799. GERARD, Alexander. This enterprising east- ern traveller, who died a martyr to his zeal in ex- ploring the various regions of Hindoostan, was the son of Gilbert Gerard, professor of theology in King's College, Aberdeen, and grandson of Alexander Gerard, who had previously occupied the same chair in that college. This clerical succession, however, was broken in the case of Alexander, who selected the army as his sphere of occupation, and went to India at the early age of sixteen. It was not, how- ever, in military transactions that he was to win distinction; but the more scientific parts of his pro- fession, for which he showed a remarkable aptitude, so that not long after his arrival in India, he was sent by Sir David Gchterlony to survey Malacca, a task which he executed with great accuracy, mostly at mid-day, under a burning sun. After this he was employed to make many of the surveys in the East which were judged of peculiar difficulty and import- ance, and in consequence of these appointments he resided many years in the then almost unknown district of Chinese Tartary, and among the Himalaya Mountains. The dangers he dared and the toils he endured among these mountains were almost in- credible : he scaled heights that had never been ascended by the foot of any European traveller, and was rewarded by finding tribes in many places which had hitherto been deemed uninhabited and unin- habitable. It was unfortunate, that while executing these pro- fessional sur\-eys, and communicating his reports to the East India Company, Captain Gerard took no means of imparting to the world at large a full ac- count of his explorations, contenting himself with a few occasional notices published in India. For- tunately, however, there was one exception to this general statement, by the appearance of a work pub- lished after his death, with the title which we give in full: IVarrative of a fourney from Caivnpoor to the Borendo Pass in the Himalaya l\foutitains, via G'cualior, Agra, Delhi, and Sirhind, by Major Sir William Lloyd; and Captain Alexander Gerard^s Account of an Attempt to Penetrate by Bekhur to Guroo and the Lake Manasorowara ; 'with a L^etter from the late jf. G. Gerard, Esq. , detailijig a Visit to the Shutool and Bore/ido Passes, for tfu Purpose of Determining the Line of Perpetual Snow on the Southern Face of the Himalaya, &c. &c., with maps. Edited by George Lloyd. 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1840. In this work the second volume is occupied by the " narrative" of Captain Gerard, and in it we can see the character of the man, and the nature of those travels and investigations which he prosecuted for so many years in India, until his energies were exhausted. Of this detailed expedition, however, our limits will only permit a few particulars. He left Sobahtoo in the beginning of June, 1821, and ascended the Himalaya Mountains, noting care- fully on the way the places inhabited, their range of elevation above the level of the sea, their temperature and produce, and the character of the tribes who occupied them. Toiling and struggling amidst the eternal snows, but still continuing his march upward, he and his company, now looking more like ghosts than men, reached the Borendo Pass, an elevation of 15,121 feet, on the 15th of June. It was a height at which travellers can sleep little, and breathe only with difficulty, while they are subject to frequent headaches. Here their native guides refused to pro- ceed with them, declaring that to go higher was impossible; so that Gerard was obliged to alter his route to the source of the Pabur, and seek it by another. Charung Pass, an elevation of 17)348 feet, he reached on the 9th of July, and half a mile of this height was so slippeiy with stones, gravel, and snow half melted by the rain, that he was obliged to move upward on all fours, thrusting his hands deep into the snow to secure his hold. Another ascent which he performed was to the Keeobrung Pass, 18,313 feet in height, and a third was the Gangthung Pass, an elevation of 18,295 f'^^'- Most of the com- munities with which the ledges of the Himalayas in these directions were dotted, consisted chiefly oJ Tartars and Chinese, the subjects of the Celestial Empire, whose conduct to the traveller was various; ALEXANDER GERARD some receiving him kindly and treating him with hospitality, while others were churlish, and would not allow him to proceed. In many cases, too, Captain Gerard did not fmd the occupants of these vast heights to be so uncomfortable as such localities would seem to intimate. They had a healthy climate cooled from the heat of the burning Indian sun, a fertile soil in which some of the fruits and grains of Europe were mixed with those of a warmer region, and his description of one of these — the village of Ilango, 11,400 feet above the sea — would present allure- ments for a European agriculturist to become a settler there. It contains "thirty families of Tartars and two nuns. It is situated at the head of a dell, in the bosom of cultivation, extending nearly a mile in one direction, and half that in the other. There are a few poplar-trees, but apricots do not vegetate. I have seldom seen more luxuriant crops: the ear of the ooa showed so large and full, that I was induced to count the grains, and I found the average of eight picked casually to be seventy-eight fold. The pro- duce here is the same as at Nako; most of the fields were ripe, and some even cut. The glen runs nearly east and west; a stream flows on each side of it, and one through the middle; and the supply of water never fails." At Nisung, another village at an eleva- tion of more than 10,000 feet, at which our traveller halted, he witnessed a usage which must have warmed his heart with recollections of his native home. "I remarked," he says, "a custom here similar to that of the Scotch farmers, who, on commencing harvest, plait some of the first-cut stalks of corn, and fix them over the chimney-piece till next harvest. The Tar- tars fasten three stalks of barley over the outside of the door, the ear hanging down: every door in the village was thus ornamented." Of the time alone occupied in these perilous expeditions of Gerard, an idea may be formed from the fact, that this one did not terminate until the end of September, 1S21, being a journey that lasted four months. But such journeys in Hindoostan, continued over a long course of -years, were sufficient to wear out a constitution of iron ; and at last, yielding to the solicitations of his friends, he returned to his native country. But the return was too late for the recovery of his health, and at home he was subject to per- iodical attacks of a fever under which he gradually sunk. It was one of these that carried him off on the 15th of December, 1839, at Aberdeen, after a short illness of three days. Alexander was not the only one of the family of the Gerards distinguished in the records of Indian travel. His elder brother. Dr. James Gerard, of the Bengal medical establishment, who accompanied him in many of his expeditions and surveys, was distinguished by the same adventurous enthusiasm, and scarcely his inferior in that scientific skill and quickness of observation so necessary for exploring unknown and interesting countries; and he, too, like his brother, fell a martyr to his zeal for Indian ex- ploration. The following short account of him by Captain Alexander Gerard, written only four weeks before his own death, in a letter to the editor of Sir William Lloyd's N'arrative, will be more interesting than a lengthened narrative: " You would be sorry to see my poor brother James's death. His trip to Bokhara with Colonel Sir A. Burnes was a mad-like expedition for him, as he had long been unwell, and was obliged to leave his bed to go, and could only travel in a palkee [palankin]. It was, however, his own wish, and, at his own particular request, that Burnes applied for him. This trip killed him, for he had several attacks of fever on his way to Bokhara, and GILBERT GERARD. 99 Burnes again and again urged him either to return or stop at Kabool till he recovered. But he would do neither. His love of research carried him on, and he persevered and accomplished the journey with the greatest difficulty. On his return he was detained three months at Meskid, and no less than eight at Herat, by fever, so after his arrival at Soobahtoo, his constitution was completely worn out. He never had a single day's good health, and gradually declined. But the doctors would not be- lieve him on account of the florid complexion he had even on the very day of his death. Patrick and I were with him the whole time he survived, which was just a year, for I got leave of absence on purpose to prepare a map of his route from his notes; for he observed the bearings, estimated the distances, and noted the villages all the way from Herat to the Indus." Of this survey taken from the notes, and drawn up under the inspection of Dr. Gerard, the captain gives the following interesting account: — "It was a splendid map. It measures ten feet long by three broad, on the scale of five miles to an inch. At my brother's dying request I presented it to Sir C. Metcalfe, then governor-general, from whom I received a thousand thanks. The map is now with the army of the Indus, and I was gratified to hear, that, as far as they had gone, they had found the positions of the roads wonderfully cor- rect, considering the distances were estimated by time, and the bearings taken with a small pocket compass." Such was the active character and career of two enterprising brothers, whom no dangers could daunt or difficulties deter; whose only place of rest was the grave, and who persevered in their long pilgrimage until their mission was accomplished. GERARD, Gilbert, D.D., a divine, father of the foregoing Alexander and James, and son of the Rev. Alexander Gerard, D.D. (a memoir of whom we have already given), was born at Aberdeen on the 1 2th of August, 1 760, and having acquired the earlier elements of his professional education in his native city, at a period when the eminence of several great and well-known names dignified its universi- ties, he finished it in the more extended sphere of tuition furnished by the university of Edinburgh. Before he reached the age of twenty-two, a vacancy having occurred in the ministry of the Scottish church of Amsterdam, a consideration of his father's qualifications prompted the consistory to invite the young divine to preach before them, and he was subsequently waited upon by that body, with an offer of the situation, which he accepted. During his residence in Holland he turned the leisure allowed him by his clerical duties, and his knowledge of the Dutch language and of general science, to the sup- port, with the assistance of two literary friends, of a periodical called Dc Rccenscjit. What may have been the intrinsic merits of this publication it would be difficult to discover, either through the medium of personal inquiry or general report, in a nation where modern Dutch literature is unnoticed and almost unknown; but it obtained the best suffrage of its utility in the place for which it was intended — an extensive circulation. During the same period he like- wise occupied himself in contributing to the English press; and on the establishment of the Analytical Ra^'iciu in 1788, he is understood to have conducted the department of that periodical referring to foreign literature, — a task for which his hereditary critical acuteness, his residence on the Continent, and know- ledge of the classical and of several modern languages, some of which were then much neglected, or had but S D Q ft Q n A GILBERT GERARD ADAM GIB. begun to attract the attention of educated English- men, must have given peculiar facilities. During his residence at Amsterdam he received as a token of respect from his native university the degree of Doctor of Divinity. Soon after this event his professional and literary pursuits experienced a check from a severe illness, which compelled him to seek early in life a restorative for his weakened con- stitution, in breathing the air of his native countr}-. The change of climate had the desired effect, and he returned restored in health to his duties in Holland. These he continued to perform until April, 1791, when strong family motives induced him to relinquish a situation which habit and friendship had endeared to him, and his resignation of which was followed by the regrets of those who had experienced the merits of their pastor. He soon after accepted the vacant professorship of Greek in the King's College of Aberdeen, a situation which he held for four years. Although the students of King's College are not verj- numerous, and the endowments connected with the institution are by no means affluent, both are very respectable, and there is every opportunity on the part of the instructor to e.xhibit, both to the world in general and to his students, those qualifications which make the man respected and esteemed. From the youth of the scholars generally committed to his care, the professor of Greek is not only the public lecturer in his department of literature, but the in- stnictor of its elements; and he has not only to per- form the more ostentatious duty of exhibiting to and laying before them the stores of his own knowledge, but to find the means by which this knowledge shall enter the mind of each individual student. The in- structor meets his pupils during a considerable por- tion of the day, and for several months together; and a knowledge of individuals is thus acquired, which gives the benevolent and active discerner of charac- ter an opportunity of uniting the friend and the in- structor towards the young man who looks to him for knowledge. The shrewdness of the young re- specting those who have cognizance over them is proverbially acute, and it frequently happens that while the learned world has overlooked, in the midst of brilliant talents or deep learning, the absence or presence of the other more personal qualities requisite fir the instruction of youth, the pupils have dis- covered these, and, as a consequence, have pursued or neglected their proper studies as they have per- sonally respected or disliked the teacher of them. It was the consequence of the learning and personal worth of Dr. Gerard that his pupils respected his personal character, and acquired, from his knowledge and his kind friendship towards them, an enthusiasm for Greek literature, which few teachers have had the good fortune to inspire, and which has very sel- dom made its appearance in Scotland. A course of lectures on Grecian history and antiquities (unfor- tunately never given to the world) which he delivered to his students was profitably remembered by many, to whom they formed a stable foundation for more extended knowledge of the subject. During the latter years of his father's life he had assisted him in the performance of his duties as pro- fessor of divinity, and on his death succeeded to that situation, where he brought, to the less irksome and more intellectual dutiesof instilling philosophic know- ledge into more advanced minds, the same spirit of friendly intercourse which had distinguished his ele- mentary instructions. The Scottish student of divinity is frequently a person who stands in need of a protector and friend; and when he has none to trust to but the teachers of the profession, on whom all have a claim, it is very natural that these individuals should hesitate in the exercise of any little patronage on which there is an indefinite number of claimants. It is, however, worthy of remark, to the honour of the individuals who have filled these situations, that many of them have been the best friends to their students, and that although they had at that period to look to them for no professional remuneration, they considered themselves as being, from the com- mencement of the connection, not only the tem- porary instructors, but the guardians of the future conduct, and the propagators of the future fortune, of their students. Of these feelings on the part of Dr. Gerard many afterwards dispersed in respectable ministerial situations through the country retained an affectionate recollection. His influence, which was considerable, was used in their favour, and where he had not that to bestow, he was still a friend. In 181 1 he added to his professorship the second charge of the collegiate church of Old Aberdeen, and con- tinued to hold both situations till his death. During the inter\-ening period he permitted his useful leisure hours to be occupied with the fulfilment of the duties of the mastership of mortifications for King's College, — certainly rather an anomalous office for a scholar, and one which, with a salarj- that could have been no inducement, seems to have brought along with it the qualities of its not very auspicious name. The duties, though petty and irksome in the extreme, were per- formed with the same scrupulous exactness which distinguished the professor's more important pursuits; and he had in the end, from his diligent discharge of these duties, and his being able to procure, from his personal influence with the government, a grant in favour of the university, the satisfaction of rescuing it from the poverty with which it was threatened, by a degree of augmentation of the stipends of several churches, of which the college was titular. During this period of adversity Dr. Gerard had before his eyes the brighter prospect of a benefice in the Scottish metropolis, which many of his friends there attempted to prevail on him to accept ; but the retired habits consequent on a studious life, the small but select circle of intimate friends in the neighbourhood of his college, to whose appearance and conversation long intercourse had endeared him, and a desire to benefit an institution he might almost call paternal, prompted him to continue his useful duties. Dr. Gilbert Gerard died on the 2Sth of September, 181 5, and amidst the regrets of his acquaintances, the professional tribute to his memory was bestowed by the same reverend friend who preached his father's funeral sermon. His only published work is entitled Institutes of Biblical Criticism, published in Edin- burgh in iSoS. It has received from his profession that approval which the author's merit had given cause to anticipate. It is characterized by the author of the Biographic Universcllc 2.% " Un ouvrage plein d'erudition, et compose dans un bon esprit." GIB, Adam, long distinguished as leader of the religious party called Antiburghers, was a native of Perthshire, and bom in 17 13. He received his edu- cation at the university of Edinburgh. In the year 1 74 1 he was ordained a minister of the Associated Presbyterj', recently formed by Mr. Ebenezer Ersktne and others, as detailed in the life of that eminent in- dividual. Mr. Gib's charge was one of the most im- portant in the kingdom— namely the congregation in the southern suburbs of Edinburgh, which was after^vards administered to by Dr. Jamieson, the learned author of the Scottish Etynwlogical Dic- tionary. It is well known that during the progress of the rebellion of 1745-6, no body of individuals in Scotland manifested a warmer loyalty to the govern- ADAM GIB JOHN GIBB. ment than that to which Mr. Gib belonged. When the insurgents were approaching Edinburgh, about 300 of the congregation in and around the city took up arms for its defence, hired a sergeant to teach them the military exercise, and were the last to de- liver up their arms to the castle, when all hope of holding out the town had been abandoned. During the six weeks' occupation of the city by Prince Charles, the established Presbyterian clergy were, with one exception, mute, having mostly fled to the country. Mr. Gib was also obliged to abandon his meeting- house; but he did not flee so far as the rest, nor resign himself to the same inactivity. He assembled his congregation at Dreghorn, about three miles from the town, and within a short distance of Colinton, where the insurgents kept a guard, and not only preached the gospel as usual, but declared that he was doing so as an open proof and testimony "that we are resolved, through the Lord's grace, to come to no terms with the enemy that has power in the city, but to look on them as enemies, showing ourselves to be none of their confederacy. In our public capacity," he continued, "it is fit that we make even a voluntary removal from the place where they are, as from the seat of robbers, showing our- selves resolved that their seat shall not be ours." Mr. Gib thus discoursed on five different Sundays, "expressly preaching up an abhorrence of the rebel- lion then on foot, and a hope of its speedy overthrow, and every day making express mention of the reign- ing sovereign in public prayer; praying for the safety of his reign, the support of his government, a bless- ing on his family, and the preservation of the Pro- testant succession in that family; at the same time praying for the suppression of the rebellion, expressly under the characters of an unnatural and anti-christian rebellion, hes.o a year to the only son of the Earl of Marr ; an un- common act of gratitude, which, however party feeling may regret the circumstances which caused it, will in the minds of good and generous men, exceed in merit all that the intellect of the artist ever achieved. GIBSON", Sir Alexander, Lord Durie, an eminent lawyer and judge, was the son of George Gibson of Goldingstones, one of the clerks of session. The period of his birth we have been unable to dis- cover; but as we find him admitted a clerk of session in 1594, we may conclude that he was born con- siderably more than twenty years previous to that period. It appears that the appointment of Gibson to this duty created a new clerkship, and as the addi- tion in number would reduce the arbitrary sources of emolument of the other two clerks, it was na- turally apprehended that the interloper would be received with the usual jealousy of those whose in- terests are unduly interfered with. King James VI., who had generally some deep and mysteriously wise purpose in all he did, chose to be personally present at the appointment of his nominee, in order that the royal choice might meet with no marks of contempt. The mindful sovereign was on this occasion pleased to be so highly delighted with the disinterested conduct of his obedient clerks, who had so willingly received a partner "at his highness's wish and special desire," that he promised in presence of the court to remun- erate them with "ane sufficient casualty for said consents." The chamber in the Register House instituted by this appointment still retains the deno- mination of "Durie's Office." At that period the duties of a principal clerk of session were of a more politically important nature than they have been since the union: these officers had to register the decrees and acts of parliament, in addition to their present duties. The only remnant of their former occupations is their acting as clerks at the elections of the Scottish representative peers. Gibson con- tinued in his clerkship for all the remainder of his life, notwithstanding the higher offices to which he was afterwards promoted. In 1621 he was appointed a lord of session ; and as the duties of judge and clerk were rather anomalous, we find by the books of sederunt that the prudent clerk had procured in the previous month his son to be installed in the office. Mr. Alexander Gibson, junior, being ap- pointed conjunct clerk with Mr. Alexander Gibson, senior, during the life of the longest liver, the senior, it may be presumed, continued to draw the salary, without being much troubled with the duties. Seven years after his appointment to the bench, we find him accepting a baronetcy of Nova Scotia, with a grant of some few square miles of land in that dis- trict. In 1633 he was appointed a member of one of the committees for the revision of the laws and customs of the countr)-. In 1640 he appears to have been elected a member of the committee of estates, and his appointment as judge was continued SIR ALEXANDER GIBSOX PATRICK GIESOX. 105 under a new commission to the court in 1641. From the period of his elevation to tlie bench in 1621, till the year 1642, this laborious lawyer preserved notes of such decisions of the court as he considered worthy of being recorded as precedents, a task for which a previously extensive practice had fitted him. These were published by his son in one volume folio, in 16SS, and are valuable as the earliest digested col- lection of decisions in Scottish law. Their chief peculiarities are their brevity, and, what would not appear at first sight a natural consequence, their ob- scurity. But Gibson produced by a too niggardly supply the effect which is frequently attributed to a too great multitude of words. He appears, however, to have always known his own meaning; and when, with a little consideration, his ralioncs decidendi are discovered, they are found to be soundly stated. The clamours which other judges of the day caused to be raised against their dishonesty and cupidity, were not applied to Durie. He seems, indeed, as far as the habits of the times could allow the virtue to exist except in an absolutely pure being, to have been a just and fearless judge, for in a period of general legal rapine and pusillanimity, the possession of a very moderate share of honesty and firmness in the judgment-seat made their proprietor worthy of a nation's honour. If the affirmation of a profes- sional brother may be credited, Durie possessed, ac- cording to the opinion of Forbes, a later collector of decisions, most of the intellectual and moral qualities which can dignify the bench. It is a proof of the respect in which his brethren held him, that while the office continued elective in the senators of the college, he was repeatedly chosen as president. At that period the legal practice of Scotland ap- peared to have improved for the mere purpose of substituting sophism and injustice under form for nide equity ; it was a handle to be made use of, rather than a rule to be applied. The crown had recourse to legal fictions, and unjust and arbitrary presumptions, in its dealings with the subject. The subject, instead of calling for a recourse to constitu- tional principles, sometimes rose against the admin- istration of the law, just or unjust. With private parties the more powerful got the command of the law, and used it against the weaker. A striking instance of contempt towards the laws, which took place during one of the presidencies of Gibson of Durie, is mentioned in Douglas' Baronage, and Forbes' Journal, and is more fully and pleasingly narrated in the Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border. The Earl of Traquair had an action depending in court, in which it was understood the president would, by his influence, cause the court to give judgment against him. A border freebooter, or gentleman thief, known by the name of Christie's Will, owed to the peer some gratitude and allegiance, having gained his protection by an insolent jest on the subject of his having been imprisoned for theft. This person being a gentleman both by descent and education, insinuated himself into the president's company during his usual morning ride on the sands of Leith. On the two reaching a very lonely spot, the judge was snatched from his horse, rolled into a blanket, and carried off he knew not where. He was imprisoned three months, during which time his friends and himself considered that he was in fairy- land. The case was decided in favour of Traquair, and a new president appo'r.ted, when the judge one morning found himself laid down in the exact spot from which he had been so suddenly carried off, and returned to claim his privileges. This useful man died at his house of Durie on the loth of June, 1644. He left behind him a son of his own name, who was active among the other persons of high rank, who came forward to protect their national church from the imposition of a foreign liturgy. He is known as having boldly resisted one of King Charles I.'s prorogations, by refusing the performance of the duty of clerk of parliament, already alluded to. He appears, however, not to have always given satisfac- tion to the cause he had so well espoused, as he is more than once mentioned in Lamonfs Diary as a malignant. He was raised to the bench in 1646. Besides this son, the wealth of the father allowed him to provide a junior branch of the family with the estate of Adistone in Lothian. GIBSON, P.A.TRICK, an eminent artist and writer upon art, was born at Edinburgh, in December, 1782. He was the son of respectable parents, who gave him an excellent classical education, partly at the high-school, and partly at a private academy. In his school-boy days he manifested a decided taste for literature, accompanied by a talent for drawing figures, which induced his father to place him as an apprentice under Mr. Nasmyth, the dis- tinguished landscape-painter; who was, in this man- ner, the means of bringing forward many men of genius in the arts. Contemporary with Mr. Gibson as a student in this school, was Kir. Nasmyth's son Peter; and it is painful to think, that both of these ingenious pupils should have gone down to the grave before their master. Mr. Nasmyth's academy was one in no ordinary degree advantageous to his apprentices: such talents as they possessed were generally brought into speedy use in painting and copying landscapes, which he himself finished and sold; and thus they received encouragement from seeing works of which a part of the merit was their own, brought rapidly into the notice of the world. About the same time Mr. Gibson attended the Trustees' Academy, then taught with distingiiished success by Mr. Graham. ^^ hile advancing in the practical part of his profession, Mr. Gibson, from his taste for general study, paid a greater share of attention to the branches of knowledge connected with it, than the most of artists had it in their power to bestow. He studied the mathematics Mith par- ticular care, and attained an acquaintance with per- spective, and with the theory of art in general, which was in his own lifetime quite unexampled in Scottish — perhaps in British — art. Mr. Gibson, indeed, might rather be described as a man of high literary and scientific accomplishments, pursuing art as a profession, than as an artist in the sense in which that term is generally understood. In landscape- painting he showed a decided preference for the classical style of Domenichinoand Nicholas Poussin; and having studied architectural drawing with much care he became remarkably happy in the views of temples and other classical buildings which he in- troduced into his works. When still a veiy young man, Mr. Gibson went to London, and studied the best works of art to be found in that metropolis — the state of the Continent at that time preventing him from pursuing his investigations any further. Mr. Gibson painted many landscapes which have found their way into the collections of the most re- spectable amateurs in his native countr)-. His own exquisitely delicate and fastidious taste perhaps pre- vented him from attaining full success at first, but he was continually improving ; and, great as the tri- umphs of his pencil ultimately were, it is not too much to say, that if life had been spared to him, he must have reached still higher degrees of perfection. Mr. Gibson's professional taste and skill, along with his well-known literary habits, pointed him out io6 PATRICK GIRSOX JOHN BORTIIWICK GILCHRIST. as a proper individual to write, not only criticisms upon the works of modern art brought under public notice, but articles upon the fundamental principles of the fine arts, in works embracing miscellaneous knowledge. He contributed to the Encychpj:dia Edinensis an elaborate article under the head "De- sign," embracing the history, theory, and practice of painting, sculpture, and engraving, and concluding with an admirable treatise on his favourite subject, "Linear Perspective," This article extends to io6 pages of quarto, in double columns, and is illus- trated by various drawings. It is, perhaps, the best treatise on the various subjects which it em- braces ever contributed to an encyclopaedia. To Dr. Brewster's more extensive work, entitled the Edin- burgh Encyclopirdia, Mr. Gibson contributed the articles "Drawing," "Engraving," and "Miniature- painting," all of which attracted notice for the full and accurate knowledge upon which they appeared to be based. In the Edinburgh Annual Register for lSi6, published in 1820, being edited by Mr. J. G. Lockhart, was an article by Mr. Gibson, entitled "A View of the Progress and Present State of the Art of Design in Britain." It is written with much discrimination and judgment, and is certainly worthy of being transferred into some more extended sphere of publication than the local work in which it ap- peared. An article of a similar kind, but confined to the progress of the fine arts in Scotland, appeared in the A'ezv Edinburgh Reziciv, edited by Dr. Rich- ard Poole. In 1S18 Mr. Gibson published a thin quarto volume, entitled Etchings of Select J'icios in Edinburgh, ■n'ith Letter-press Descriptions. The sub- jects chiefly selected were either street scenes about to be altered by the removal of old buildings, or parts opened up temporarily by the progress of im- provements, and which therefore could never again be observable in the point of view chosen by the artist. The most remarkable critical effort of Mr. Gibson was an anonymous j'eu d' esprit, published in 1822, in reference to the exhibition of the works of living artists then open, under the care of the Royal Institution for the Encouragement of the Fine Arts in Scotland. It assumed the form of a report, by a society of cognoscenti, upon these works of art, and treated the merits of the Scottish painters, Mr. Gibson himself included, with great candour and impartiality. The style of this pamphlet, though in no case unjustly severe, was so different from the in- dulgent remarks of periodical writers, whose names are generally known, and whose acquaintance with the artists too often forbids rigid truth, that it occa- sioned a high degree of indignation among the au- thor's brethren, and induced them to take some steps that only tended to expose themselves to ridicule. Suspecting that the traitor was a member of their own body, they commenced the subscription of a paper disclaiming the authorship, and this being carried to many different artists for their adherence, was refused by no one till it came to Mr. Gibson, who excused himself upon general principles from subscribing such a paper, and dismissed the intruders with a protest against his being supposed on that account to be the author. The real cause which moved Mr. Gibson to put forth this half-jesting, half-earnest criticism upon his brethren, was an ungenerous attack upon his own works which Aad appeared in a newspaper the previous year, and which, though he did not pretend to trace it to the hand of any of his fellow-labourers, was enjoyed, as he thought, in a too malicious manner by some to whom he had formerly shown much kindness. He retained his secret, and en- joyed his joke to the last, and it is only here that his concern in the pamphlet is for the first time disclosed. In 1S26 he gave to the world A Letter to the Directors and Managers 0/ the Institution for the En- couragement of the Eine Arts in Scotland. Towards the close of his life he had composed, with extra- ordinary care, a short and practical work on per- spective, which was put to press, but kept back on account of his decease. In June, 1818, Mr. Gibson was married to Miss Isabella M. Scott, daughter of his esteemed friend Mr. William Scott, the well-known writer upon elo- cution. By this lady he had three daughters and a son, the last of whom died in infancy. In April, 1824, he removed from Edinburgh, where he had spent the most of his life, to Dollar, having accepted the situation of professor of painting in the academy founded at that village. In this scene, quite un- suited to his mind, he spent the last five years of his life, of which three were embittered in no ordinary degree by ill health. After enduring with manly and unshrinking fortitude the pains of an uncom- monly severe malady, he expired, August 26, 1829, in the forty-sixth year of his age. Mr. Gibson was not more distinguished in public by his information, taste, and professional success, than he was in private by his upright conduct, his mild and affectionate disposition, and his righteous fulfilment of ever)- moral duty. He possessed great talents in conversation, and could suit himself in such a manner to ever)' kind of company that old and young, cheerful and grave, were alike pleased. He had an immense fund of humour, and what gave it perhaps its best charm was the apparently unin- tentional manner in which he gave it vent, and the fixed serenity of countenance which he was able to preser\-e while all were laughing around him. There are few men in whom the elements of genius are so admirably blended with those of true goodness, and all that can render a man beloved, as they were in Patrick Gibson. GrLCHRIST, John Borthwick, LL.D. This learned oriental scholar was bom at Edinburgh in 1759, and educated in George Heriot's Hospital, an institution to which he bequeathed a liberal dona- tion, in acknowledgment of the benefits he had derived from it. Having studied for the medical profession, and obtained the appointment of assist- ant-surgeon in the East India Company's service, he went out in that capacity to Calcutta. At this period it was thought enough by the Company if its officials possessed a tolerable knowledge of Per- sian, the court language of India, in which the acts of the Anglo-Indian government and the proceedings of the legal tribunals were registered. But this limited means of intercourse with the people under our rule did not satisfy Dr. Gilchrist, and he saw, that to hold intercourse with them, as the proper means of governing and benefiting them, it was necessary to possess a proper knowledge of the various languages of Hindostan. To facilitate their acquirement, and at the same time to set an example to others, he assumed an eastern garb, and travelled over those provinces where Hindostanee was spoken in its greatest purity ; and besides the native lan- guage in its various dialects, he obtained a complete knowledge of the Sanskrit, Persian, and other eastern tongues. His success in these attainments inspired a new spirit in the Company's servants, and the study of Hindostanee was pursued among them with a dili- gence that had as yet been unknown. To facilitate this hopeful commencement. Dr. Gilchrist published in 1786 and 1790 his Anglo-Hindostanec Dictionary^ JOHN BORTIIWICK GILCHRIST. 107 and in 1796 his Hindostance Grammar. But a still more favourable opportunity of communicating his acquirements in oriental learning was furnished to him in consequence of the foundation of the college of Calcutta by the Marquis Wellesley, governor- general of India, in 1800. On this occasion Dr. Gilchrist was appointed to the chair of the Hindos- tance and Persian languages, being the first appoint- ment of the kind that had been made by our govern- ment in India. He did not, however, long hold this office, being compelled in consequence of ill health to return home in 1S04. His departure from India was accompanied with highly honourable tes- timonials of the diligence and success of his labours, and the estimation in which he was held. He re- ceived from the governor-general in council a public letter to the court of directors at home, recommend- ing him to their favour in their endeavours to pro- mote the study of the oriental languages. But be- sides this, the marquis introduced him to Mr. Ad- dington, aftenvards Lord Sidmouth, in a letter of which the following is an extract: — "Mr. John Gilchrist, late professor of the Hindostanee language in the college of Fort William, will have the honour of delivering this letter to you. The records of this government furnish ample proof of the importance of Mr. Gilchrist's services. I am anxious, however, that you should be apprised of the personal interest which I feel in Mr. Gilchrist's honourable reception in England; and I take the liberty of recommending him to your favourable notice, as a gentleman highly distinguished for his zeal in the promotion of an important branch of the public service, and for his eminent knowledge of the oriental languages." On returning home Dr. Gilchrist set up his re- sidence in his native Edinburgh, and there his fiery eastern temperament, his liberal opinions in politics, which trenched upon republicanism, and his eccen- tricity in conduct as well as opinions, astonished the gravity of his wondering fellow-citizens. Being too impatient to be idle, he instituted, in conjunc- tion with Mr. James Inglis, a bank in the Scottish capital, under the title of "Inglis, Borthwick Gil- christ, & Co.;" but the other banks, doubtful of its management, looked so unfavourably upon it, that the establishment after some time was closed. He set up an aviary at his house on the north side of Nicholson Square, the building being largely trellised with wire-work and stored with all manner of bright and curious birds — and the natives, who gazed and marvelled, thought it the strangest of Noah's arks, or the best of raree shows. From his strong language, especially at civic meetings, and his aptitude to take offence, he was liable to be involved in serious quar- rels; and on one occasion, in June, 1815, when a gen- tleman was reading aloud in a coffee-room an account of the victory of Waterloo, Dr. Gilchrist, who was present, gave him the lie, and proclaimed the intelligence to be false. This mortal offence would probably have been followed by a deadly meeting, had not the friends of both parties inter- fered. Such was Dr. Gilchrist in Edinburgh, and where these singularities were perhaps more vividly remembered in later periods than his talents, his kindliness, and benevolence, by which they were more than counterpoised. In 1 81 6 this learned orientalist left Edinburgh to settle in London ; and here he found more con- genial occupation, by teaching the eastern languages in his own house to such young gentlemen as were qualifying themselves for the Indian service. Two years after his class was removed to the Oriental Institution, Leicester Square, where he taught Hin- dostanee and Persian under the sanction of the East India Company. This connection, however, lasted only six years, and its dissolution was probably owing to incompatibility of temper between the employers and the employed. Dr. Gilchrist was not of a temper to brook contradiction or interfer- ence. His mode of teaching was also apt to give offence to the grave and the formal. At this time his bushy head and whiskers were as white as the Himalayan snow, and in such contrast to the active expressive face which beamed from the centre of the mass, that he was likened to a royal Bengal tiger — a resemblance of which he was even proud. His lec- tures also, which were extemporaneous, and governed by the fitful impulses of the moment, were a singular medley of "orient pearls at random strung;" but still they were pearls of price, and those pupils who were willing to learn were enriched by his prelec- tions, however oddly delivered or illustrated. Nor was his style of writing less strange than that of his lecturing ; and besides the eccentricities of style and innovations in orthography with which it astonished the readers eye, the doctor had a sublime contempt of capitals, which he had banished from his printed compositions. These serious offences against the common usages of good taste cannot be perpetrated with impunity ; and those who might have been attracted by the doctor's valuable erudition, were offended by the adjuncts with which it was garnished. In the meantime his publications, which were nume- rous and valuable, and chiefly connected with the languages, condition, and histor}' of India, were mingled with pamphlets and broad-sheets filled with his personal resentments, or expounding his own crotchets. His chief subject of complaint was the ill treatment he had received from the East India Company, which had only allowed him a retiring surgeon's pension of ;^300 instead of ;^500> ^"^ '^ salary of ;i^350 as a teacher of eastern languages, which was greatly disproportioned, as he thought, to his services. It was in this mood that the writer of the present memoir found him in London some forty years ago. Among those who were persistent friends of Dr. Gilchrist, and knew his real talents, was the late Joseph Hume, whose career had in some cases been similar to his own. Both had commenced their career as surgeons in India ; both had com- menced their rise by the study of eastern languages, which they turned to a profitable account ; both had returned with a competence after a short stay in the East; and they were heartily at one in perceiv- ing the existing evils of government, and advocating a reform. But here the similarity ended. Dn Gilchrist unfortunately could not lay claim to the temper, caution, management, and good sense by which his more fortunate but not more talented friend was distinguished. While residing in Edinburgh, Dr Gilchrist had married a Miss Mary Ann Coventry ; and on re- moving to London, the pair, who had no children, occupied a house in the fashionable locality of Clarges Street. The doctor's means of living in such a place were comfortable, not only from the extensive sale of his principal works connected with India and its languages, but also from the result of his banking speculation in Edinburgh, which had turned out better than could have been anticipated. After he had given an impulse to the study of the eastern tongues which has steadily increased to the present day, and trained young cadets for the East India service, whose proficiency reflected honour upon their teacher, and by whom he was respected and beloved. Dr. Gilchrist, worn out with the infirmities of old age, lived in retirement, and died at Paris on the 9th of January, 1 841, at the age of eighty-two years. loS ROBERT CILFILLAX, GELFILLAN, Robert. This amiable poet of domestic Yitc and popular song-writer, was bom in Dunfermline, Fifeshire, on the Jihof July, 179S, and was the second of three sons. His father was a man of respectable condition, according to the reckoning of the times in provincial towns, for he was a master weaver, and kept several looms in full employment. His mother, who died in 1S44, was justly character- ized as " a woman of high intellectual powers, and one who, belonging to the middle classes of society, was distinguished by high literar)- acquirements, united to a modesty that rather fostered the talents of others than exhibited her own." Can we easily imagine a poet of good, current, lasting songs, bom in a loftier position, or independent of such a mater- nity? Like most bards, and especially of this par- ticular class, Robert Gilfillan's natural tendency was called forth in early life, under the pressure of a stirring public impulse. While still a boy, he had joined a group of urchins like himself, to make merry during the Christmas holidays with the sport of giiisiii:^, OT guisarJiit^ — an old Saxon revel, scarcely yet disused in Scotland, but which is now generally supplanted by the drawing-room amusement of charades; and while employed in this merry street masquerade, instead of confining himself to the hun- dred-year-old hackneyed stanzas about Alexander the Great and Guloshin, he chanted a song of his own composition on the death of Sir Ralph Aber- cromby, at that time a recent event, and by which the sympathies of everj- cottage in Scotland had been roused into full native vigour. Young Gilfillan on this occasion received more than the usual poet's meed of pence and praise from the goodwives of Dunfermline, who listened at their doors in silent admiration. After this sudden outburst of rhyme a long in- terval succeeded: school-boy trials, and the suc- ceeding cares and difficulties of apprenticeship, are generally sufficient to banish the Muses for years, if not for life; and Robert Gilfillan, who at the age of thirteen removed with his parents to Leith, was employed during a seven years' service in the un- poetical occupation of hammering tubs and barrels, having been bound apprentice for that period to a cooper. Although he manfully endured this pro- bation, he abandoned the trade of a cooper as soon as his term of indenture had expired ; and, returning to Dunfennline in iSiS, he was employed for nearly three years in the superintendence of a grocerj- esta- blishment Here his first love retumed upon him in full \-igour, and his attempts in song-writing were accompanied with the work of self-improvement, which he prosecuted not only by general reading, but associating with the young men of his neigh- bourhood who were like-minded with himself In this way not only his acquired knowledge, but his conversational power in the use of it, made him distinguished in Dunfermline society, and caused him to be regarded as one whose future career would surpass that of his companions. After this he again settled in Leith, where he was first employed in the warehouse of a firm of oil and colour merchants, and subsequently in that of a wine merchant, as confi- dential clerk, until 1837, when he was appointed collector of the police-rates at Leith, which situa- tion he held till the close of his life. In this way Mr. Gilfillan held onward in his course, and fulfilled his mission as a useful member of society; but as a poet he had continued during his several changes of store-keeper, clerk, and tax-gatherer, to labour for a wider sphere and a more permanent memorial. The first earnest of this he enjoyed in the popularity of his songs, which, although still unpublished, were circulated over the whole of Scot- land, and sung not only at public festivals, but also at social and domestic meetings. How was it pos- sible, under sueh circumstances, to resist the tempta- tions of the press? It speaks much, however, for his self-denial, that he did not yield until he had attained the matured reflective age of thirty-three, and when his songs had stood the test of years. In I S3 1 he became an author, by publishing a small volume of about 150 pages, under the title of Origi- nal Scvigs, which he dedicated to Allan Cunningham, himself, ne.xt to Burns, the prince of Scottish song- poets. So successful was this appeal to public ap- probation, that in 1835 he brought out a new edition, increased by fifty additional pieces ; and soon after its appearance a public dinner was given to him in the Royal Exchange, Edinburgh, and a massive silver cup presented to him on the occasion thus inscribed: — "Presented to Mr. Robert Gilfillan by the admirers of native genius, in token of their high estimation of his poetical talents and private worth. Edinburgh, 1835." In 1839 he published a third and still larger edition of his original volume, sixty new songs being added to the collection; and by this completed work he will continue to hold an hon- oured place in the third rank of Scottish song-writers — Bums being of the first, and standing alone, and Hogg and Cunningham being taken as the repre- sentatives of the second. In addition to those warm but simple and narrowed home affections which formed the chief themes of his hiics, and in the delineation of which he has not often been surpassed, there is a moral purity in the songs of Gilfillan in -which he has very- seldom been equalled. But how, indeed, could it be otherwise, when we take into account the ordeal to which he submitted them? "It was his practice," says his biographer, "to read to his mother and sister his songs as he wrote them; and he was entirely guided by their judgment re- garding them. " This was better still than the house- keeper of Moliere ! One circumstance connected with this gentle home tribunal of criticism first gave him the hope that fame was within his reach. He was reading his Fare ihee well, for I must Leave thee, when his sister and a young lady, a cousin of his own, who was present, were so deeply affected, that they burst into tears. - After such an incident some of our readers might wish to know the song: it is as follows: — " Fare thee well, for I must leave thee, But, 01 let not our parting grieve thee; Happier days may yet be mine, At least 1 wish them thine — believe mc! " We part — but by those dew-drops clear, My love for thee will last for ever; I leave thee — but thy image dear. Thy tender smiles, will leave me never. " O I drj- those pearly tears that flow — One farewell smile before we sever; The only balm for parting woe Is — fondly hope 'tis not forever. "Though dark and drear>- lowers the night, Calm and serene may be the morrow; The cup of pleasure ne'er shone bright. Without some mingling drops of sorrow! '- Fare thee well, for I must leave thee. But, O! let not our parting grieve thee; Happier days may yet be mine. At least I wish them thine — believe me!" The rest of the incidents in Mr. Gilfillan's tran- quil life scarcely require commemoration. Indepen- dently of his devotion to poetrv-, which was his master affection, he took pleasure in the various departments of light and ever)--day literature, and was a frequent contributor to the Edinburgh Jcunial and the Dublin University Magazine. Although he continued to the GEORGE GILLESPIE. 109 end of his clays a bachelor, he was not the less sub- ject to pahifui bereavements, and these, too, at that period of life when the affections are most confirmed; for his mother died in 1S44, '^^^ ^^'s sister in 1849, and thus the voices that liad hitherto cheered him onward were no longer heard. Mis own death occurred on the 4th of December, 1850, and was occasioned by a stroke of apoplexy. Ilis remains were buried in the churchyard of South Leilh, where a monument, by the subscription of his admirers, has been erected to his memory. V GILLESPIE, George, an eminent divine at a time when divines were nearly the most eminent class of individuals in Scotland, was the son of the Rev. John Gillespie, minister at Kirkcaldy, and was born^January 21, 1613. His advance in his studies was so rapid, that he was laureated in his seven- teenth year. About the year 1634, when he must have still been very young, he is known to have been chaplain to Viscount Kenmure: at a subsequent period he lived in the same capacity with the Earl of Cassilis. While in the latter situation he wrote a work called English Popish Ccretnonies, in which, as the title implies, he endeavoured to excite a jealousy of the episcopal innovations of Charles I., as tending to Popery. This book he published when he was about twenty-two years of age, and it was soon after prohibited by the bishops. Had Episco- pacy continued triumphant, it is likely that Mr. Gillespie's advance in the church would have been retarded; but the signing of the national covenant early in 1638 brought about a different state of things. In April that year, a vacancy occurring at Wemyss in Fife, he was appointed minister; and at the General Assembly which took place at Glasgow in the ensuing November, he had the honour to preach one of the daily sermons before the house, for which he took as his text, "The king's heart is in the hands of the Lord." The Earl of Argyle, who had then just joined the covenanting cause, and was still a member of the privy-council, thought that the preacher had trenched a little, in this dis- course, upon the royal prerogative, and said a few words to the assembly, with the intention of warning them against such errors for the future. In 1 64 1 an attempt was made to obtain the trans- portation of Air. Gilliespie to Aberdeen; but the General Assembly, in compliance with his own wishes, ordained him to remain at Wemyss. When the king visited Scotland in the autumn of this year, Mr. Gillespie preached before him in the Abbey Church at Edinburgh, on the afternoon of Sunday the 1 2th of September. In the succeeding year he was removed by the General Assembly to Edinburgh, of which he continued to be one of the stated clergy- men till his death. Mr. Gillespie had the honour to be one of the four ministers deputed by the Scot- tish church, in 1543, to attend the Westminster Assembly of Divines; and it is generally conceded that his learning, zeal, and judgment were of the greatest service in carrying through the work of that venerable body, particularly in forming the Directory of Worship, the Catechisms, and other important articles of religion, which it was the business of the assembly to prepare and sanction. Baillie thus al- ludes to him in his letters: "We got good help in our assembly debates of Lord Warriston, an occa- sional commissioner, but of none more than the noble youth Mr. Gillespie. I admire his gifts, and bless God, as for all my colleagues, so for him in particular, as equal in these to the first in the assembly." It appears that Mr. Gillespie composed six volumes of manuscript during the course of his attendance at the Westminster Assembly; and these were extant in 1707,' though we are not aware of their still continuing in existence. He had also, when in England, prepared his sermons for the press— part being controversial, and part practical; l)ut they are said to have been suppressed in the hands of the printer with whom he left them, through tlie instrumentality of the Independents, who dreaded their publication. He also wrote a piece against toleration, entitled Wholesome Sci'cri/y Reconciled zcilh Christian Liberty. In 1648 Mr. Gillespie had the honour to be moderator of the General Assembly; and the last of his compositions was the Conunission of the A'irk^s Ans7C'cr to tlie Estates' Observations on the Declaration of the General Assejubly concerning the Unlawfulness of the Engagement. For some months before this assembly he had been greatly reduced in body by a cough and perspiration, which now at length came to a height, and threatened fatal consequences. Thinking perhaps that his native air would be of service, he went to Kirkcaldy with his wife, and lived there for some months; but his illness nevertheless advanced so fast, that, early in December, his friends despaired of his life, and despatched letters to his brother, to Mr. Samuel Rutherford, the Marquis of Argyle, and other distinguished individuals, who took an interest in him, mentioning that if they wished to see him in life, speed would be necessar)'. The remainder of his life may be best related in the words of Wodrow, as taken, in I707) from the mouth of Mr. Patrick Simpson, who was cousin to Mr. Gillespie, and had witnessed the whole scene of his death-bed: "Monday, December II, came my Lord Argyle, Cassils, Elcho, and Warriston, to visit him. He did faithfully declare his mind to them as public men, in that point whereof he hath left a testimony to the view of the world, as afterwards; and though speaking was very burdensome to him, and trouble- some, yet he spared not very freely to fasten their duty upon them. "The exercise of his mind at the time of his sick- ness was very sad and constant, without comfortable manifestations, and sensible presence for the time; yet he continued in a constant faith of adherence, which ended in ane adhering assurance, his gripps growing still the stronger. "One day, a fortnight before his death, he had leaned down on a little bed, and taken a fit of faint- ness, and his mind being heavily exercised, and lifting up his eyes, this expression fell with great weight from his mouth, ' O ! my dear Lord, forsake me not for ever.' His weariness of this life was very great, and his longing to be relieved, and to be where the vail would be taken away. "December 14, he was in heavy sickness, and three pastors came in the afternoon to visit him, of whom one said to him, 'The Lord hath made you faithfid in all he hath employed you in, and it's likely we be put to the trial; therefore what encourage- ment do you give us thereanent?' Whereto he an- swered, in few words, 'I have gotten more by tiie Lord's immediate assistance than by study, in the disputes I had in the assembly of divines in England; therefore, let never men distrust God for assistance, that cast themselves on him, and follow his calling. For my part, the time I have had in the exercise of the ministry is but a moment !' To which sentence another pastor answered, 'But your moment hath exceeded the gray heads of others; this I may speak without flattery.' To which he answered, disclaim- 1 Wodrow's Analecia (MS. Adv. Lib.), i. 329. THOMAS GILLESPIE. ing it with a noe; for he desired still to have Christ exalted, as he said at the same time, and to another; and at other times, when any such thing was spoken to him, ' What are all my righteousnesses but rotten rags? all that I liave done cannot abide the touch- stone of His justice; they are all but abominations, and as an unclean thing, when they are reckoned between God and me. Christ is all things, and I am nothing.' The other pastor, when the rest were out, asked whether he was enjoying the comforts of God's presence, or if they were for a time suspended. He answered, 'Indeed, they are suspended.' Then within a little while he said, 'Comforts I ay comforts!' meaning that they were not easily attained. His wife said, 'What reck? the comfort of believing is not suspended ?' He said, 'Noe.' Speaking further to his condition he said, 'Although that I should never more see any light of comfort, that I do see, yet I shall adhere, and do believe that he is mine and that I am his.' " Mr. Gillespie lingered two days longer, and ex- pired almost imperceptibly, December 1 6, 1646. On the preceding day he had written and signed a paper, in which ' ' he gave faithful and clear testi- mony to the work and cause of God, and against the enemies thereof, to stop the mouths of calumniators, and confirm his children." The object of the paper was to prevent, if possible, any union of the friends of the Church of Scotland with the loyalists, in be- half of an uncovenanted monarch. The committee of estates testified the public gratitude to Mr. Gil- lespie by voting his widow and children ;,{^iooo, which, however, from the speedily ensuing troubles of the times, was never paid. GILLESPIE, Rev. Tho.m.\s, was the first Relief minister, and founder of the synod of Relief. He was born in the year 1708, at Clearbum, in the parish of Duddingstone near Edinburgh, of parents distin- guished for their piety. He lost his father, who was a farmer and brewer, when he was very young. His mother, who seems to have been a woman of decided piety, and at the same time of active business habits, continued her husband's business as farmer and brewer after his death. Gillespie, who was of de- licate constitution and melancholy temperament, seems throughout life to have been marked by the shyness of disposition, the reserved manners, the fondness for retirement, and the tenderness yet con- scientiousness of feeling, which usually distinguish the boy brought up in a retired domestic way, under a fond and widowed mother. His mother was ac- customed to attend the services at the dispensation of the Lord's supper by Mr. Wilson of Maxton, Mr. Boston of Ettrick, Mr. Davidson of Galashiels, and other eminent evangelical ministers, with whom the south of Scotland was at that time favoured. On these occasions she commonly took with her her son Thomas, in whom the anxious mother had not yet traced those satisfactory evidences of decisive piety which her maternal regard for his best interests so earnestly desired; on one of these occasions she mentioned her distress on account of her son to Mr. Boston, who, at her request, spoke to him in private on his eternal interests.. His counsels made a de- cisive impression upon the mind of Gillespie, at that time a young man about twenty years of age, and led him soon after to commence his studies as prepa- ratory to the ministry', which he prosecuted at the university of Edinburgh. After the origin of the Secession his mother be- came attached to that body; and through her advice and influence Gillespie went to Perth to study under Mr. Wilson, their first theological professor. In this step he seems to have been influenced more by a desire to comply with the wishes of a fond and pious mother, than by personal attachment to the peculiarities of the Secession. His whole stay at Perth was ten days; for as soon as from conversa- tions with Mr. Wilson he fully comprehended the principles on which the Secession were proceeding, he withdrew. He proceeded to England, where he pursued his studies at the theological academy in Northampton, at that time superintended by the celebrated Dr. Philip Doddridge. When he thus went to England Dr. Erskine states (in his preface to his Essay on Temptations) that he had attended the humanity, philosophy, and divinity classes in the college of Edinburgh, and that he carried with him attestations of his personal piety and acquirements in philosophical and theological literature from several ministers of the Church of Scotland: viz. Rev. Messrs. Davidson of Galashiels, Wilson of Maxton, Wardlaw of Dunfermline, Smith of Xewburn, Gust- hart, Webster, and Hepburn, of Edinburgh, James Walker of Canongate, M 'Vicar of West Kirk, Kid of Queensferr)', Bonnar of Torphichen, and Ward- rope of Whitburn — all of whom mention their having been intimately acquainted with him. After the usual trials, he was licensed to preach the gospel, 30th October, 1740, by a respectable class of English dissenters, among whom Dr. Dod- dridge presided as moderator, and ordained to the work of the ministry, 22d January, 1741. It is said that his first charge was over a dissenting congrega- tion in the north of England. If so, it must have been for a very short time, for in March following he returned to Scotland, bringing with him warm and ample recommendations from Dr. Doddridge, Mr. Job Orton, and thirteen other ministers in that neighbourhood, "as a deeply experienced Christian, well qualified for the important work of the ministr}', and one who bade fair to prove an ornament to his holy profession, and an instrument of considerable usefulness to the souls of men." Soon after his return to Scotland he got a regular call to the parish of Carnock near Dunfermline, to which he was presented by Mr. Erskine of Carnock. At that time the forms of procedure in the Church of Scotland seem to have been not so strict and un- accommodating to circumstances as they are now; for in inducting him into Carnock the presbytery of Dunfermline proceeded on his deed of license and ordination by the English dissenters as valid, and dealt by him as one who had already held a charge. At his admission into Carnock he showed the influ- ence which his theological education at Northampton, and his intercourse with the English dissenters had exerted upon his opinions as to Christian liberty, by objecting to the doctrine of the Confession of Faith respecting the power of the civil magistrate in reli- gion; he was permitted to subscribe with an expla- nation of his meaning upon this point. The passages of the Confession to which he objected were the 4th section of the 20th chapter, and the 3d section of the 23d chapter: which declare that those may be pro- ceeded against by the power of the civil magis- trate who publish such opinions, or maintain such practices, as are contrary to the light of nature, the known principles of Christianity, or the power of godliness, or which are destructive to the external peace and order which Christ hath established in the church ; and that the civil magistrate hath authority, and it is his duty, to take order that unity and peace be preserved in the church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline, be prevented or reformed, and all THOMAS GILLESPIE. the ordinances of God duly settled, administered, and observed, for the better effecting of which he liath power to call synods, to be present at them, and to provide that whatever is transacted in them be according to the mind of God. Mr. Gillespie laboured as parish minister of Car- nock till the year 1752. He was a careful student, a diligent and faithful minister, and generally ac- ceptable and useful in his pulpit labours, both in his own parish and as an occasional assistant elsewhere. The acceptance which his pulpit discourses met was not owing to any advantage of manner, for his de- livery was uncouth, and his whole manner that of one nervously afraid of his audience. Hut he was solemn and affectionate, much impressed himself as conscious of his awful charge. He had struggled hard himself against the oppression of a constitutional tendency to despondency; and in his discourses he sought especially to comfort and counsel the de- sponding and tempted Christian. Dr. John Erskine, who was several months his stated hearer, and who besides this often heard him occasionally, bears witness in his preface to Mr. Gillespie's Essay on the Continuance of hnmcdiate Rez'elations in^ the Church, that "he studied in his ministry what was most needful for the bulk of his hearers, giving law and gospel, comfort and terror, privileges and duties, their proper place. I never (says he) sat under a ministry better calculated to awaken the thoughtless and secure, to caution convinced sinners against what would stifle their convictions and prevent their issuing in conversion, and to point out the difference between vital Christianity and specious counterfeit appearances of it." During the eleven years that Mr. Gillespie occu- pied the charge of Carnock he kept close to the humble and unostentatious yet useful duties of the pastor of a country parish. He seems never to have taken any prominent part in the business of the church courts: he was, both from habit and disposi- tion, retiring and reserved, fond of the studies of the closet, but destitute alike of the ability and the inclination for managing public affairs, and leading the van in ecclesiastical warfare. It was his scrupu- lous conscientiousness, not his ambition, that made him the founder of a party. He was thrust on it by circumstances beyond his intention. Mr. Gillespie entered the ministry in the Church of Scotland when the harsh operation of the law of patronage was causing painful and lamentable contests between the people and the dominant party in the church courts. It had already caused the secession ; and there still remained in the Church of Scotland many elements of discord and sources of heart-burning ; whole presbyteries even refused to act when the settlement of obnoxious presentees was enjoined by the superior courts — and to effect the execution of their sentences appointing the settlement of unpopular individuals, the General Assembly had at times wholly to supersede the func- tions of the presbytery, and appoint the induction to be completed by committees of individuals not connected with the presbytery; it might be men who, without scruple, were willing to act on whatever was ecclesiastical law, and carry through the matter in- trusted to their care in the face of the menaces or murmurs of a dissatisfied and protesting people. This method of settling obnoxious presentees by riding committees, as they were called in those days by the populace, was confessedly a most irregular and unconstitutional device. It was a clumsy ex- pedient to avoid coming in direct collision with re- cusant presbyteries. It was found to answer the purpose very imperfectly; and it was soon seen that there remained to the General Assembly but two alternatives, either to soften the operation of the law of patronage, and give way to the popular voice, or to compel the presbyteries to settle every man who received a presentation, against whom heresy or immorality could not be proved; otherwise there would be perpetual collision between themselves and the inferior courts. The assembly chose the latter and the bolder alternative. In 1750, accord- ingly, the assembly referred it to their commission, "to consider of a method for securing the execution of the sentences of the assembly and commission, and empowered them to censure any presbyteries which might be disobedient to any of the sentences pronounced by that meeting of assembly." In 1 75 1 Mr. Andrew Richardson, previously settled at Broughton, in the parish of Biggar, was presented to the charge of Inverkeithing by the patron of the parish. He was unacceptable to the body of the people, and his call was signed only by a few non-resident heritors. Opposition being made to his settlement by the parishioners, the presbyteiy of Dunfermline, and after them the synod of Fife, refused to comply with the orders of the commission to proceed to the settlement of Mr. Richardson. The case came before the assembly in 1752; and it was justly anticipated that it would bring to an issue the conflict between recusant presbyteries, who had a conscientious regard for the rights of the people, and the dominant party in the assembly, who had no regard for them, but were resolved to give effect to every presentation. The lord-commissioner, the Earl of Leven, in his opening speech, with sufficient plainness indicated the course of procedure which the government desired and expected the assembly should pursue, in the circumstances; and said that it was more than high time to put a stop to the growing evil of inferior courts assuming the liberty of disputing and disobeying their decisions. The ruling party in the assembly were prompt in obey- ing these orders of the lord-commissioner. They acted with more energy than prudence or tenderness. When the Inverkeithing case came to be considered, the assembly sent the presbytery from their bar to Inverkeithing with orders to complete Mr. Richard- son's induction: they enjoined every member of pres- bytery to be present at the admission: they changed the legal quorum from three to five. These orders were issued by the assembly on Monday; the induc- tion was appointed to take place on Thursday, and the members of the presbyteiy were all commanded to appear at the bar of the assembly on Friday, to report their fulfilment of these orders. On Friday, when the members of the Dunfermline presbytery were called upon, it appeared that only three had attended at Inverkeithing, and they not being the number required by the decision of the assembly to constitute a presbytery, did not feel themselves authorized to proceed to the admission. Of the other six, Mr. Gillespie and other five pleaded conscientious scruples, and gave in a paper in defence of their conduct, quoting in their justification the language of the assembly itself, who in 1736 had declared that "it is, and has been ever since the Reformation, the principle of the church, that no minister shall be introduced into any parish contrary to the will of the congregation; and therefore it is seriously recommended to all judicatories of the church, to have a due regard to the said principle in planting vacant congregations, so as none be in- truded into such parishes, as they regard the glory of God, and the edification of the body of Christ." The assembly paid small regard to their own former declarations thus brought under their notice. THOMAS GILLESPIE. They felt, indeed, that it would be rather trenchant and severe, by one fell swoojj to depose six ministers all equally guilty : they resolved, however, by a majority, to depose one of the six. This was inti- mated to them with orders to attend on the morrow. Next day Mr. Gilles[)ie gave in a paper justifying a statement made in their joint representation, tliat the assembly had themselves stigmatized the act of 1712, restoring patronages, as an infraction of the settlement made at the union. The proof of this statement, which had been questioned in the previous day's debate, he proved by quotations from the assembly's act of 1736, made at the time when they wished to lure back and reconcile the four seceding brethren — the founders of the Secession. After prayer to God for direction — which, in the circumstances of the case, and in the predetermined state of mind in which the ruling party in the assem- bly were, was a profane mockery of Heaven — they proceeded to decide which of the six should be de- posed. A great majority of the assembly (102) declined voting; 52 voted that Mr. Gillespie should bs deposed, and 4 that some one of the others should be taken. The moderator then pronounced the sentence of deposition on Mr. Gillespie. He stood at the bar to receive it, and when he had heard it to an end, with the meek dignity of con- scious innocence, replied, "Moderator, I receive this sentence of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland with reverence and awe on account of the divine conduct in it. But I rejoice that it is given to me on the behalf of Christ, not only to be- lieve on him, but to suffer for his sake." This hard measure dealt to him excited general commiseration and sympathy even among the min- isters of the church. He was humble and unassum- ing, a quiet, retired student, not one versant in the warfare of church courts. Sir H. Moncrieff, in his Life of Dr. Erskine, testifies that he was one of the most inoffensive and upright men of his time, equally zealous and faithful in his pastoral duties, but one who never entered deeply into ecclesiastical business, and who was at no time a political intriguer. His sole crime was, that from a conscientious feeling, he would not be present or take any active part in a violent settlement, and they must be strangely fond of stretches of ecclesiastical power who will pronounce the deposition of such a man in such circumstances either praiseworthy or wise. The sentence of deposition was pronounced on Sa- turday. On Sabbath, the day following, he preached in the fields at Carnock to his people, from the words of Paul, "For necessity is laid upon me, yea, woe is unto me if I preach not the gospel." He told his hearers, that though the assembly had de- posed him from being a member of the Established church, for not doing what he belived it was sinful for him to do, yet he hoped, through grace, no public disputes should be his theme, but Jesus Christ and him crucified,^ and then went on to illustrate his text, without saying anything in justification of him- self or in condemnation of the assembly. He preached in the fields till the month of Sep- tember, when he removed to the neighbouring town of Dunfermline, where a church had been prepared for him. At the following meeting of assembly, in 17535 firi attempt was made by the evangelical party in the church to have the sentence of deposi- tion rescinded; but though some of those who voted for his deposition, stung by their own consciences, or moved by sympathy, expressed their regret in 1 Dr. Erskine's Preface to his Essay on Temptations. very poignant language," yet the motion was lost by a majority of three. He laboured in Dunfermline for five years with- out any ministerial assistance, and during that period he dispensed the sacrament of the Lord's supper thirteen times, preaching on these occasions com- monly nine sermons, besides the exhortations at the tables. When he first determined to celebrate the Lord's supper in his congregation at Dunfermline, he requested the assistance of some of the evangeli- cal ministers in the Church of Scotland ; but from fear of the censures of the assembly, they refused him their aid. The first minister who joined Mr. Gillespie in his separation from the Church of Scotland, was Mr. Boston, son of the well-known author of the Four- fold State. The parish of Jedburgh becoming vacant, the people were earnestly desirous that Mr. Boston, who was minister of Oxnam, and a man of eminently popular talents, might be presented to the vacant charge. No attention, however, was paid to their wishes. The people of Jedburgh took their redress into their own hands, they built a church for them- selves, and invited Mr. Boston to become their min- ister; and he resigning his charge at Oxnam, and renouncing his connection with the Church of Scot- land, cheerfully accepted their invitation. He was settled among them 9th December, 1757. He im- mediately joined Mr. Gillespie, to whom he was an important acquisition, from his popular talents and extensive influence in the south of Scotland. Though associated together, and lending mutual aid, they did not proceed to any acts of ecclesiastical government, till, by a violent settlement in the parish of Kilconquhar, in P'ife, the people were led to erect a place of worship for themselves in the village of Colinsburgh, to which they invited as their pastor the Rev. Thomas Collier, a native of the district, who had for some time been settled at Kavenstondale, in Northumberland, in connection with the English dissenters. At his admission to the charge of the congregation formed in Colinsburgh, on the 22d of October, 1761, Mr. Gillespie and Mr. Boston, with an elder from their respective congregations, first met as a presbytery. In the minute of that meeting they rehearsed the circumstances connected with their separation from the Church of Scotland, and declared that they had formed themselves into a presbytery for the relief of Christians oppressed in their privi- leges. The number of congregations in connection with the Relief rapidly increased. It afforded an asylum for those who desired to have the choice of their own ministers, yet could not accede to the peculiarities of the Secession. Relief from patronage, the asser- tion of the people's right to choose their own min- isters, the extending of their communion to all visible saints, to all sound in the faith and of holy life — these were the distinguishing peculiarities which marked the Relief They were distinguished from the two bodies of the Secession by their permission of occasionally attending the ministry of other churches, their disregard of the covenants sworn by our Scottish ancestors, their neglect of the duty of covenanting, and their not restricting their com- munion to their own Christian societies.. These peculiarities provoked the reproaches of the Seces- sion writers of the day. In the progress of time, how- ever, a large section of the Seceders came to be of one mind with their Relief brethren on all matters of doctrine and discipline. In the year 1847 the two - Memoir of Gillespie, in the Quarterly Magazine, by Dr. Stuart. THOMAS GILLESPIE — bodies were joined together under the designation of the United Presbyterian Church. This respect- able denomination now (iS66) numbers 5SS congre- gations, with an aggregate attendance of 460,000 per- sons. The Relief and United Secession churches were both opposed to the principle of an established church ; and although the voluntary principle of the United Presbyterian church is not formally avowed in her standards, it is distinctly implied in her posi- tion and actings. It has been said that Gillespie cooled in his at- tachment to the Relief in the latter part of his life, and that he even expressed a wish that his congrega- tion should join the Established church as a chapel of ease. This last assertion is certainly questionable. It has been contradicted by Mr. Smith in his His- torical Skdchcs of the Relief Church, who, holding a charge in Dunfermline, and living among the per- sonal associates of Gillespie, may be reckoned a competent witness as to what was known of Mr. Gillespie's sentiments. He states that the church and part of the congregation were carried over to the Establishment by the undue influence and re- presentations of Mr. Gillespie's brother; and that Mr. Gillespie had no difference with his brethren as to the constitution and principles of the Relief church. He never discovered to his people any inclination to be connected again with the Establish- ment. His disapprobation of the church which deposed him continued to the end of his days. He was, however, dissatisfied with some of his brethren for the willingness they showed to listen to the ap- plication of Mr. Perrie (1770) to be received into the body. Perhaps, too, his being thrown into the shade in the conduct of the public affairs of the body, by the active business habits of Mr. Bain, after his accession to the Relief, might heighten his chagrin. These circumstances, operating on the tenderness of temper incident to old age and increas- ing infirmities, seem to have created in his mind a degree of dissatisfaction with some of his brethren; but that he repented -of the steps he had taken in the formation of the presbytery of Relief, or that he had changed his sentiments on the terms of com- munion, on the impropriety of the civil magistrate's interference in ecclesiastical affairs, or similar points, there is no evidence. The only productions of Gillespie that have been published are. An Essay on the Continuance of Im- mediate Rez'elations in the Church, published in his lifetime, and a Treatise on Temptation, in 1774, after his death, both prefaced by Dr. J. Erskine of Edin- burgh. The first is designed to prove that God does not now give to any individuals, by impressions, dreams, or otherwise, intimations of facts or future events. He argues the point solidly and sensibly, and with some ingenuity. From his correspondence it appears that the topic had occupied his thoughts much. He corresponded with Doddridge, Harvey, and President Edwards; and his correspondence with Edwards was published in the Quarterly ^Magazine, conducted by Dr. Stuart, son-in-law to Dr. Erskine. Mr. Gillespie always prepared carefully for the pul- pit. He left in MS. about 800 sermons, fairly and distinctly written. He died on the 19th of January, 1774- GILLESPIE, Rev. Thomas, D.D., was bom in the parish of Clossbum, Dumfriesshire, but in what year we have been unable to ascertain. He received the rudiments of education at the celebrated seminary of Wallacehall, in his own native parish, and afterwards went through the curriculum of the Dumfries Academy, a place noted for its excellence VOL. II. WILLIAM GILLESPIE. "3 among the educational establishments of Scotland. Having been designed for the church, Mr. Gillespie enrolled as a student in the university of Edinburgh; and after having been distinguished in the divinity- hall by his talents and scholarship, was licensed as a preacher, and a few years afterwards was presented by the United College, St. Andrews, to the parish of Cults, in the presbytery of Cupar-Fife. In this ministerial charge he was the immediate successor of the Rev. David Wilkie, father of the celebrated painter; and, on taking possession of his manse lie was grieved to find that, in the process of cleaning and white-washing, the sketches with which Sir David Wilkie, when a little boy, had covered the walls of his nursery, were remorselessly swept away. To a man of Gillespie's taste and enthusiasm it seemed as if his entrance into a peaceful home had been preceded by an onslaught of the Vandals; but after settling in Cults he made many inquiries into the early history of Sir David, which he communi- cated to Allan Cunningham, the artist's eloquent biographer. Over the portal of the manse, also, in imitation of Gil Bias, he afterwards cars'ed that couplet of the Latin poet— Inveni portum, spes et fortuna valete: Sat me lusistis, ludite nunc alios." This final good-bye to hope and fortune, however, was somewhat premature; for having been appointed assistant and successor to Dr. John Hunter, professor of humanity in St. Andrews, whose daughter Mr. Gillespie had married, he relinquished the minis- terial charge of Cults, and became a resident in the ancient town of St. Andrews. In his capacity of a country divine, and after^vards as a professor, Mr. Gillespie was distinguished by superior talent, both as an able writer and ready eloquent speaker. His chief work was a volume of sermons on the Seasons; but his contributions to some of our best newspapers and journals, both in prose and verse, showed how high a rank he might have attained as an author had he devoted his labours to this department. But his productions through the press were the light buoyant sallies of an occasional hour of leisure, as a relief from more important occu- pations, rather than serious and continued efforts; and as such they were read, admired, and forgot, amidst the gay sparkling literature of the hour to which they were contributed. It was in the pulpit as an elo- quent persuasive divine, and in his university chair as an effective teacher of classical literature, that his whole energies were thrown forth; and when he died a blank was left both in presbytery and college, which his learned and reverend brethren felt would not soon be filled up. Dr. Gillespie's death, which was sudden, occurred at Dunino, on the llth of September, 1844. He was twice married, and his second wife was daughter of the Rev. Dr. Campbell, formerly minister of Cupar, and sister of the Right Hon. Lord John Campbell. GILLESPIE, Rev. William, minister of Kelis in Galloway, was the eldest son of the Rev. John Gillespie, who preceded him in that charge; and was born in the manse of the parish, February 18, 1776. After receiving the rudiments of education at the parish school, he entered the university of Edinburgh in 1792, and was appointed tutor to Sir. Don, after- wards Sir Alexander Don, Bart., in whose company he was introduced to the most cultivated society. While acting in this capacity, and at the same time prosecuting his theological studies, he amused him- self by writing verses, and at this time commenced his poem entitled the Progress of Refinement, which was not completed or published till some years after- 43 114 JOIIX GILLIES. wards. Among other clubs and societies of wliich he was a member may be instanced the Academy of Physics, which compreliendcd Brougham, Jeffrey, and other young men of the highest abilities, and of which an account has already been given in our article Dr. Thom.vs Brown. In iSoi, having for some time completed his studies and obtained a license as a preacher, he was ordained helper and successor to his father, with the unanimous approba- tion of the parish. Soon after he was invited by his former pupil, Mr. Don, to accompany him in making the tour of P^urope; and he had actually left home for the purpose when the project was stopped by intelligence of the renewal of the war with France. In 1S05 Mr. Gillespie published the ^'Pivprss of Refinement, an Allegorical Poem," intended to de- scribe the advance of society in Britain from its infancy to maturity, but which met with little success. It was generally confessed that, though Mr. Gillespie treated every subject in poetry with much taste and no little feeling, he had not a sufficient amount of inspiration, or that vivid fervour of thought which is necessary, to reach the highest rank as a versifier. In 1806, by the death of his father, he succeeded to the full charge of the parish of Kells. For some years afterwards he seems to have contented himself in a great measure with discharging his duties as a clerg)'man, only making occasional contributions to periodical works, or communicating information to the Highland Society, of which he was a zealous and useful member. At length, in 181 5, he published, in an octavo volume. Consolation and other Poems, which, however, received only the same limited measure of applause which had already been be- stowed upon his P?vi:^ress of Refinement. Mr. Gil- lespie, in July, 1825, married Miss Charlotte Hoggan; but being almost immediately after seized with erysipelas, which ended in general inflamma- tion, he died, October 15, in the fiftieth year of his age. As the character of this accomplished person had been of the most amiable kind, his death was very generally and very sincerely mourned: his bio- grai">her, Mr. Murray, in his Literary History of Galloiuay, states the remarkable fact, that, amidst the many wet eyes which surrounded his grave, "even the sexton — a character not in general noted for soft feelings — when covering the remains of his beloved pastor, sobbed and wept to such a degree that he was hardly able to proceed with his trying duty." GILLIES, John, LL.D., F.R.S., F.A.S., mem- ber of many foreign societies, and historiographer to his majesty for Scotland. The many literary titles of this enulite and once popular historian, eviq,ce the high estimation in which he was held by the learned men of his day. He was born at Bre- chin, in the county of Forfar, on the i8th of January, 1747. Although of a family belonging to the middling classes, he was not its only distinguished member, as one of his younger brothers became an eminent lawyer at the Scottish bar, and finally attained the rank of lord of session. John Gillies was educated at the university of Glasgow, and there he so highly distinguished himself by his classical attainments, that, before he was of age, he was ap- pointed to teach the classes of the Greek professor, who had been laid aside by old age and infirmity. Instead of waiting, however, for those turns of for- tune that might have elevated him to the chair which he had filled as deputy, he repaired to London, for the purpose of devoting himself to authorship. Before he settled down in the metropolis he resolved still further to qualify himself for his future occupation by the study of the living languages; and for this purpose he took up his residence for some time on the Continent. Upon his return he was engaged by the Earl of Ilopetoun to accompany his second son as travelling tutor; and as it was necessary that he should relinquish certain profitable literary engage- ments into which he had already entered, before he set out with his pupil, he was remunerated for the sacrifice by the earl in 1777, who settled upon him a pension for life. But in the year previous his young charge died abroad; and a few years afterwards he was induced to undertake the charge of two other sons of the earl, who were abcnit to travel on the Continent — one of theni being John, afterwards Sir John Hope, and finally Earl of Ilopetoun, distin- guished by his military achievements — the other, Alexander, afterwards Sir Alexander Llope, lieu- tenant-governor of Chelsea Hospital. During the interval that elapsed between his first and second tutorship, and when no such interniption was anti- cipated, he had commenced the purposed business of his life in earnest, by publishing his first work. This was the " Orations of Lysias and Socrates, trans- lated from the Greek, with some account of their Lives; and a Discourse on the History, Manners, and Character of the Greeks, from the conclusion of the Peloponnesian War to the Battle of Chaeronea," 1778, 4to. About the same time he received the diploma of LL.D., the first of his literary distinc- tions. On returning from the Continent, when his office of travelling-tutor had ended, which it did in 1784, Dr. Gillies resumed those labours which were so congenial to his tastes and habits, and which were now continued to the end of a very long life. His previous duties had not only furnished him with such a competence as to make him independent of the many painful contingencies to which authorship as a profession is subject, but had closely connected him with the Hopetoun family, to whose early patronage and continuing kindness he was wont to attribute much of the happiness by wliich his tranquil course was enlivened. Two years after his return to Eng- land he published the first portion of the work by which he is best known, entitled the '■''History of Ancient Greece, its Colonies and Conquests, from the Earliest Accounts till the Division of the Mace- donian Empire in the East; including the History of Literature, Philosophy, and the Fine Arts," 2 vols. 4to, 1786. This work, which was continued in a second part, was so acceptable to the scholars of Germany, that a translation of it into German was published at Vienna in 1825, while at home it was so popular that it went through several editions. Time, however, which has so much diminished the lustre that invested the literature and science of the last century, has not spared his history any more than it has done the more distinguished productions of Flume and Gibbon; and Gillies, the once distin- guished historian of Greece, is now subjected to an ordeal through which few of his contemporaries have passed unscathed. Newer and juster views, the fruit of a more ample experience and sounder philosophy; a more extensive knowledge of Grecian history and antiquity, and a more rigid and severe taste in his- torical writing, by which the present day is in the habit of judging the labours of the past, will no longer be satisfied with any history of ancient Greece that has as yet been produced. But, notwithstand- ing the faults that have been objected to the work of Gillies under this new and improved school of criticism, it was certainly a most useful production in its d.ay, and well worthy of the approval with which it was welcomed by the learned; so that, not- JOHN GLASS. "S withstanding the complaints that have been made of the duhiess of his dissertations, the pomposity of his style, and the occasional unfiithfulness of his translations, we have still to wait for a better history of Greece. By a curious coincidence the first part of the work, and the first volume of Mitford's His- tory of Greece — two rival publications upon a common subject — were published during the same year. The rest of the life of Dr. Gillies presents few in- cidents for the biographer. In 1793 he succeeded Dr. Robertson as historiographer royal for Scotland, a sinecure office, to which a salary of ^200 per annum is attached. He was also elected a member of several societies in our own country, as also a corresponding member of the French Institute and of the Royal Society of Gottingen. In 1794 he married. His various publications continued to appear at distant intervals, until the debility of old age compelled him to lay aside his pen; and, having done enough for fame and fortune, he retired in 1830 to Clapham, near London, where the rest of his life was passed in tranquil enjoyment, until he died at the age of ninety without disease and without pain. This event occurred on the 15th of February, 1836. Besides his writings which we have already speci- fied, Dr. Gillies published: — i. ^^ VicM of the Reign of Frederic II. of Prussia, with a Parallel between that Prince and Philip II. of Macedon," 1789, 8vo. 2. "Aristotle's Ethics and Politics, comprising his Practical Philosophy, translated from the Greek; illustrated by Introductions and Notes, the Critical History of his Life, and a New Analysis of his Speculative Works," 1797, 2 vols. 4to. 3. "Supple- ment to the Analysis of Aristotle's Speculative Works, containing an Account of the Interpreters and Cor- rupters of Aristotle's Philosophy, in connection with the Times in which they respectively flourished," 1S04, 4to. 4. The Histoiy of the Ancient World, from the Dominion of Alexander to that of Augustus, with a Preliminary Survey of Preceding Periods, 1807-10, 2 vols. 4to. This was afterwards reprinted in 4 vols. 8vo, as the History of Ancient Greece, its Colonies and Conquests, Part II., 1820. 5. "A New Translation of Aristotle's Rhetoric, with an Introduction and Appendix, explaining its Relation to his Exact Philo- sophy, and vindicating that Philosophy by Proofs that all Departures from it have been Deviations into Error," 1823, 8vo. GLASS, John, founder of a sect still known by his name, was the son of the Rev. Alexander Glass, minister of the parish of Auchtermuchty, in the county of Fife, where he was born on the 21st of September, 1695. In the year 1697 his father was translated to the parish of Kinclaven, at which place Mr. John Glass received the rudiments of his educa- tion. He was afterwards sent to the grammar-school of Perth, where he learned the Latin and Greek languages. He completed his studies at the univer- sities of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, and having been licensed as a preacher by the presbytery of Perth, was in 17 19 ordained a minister of the Church of Scotland, in the parish of Tealing, in the neighbourhood of Dundee. Mr. Glass had been a diligent student, was deeply impressed with the im- portance of the ministerial' character and the awful responsibility which attached to it, and was anxious, in no common degree, about the due discharge of the various duties which it involved. In his public services he was highly acceptable; had a singular gift of prayer; and in his sermons, which, according to the fashion of the time, were seldom less than two, sometimes three, hours in length, he attracted and kept up the unwearied attention of crowded audiences. His fame as a preacher, of course, soon spread abroad, and his sacramental occasions attracted vast crowds from distant quarters; the usual concomitant, in those days, of popularitv. But it was not public services alone that absorl)e- was a whore, and had murdered her husband. Watty, not knowing whether it was a dream or a real adventure, or whether the voice proceeded from a ghost or living creature, started up, and before he was awake, or his eyes well opened, he sprang upon Hume, and, seizing him by the throat, pushed him to the further end of the library, exclaiming all the while that he was some base Presbyterian parson, who was come to murder the character of Queen Mary as his predecessors had iiS ALEXANDER GORDON LORD GEORGE GORDON. contributed to murder her person. Hume used to tell this story with much glee, and Watty acknow- ledged the truth of it with much frankness." In 1753 Mr. Goodal acted as editor of a new edition of the work called C)\n^'foi\rs Memoirs, which he is generally blamed for not having corrected or purified from the vitiations of its autiior. In 1754 he published an edition, with emendatory notes, of Scott of Scotstar%-et's Stuggcriii^ Stah- 0/ Scots Stales- me/i, and wrote a preface and life to Sir James Bal- four's Practices. He contributed also to Keith's Catalogue of Scottish Bishops, and published an edition of Fordun's Scotichroiticoii, with a Latin introduction, of which an English version was given to the world in 1769. Goodal died July 2S, 1766, in very in- digent circumstances, which Mr. Chalmers attributes to habits of intemperance. The following extract from the minutes of the Faculty of Advocates throws a melancholy light upon the subject, and is fully entitled to a place in Mr. DTsraeli's Calamities of Authors: — "A petition was presented in name of INIary Goodal, only daughter of the deceased Mr. Walter Goodal, late depute-keeper of the Advocates' Library, representing that the petitioner's father died the 2Sth last month; that by reason of some accidental mis- fortunes happening in his affairs, any small pieces of household furniture or other movables he hath left behind will scarcely defray the expense of his funeral; that if there is any overplus, [it] will be attached by his creditors; that she is in the most indigent cir- cumstances, and without friends to give her any assistance; that she proposes to go to the north country, where she hath some relations, in order to try if she can be put upon any way of gaining her bread; tliat she would not be permitted to leave the town until she should discharge some small debts that she was by necessity obliged to contract; that, besides, she was in such want of clothes and other necessaries, that she can scarcely appear in the streets; and that, in her most distressed situation, she hath presumed to make this humble application to the honourable the dean and 'faculty of advo- cates, praying that they would be pleased to order her such a sum from their fund as they shall judge her necessities require. "The dean and faculty, taking this clamant case under their consideration, were unanimously of opinion that the petitioner should have some allowance out of their fund. " The sum given was ten pounds. GORDON, Alexander, authorof various learned and useful antiquarian works, is one of the numerous subjects for the present puljlication, of whom nothing is known except their birth in Scotland, and their transactions in pulilic life out of it. He was a well- educated man, possessing what was not in his time common among the Scottish literati — an intimate knowledge of the Greek language. In early life he travelled through France and other parts of the Continent, and spent some years in Italy. His first publication referred to the antiquities of his native country, which he seems to have explored with minute and painstaking fidelity. The work appeared in 1726, under the title of ^^ Itinoarium Septentrionalc, or a yoiirney through ?nost Parts of the Counties of Scotland, in two parts, with sixty-six copperplates," folio: a supplement, published in 1732, was entitled Additions and Corrections to the Itinerariuin Septen- trionale, containing scz' resolutions were passed against the Papists, and the firmest determination expressed to oppose their petition. These resolutions being published in the newspapers, soon propagated the ferment, and fanned the popular excitement into a blaze. Numerous so- cieties were organized at Edinburgh, Glasgow, and elsewhere, who severally passed resolutions to the same effect. That at Edinburgh, together with all the incorporations of the city, excepting the surgeons, the merchant company, and the society of candle- makers, petitioned the town-council early in Januarj', 1779, to oppose the bill, which was agreed to; and the members for the city and county were instructed accordingly. Similar proceedings also took place at Glasgow. The populace, however, were far too highly irri- tated to await patiently the issue of these decided measures, and on the 2d of Februar)' their fury burst out at Edinburgh with uncontrollable vio- lence. Incendiar)' letters had previously been dis- tributed in the streets, calling upon the people to meet at the foot of Leith Wynd on the above day, ' ' to pidl down that pillar of Popery lately erected there" — alluding to a house occupied, along with other families, by a Roman Catholic bishop, and which was supposed to contain a Catholic place of worship. A large mob accordingly assembled, and in spite of the exertions of the magistrates, backed by a regiment of fencibles, the house was set on fire and reduced to ashes. The house of another Popish clerg)'man in Black friars' Wynd was completely gutted. The Catholics in all the other parts of the town were indiscriminately abused, and their houses pillaged. Nor against these alone was the violence of the mob directed. The liberal Protestants kno^^•n to favour toleration towards the Catholics became equally the marks of popular fury. Amongst these were the celebrated Professor Robertson, and Mr. Crosbie, an eminent advocate, whose houses were attacked, and which, but for the timely interference of the militar}% would doubtless, like the rest, have been fired and razed to the ground. Seeing no likelihood of a termination to the tumults, the provost and magistrates, after several days' feeble and ineffectual efforts to restore order, at length issued a proclamation of a somewhat singular description, assitriii!^ the people that tio repeal of the statutes against Papists should take place, and attri- buting the riots solely to the "fears and distressed minds of well-meaning people." This announce- ment, nevertheless, had the effect of partially re- storing quiet. The example of Edinburgh was in part copied in Glasgow; but the disturbances there, owing to the exertions and influence of the principal merchants and others, were soon got under; — the provost and magistrates finding it necessary, how- ever, to issue a notice similar to that of their civic brethren at Edinburgh. But notwithstanding that these magisterial assurances were corroborated by a letter to the same effect from Lord Weymouth, home- secretary, dated 12th February, addressed to the lord justice-clerk, the excitement throughout the country every day increased, instead of abating. At no period of our history, unless perhaps during the political crisis in i S3 1-32, has either branch of the legislature been addressed or spoken of in lan- guage half so daring, menacing, or contemptuous. The resolutions passed by the heritors and heads of families in the parish of Carluke, Lanarkshire, may vie with the most maledictory philippics poured forth on the heads of the " boroughmongers" in modern days. To such a height did this anti- catholic feeling at last rise, that the Papists deemed it at last prudent to memorialize parliament on the subject, and pray for protection to their lives and property, as well as redress for what they had already suffered. This petition was laid before the house by Mr. Burke on the i8th of March, and it is in the debate which thereupon ensued that we first find Lord George Gordon standing forth in parliament as the champion of the Protestant interests. In the following August, after the rising of the session. Lord George paid a visit to Edinburgh, where he was received with extraordinarv' attention, and unani- mously chosen president of the "committee of cor- respondence for the Protestant interest." We ought to have mentioned that, in the month of April, the sum of £\(iOO had been adjudged by arbitration to the Catholics in compensation of their loss in the city of Edinburgh, which amount was paid from the city's funds. The remarkable respect and honours which Lord George experienced from the Protestant societies in Scotland appear to have operated like quicksilver in his veins. He forthwith devoted himself heart and hand to their cause; and on his return to London he was, as we have already mentioned, chosen presi- dent of the formidable Protestant Association. Encouraged by the deference paid by government to the wishes of the Scottish Protestants, the mem- bers of the London Association entertained the most sanguine hopes of getting a repeal of the late tolera- tion act for England. The most strenuous exertions by advertisement and otherwise were therefore made to swell the numbers of the society ; meetings were called, and resolutions passed, to petition the House of Commons for an abrogation of the obnoxious act. After various desultory motions in parliament, which it is unnecessary to specify, Lord George, on the 5th of May, presented a petition from Ply- mouth, praying for a repeal of Sir G. Saville's act. Finding, however, the government and legislature little disposed to pay any attention to these applica- tions, the members of the association resolved upon adopting more active and unequivocal measures to accomplish their object. A meeting was accordingly held in Coachmakers' Hall, on the evening of the; 29th May — at which Lord George, who was in the chair, addressed them in a long and inflammatory harangiie upon the wicked designs of the Papists, the fearful increase of Poperj' in the kingdom in consequence of the late act, and the measures in- dispensably necessarj' to be adopted for the salvation of Protestantism. He said their only resource was to go in a body to the House of Commons, and ex- press their determination to protect their religious ])rivileges with their lives; that for his part he would run all hazards with "the people," and if they were too lukewarm to do the like with him, they might choose another leader. This speech was received with tremendous acclamations; and resolutions were passed, that the whole Protestant Association should assemble in St. George's Fields on the following Friday (June 2d), to accompany his lordship to the House of Commons, where he was to present the Protestant petition, and that they should march to the house in four divisions, and by different routes. LORD GEORGE GORDON. His lordship also added, that unless 20,000 people, ' each decked with a blue cockade, assembled, he would not present the petition. Ne.xt evening Lord (ieorge gave notice in the House of Commons of his intention of presenting the petition on the ap- pointed day, as also of the proposed processions of the association; and it is a remarkable fact, that although by the act of 1661 such a proceeding was declared quite illegal, not the slightest intimation was given to him by the ministry to that effect. On the day appointed an immense concourse of people, not less, it was computed, than 100,000, assembled in St. George's P'ields. Lord George arrived about twelve o'clock, and after haranguing them for a considerable time, directed them how they were to march. One party, accordingly, pro- ceeded round by London Bridge, another over Blackfriars, and a third accompanied their presi- dent over Westminster Bridge. The petition, to which the subscriptions of the petitioners were ap- pended, on an immense number of rolls of parch- ment, was borne before the latter body. On their assembling at the two houses of parliament, which they completely surrounded, they announced their presence by a general shout, and it was not long ere the more unndy of them began to exercise the power they now felt themselves to possess,- by abus- ing and maltreating the members of both houses, as they severally arrived. At the door of the House of Lords the Archbishop of York, the Bishops of Litchfield and Lincoln, the Duke of Northumber- land, Lords Bathurst, Mansfield, Townshend, Hills- borough, Stormont, Dudley, and many others, were all more or less abused, both in character and per- son. Lord Boston, in particular, was so long in the hands of the mob, tlitit it was at one time pro- posed that the house should go out in a body to his rescue. He entered at last, unwigged, and with his clothes almost torn from his person. In the meantime the rioters had got complete possession of the lobby of the House of Commons, the doors of which they repeatedly tried to force open; and a scene of confusion, indignation, and uproar ensued in the house, almost rivalling that which was passing out of doors. Lord George, on first entering the house, had a blue cockade in his hat, but upon this being commented upon as a signal of riot, he drew it out. The greatest part of the day was consumed in debates (almost inaudible from the increasing roar of the multitude without) relat- tive to the fearful aspect of affairs ; but something like order being at last obtained. Lord George in- troduced the subject of the Protestant petition, which, he stated, was signed by 120,000 Protestants, and moved that it be immediately brought up. Leave being given, he next moved that it be forthwith taken into consideration. This informal and un- precedented proposition was of course resisted ; but Lord George, nevertheless, declared his determina- tion of dividing the house on the subject, and a desultor)' but violent debate ensued, which was ter- minated by the motion being negatived by 192 to 9. During the course of the discussion the riot with- out became every moment more alarming, and Lord George was repeatedly called upon to disperse his followers; but his manner of addressing the latter, which he did from the top of the galler)' stairs, leaves it doubtful whether his intention was to quiet or irritate them still farther. He informed them, from time to time, of the progress of the debate, and men- tioned by name (certainly, to put the best construc- tion upon it, an extremely thoughtless proceeding) those members who opposed the immediate con- sideration of the petition; saying — "Mr. So-and- so is now speaking against you." He told them it was proposed to adjourn the question to the following Tuesday, but that he did not like delays; that "parliament might be previously prorogued, and there would be an end of the affair." During his harangues several members of the house warmly expostulated with him on the imprudence of his con- duct; but to no purpose. General Grant attempted to draw him back, begging him "for God's sake not to lead tiiese poor deluded people into danger;" and Colonel Gordon (or, as other authorities say, Colonel Murray, uncle to the Duke of Athol), a near relative of his lordship's, demanded of him — "Do you intend, my Lord George, to bring your rascally adherents into the House of Commons? If you do, the first man that enters, I will plunge my sword not into his body, but yours.'" In this state did matters continue until about nine o'clock at night, when a troop of horse and infantry arrived. Lord George then advised the mob to disperse quietly, observing ' ' that now their gracious king was made aware of the wishes and determination of his subjects, he would no doubt compel his ministers to comply with their demands." Those who attended from purely religious motives, numbering, it is said, not more than 600 or 700, immediately departed peace- ably, first giving the magistrates and soldiers three cheers. The remainder also retired about eleven o'clock, after the adjournment of the house ; but soon began to display the villanous designs which had congregated them. Dividing themselves into two bodies, one proceeded to the chapel of the Sardinian ambassador in Duke Street, Lincoln's-Inn- Fields, the other to that of the Bavarian ambassador in War\vick Street, Golden Square, both of which edifices they completely gutted, burning the furni- ture, ornaments, &c., in heaps on the public street. A party of guards arrived, but after the mischief was over, who succeeded in capturing thirteen of the rioters. In concluding our account of this eventful day's proceedings, we must mention, that great negligence was charged, and seemingly not without reason, against government as well as the magistracy, for the absence of ever}'thing like preparation for preserving the peace — aware, as they perfectly were, of the intended multitudinous procession. Next day (Saturday) passed over without any disturbance ; but this quiescence proved only a lull before the storm. In the afternoon of Sunday, an immense multitude met simultaneously, and evidently by previous concert, in Moorfields, and raising the slogan of "No Popeiy," "Down with the Papists," &c., immediately attacked and utterly demolished the Catholic chapel, burning the altar, images, pictures, &c., in the open street. Here again, the guards arrived (to use an Iricism) in time to be too late ; and encouraged by this circumstance, as well as by the lenient deportment of the militar)-, who up to this time had refrained from the use of either sabre or fire-arms, the rioters hourly grew more daring and outrageous. They renewed their violence early on INIonday (the king's birth-day), by destroy- ing a school-house and three dwelling-houses, with a valuable librarj' belonging to Papists, in Rope- makers' Alley. Separating their force into several detachments, they proceeded into various quarters of the city at once ; thus distracting the attention of the authorities, who appeared to be paralyzed by the fearful on-goings around them — losing all self- possession, and of course their efficiency in checking the career of the rioters. The houses of Sir George Saville and several other public and private gentle- men, together with several Popish chapels, quickly fell a prey to pillage and flame. The violence of the LORD GEORGE GORDON. mob also received an accession of furj- this day from two circmnstances — \iz. a proclamation offering a reward of ;^500 for the discover}- of those concerned in destro\-ing the Bavarian and Sardinian chapek ; and the public committal to Newgate of three of the supp)Osed ringleaders on those occasions. It must here be recorded that early on the same morning (Monday, 5th June) the Protestant Associa- tion distributed a circular disclaiming all connection with the rioters, and earnestly counselling all good Protestants to maintain peace and good order. Tuesday the 6th being the day appointed for the consideration of the Protestant petition, a multitude not less numerous than that of the pre%ious Friday assembled round both houses of parliament, coming in however, not in one body, but in small parties. A disposition to outrage soon manifested itself^ and Lord Sandwich, who fell into their hands, with difficulty escaped with life, by the aid of the military, his carriage being smashed to pieces. The House of Peers, after several of their lordships had com- mented on the unprecedented circumstances in which they were placed, unanimously decided on the ab- surdity of transacting business while in a state of durance and restraint, and soon broke up, after ad- journing proceedings till the Thursday following. In the House of Commons, after several remarks similar to those in the upper house, and the passing of various resolutions to the same effect, a \-iolent attack was made upon ministers by Mr. Burke, Mr. Fox, and others of the opp)osition, on account of the relaxed state of the police, which had left the l^islature itself at the mercj' of a reckless mob. Lord George Gordon said if the house would ap- point a day for the discussion of the petition, and appoint it to the satisfaction of the people, he had n* doubt they would quietly disperse. Colonel Her- bert remarked that although Lord George disclaimed all connection with the rioters, it was strange that he came into the house with their ensign of insurrec- tion in his hat (a blue cockade), upon which his lordship pulled it out. A committee was then ap- pointed "to inquire into the causes of the riot," &:c, and the house adjourned to Thursday. L'f)on the breaking up of the house Lord George addressed the multitude, told them what had been done, and advised them to disperse quietly. In return, they unharnessed his horses, and drew him in triumph through the town. In the meantime a ftirioos attack had been made on the residence of Lord North in Downing Street, which was only saved from destruction by the inter- position of the military. In the evening the house of Justice Hyde was surrounded, sacked, and all the furniture, pictures, books, &c., burned before his door. The rioters then directed their steps towards Newgate, for the purpose of releasing their com- panions in outrage, who were there confined. On arriving at the gates they demanded admittance ; which being refused by Mr. Akerman, the governor, they forthwith proceeded to break his windows, and to batter in the doors of the prison with pickaxes and sledge-hammers. Flambeaus and other fire- brands being procured, these were thrown into the governor's house, which, along with the chapel and other parts of the prison, was sf)eedily in flames. The prison-doors were ako soon consumed, and the mob rushing in set all the prisoners, to the number of 300 (amongst whom were several imder sentence of death), at liberty. One most remarkable circum- stance attending this daring proceeding must not be passed over in silence — that from a prison thus enveloped in flames, and in the midst of a scene of such uproar and confusion, such a number of prisoners, many of them shut in cells to which access was at all times most intricate and difficult, could escape without the loss of a single life, or even the fracture of a limb I But w-hat wUl appear perhaps scarcely less astonishing, is the fact, that within a very few days almost the whole of the individuals thus unexpectedly liberated were recaptured, and lodged either in their old or more secure quarters. Still more emboldened by this reinforcement of desperate confederates, the rioters proceeded in dif- ferent detachments to the houses of Justice Cox and Sir John Fielding, as also to the public office in Bow Street, and the new prison, Clerkenwell — all of which they broke in upon and gutted, liberating the prisoners in the latter places, and thereby gain- ing fresh numbers and strength. But the most daring act of all was their attacking the splendid mansion of Lord Chief-justice Mansfield, in Bloomsbury Square. Having broken oi)en the doors and win- dows, they proceeded, as was their custom, to fling all the rich and costly fiimiture into the street, where it was piled into heaps and burned amid the most exulting yelk. The library, consisting of many thousands of volumes, rare MSS., title-deeds, Sic, together with a splendid assortment of pictures — all were remorselessly destroyed. And all this passed, too, in the presence of between 200 and jCxj soldiers, and imder the eye of the lord chief-justice himself, who calmly permitted this destruction of his pro- perty, rather than expose the WTetched criminals to the vengeance of the military. At last, seeing pre- parations made to fire the premises, and not knowing where the conflagration might terminate, a magistrate read the riot act; but without efiiect. The military were then reluctantly ordered to fire; but although several men and women wrfere shot, the desperadoes did not cease the work of destruction until nothing but the bare and smoking walls were left standing. At this time the British metropolis may be said to have been entirely in the hands of a lawless, reckless, and frenzied mob I The vilest of the rabble possessed more power and authority than the king upon the throne; the fiinctions of government were for a time suspended; and the seat of l^islation had become the theatre of anarchy and misrule. So confident now were the rioters in their owm irresistible strength, that on the afternoon of the above day they sent notices round to the various prisons yet left standing, to inform the prisoners at what hour they intended to visit and liberate them! If any one incident con- nected with a scene of such devastation, plunder, and triumphant villany, could raise a smile on the face of the reader or narrator, it would be the fact, that the prisoners confined in the Fleet, sent to request that they mig^t not be turned out of their lodgings so late in the evening; to which a generous answer was returned, that they would not be disturbed till next day! In order not to be idle, however, the considerate mob amused themselves during the rest of the evening in burning the houses of Lord Petre and about twenty other individuals of note — Pro- testant as well as Catholic — and concluded the labours of the day by ordering a general illumina- tion in celebration of their triimiph — an order which the inhabitants were actually compelled to obey! On Wednesday this horrible scene of tumult and devastation reached its acme. A party of the rioters paid a \isit to Lord Mansfield's beautiful villa at Caen-wood in the forenoon, and coolly began to regale themselves with the contents of his larder and wine-cellar, preparatory to their commencing the usual work of destruction. Their orgies were inter- rupted, however, by a p>arty of military, and they Qod in all directions. It was not until the evening LORD GEORGE GORDOX. 123 that the main body seriously renewed their diabolical work; and the scene which ensued is described by contemporary writers, wlio witnessed the proceed- ings, as being too frightful for the power of language to convey the slightest idea of. Detachments of military, foot and horse, had gradually been drawing in from different parts of the interior; the civic authorities, who up to that time had been solely occupied consulting and debating upon the course they should pursue in the awful and unparalleled circumstances in which they were placed, began to gather resolution, to concentrate their force, and to perceive the absolute necessity of acting with vigour and decision — a necessity which every moment in- creased. The strong arm of the law, which had so long hung paralyzed over the heads of the wretched criminals, once more became nerved, and prepared to avenge the cause of justice, humanity, and social order. The struggle, however, as may well be conceived, was dreadful ; and we gladly borrow the language of one who witnessed the awful spectacle in detailing the events of that ever-memorable night. The King's Bench, Fleet Prison, Borough Clink, and Surrey Bridewell were all in flames at the same moment, and their inhabitants let loose to assist in the general havoc. No less than thii-ty-six fearful conflagrations in different parts of the metropolis were seen raging simultaneously, "licking tip every- thing in their way," as a writer at the time ex- pressively described it, and "hastening to meet each other. " "Let those," observes the writer before alluded to, "call to their imagination flames ascending and rolling in vast voluminous clouds from the King's Bench and Fleet Prisons, the Surrey Bridewell, and the toll-houses on Blackfriars Bridge: from houses in flames in ever>' quarter of the city, and particularly from the middle and lower end of Holborn, where the premises of Messrs. Langdale and Son, eminent distillers, were blazing as if the whole elements were one continued flame; the cries of men, women, and children, running up and down the street, with what- ever, in their fright, they thought most necessary or most precious; the tremendous roar of the infernal miscreants inflamed with liquor, who aided the sly incendiaries, whose sole aim was plunder; and the repeated reports of the loaded musketry dealing death and worse than death among the thronging multitude !" But it was not what was doing only, but what might yet be done, that roused the fears of all classes. When they beheld the very outcasts of society everywhere triumphant, and heard of their attempting the Bank; threatening Doctoi-s-Commons, the exchange, the pay-office ; in short, every re- pository of treasure and office of record, men of every persuasion and party bitterly lamented the rise and progress of the bloody and fatal insurrection, and execrated the authors of it. Had the Bank and p